Content deleted Content added
Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) |
Grammar Issues Fixed |
||
Line 2:
{{History of war}}
'''
{{TOC limit|3}}
==Concept==
=== From "battlefield" to "
Over the last 25{{When|date=May 2020}} years, the understanding of the military operational environment has transformed from primarily a time and space-driven linear understanding (a "battlefield") to a multi-dimensional system of systems understanding (a
Battlespace agility refers to the speed at which the warfighting organization develops and transforms knowledge into actions for desired effects in the battlespace. Essentially it argues that you must be better than the opposition at doing the right actions at the right time and place. Inbuilt into this understanding is that battlespace agility is not just about speed, but it is also about executing the most effective action (ways) in the most efficient manner (means) relative to achieving the desired impact on the system (ends). At all times battlespace agility is dependent on the quality of situational awareness and holistic understanding of the battlespace to determine the best actions, a logic that has become a driving force behind a renaissance of interest in the quality of military intelligence. It has been heavily linked to the ability of intelligence analysts and operational planners to understand their battlespace, and their targets, as networks in order to facilitate a faster, and more accurate shared situational understanding. This in turn increases targeting efficacy and helps retain the overall initiative. Battlespace agility has its roots solidly in the more generic Command & Control (C2) research field on C2 agility conducted by NATO,<ref>[http://www.dodccrp.org/files/C2_Agility_Tutorial.pdf (1985) C2 Agility: a tutorial and review of SAS-085 Findings]</ref> but works specifically with an agility concept within the context of warfighting only.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20111226030006/http://forsvaret.dk/FAK/Publikationer/B%C3%B8ger%20og%20andre%20publikationer/Documents/AgilityandInteroperabilityfor21stCenturyCommandandControl.pdfWilliam Mitchell, Agile Sense-Making in the Battlespace]</ref> Hence it is framed by effects based thinking, system of systems analysis, and competing Observation Orient Decide Act ([[OODA loop|OODA]]) loops.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://forsvaret.dk/FAK/Publikationer/Briefs/Documents/Battlespace%20Agility%20201.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=2013-12-05 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131212195333/http://forsvaret.dk/FAK/Publikationer/Briefs/Documents/Battlespace%20Agility%20201.pdf |archive-date=2013-12-12 }}</ref>▼
===
▲
Battlespace awareness (BA) is a practice of [[military science|military philosophy]] that is used as a valuable asset by joint component and force commanders, to predict courses of action before employing troops into a prescribed area of operation (AO). It utilizes the intelligence preparation asset to assist the commander in being 'aware' of recent, current, and near term events in his battlespace.<ref>[http://www.dodccrp.org/events/8th_ICCRTS/pdf/005.pdf Joint Synthetic Battlespace: Cornerstone for Predictive Battlespace Awareness]</ref>▼
===Battle-space awareness===
▲
It is based around its knowledge and understanding obtained by the [[Joint Functional Component Command for Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance|intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance]] (ISR) system. It is another methodical concept used to gain information about the operational area—the environment, factors, and conditions, including the status of friendly and adversary forces, neutrals and noncombatants, weather and terrain—that enables timely, relevant, comprehensive and accurate assessments. It has become an effective concept for [[conventional warfare|conventional]] and [[unconventional warfare|unconventional operations]] in successfully projecting, or protecting, a military force, and/or completing its mission.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/doddict/data/b/ |title=DOD - Battlespace Awareness defined |access-date=2006-07-05 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080618002413/http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/doddict/data/b/ |archive-date=2008-06-18 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
===
===Battlespace intelligence preparation===
====Intelligence preparation====
[[Military intelligence|Intelligence preparation of the battlespace]] (IPB) is an analytical methodology employed to reduce uncertainties concerning the enemy, environment, and terrain for all types of operations. Intelligence preparation of the
The database is then analyzed in detail to determine the impact of the enemy, environment and terrain on operations and presents it in graphic form. Intelligence preparation of the
====Joint intelligence preparation====
Joint intelligence preparation of the
The process is used to analyze the [[air|aerial]], [[landform|terrestrial]], [[sea|maritime/littoral]], [[space|spatial]], [[Electromagnetism|electromagnetic]], [[cyberspace]], and human dimensions of the environment and to determine an opponent's capabilities to operate in each. JPIB products are used by the joint force and component command staffs in preparing their estimates and are also applied during the analysis and selection of friendly courses of action.
===
====
They are normally designated along terrain features easily recognizable on the ground. An important point on maneuver control graphics: staffs must be knowledgeable regarding the different maneuver control measures and their impact on clearance of fires. For instance, boundaries are both restrictive and permissive; corridors are restrictive, while routes, axis, and directions of attack are neither.
Line 52 ⟶ 53:
**There are free-fire areas (FFA) which fire support can commence without additional coordination with the establishing headquarters. Normally, it is established on identifiable terrain by division or higher headquarters.
===
{{Further|Area of responsibility}}
==See also==
Line 69 ⟶ 70:
==Further reading==
*Mitchell, W. (2013). ''
*Mitchell, W. (2013). ''
*Mitchell, W. (2012). ''
*Mitchell, W. (2012). ''
*Mitchell, W. (2008). ''Comprehensive Approach Capacity Building''.Royal Danish
*Blackmore, T. (2005). ''War X: Human Extensions in
*Owens, W. (2002). ''Dominant
==External links==
|