Content deleted Content added
m IPA-xx deprecated |
|||
(64 intermediate revisions by 41 users not shown) | |||
Line 2:
{{Redirect|Schengen}}
{{Use British English|date=March 2013}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=
{{Infobox geopolitical organization
| name = '''Schengen Area'''
Line 51 ⟶ 50:
| population_estimate_year = 2021
| population_density_km2 = 98.7
| GDP_nominal = {{Increase}}{{Spaces}}$19.213 trillion<ref name="GDP">{{Cite web |title=World Economic Outlook Database, October 2023 |url=https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2023/October/weo-report?c=122,124,918,960,935,128,939,172,132,134,174,944,176,136,941,946,137,181,138,142,964,182,968,936,961,184,144,146,&s=NGDP_RPCH,NGDPD,PPPGDP,NGDPDPC,PPPPC,LP,&sy=2022&ey=2024&ssm=0&scsm=1&scc=0&ssd=1&ssc=0&sic=0&sort=country&ds=.&br=1 |access-date=31 March 2024 |website=IMF.org |publisher=International Monetary Fund |archive-date=31 March 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240331004100/https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2023/October/weo-report?c=122,124,918,960,935,128,939,172,132,134,174,944,176,136,941,946,137,181,138,142,964,182,968,936,961,184,144,146,&s=NGDP_RPCH,NGDPD,PPPGDP,NGDPDPC,PPPPC,LP,&sy=2022&ey=2024&ssm=0&scsm=1&scc=0&ssd=1&ssc=0&sic=0&sort=country&ds=.&br=1 |url-status=live }}</ref>
| GDP_nominal_per_capita = {{Increase}}{{Spaces}}$42,237
| GDP_nominal_year = 2023
Line 60 ⟶ 59:
{{Politics of the European Union}}
The '''Schengen Area''' ({{IPAc-en|lang|ˈ|ʃ|ɛ|ŋ|ən}} {{respell|SHENG|ən}}, {{IPA
Of the 27 [[Member state of the European Union|EU member states]], 25 are members of the Schengen Area. [[
In addition to the member states of the European Union, all member states of the [[European Free Trade Association]], namely [[Iceland]], [[Liechtenstein]], [[Norway]] and [[Switzerland]], have signed association agreements with the EU to be part of the Schengen Area. Moreover, the
The Schengen Area has a population of more than 450 million people and an area of
{{TOC limit|3}}
== History ==
=== European borders prior to Schengen ===
{{Main|Nordic Passport Union|Benelux}}
Before the [[First World War]], most countries of the world, including Europe, had lax border policies, facilitating such educational trips as the [[Grand Tour]] amongst the
Visas became commonplace during the [[interwar period]], as did border controls. After the [[Second World War]], however, customs unions arose between various European countries. The [[Nordic Passport Union|Nordic countries allowed free movement and residence between them in 1954]], and the countries of [[Benelux]] opened their mutual borders in 1960. This reflected a greater trend towards European integration; the [[European Communities]] (EC), the predecessor of the EU,
=== Schengen Agreement ===
{{Main|Schengen Agreement}}
The first move towards the abolition of border controls between [[Member states of the European Union|EC member states]] took place on 14 June 1985 with the signing of the Schengen Agreement by five [[European Economic Community|EEC]] members
The Agreement was supplemented in 1990 by the Schengen Convention, which proposed the abolition of internal border controls and a common visa policy.<ref name="Baltic Legal">{{citation |title=Schengen area by Latvian Law Firm |publisher=Baltic Legal |url=http://www.immigration-residency.eu/counsel/schengen-area/ |access-date=19 September 2013 |archive-date=31 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190331233054/http://www.immigration-residency.eu/counsel/schengen-area/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The Agreements and the rules adopted under them continued to be separate from the [[Institutions of the European Union|EC structures]], and led to the creation of the Schengen Area on 26 March 1995.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://biblio.ucv.ro/bib_web/bib_pdf/EU_books/0056.pdf |title=The Schengen Area |publisher=[[European Commission]] |access-date=15 September 2011 |archive-date=7 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170807020152/http://biblio.ucv.ro/bib_web/bib_pdf/EU_books/0056.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
As more EU member states signed the Schengen Agreement, consensus was reached on absorbing it into the procedures of the EU. The Agreement and its related conventions were incorporated into the mainstream of [[European Union law]] by the [[Amsterdam Treaty]] in 1997, which came into effect in 1999. A consequence of the Agreement being part of European law is that any amendment or regulation is made within its processes, in which the non-EU members are not participants.
Line 88 ⟶ 87:
The UK, the Crown Dependencies, and the Republic of Ireland have operated a [[Common Travel Area]] (CTA) since 1923 (with passport-free travel and freedom of movement with each other), but the UK would not abolish border controls with any other countries and therefore opted out of the Agreement. While not signing the Schengen Treaty, the Republic of Ireland has always looked more favourably on joining, but has not done so in order to maintain the CTA and its open border with [[Northern Ireland]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0450/D.0450.199503140014.html |first=Nora |last=Owen |author-link=Nora Owen |title=''Dáil Debates'' volume 450 column 1171 |date=14 March 1995 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110607100817/http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0450/D.0450.199503140014.html |archive-date=7 June 2011}}; {{cite web |url=http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0501/D.0501.199903090246.html |first=John |last=O'Donoghue |author-link=John O'Donoghue (politician) |title=''Dáil Debates'' volume 501 column 1506 |date=9 March 1999}}{{dead link|date=July 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}; "Declaration by Ireland on Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland" attached to the Treaty of Amsterdam.</ref>
==== Common Schengen Visa Policy ====
{{Main|Visa policy of the Schengen Area}}
The common visa policy allows nationals of certain countries to enter the Schengen Area via air, land or sea without a visa for stays of up to 90 days within a 180-day period. Nationals of certain other countries are required to have a visa either upon arrival or in transit.
== Current members ==▼
{{Schengen Agreement Labelled Map 2}}▼
▲==Current members==
▲{{Schengen Agreement Labelled Map 2}}
[[Romania]] and [[Bulgaria]] are the newest members of the Schengen Area, with border controls lifted for air and sea travel on 31 March 2024 and land border controls lifted effective 1 January 2025,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Schengen area: Controls at air and sea borders with Bulgaria and Romania will be lifted – European Commission |url=https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/news/schengen-area-controls-air-and-sea-borders-bulgaria-and-romania-will-be-lifted-2024-01-03_en |access-date=19 January 2024 |website=home-affairs.ec.europa.eu |language=en |archive-date=19 January 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240119202622/https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/news/schengen-area-controls-air-and-sea-borders-bulgaria-and-romania-will-be-lifted-2024-01-03_en |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_6861 | title=Press corner | access-date=31 December 2023 | archive-date=29 February 2024 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240229084118/https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_6861 | url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Schengen: Council decides to lift land border controls with Bulgaria and Romania |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/12/12/schengen-council-decides-to-lift-land-border-controls-with-bulgaria-and-romania/ |access-date=12 December 2024 |website=Consilium |language=en |archive-date=12 December 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241212125630/https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/12/12/schengen-council-decides-to-lift-land-border-controls-with-bulgaria-and-romania/ |url-status=live }}</ref> more than 17 years after they [[2007 enlargement of the European Union|acceded to the European Union]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn4xjj4xde3o|title=Moment of relief as Romania and Bulgaria join EU border-free zone|date=12 December 2024|website=BBC|access-date=4 January 2025|archive-date=22 December 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241222153143/https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn4xjj4xde3o|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/1/1/romania-bulgaria-join-borderless-schengen-zone-after-13-year-wait|title=Romania, Bulgaria join borderless Schengen zone after 13-year wait|date=1 January 2025|website=Al Jazeera|access-date=4 January 2025|archive-date=3 January 2025|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250103054103/https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/1/1/romania-bulgaria-join-borderless-schengen-zone-after-13-year-wait|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2011 the [[European Commission]] concluded that the two countries had fulfilled all technical accession criteria,<ref name="Commission welcomes">{{Cite web|url=https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_6861|title=Bulgaria and Romania to join Schengen area starting with air and sea borders: Commission welcomes landmark Council decision|website=European Commission – European Commission|access-date=31 December 2023|archive-date=29 February 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240229084118/https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_6861|url-status=live}}</ref> and their participation was approved by the [[European Parliament]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Schengen zone: Delay for Bulgaria and Romania to join |date=9 June 2011 |publisher=British Broadcasting Corporation |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13709768 |access-date=9 June 2011 |archive-date=10 June 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110610021157/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13709768 |url-status=live }}</ref> However this was rejected by the [[Council of the European Union|Council of Ministers]], with some countries (such as Denmark and Finland) citing concerns about shortcomings in anti-corruption measures and in the fight against organised crime.<ref name="nyt-defered">{{cite news |last=Castle |first=Stephen |title=Europe Denies 2 Nations Entry to Travel Zone |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/23/world/europe/romania-and-bulgaria-are-denied-entry-to-schengen-zone.