Content deleted Content added
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.3) (Whoop whoop pull up - 12570 |
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Alter: template type. Add: magazine. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Whoop whoop pull up | #UCB_webform 923/1421 |
||
Line 86:
[[Roger Ebert]] gave the film four out of four stars and praised Harrelson's performance, writing "Harrelson is an ideal actor for the role. Especially in tensely wound-up movies like this, he implies that he's looking at everything and then watching himself looking."<ref>{{cite web|first=Roger|last=Ebert|author-link=Roger Ebert|url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/rampart-2012|title=Rampart|newspaper=[[Chicago Sun-Times]]|publisher=[[Sun-Times Media]]|location=Chicago, Illinois|date=February 12, 2012|access-date=August 16, 2016}}</ref>
[[Peter Travers]] of ''[[Rolling Stone]]'' praised Harrelson's performance: "it could have been a bucket of bleak. But the electric talent of Harrelson and Moverman is too exciting to be anything but exhilarating."<ref>{{cite
[[Justin Chang]] of ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' wrote: "While the film is drenched in atmosphere and packs a verbal and visceral punch, its relentless downward spiral makes for an overdetermined, not entirely satisfying character study."<ref>{{cite web |date= 12 September 2011 |last= Chang |first= Justin |title= Rampart |url= https://variety.com/2011/film/markets-festivals/rampart-1117946049/ |website= Variety }}</ref>
| |||