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110924155245/http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/23/world/europe/romania-and-bulgaria-are-denied-entry-to-schengen-zone.html |archive-date=24 September 2011 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |access-date=23 September 2011 |newspaper=The New York Times|date=22 September 2011}}</ref><ref name="wsj-defered">{{cite news |last=Robinson |first=Frances |title=Bulgaria, Romania Blocked From Travel Zone |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424053111903791504576586951295398230 |access-date=25 September 2011 |newspaper=The Wall Street Journal |date=22 September 2011 |archive-date=26 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230326041807/https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424053111903791504576586951295398230 |url-status=live }}</ref> The Netherlands conditioned approval for joining the Schengen Area on positive reports under the [[Mechanism for Cooperation and Verification]].<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.euractiv.com/justice/romania-older-members-ready-sche-news-532132 |title=Romania tells EU: 'We are ready for Schengen when you are' |date=5 December 2013 |newspaper=euractiv.com |access-date=31 July 2014 |archive-date=23 January 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160123131844/http://www.euractiv.com/justice/romania-older-members-ready-sche-news-532132 |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Austria]] was the last country to end their veto, after series of negotiations to address concerns that the countries were a major transit route for illegal [[Immigration to Austria|immigration to the country]].<ref name="austriaveto">{{Cite web |title=Nu intrăm în Schengen. Austria și Olanda au votat împotriva noastră |url=https://www.digi24.ro/stiri/externe/ue/ministrul-austriac-de-interne-astazi-voi-vota-contra-extinderii-schengen-cu-romania-si-bulgaria-2177591 |access-date=8 December 2022 |website=Digi24 |language=ro |archive-date=8 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221208124948/https://www.digi24.ro/stiri/externe/ue/ministrul-austriac-de-interne-astazi-voi-vota-contra-extinderii-schengen-cu-romania-si-bulgaria-2177591 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title= Ministrul austriac de Interne: "Are sens să includem Croația și să nu includem acum Bulgaria și România" în Schengen |url= https://www.digi24.ro/stiri/externe/ue/ministrul-austriac-de-interne-are-sens-sa-includem-croatia-si-sa-nu-includem-acum-bulgaria-si-romania-in-schengen-2172203 |access-date= 3 December 2022 |website= Digi24 |date= 3 December 2022 |language= ro |archive-date= 3 December 2022 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20221203115445/https://www.digi24.ro/stiri/externe/ue/ministrul-austriac-de-interne-are-sens-sa-includem-croatia-si-sa-nu-includem-acum-bulgaria-si-romania-in-schengen-2172203 |url-status= live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.romania-insider.com/austria-rejects-commission-call-romania-bulgaria-schengen-2023|title=Austria rejects EC's call to allow Romania, Bulgaria into Schengen|date=14 September 2023|accessdate=2 October 2023|archive-date=6 October 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231006115439/https://www.romania-insider.com/austria-rejects-commission-call-romania-bulgaria-schengen-2023|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Joint Declaration-20241128">{{Cite web |date=22 November 2024 |title=Joint Hungarian, Austrian, Romanian and Bulgarian Declaration |url=https://hungarian-presidency.consilium.europa.eu/en/news/joint-hungarian-austrian-romanian-and-bulgarian-declaration/ |access-date=28 November 2024 |website=Joint Hungarian, Austrian, Romanian and Bulgarian Declaration |language=en |archive-date=1 December 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241201200621/https://hungarian-presidency.consilium.europa.eu/en/news/joint-hungarian-austrian-romanian-and-bulgarian-declaration/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
▲The Schengen Area consists of {{SCHENGENnum}} countries, including four which are not members of the [[European Union]] (EU). Two of the non-EU members{{snd}}[[Iceland]] and [[Norway]]{{snd}}are part of the [[Nordic Passport Union]] and are officially classified as states associated with the Schengen activities of the EU.<ref name="associated-states"/> [[Switzerland]] was allowed to participate in the same manner in 2008, and [[Liechtenstein]] in 2011. [[Bulgaria]] and [[Romania]] are the newest members of the Schengen Area, with land border controls lifted on 1 January 2025.
''De facto'', the Schengen Area also includes four European micro-states{{snd}} Andorra, Monaco, San Marino, and the Vatican City{{snd}}that maintain open or semi-open borders with other Schengen member countries.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.schengenvisas.com/list-of-non-schengen-countries-that-can-be-visited-with-a-schengen-visa/ |title= List of non-Schengen countries that can be visited with a Schengen visa |publisher= YOYO TRAVELS, Dubai |date= 14 January 2021 |access-
One EU member state{{snd}}[[Republic of Ireland|Ireland]]{{snd}}negotiated opt-outs from Schengen and continues to operate border controls with other EU member states, while at the same time being part of the open-border [[Common Travel Area]] with the [[United Kingdom]] (a [[United Kingdom membership of the European Union|former EU member]] that had held a similar opt-out) and the [[Crown Dependencies]]. The remaining EU member state{{snd}}Cyprus{{snd}} is committed by its [[Treaty of Accession|Treaties of Accession]] to join the Schengen Area eventually. However, before fully implementing the Schengen rules, the state must have its preparedness assessed in four areas: [[Controlled airspace|air borders]], [[visa (document)|visas]], police cooperation, and [[Information privacy|personal data protection]]. This evaluation process involves a questionnaire and visits by EU experts to selected institutions and workplaces in the country under assessment.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/justice_freedom_security/free_movement_of_persons_asylum_immigration/l33020_en.htm |title= The Schengen Area and cooperation |publisher= Europa |date= 3 August 2009 |access-
=== Summary table ===
Line 126 ⟶ 115:
|style="text-align:right;"|{{nts|83871}}
|style="text-align:right" |{{UN_Population|Austria}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|1995|4|28}}<ref>{{cite web |url=https://verdragenbank.overheid.nl/en/Treaty/Details/006127.html |title=Protocol on the accession of the Government of the Republic of Austria to the Agreement between the Governments of the Member States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of controls at their common borders, signed at Schengen on 14 June 1985, as amended by the Protocols of 27 November 1990, 25 June 1991 and 6 November 1992 on the accession of the Governments of the Italian Republic, the Kingdom of Spain and the Portuguese Republic and the Hellenic Republic, respectively |access-date=
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|1997|12|1}}<ref name="Austria">{{cite web |url=https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10006000 |title=Beschluß des Exekutivausschusses zur Inkraftsetzung des Schengener Durchführungsübereinkommens in Österreich |language=de |trans-title=Resolution of the Executive Committee on the implementation of the Schengen Convention in Austria |date=7 October 1997
|-
|{{flag|Belgium}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{nts|30528}}
|style="text-align:right" |{{UN_Population|Belgium}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|1985|6|14}}<ref name="origsign">{{cite web |url=https://verdragenbank.overheid.nl/en/Treaty/Details/000058.html |title=Agreement between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the Gradual Abolition of Checks at their Common Borders |access-date=
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|1995|3|26}}<ref name="1995states">{{cite journal |url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:41994D0029 |title=Decision of the Executive Committee of 22 December 1994 on bringing into force the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 19 June 1990 |date=
|-
| |{{flag|Bulgaria}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{nts|110994}}
|style="text-align:right" |{{UN_Population|Bulgaria}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|2005|4|25}}<ref name="2007enlarge">{{cite web|url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/documents-publications/treaties-agreements/agreement/?id=2005017|title=Treaty between the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, Ireland, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Member States of the European Union) and the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania, concerning the Accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union (Deposited with the Government of the Italian Republic)|access-date=17 January 2019|publisher=[[Council of the European Union]]|archive-date=30 October 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231030171318/https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/documents-publications/treaties-agreements/agreement/?id=2005017|url-status=live}}</ref>
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|2024|3|31}}<ref name="RomBulgAir">{{cite journal |url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L_202400210 |title=Council Decision (EU) 2024/210 of 30 December 2023 on the full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania |date=4 January 2024
|-
| |{{flag|Croatia}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{nts|56594}}
|style="text-align:right" |{{UN_Population|Croatia}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|2011|12|9}}<ref>{{cite web |url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.L_.2012.112.01.0006.01.ENG#L_2012112EN.01001001 |title=TREATY CONCERNING THE ACCESSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA TO THE EUROPEAN UNION |access-date=9 December 2022
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|2023|1|1}}<ref>{{cite journal |url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.L_.2022.320.01.0041.01.ENG&toc=OJ%3AL%3A2022%3A320%3ATOC |title=Council Decision (EU) 2022/2451 of 8 December 2022 on the full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in the Republic of Croatia |date=
|-
|{{flag|Czech Republic}}
Line 151 ⟶ 140:
|style="text-align:right" |{{UN_Population|Czechia}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|2003|4|16}}<ref name="2004enlarge"/>
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|2007|12|21}}<ref name="2004states">{{cite journal |url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32007D0801 |title=COUNCIL DECISION of 6 December 2007 on the full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic |date=8 December 2007
|-
|{{flag|Denmark}} <br /><small>(excluding [[Greenland]] and the [[Faroe Islands]]){{refn|Greenland and the Faroe Islands are not included in the Schengen Area. However, persons travelling between the Faroe Islands, Greenland and the Schengen Area are not subject to border checks.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A42000A0922%2808%29|title=EUR-Lex
|style="text-align:right;"|{{nts|43094}}
|style="text-align:right" |{{UN_Population|Denmark}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|1996|12|19}}<ref>{{cite web |url=https://verdragenbank.overheid.nl/en/Treaty/Details/007473.html |title=Protocol on the accession of the Kingdom of Denmark to the Agreement on the gradual abolition of controls at the contracting parties' common borders, signed at Schengen on 14 June 1985 |access-date=
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|2001|3|25}}<ref name="2001enlarge">{{cite journal |url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32000D0777 |title=COUNCIL DECISION of 1 December 2000 on the application of the Schengen acquis in Denmark, Finland and Sweden, and in Iceland and Norway |date=9 December 2000
|-
|{{flag|Estonia}}
Line 168 ⟶ 157:
|style="text-align:right;"|{{nts|338145}}
|style="text-align:right" |{{UN_Population|Finland}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|1996|12|19}}<ref>{{cite web |url=
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|2001|3|25}}<ref name="2001enlarge"/>
|-
|{{flag|France}} <br /><small>(excluding [[Overseas France]]){{refn|The [[Overseas France|overseas departments and collectivities of France]] are not part of the Schengen Area. However, when travelling by air from [[metropolitan France]] directly to [[French Guiana]], [[Guadeloupe]], [[Martinique]], [[Mayotte]] and [[Réunion]], border checks by the [[French Border Police]] only take place at the departure airport, not at the arrival airport (where passengers walk past the passport control booths, which will be unstaffed). This arrangement does not, however, apply to direct flights from other Schengen member states, such as the past Charleroi-Guadeloupe and Charleroi-Martinique flights by Air Belgium. On the other hand, passengers flying from French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte and Réunion directly to metropolitan France have to undergo border checks by the French Border Police both on departure and on arrival (an arrangement known as 'double contrôle').<ref>{{cite web |url=
|style="text-align:right;"|{{nts|551695}}<!-- Metropolitan France, not overseas areas -->
|style="text-align:right" |{{UN_Population|France}}
Line 177 ⟶ 166:
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|1995|3|26}}<ref name="1995states"/>
|-
|{{flag|Germany}}{{refn|East Germany became part of the Federal Republic of Germany, joining Schengen, on 3 October 1990.|group= Note}} <br /><small>(including [[Büsingen am Hochrhein]])</small><ref>{{cite web |url=
|style="text-align:right;"|{{nts|357022}}
|style="text-align:right" |{{UN_Population|Germany}}
Line 183 ⟶ 172:
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|1995|3|26}}<ref name="1995states"/>
|-
|{{flag|Greece}}{{refn|According to a legally non-binding declaration attached to the Greek accession agreement to the Schengen convention,<ref>{{Cite web| url = https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A42000A0922%2806%29| title = EUR-Lex
|style="text-align:right;"|{{nts|131990}}
|style="text-align:right" |{{UN_Population|Greece}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|1992|11|6}}<ref>{{cite web |url=
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|2000|1|1}}<ref name="Greece">{{cite journal |url=
|-
|{{flag|Hungary}}
Line 195 ⟶ 184:
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|2007|12|21}}<ref name="2004states"/>{{refn||name=2004states|group=Note}}
|-
|{{flag|Iceland}}{{refn|EFTA state, which is outside the EU, that is associated with the Schengen activities of the EU,<ref name= "associated-states">This terminology is, for example, used in the [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:21999A0710(02) Final Act of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters' association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222135509/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:21999A0710(02):EN:NOT |date=22 February 2014 }}.</ref> and where the Schengen rules apply.|name=associated|group=Note}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{nts|103000}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{UN_Population|Iceland}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|1996|12|19}}<ref name="icenor1">{{cite web |url= https://verdragenbank.overheid.nl/en/Treaty/Details/007472.html |title= Cooperation agreement between the Kingdom of Belgium, the Federal Republic of Germany, the French Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Italian Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the Portuguese Republic, the Hellenic Republic, the Republic of Austria, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, i.e. the Contracting Parties to the Schengen Agreement and to the Schengen Convention, and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway, on the gradual abolition of controls at their common borders |access-date= 1 November 2014
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|2001|3|25}}<ref name="2001enlarge"/>
|-
Line 204 ⟶ 193:
|style="text-align:right;"|{{nts|301318}}
|style="text-align:right" |{{UN_Population|Italy}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|1990|11|27}}<ref>{{cite web |url=
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|1997|10|26}}<ref name="Acquis"/><ref name="Italy">{{cite web |url=http://www.interior.gob.es/ca/web/servicios-al-ciudadano/normativa/resoluciones/resolucion-de-26-de-mayo-de-1998-de-la-secretaria |title=Resolución de 26 de mayo de 1998, de la Secretaría General Técnica del Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores |date=
|-
|{{flag|Latvia}}
Line 216 ⟶ 205:
|style="text-align:right;"|{{nts|160}}
|style="text-align:right" |{{UN_Population|Liechtenstein}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|2008|2|28}}<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/documents-publications/agreements-conventions/agreement/?aid=2007007 |title= Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis |access-date= 1 November 2014
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|2011|12|19}}<ref>{{cite journal |url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32011D0842 |title=COUNCIL DECISION of 13 December 2011 on the full application of the provisions of the Schengen ''acquis'' in the Principality of Liechtenstein |date=5 December 2011
|-
|{{flag|Lithuania}}
Line 243 ⟶ 232:
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|1995|3|26}}<ref name="1995states"/>
|-
|{{flag|Norway}}{{refn||name=associated|group=Note}} <br /><small>(excluding [[List of possessions of Norway|overseas territories and dependencies]])</small><ref>{{Cite web |url=
|style="text-align:right;"|{{nts|385155}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{UN_Population|Norway}}
Line 258 ⟶ 247:
|style="text-align:right;"|{{nts|92391}}
|style="text-align:right" |{{UN_Population|Portugal}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|1991|6|25}}<ref>{{cite web |url=
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|1995|3|26}}<ref name="1995states"/>
|-
Line 265 ⟶ 254:
|style="text-align:right" |{{UN_Population|Romania}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|2005|4|25}}<ref name="2007enlarge"/>
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|2024|3|31}}<ref name="RomBulgAir"/><ref name=RomBulgLand/>{{refn|name=RomBulg|group=Note}}
|-
|{{flag|Slovakia}}
Line 276 ⟶ 265:
|style="text-align:right;"|{{nts|20273}}
|style="text-align:right" |{{UN_Population|Slovenia}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|2003|4|16}}<ref name="2004enlarge">{{cite web |url= https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/documents-publications/agreements-conventions/agreement/?id=2003007 |title=Treaty between the Kingdom of Belgium, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, Ireland, the Italian Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Member States of the European Union) and the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic concerning the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the European Union (Deposited with the Government of the Italian Republic) |access-date=
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|2007|12|21}}<ref name="2004states"/>{{refn||name=2004states|group=Note}}
|-
Line 282 ⟶ 271:
|style="text-align:right;"|{{nts|505990}}
|style="text-align:right" |{{UN_Population|Spain}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|1991|6|25}}<ref>{{cite web |url=https://verdragenbank.overheid.nl/en/Treaty/Details/004727.html |title=Protocol on the accession of the Government of the Kingdom of Spain to the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the Member States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of controls at their common borders, as amended by the Protocol on the accession of the Italian Republic signed at Paris on 27 November 1990 |access-date=
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|1995|3|26}}<ref name="1995states"/>
|-
Line 288 ⟶ 277:
|style="text-align:right;"|{{nts|449964}}
|style="text-align:right" |{{UN_Population|Sweden}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|1996|12|19}}<ref>{{cite web |url=https://verdragenbank.overheid.nl/en/Treaty/Details/007477.html |title=Protocol on the accession of the Government of the Kingdom of Sweden to the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 on the gradual abolition of controls at the contracting parties' common borders |access-date=
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|2001|3|25}}<ref name="2001enlarge"/>
|-
Line 294 ⟶ 283:
|style="text-align:right;"|{{nts|41285}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{UN_Population|Switzerland}}
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|2004|10|26}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/documents-publications/agreements-conventions/agreement/?aid=2004085 |title=Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis |access-date=1 November 2014
|style="text-align:right;"|{{dts|format=dmy|2008|12|12}}<ref name="switz">{{cite journal |url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32008D0903 |title=COUNCIL DECISION of 27 November 2008 on the full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in the Swiss Confederation |date=5 December 2008
|-
!{{flag|EU|name=Schengen Area}}
Line 331 ⟶ 320:
{{Reflist|group="Note"|2}}
== Potential member states and EU territories outside the Schengen Area ==
=== Prospective members ===
{{Supranational European Bodies|align=right|size=400px}}
The procedure to enter the Schengen Area is that European Commission evaluates certain criteria. These criteria include border control legislation, infrastructure and organisation, personal data protection, visas, deportations, police cooperation and more.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://in-cyprus.philenews.com/eu-experts-due-in-cyprus-to-assess-schengen-acquis-implementation/|title=EU experts due in Cyprus to assess Schengen acquis implementation|access-date=1 July 2020|archive-date=29 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200929211927/https://in-cyprus.philenews.com/eu-experts-due-in-cyprus-to-assess-schengen-acquis-implementation/|url-status=dead}}</ref> After a positive evaluation the Schengen members of the [[Council of the European Union]] decides unanimously together with the [[European Parliament]] to accept the new member.
==== Cyprus ====
Although [[Cyprus]], which joined the EU on 1 May 2004, is legally bound to join the Schengen Area, implementation has been delayed because of the [[Cyprus dispute]]. According to former Cypriot Minister of Foreign Affairs [[Giorgos Lillikas]], "strict and full control based on Schengen will create a huge tribulation on a daily basis for the [[Turkish Cypriots]]" of [[Northern Cyprus]], and it is unclear if this control is possible before the resolution of the dispute.<ref name="mfacy">{{cite web |url=http://www.mfa.gov.cy/mfa/Embassies/BerlinEmbassy.nsf/All/9E3EA74BCAD066E5C125727D00493F03?OpenDocument&print |title=Foreign Minister says Cyprus not to join Schengen before 2010 |publisher=Embassy of the Republic of Cyprus in Berlin |access-date=3 February 2010 |archive-date=8 September 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120908075812/http://www.mfa.gov.cy/mfa/Embassies/BerlinEmbassy.nsf/All/9E3EA74BCAD066E5C125727D00493F03?OpenDocument&print |url-status=dead }}</ref> The British Sovereign Base Areas of [[Akrotiri and Dhekelia]], a [[British Overseas Territories|British Overseas Territory]] which is outside the EU, also needs "other handling and mechanisms".<ref name="mfacy"/> Akrotiri and Dhekelia has no border control to Cyprus, but has its own border control at its air base. {{As of|2018}} no date has been fixed for implementation of the Schengen rules by Cyprus.<ref name="cyprus-2011">{{cite web |title=Frequently asked questions |url=http://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/policies/borders/borders_faq_en.htm |work=europa.eu |publisher=European Commission |access-date=15 September 2011 |date=29 March 2011 |quote=When will Cyprus, Romania and Bulgaria join the Schengen area?... These three Member States still have to pass the Schengen evaluation before they can join the Schengen area. The target date for Bulgaria and Romania is 2011. |archive-date=3 November 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121103165928/http://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/policies/borders/borders_faq_en.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> Cyprus has less potential benefit from an implementation of Schengen, for it has no land border with another EU member; air travel or around 12 hours of sea travel is needed to the nearest EU member.
In November 2019, Cyprus's Foreign Affairs Minister [[Nikos Christodoulides]] revealed that Cyprus formally began the process of joining the Schengen Area in September.<ref name="Charalambous">{{cite web | url = https://in-cyprus.com/cyprus-submitted-application-to-enter-schengen-area-in-september/ | title = Cyprus submitted application to enter Schengen area in September | date = 4 November 2019 | editor = Annie Charalambous | newspaper = In Cyprus | access-date = 20 November 2019 | archive-date = 5 November 2019 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20191105161023/https://in-cyprus.com/cyprus-submitted-application-to-enter-schengen-area-in-september/ | url-status = live }}</ref> In July 2023, Cyprus joined the [[Schengen Information System]] (SIS) (participation in the SIS allows for cooperation on crime, immigration and other security-related matters within the Schengen Area).<ref>{{Cite web |last= |date=
====Gibraltar====
{{See also|Effect of Brexit on Gibraltar}}
[[File:Gibraltar Border.jpg|thumb|The Gibraltar/Spain border in 2004 with the Rock of Gibraltar in the background]]
As a result of [[Brexit]], [[Gibraltar]] ceased to be part of the European Union on 31 January 2020, although for most purposes it was treated as part of it during the transition phase until 31 December 2020. Like the United Kingdom, it had not been part of the Schengen Area but, unlike the United Kingdom, Gibraltar had also been outside of the [[European Union Customs Union|EU customs union]].<ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.gibraltar.gov.gi/uploads/Brexit%20Page/20200921-TN%20-%20FR%20-%20Border%20-%20Goods.pdf |publisher= Government of Gibraltar |title= Technical Notice (2): Getting ready for the end of the Transition Period. |date= 21 September 2020 |access-date= 14 January 2021 |archive-date= 17 January 2021 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20210117055427/https://www.gibraltar.gov.gi/uploads/Brexit%20Page/20200921-TN%20-%20FR%20-%20Border%20-%20Goods.pdf |url-status= live }}</ref> Owing to a declaration lodged by the United Kingdom with the EEC in 1982, in view of the entry into force of the [[British Nationality Act 1981]], Gibraltarians had been counted as British nationals for the purposes of Community law, and as such they had enjoyed full free movement within the [[European Economic Area]] and [[Switzerland]].<ref name="1982declaration">{{cite web | url=http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=46193&doclang=EN | title=Judgement of the court in Case C-192/99 | quote=In 1982, in view of the entry into force of the British Nationality Act 1981, the United Kingdom Government lodged with the Italian Government, as depositary of the Treaties, the 1982 Declaration, which replaced the 1972 Declaration with effect from 1 January 1983. The 1982 Declaration provides: 'As to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the terms "nationals", "nationals of Member States" or "nationals of Member States and overseas countries and territories", wherever used in the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community or the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community or in any of the Community acts deriving from those Treaties, are to be understood to refer to: (a) British citizens; (b) Persons who are British subjects by virtue of Part IV of the British Nationality Act 1981 and who have the right of abode in the United Kingdom and are therefore exempt from United Kingdom immigration control; (c) British Dependent Territories citizens who acquire their citizenship from a connection with Gibraltar. | access-date=2 January 2021 | archive-date=10 November 2022 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221110151620/https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=46193&doclang=EN | url-status=live }}</ref> During the [[Brexit transition period]] until 31 December 2020, Gibraltar was still for most purposes treated as an EU territory.
On 31 December 2020, the governments of Spain and of the United Kingdom (advised by the [[Government of Gibraltar]]) came to an agreement in principle on a framework for a UK-EU treaty on aspects of Gibraltar's future relationship with the European Union.<ref name="Graun311220" /> Both Spain and the Head<!-- not "Ambassador" per UK's unique worldview --> of the UK Mission to the European Union subsequently indicated with the European Commission their desire that such an agreement be negotiated and that the EU should seek a mandate for that purpose.<ref name="GibStatement">{{cite web|url=https://www.gibraltar.gov.gi/press-releases/chief-ministers-statement-the-new-years-eve-in-principle-agreement-a-post-brexit-deal-for-gibraltar-9462020-6542|title=Chief Minister's Statement – The New Year's Eve 'In-Principle' Agreement: A Post Brexit Deal for Gibraltar
[[Chief Minister of Gibraltar]] [[Fabian Picardo]] stated that he anticipates that the arrangement, which will apply for an initial period of four years, will make Gibraltar's port and airport entry points to the Schengen Area. These entry points will be managed by a [[Frontex]] operation. Spain, as the neighbouring Schengen member state, will be responsible as regards the European Union for the implementation of the Schengen acquis. Residents of Gibraltar, regardless of their nationality, are anticipated to enjoy maximised and unrestricted mobility to the Schengen Area.<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-55497084 | title=Brexit: Gibraltar gets UK-Spain deal to keep open border | date=31 December 2020 | access-date=31 December 2020 | work=BBC News | archive-date=26 April 2021 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210426190858/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-55497084 | url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="GibStatement" /> UK citizens who are not residents of Gibraltar will be subjected to third-country national checks when they enter Gibraltar through the Gibraltar port or airport.<ref name="GibPressConference1">{{cite web |url=https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=199470488344239 |title=Press Conference of HM Government of Gibraltar |date=31 December 2020 |access-date=2 January 2020 |work=Government of Gibraltar |quote=We anticipate that residents of Gibraltar of whatever nationality—the residence in Gibraltar is what matters—will have the ability to enter and exit Schengen like Schengen nationals, if you want to express it that way, and that those who are not resident in Gibraltar, or indeed in the rest of the Schengen Area, will then have to go through the third-country national check. [...] They will have to show their passports, as they do today. [...] Today a non-Gibraltar resident who is a British citizen has to show his passport and has to be given entry by the BCA, because they come into Gibraltar. In the future they will be given entry by the BCA and by the Schengen authorities, by Frontex, to be able to enter Gibraltar, and the Schengen zone. |archive-date=31 December 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201231145330/https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=199470488344239 |url-status=live }}</ref> It is anticipated that the third-country national check will entail two controls, one by Gibraltar's [[Borders and Coastguard Agency]], giving entry into Gibraltar, and one by [[Frontex]], giving entry into the Schengen Area. Picardo likened this arrangement to the [[juxtaposed controls]] at [[Eurostar]] stations, although he admitted the situation there is slightly different.<ref name="GibPressConference2">{{cite web |url=https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=199470488344239 |title=Press Conference of HM Government of Gibraltar |date=31 December 2020 |access-date=2 January 2020 |work=Government of Gibraltar |quote=They will in effect be looking out for the same things, but they will be dealing with different entry points, in effect, there will be a Gibraltar entry point and a Schengen entry point. The best example I can give you which we have wrestled with—it's slightly different—is the sort of agreement which provided for juxtaposed controls at St Pancras and Paris, but in a very different way, because you haven't got this principle here of those juxtaposed controls; you have two controls to go through. In one control you're given entry into Gibraltar, and in the other control you're given entry into Schengen. |archive-date=31 December 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201231145330/https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=199470488344239 |url-status=live }}</ref>
On 31 December 2020, Spain's foreign minister, [[Arancha González Laya]] said that she anticipated that it would take about six months to negotiate and conclude a treaty but that in the meantime Spain would work to ensure that mobility at the border would be "as fluid as possible".<ref name="Graun311220">{{cite news | title= Spain and UK reach draft deal on post-Brexit status of Gibraltar | author1= Ashifa Kassam | author2= Daniel Boffey | date= 31 December 2020 | work= The Guardian | url= https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/31/spain-and-uk-reach-draft-deal-on-post-brexit-status-of-gibraltar | archive-date= 26 March 2023 | access-date= 1 January 2021 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20230326041930/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/31/spain-and-uk-reach-draft-deal-on-post-brexit-status-of-gibraltar | url-status= live }}</ref>
Apart from the unrestricted mobility of persons, the negotiations will also seek to address maximised and unrestricted mobility of goods between Gibraltar and the European Union, and consider matters related to the environment, the level playing field, social security coordination,
On 6 October 2021, the EU agreed to open formal negotiations with UK anticipating an agreement on Gibraltar, and negotiations started soon after.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.politico.eu/article/post-brexit-talks-on-gibraltars-future-drag-into-2022/|title=Post-Brexit talks on Gibraltar's future drag into 2022|date=16 December 2021|access-date=3 April 2022|archive-date=16 January 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220116103137/https://www.politico.eu/article/post-brexit-talks-on-gibraltars-future-drag-into-2022/|url-status=live}}</ref> They were ongoing as of February 2022; hopes were they would finish during spring 2022.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.sovereigngroup.com/news/news-and-views/talks-on-gibraltars-future-relationship-with-eu-go-into-fifth-round/|title=Talks on Gibraltar's future relationship with EU go into fifth round|date=17 February 2022|website=The Sovereign Group|access-date=3 April 2022|archive-date=7 March 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220307120607/https://www.sovereigngroup.com/news/news-and-views/talks-on-gibraltars-future-relationship-with-eu-go-into-fifth-round/|url-status=live}}</ref> {{As of|December 2022}}, negotiations were continuing,<ref>{{cite news |title=UK and Spain close in on post-Brexit deal for Gibraltar |first=Christina |last=Gallardo |date=14 December 2022 |access-date=16 December 2022 |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-and-spain-close-in-on-post-brexit-deal-for-gibraltar/ |work=Politico.eu |archive-date=16 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221216013906/https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-and-spain-close-in-on-post-brexit-deal-for-gibraltar/ |url-status=live }}</ref> but appeared to be deadlocked over policing of passport control at Gibraltar airport.<ref>{{cite news |title=Spain 'ready for any scenario' as Gibraltar talks with UK falter |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jan/02/spain-ready-for-any-scenario-as-gibraltar-talks-with-uk-falter |first1=Ashifa |last1=Kassam |first2=Jessica |last2=Elgot |work=The Guardian |date=2 January 2023 |access-date=2 January 2023}}</ref>
==== Summary table ====
{|class="wikitable sortable" style="width:100%"
! State/territory
Line 369 ⟶ 358:
| style="text-align:right" | {{UN_Population|Cyprus}}
| style="text-align:right" | {{dts|format=dmy|2004|5|1}}<ref name="2004enlarge"/>
| 2025<ref>{{Cite web |last=Capital.gr |title=Πρόσω ολοταχώς για τη ζώνη Σένγκεν κινείται η Λευκωσία |url=https://www.capital.gr/diethni/3805885/proso-olotaxos-gia-ti-zoni-sengken-kineitai-i-leukosia/?amp=true |access-date=
| Cease Fire line, caused by [[Cyprus conflict]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mfa.gov.cy/mfa/Embassies/BerlinEmbassy.nsf/All/9E3EA74BCAD066E5C125727D00493F03 |title=Foreign Minister says Cyprus not to join Schengen before 2010 |publisher=Embassy of the Republic of Cyprus in Berlin |access-date=17 January 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090510074152/http://www.mfa.gov.cy/mfa/Embassies/BerlinEmbassy.nsf/All/9E3EA74BCAD066E5C125727D00493F03 |archive-date=10 May 2009}}</ref>
|-
| {{flag|Gibraltar}}<br/>([[United Kingdom]])
| style="text-align:right" | 6.8{{#tag:ref|The United Kingdom, the administering power, considers that the area of Gibraltar is {{cvt|6.8|km2}}, while for Spain it is {{cvt|6.7|km2}}.<ref name="A/AC.109/2015/13">{{Cite web |url=http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/AC.109/2015/13&referer=/english/&Lang=S |title=A/AC.109/2015/13. Gibraltar. Documento de trabajo preparado por la Secretaría |author=[[United Nations General Assembly]] |date=9 March 2015 |publisher=Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples |access-date=31 December 2020 |archive-date=27 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210227044707/http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/AC.109/2015/13&referer=/english/&Lang=S |url-status=live }}</ref> However, the various extensions using land reclaimed from the sea have in practice increased it to {{cvt|6.8|km2}}.|group="lower-alpha"}}
| style="text-align:right" | {{UN_Population|Gibraltar}}
| style="text-align:right" | ''n/a''{{refn|Application of Schengen rules in Gibraltar is not to be conditional on joining the EU. The United Kingdom (and thus Gibraltar) was a member of the EU (but not Schengen) from 1 January 1973 to 31 January 2020. |group=Note}}<!-- I don't see that we can put the ES/UK agreement date here. -->
| No date set
| [[Effect of Brexit on Gibraltar#Post-Brexit treaty negotiations|The EU and the United Kingdom are to negotiate a treaty]] or other arrangement to apply to Gibraltar, based on the agreement reached between the United Kingdom and Spain on 31 December 2020.<ref>{{Cite web
|}
Line 383 ⟶ 372:
{{Reflist|group="Note"}}
=== Territories of Schengen states outside the Area ===
{{See also|Special territories of members of the European Economic Area}}
Line 394 ⟶ 383:
Only the Netherlands' European territory is part of the Schengen Area. Six Dutch territories in the [[Caribbean]] are outside the Area. Three of these territories – [[Bonaire]], [[Sint Eustatius]] and [[Saba (island)|Saba]] (collectively known as the [[Caribbean Netherlands|BES islands]]) – are special municipalities within the Netherlands proper. The other three – [[Aruba]], [[Curaçao]] and [[Sint Maarten]] – are autonomous countries within the Kingdom of the Netherlands. All islands retain their status as [[Overseas countries and territories]] and are thus not part of the [[European Union]]. The six territories have a separate [[Visa policy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in the Caribbean|visa system]] from the European part of the Netherlands and people travelling between these islands and the Schengen Area are subjected to full border checks, with a passport being required even for EU/Schengen citizens, including Dutch (national ID cards are not accepted).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/paspoort-en-identiteitskaart/vraag-en-antwoord/naar-welke-landen-reizen-met-nederlandse-identiteitskaart |title=Naar welke landen kan ik reizen met de Nederlandse identiteitskaart?
|date=12 January 2017
==== Norwegian territories ====
[[Svalbard]] is part of Norway and has a [[Svalbard Treaty|special status under international law]]. It is not part of the Schengen Area. There is no visa regime in existence for Svalbard either for entry, residence or work,<ref name="svalbard">{{cite web|title=Entry and residence |url=http://www.sysselmannen.no/hovedEnkel.aspx?m=45270 |access-date=11 August 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110723003904/http://www.sysselmannen.no/hovedEnkel.aspx?m=45270 |archive-date=23 July 2011}}</ref> but it is difficult to visit Svalbard without travelling through the Schengen Area,<ref name="svalbard"/> although there are charter flights from Russia. Since 2011, the Norwegian government has imposed systematic border checks on individuals wishing to enter and leave Svalbard, requiring a passport or national identity card for non-Norwegian citizens. As a result, the border between Svalbard and the rest of Norway is largely treated like any other external Schengen border.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.spitsbergen-svalbard.net/2010/12/21/pass-control-in-longyearbyen.html |title=Pass control in Longyearbyen |publisher=Spitsbergen-svalbard.net |access-date=
==== Danish territories ====
The Danish territories of the [[Faroe Islands]] and [[Greenland]] are neither part of the European Union nor part of the Schengen Area, and visas to Denmark are not automatically valid in these territories. However, both of these territories lack border controls on arrivals from the Schengen Area, and the air or sea carriers are responsible for carrying out document checks before boarding, as is common for travel inside the Schengen Area. Citizens of EU/EFTA countries can travel to the Faroes and back using a passport or a national ID card<ref name="visitfaroeislands.com">{{Cite web |title=Passport and Visa |url=https://visitfaroeislands.com/en/plan-your-stay/before-you-arrive-in-the-faroe-islands/passport-and-visa |access-date=
===EU member states and former EU member states with opt-outs===
When EU states were negotiating subsuming the Schengen Agreement into the EU by the [[Amsterdam Treaty|Treaty of Amsterdam]], Ireland and the United Kingdom were the only member states that had not signed the Agreement. The UK did not want to join and Ireland wished to maintain its [[Common Travel Area]] with the [[British Islands|United Kingdom and associated islands]], an arrangement that would be incompatible with Schengen membership while the UK remained out. As a result, both negotiated an [[opt-outs in the European Union|opt-out]] from the part of the treaty which was to incorporate the [[Schengen acquis|Schengen rules]] (or ''acquis'') into EU Law when it came into effect on 1 May 1999.<ref>See Article 4 of Protocol (No 19) on the Schengen Acquis integrated into the framework of the European Union ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:12016E/PRO/19]).</ref> Under the relevant protocol, either may request to participate in aspects of the Schengen ''acquis'' but this is subject to the approval of the Schengen states.<ref>See Article 4 of Protocol (No 19) on the Schengen Acquis integrated into the framework of the European Union ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HU/ALL/?uri=CELEX:12016ME/TXT Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221110170123/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HU/ALL/?uri=CELEX:12016ME/TXT |date=10 November 2022 }}) and the decision of the [[European Court of Justice]] in Cases [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:62005CJ0077 C-77/05] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220417190729/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A62005CJ0077 |date=17 April 2022 }} and [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:62005CJ0137 C-137/05] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220511211057/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A62005CJ0137 |date=11 May 2022 }} ''United Kingdom v Council''.</ref>
On 31 January 2020, [[Brexit|the United Kingdom withdrew from the European Union]] and the protocol ceased to apply to it. Ireland will continue to operate the Common Travel Area and not join the Schengen Area for [[United Ireland#Good Friday Agreement|the foreseeable future]], because it wants to keep open its [[Irish border|land border with the UK]].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/uk/britain-guarantees-common-travel-area-without-qualification-1.2957889 |title=Britain guarantees common travel area 'without qualification' |newspaper=[[The Irish Times]] |archive-date=11 November 2020 |access-date=20 February 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201111200055/https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/uk/britain-guarantees-common-travel-area-without-qualification-1.2957889 |url-status=live }}</ref>
In 1999, the UK formally requested participation in certain provisions of the Schengen ''acquis'' – Title III relating to Police Security and Judicial Cooperation, and this request was approved by the [[Council of the European Union]] on 29 May 2000.<ref>Council Decision (2000/365/EC) of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32000D0365 OJ L 131, 1 June 2000, p. 43] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210224204704/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32000D0365 |date=24 February 2021 }})</ref> The United Kingdom's formal participation in the previously approved areas of cooperation was put into effect by a 2004 Council decision that came into effect on 1 January 2005.<ref>Council Decision (2004/926/EC) of 22 December 2004 on the putting into effect of parts of the Schengen acquis by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32004D0926:EN:NOT OJ L 395, 31 December 2004, p. 70])</ref>
Although the United Kingdom was not part of the Schengen passport-free area,<ref>{{cite web|title=Schengen Area|url=http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/index_en.htm
In contrast, while Ireland initially submitted a request to participate in the Schengen ''acquis'' in 2002, which was approved by the Council of the European Union,<ref>Council Decision (2002/192/EC) of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland's request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32002D0192 OJ L 64, 7 March 2002 p. 20] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211020095637/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32002D0192 |date=20 October 2021 }})</ref> that decision took nearly eighteen years to be put into effect. In February 2010 the Irish Minister for Justice, in response to a parliamentary question, said that: "The measures which will enable Ireland to meet its Schengen requirements are currently being progressed".<ref name="irishquestion09">[http://debates.oireachtas.ie/DDebate.aspx?F=DAL20091210.xml&Ex=All&Page=14 Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Dermot Ahern, ''Dáil Debates'' volume 698 number 1: Priority Questions—International Agreements (10 December 2009)].</ref> Ireland joined the law enforcement aspect of SIS II on 1 January 2021 with plans to have "full operational capacity" two months later.<ref name="RTE201218">{{cite news | title= Ireland to join EU police database from 1 January as UK leaves | url= https://www.rte.ie/news/2020/1218/1185318-eu-security-system/ | author= Sean Whelan | work= RTE News | date= 18 December 2020 | access-date= 28 December 2020 | archive-date= 25 December 2020 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20201225231700/https://www.rte.ie/news/2020/1218/1185318-eu-security-system/ | url-status= live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32020D1745 |
===Status of the European microstates===
Line 417 ⟶ 406:
[[File:The border between España and Andorra.jpg|thumb|The border checkpoint in La Farga de Moles on the [[Andorra–Spain border]]]]
Four [[European microstates]] — [[Andorra]],<ref name="amt.de"/> [[Monaco]], [[San Marino]] and the [[Vatican City]] — are not officially part of the Schengen Area, but are considered ''de facto'' within the Schengen Area, as they have open or semi-open borders and do not conduct systematic border controls with the Schengen countries that surround them. Some national laws have the text "countries against which border control is not performed based on the Schengen Agreement and the 562/2006 EU regulation",<ref>[https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/Dokument-Lagar/Lagar/Svenskforfattningssamling/sfs_sfs-1978-302/ Passlag (1978:302)] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305012650/https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/Dokument-Lagar/Lagar/Svenskforfattningssamling/sfs_sfs-1978-302/ |date=5 March 2016 }} (in Swedish)</ref> which then includes the microstates and other non-EU areas with open borders.{{citation needed|date=June 2024}} The three microstates cannot issue Schengen visas and with the exception of Monaco, are not formally part of the Schengen Area.{{citation needed|date=June 2024}}
'''Andorra''' is landlocked and does not have an airport or seaport, but there are several heliports. Visitors to the country can gain access only by road or helicopter through Schengen members France or Spain. Andorra has no border controls with either France or Spain. Border control points exist and border controls may be carried out in the other direction, but these are more focused on customs control ([[Andorra]] has considerably lower taxes than its neighbours, [[Taxation in Andorra#Value added tax|with for example a standard VAT rate of just 4.5%]]). Andorra does not have any visa requirements. Citizens of EU countries need either a [[National identity cards in the European Union|national identity card]] or [[Passports of the European Union|passport]] to enter Andorra, while anyone else requires a passport or equivalent. Schengen visas are accepted,<ref name="open">{{cite web |url=
'''Liechtenstein''' is landlocked and does not have an international airport. It has been a member of the Schengen Area since 2011. It does not have a border check at [[Balzers]] heliport, as flights to and from Balzers must be to or from the Schengen Area. Liechtenstein does not issue visas and as such recommends visitors apply for a visa in another Schengen country, e.g. Switzerland.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.liechtensteinusa.org/index.php?page=permits |title=
'''Monaco''' has an open border with France. Schengen laws are administered as if it were part of the EU as a result of bilateral agreements with France, and Schengen visas are accepted. Both French and Monégasque authorities carry out checks at Monaco's seaport and heliport.
Line 429 ⟶ 418:
'''San Marino''' has an open border with Italy, although some random checks are made by Italy's [[Guardia di Finanza]] and San Marino's [[Guardia di Rocca]].
The '''Vatican City''' has an open border with Italy. However, there is no customs union between Italy and Vatican City, hence vehicles may be subject to checks at the border. Typical border controls would not be suitable in Vatican City, due to its small size, high number of pedestrian visitors, and unique position as an [[Enclave and exclave|enclave]] within [[Rome]]. In 2006, the Vatican City showed interest in joining the Schengen agreement for closer cooperation in information sharing and similar activities covered by the [[Schengen Information System]].<ref>{{cite news |newspaper=euobserver.com |url=
==Economics==
Total trade between any two countries in the Schengen Area increases by approximately 0.1% per year. The same amount of increase in trade is gained again for every 1% annual increase in immigration between the countries.<ref name="TWE">{{Cite journal| title = The Positive Effects of the Schengen Agreement on European Trade| journal = The World Economy| volume = 37| issue = 11| pages = 1541–1557|vauthors=Davis D, Gift T | date =
===Movement of people===
About 1.7 million people commute to work across a European border each day, and in some regions these people constitute up to a third of the workforce. For example, 2.1% of the workers in Hungary work in another country, primarily Austria and Slovakia. Each year, there are 1.3 billion crossings of Schengen borders in total. 57 million crossings are due to transport of goods by road, with a value of €2.8 trillion each year.<ref name="europarl"/><ref>{{Cite web| title = The Future of Schengen| author = European Council on Foreign Relations| date = 2016| access-date = 15 June 2017| url = http://www.ecfr.eu/specials/scorecard/schengen_flash_scorecard| archive-
===Transit of goods===
The [[Single Administrative Document]] (SAD) is a [[customs declaration]] form used for goods entering or exiting the [[European Union]]. Traders and agents can use the SAD to assist with declaring import, export, transit and community status declarations in manual processing situations.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/single-administrative-document-sad_en|title=The single administrative document (SAD)
The [[TIR Convention]] procedure is used for transit operations that begin, end, or travel in a third, non-EU country that is a signatory to the convention.
Line 444 ⟶ 433:
A Transit Accompanying Document (TAD) can be produced at the point of departure or by an authorised consignor. It includes a barcode and the movement reference number that matches the transit declaration. This is useful if goods are diverted or delayed.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2016-09/guidance_transit_info_changes_ucc_en.pdf|title=EU customs document TAXUD/A2/TRA/001/2016 -REV. 1-EN}}</ref>
[[EORI number]]s are an official link to a specific registered address of a business concerned with arranging the export, import or movement of goods across the EU. It may also link to official records ('''Union Customs Code''') describing the nature of the goods and the identity of vehicles or haulers to be used.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/;ELX_SESSIONID=ybKbJYTfQqCQtzT0J0Pj8wfNTwRRkDJY2pDgT57yQkHZmnyTyH66!1423684890?qid=1423149246984&uri=CELEX:02013R0952-20131030 |title=Consolidated text: Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (recast) |publisher=European Union |access-date=5 October 2024 |archive-date=12 August 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240812172251/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/;ELX_SESSIONID=ybKbjYTfQqCQtzT0j0Pj8wfNTwRRkDjY2pDgT57yQkHzmnyTyH66!1423684890?qid=1423149246984&uri=CELEX:02013R0952-20131030 |url-status=live }}</ref>
==Regulation of internal borders==
Line 453 ⟶ 442:
Since the implementation of the Schengen rules, border posts have been closed (and often entirely removed) between participating countries.
The ''Schengen Borders Code'' requires participating states to remove all obstacles to free traffic flow at internal borders.<ref>Article 22 of the former Schengen Borders Code ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R0562:EN:NOT OJ L 105, 13 April 2006, p. 1] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131114121129/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R0562:EN:NOT |date=14 November 2013 }}).</ref> Thus, road, rail and air passengers no longer have their identity checked by border guards when travelling between Schengen countries, although security controls by carriers are still permissible.<ref>{{nowrap|Article 21 (b)}} of the former Schengen Borders Code ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R0562:EN:NOT OJ L 105, 13 April 2006, p. 1] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131114121129/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R0562:EN:NOT |date=14 November 2013 }}).</ref> Per EU guidelines all [[EU citizens]] are advised to bring a [[passport]] and/or [[national identity card]], as one may be required.<!-- See following paragraphs for more details and sources.-->
[[#Passport stamp|Passport stamps]] are never issued when travelling between Schengen member states, even when border controls between Schengen member states are temporarily re-introduced.<ref>Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the operation of the provisions on stamping of the travel documents of third-country nationals in accordance with Articles 10 and 11 of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52009DC0489 COM (2009) 489, p. 8])</ref>
===Internal checks===
Although EU and EFTA nationals travelling within the Schengen Area are not required to show [[Passports of the European Union|passports]], [[National identity cards in the European Economic Area|national identity cards]] or other identity documents at an internal border, the laws of most countries still require them to carry national identity documents and to produce them to an authorised person on request.<ref name="entryexit">{{cite web|url=https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/travel/entry-exit/index_en.htm |title=Documents you need for travel in Europe |access-date=27 December 2019}}</ref> Different rules apply to other nationals.<ref name="entryexit" /> It is the obligation of everyone travelling within the area to be able to show a fully valid form of personal identification accepted by other Schengen states, typically one issued by the state.<ref name="Travel documents for non-EU nationals">{{cite web |url=https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/travel/entry-exit/non-eu-nationals/index_en.htm |title=Travel documents for non-EU nationals |access-date=3 June 2018 |archive-date=15 June 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180615080810/https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/travel/entry-exit/non-eu-nationals/index_en.htm |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.kefairport.is/English/Before-Departure/Passport-Control-Schengen/ |title=Passport Control & Schengen |access-date=8 August 2012 |archive-date=22 July 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110722022350/http://www.kefairport.is/English/Before-Departure/Passport-Control-Schengen/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
According to the Schengen rules, hotels and other types of commercial accommodation must register all foreign citizens, including citizens of other Schengen states, by requiring the completion of a registration form by their own hand. This does not apply to accompanying spouses and minor children or members of travel groups. In addition, a valid identification document has to be produced to the hotel manager or staff.<ref>Article 45 of the Schengen Convention.</ref> The Schengen rules do not require any other procedures; thus, the Schengen states are free to regulate further details on the content of the registration forms, and identity documents which are to be produced, and may also require the persons exempted from registration by Schengen laws to be registered. Enforcement of these rules varies by country.
Line 467 ⟶ 456:
The [[European Union]] constitutes a [[European Union Customs Union|customs union]] and a [[European Union Value Added Tax Area|Value Added Tax area]]. However, not all Schengen states or all of the territory of Schengen states are part of the customs union or VAT area. Some countries therefore legally conduct customs controls targeted at illegal goods, such as drugs.
Security checks can legally be carried out at ports and airports. Also police checks can be conducted if they:<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/399/oj/eng|title=EUR-Lex
* do not have border control as an objective;
* are based on general police information and experience regarding possible threats to public security and aim, in particular, to combat cross-border crime;
Line 475 ⟶ 464:
===Air travel===
[[File:RIX Schengen arrival.jpg|thumb|Schengen arrival gate at Rīga Airport (RIX)]]
For flights within the Schengen Area (either between Schengen member states or within the same Schengen member state), law enforcement agencies, airport authorities and air carriers are permitted only to carry out ''security'' checks on passengers and may not carry out border checks.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32006R0562|title=EUR-Lex
Travellers boarding flights between Schengen countries, but originating from a third country outside the area, are required to go through Schengen entry border checks upon arrival in the Schengen Area. This is because the route originates outside the Schengen Area and the authorities at the final destination would have no way of differentiating between arriving passengers who boarded at the origin and those who joined in the middle. Additionally, travellers are required to process through Schengen exit border checks upon departure.
Line 482 ⟶ 471:
[[File:German-Danish Border.jpg|thumb|Temporary border controls conducted by the [[Police of Denmark|Danish Police]] in [[Kruså]] at the [[Denmark–Germany border|internal border with Germany]]]]
A Schengen member state is permitted to reinstate border controls with another Schengen member state for a short period where there is a serious threat to that state's "public policy or internal security" or when the "control of an external border is no longer ensured due to exceptional circumstances".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.france24.com/en/20120608-european-union-schengen-border-control-migrants-refugees |title=EU agrees short-term border closures to block migrants |date=8 June 2012 |access-date=8 August 2012 |archive-date=12 July 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120712181401/http://www.france24.com/en/20120608-european-union-schengen-border-control-migrants-refugees |url-status=live }}</ref> When such risks arise out of foreseeable events, the state in question must notify the European Commission in advance and consult with other Schengen states.<ref>Chapter II of the Schengen Borders Code ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R0562:EN:NOT OJ L 105, 13 April 2006, p. 1] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131114121129/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R0562:EN:NOT |date=14 November 2013 }}).</ref>
The introduction of temporary controls at internal borders is a prerogative of the member states. Although the [[European Commission]] may issue an opinion about the necessity and proportionality of introducing temporary controls at internal borders, it cannot veto or override such a decision if it is taken by a member state.<ref name="temporary_controls">{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/reintroduction-border-control/index_en.htm|title=Temporary Reintroduction of Border Control|date=6 December 2016
In April 2022 the [[European Court of Justice]] clarified that temporary internal border controls cannot exceed a duration of six months for one and the same threat. Only in case of a new serious threat "the member state may apply such a measure afresh, even immediately after the six-month period has ended."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2022-04/cp220064en.pdf|title=Where there is a serious threat to its public policy or internal security, a Member State may reintroduce border control at its borders with other Member States, but without exceeding a maximum total duration of six months|date=26 April 2022
In April 2010, Malta introduced temporary checks due to [[Pope Benedict XVI]]'s visit.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20100405/local/border-checks-are-back |title=Border checks are back |newspaper=Times of Malta |date=5 April 2010 |access-date=9 May 2010 |archive-date=9 April 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100409020055/http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20100405/local/border-checks-are-back |url-status=live }}</ref> It reimposed checks in 2015 in the weeks surrounding the [[CHOGM 2015|Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting]].
Estonia introduced temporary checks in September 2014 due to the visit of US President [[Barack Obama]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.visittallinn.ee/eng/visitor/discover/news/aid-16547/changes-in-travelling-during-us-president-barack-obama-s-visit-to-estonia|title=Changes in travelling during US President Barack Obama's visit to Estonia|publisher=Visit Tallinn|access-date=19 December 2018|archive-date=20 December 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181220230448/https://www.visittallinn.ee/eng/visitor/discover/news/aid-16547/changes-in-travelling-during-us-president-barack-obama-s-visit-to-estonia|url-status=live}}</ref>
In response to the [[European migrant crisis]] in 2015, several Schengen countries set up border controls.
In November 2017, Germany introduced temporary checks on flights arriving from Greece.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://griechenland.diplo.de/gr-de/aktuelles/-/1496852 |title=Border controls for flights from Greece to Germany
In 2019, Denmark set up border controls with Sweden due to serious attacks by Swedish citizens.<ref>{{cite news |title=Denmark sets up temporary border control with Sweden after attacks |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-denmark-border-sweden/denmark-sets-up-temporary-border-control-at-border-with-sweden-idUSKBN1WP0QZ |access-date=13 November 2019 |work=Reuters|date=10 October 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191011073226/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-denmark-border-sweden/denmark-sets-up-temporary-border-control-at-border-with-sweden-idUSKBN1WP0QZ |archive-date=11 October 2019 |quote=Swedes were suspected of being behind a number of serious attacks this year in the Danish capital Copenhagen}}</ref>
In response to the [[COVID-19 pandemic]] in 2020, almost all Schengen countries set up border controls. Several of these controls blocked citizens of EU/Schengen countries from entering, allowed only citizens or residents of the country to enter, plus prioritised traffic like food transport.<ref>{{cite news |title=Europe Barricades Borders to Slow Coronavirus |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/17/world/europe/EU-closes-borders-virus.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200317191033/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/17/world/europe/EU-closes-borders-virus.html |archive-date=
In September 2024, Germany announced it would temporarily introduce checks at all of its land borders, in order to tackle irregular migration. The controls were scheduled to be in force for six months.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Germany to put temporary controls on all land borders, source says |website=[[Reuters]] |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/germany-put-temporary-controls-all-land-borders-source-says-2024-09-09/ |access-date=9 September 2024 |archive-date=17 December 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241217230029/https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/germany-put-temporary-controls-all-land-borders-source-says-2024-09-09/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
====Internal border controls in place since 2015====
[[File:Border controls at internal and external Schengen borders.svg|thumb|upright=1.2|The yellow and green-coloured countries indicate Schengen members. The green-coloured countries indicate no current use of internal border controls. The yellow-coloured countries indicate internal border controls currently imposed. The green lines indicate internal Schengen land borders without border controls, the yellow lines indicate internal Schengen land borders with ongoing temporary border controls and the red lines indicate the external Schengen land borders with full border controls.]]
The table below lists internal border controls in place as of
{|class="wikitable sortable"
Line 520 ⟶ 504:
|-
|rowspan="2"|{{flagcountry|Austria}}
|Land borders with Slovakia and
|rowspan="2"|[[European migrant crisis]], pressure on the asylum reception system, high migratory pressure at the
|style="text-align:center;"|{{dts|16 October 2024}}
|style="text-align:center;"|''{{dts|15 April 2025}}''
|-
|Land borders with Hungary and Slovenia
|style="text-align:center;"|{{dts|12 November 2024}}
|style="text-align:center;"|''{{dts|15 May 2025}}''
|-
|{{flagcountry|Bulgaria}}
|Land
|European migrant crisis, migratory pressure caused by crises in [[Afghan conflict|Afghanistan]], [[Israel–Hamas war|Gaza]], [[Israel–Hezbollah conflict (2023–present)|Lebanon]], and [[Syrian civil war|Syria]]
Imposed and agreed on temporarily as a condition for admission of Bulgaria and Romania, fixed by the Budapest agreement
| style="text-align:center;" |1 January 2025▼
| style="text-align:center;" |
|-
|{{flagcountry|Denmark}}
|Land
|European migrant crisis, Islamist terrorist threat, organised crime, smuggling, [[2022 Invasion of Ukraine|2022 invasion of Ukraine]], irregular migration along the Central Mediterranean route
| style="text-align:center;" |{{dts|4 January 2016}}
| style="text-align:center;" |''{{dts|11 May 2025}}''
|-
|{{Flag|France}}
|
|[[Terrorism in France|Terrorism]], [[European Migrant Crisis|European migrant crisis]], [[2022 Invasion of Ukraine|2022 invasion of Ukraine]], increase in irregular entry flows at the external borders
| style="text-align:center;" |{{dts|October 2015}}<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ldh-france.org/retablissement-des-controles-aux-frontieres-interieures/|title=Rétablissement des contrôles aux frontières intérieures|date=17 October 2024|access-date=2 January 2025|archive-date=2 January 2025|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250102192633/https://www.ldh-france.org/retablissement-des-controles-aux-frontieres-interieures/|url-status=live}}</ref>
▲| style="text-align:center;" |27 July 2016
| style="text-align:center;" |''{{dts|30 April 2025}}''
|-
| rowspan="3" |{{flagcountry|Germany}}
|
| rowspan="3" |European migrant crisis, increase in irregular migration from Turkey through the Western Balkans, strain on the asylum reception system, human smuggling
| style="text-align:center;" |{{dts|13 September 2015}}
| style="text-align:center;" |''{{dts|15 March 2025}}''
|-
|Land borders with the Czech Republic, Poland and Switzerland
| style="text-align:center;" |{{dts|16 June 2024}}
| style="text-align:center;" |''{{dts|15 March 2025}}''
|-
|Land borders with Belgium, Denmark, France, Luxembourg and the Netherlands
| style="text-align:center;" |{{dts|16 September 2024}}
| style="text-align:center;" |''{{dts|15 March 2025}}''
|-
|{{flagcountry|Hungary}}{{cn|date=January 2025}}
|Land border with Romania
|Imposed and agreed on temporarily as a condition for admission of Bulgaria and Romania, fixed by the Budapest agreement
▲| style="text-align:center;" |{{dts|1 January 2025}}
| style="text-align:center;" |''{{dts|1 July 2025}}''
|-
|{{flagcountry|Italy}}
|Land border with Slovenia
|[[Israel–Hamas war]], [[European migrant crisis]], Islamist terrorist threat, security risks associated with the [[2025 Jubilee]]
| style="text-align:center;" |{{dts|21 October 2023}}
| style="text-align:center;" |''{{dts|18 June 2025}}''
|-
|{{flagcountry|Netherlands}}
|Land and air borders with Belgium and Germany
|Irregular migration and migrant smuggling
| style="text-align:center;" |{{dts|9 December 2024}}
| style="text-align:center;" |''{{dts|8 June 2025}}''
|-
|{{flagcountry|Norway}}
|Ports with ferry connections to the Schengen Area
|[[2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine|2022 invasion of Ukraine]], threat to critical on-shore and off-shore infrastructures
| style="text-align:center;" |{{dts|26 November 2015}}
| style="text-align:center;" |''{{dts|11 May 2025}}''
|-
|{{flagcountry|Romania}}{{cn|date=January 2025}}
|Land borders with Hungary and Bulgaria and ferry connections with Bulgaria
|Imposed and agreed on temporarily as a condition for admission of Bulgaria and Romania, fixed by the Budapest agreement
|style="text-align:center;"|{{dts|1 January 2025}}
|style="text-align:center;"|''{{dts|1 July 2025}}''
|-
|{{flagcountry|Slovenia}}
|Land borders with Croatia and Hungary
|[[Israel–Hamas war]], [[2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine|2022 invasion of Ukraine]], [[European migrant crisis]], Islamist terrorist threat, organised crime
| style="text-align:center;" |{{dts|21 October 2023}}
| style="text-align:center;" |''{{dts|21 June 2025}}''
|-
|{{flagcountry|Sweden}}
|All internal borders
|[[European migrant crisis]], Islamist terrorist threat
| style="text-align:center;" |{{dts|12 November 2015}}
| style="text-align:center;" |''{{dts|11 May 2025}}''
|}
Line 603 ⟶ 594:
At the request of France, in May 2011 the [[European Commissioner for Home Affairs]], [[Cecilia Malmström]] proposed that more latitude would be available for the temporary re-establishment of border control in the case of strong and unexpected migratory pressure, or the failure of a state to protect the external borders of the EU.<ref name="AFP20110725"/>
On 25 July 2011, in delivering the European Commission's final assessment on the measures taken by Italy and France,
====2015 migrant crisis====
Line 612 ⟶ 603:
Other countries, including Austria, Denmark, Slovenia, Hungary, Sweden and Norway have set up border controls in response to the crisis.<ref name="temporary_controls_pdf">{{cite web|title=Member States' notifications of the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders pursuant to Article 23 ''et seq.'' of the Schengen Borders Code|url=http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/reintroduction-border-control/docs/ms_notifications_-_reintroduction_of_border_control_en.pdf |website=ec.europa.eu|publisher=European Commission|access-date=16 February 2016}}</ref>
In December 2015, Sweden passed a temporary law that allows the government to oblige all transport companies to check that their passengers carry valid photographic identification. The new law came into effect on 21 December 2015 and was valid until 21 December 2018.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.riksdagen.se/sv/Dokument-Lagar/Utskottens-dokument/Betankanden/Arenden/201516/JuU24/|title=Särskilda åtgärder vid allvarlig fara för den allmänna ordningen eller den inre säkerheten i landet Justitieutskottets Betänkande 2015/16:JuU24
On 30 May 2018, when the migrant crisis border controls were still active in some countries, the European Parliament decided to [[European Union response to the 2015 migrant crisis|condemn prolonged border checks]] between Schengen Area member countries.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20180524IPR04217/the-schengen-area-is-at-a-crossroads|title=The Schengen area is at a crossroads
====2015 Paris attacks====
Line 623 ⟶ 614:
[[File:Germany-Poland Lubieszyn Border Covid-19.jpg|thumb|[[Roadblock]]s and [[police vehicle]]s at the temporarily closed [[Germany-Poland border]] in Lubieszyn on 15 March 2020 during the [[COVID-19 pandemic]]]]
Although some European politicians did call for Europe's internal borders to be temporarily closed,<ref>{{cite news |title=Coronavirus: European borders likely to remain open despite crisis in Italy, observers say |url=https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3073897/coronavirus-european-borders-likely-remain-open-despite-crisis |work=[[South China Morning Post]] |date=7 March 2020 |archive-date=15 March 2020 |access-date=22 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200315040544/https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3073897/coronavirus-european-borders-likely-remain-open-despite-crisis |url-status=live }}</ref> the [[European Union]] decided in late February 2020 to turn down the idea of suspending the Schengen free travel area and introducing border controls with Italy.<ref name="dw-schengen">{{cite news |title=Coronavirus: EU rules out Schengen border closures amid Italy outbreak |url=https://www.dw.com/en/coronavirus-eu-rules-out-schengen-border-closures-amid-italy-outbreak/a-52497811 |publisher=Deutsche Welle |date=24 February 2020 |archive-date=13 March 2020 |access-date=22 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200313142436/https://www.dw.com/en/coronavirus-eu-rules-out-schengen-border-closures-amid-italy-outbreak/a-52497811 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Salvini and Le Pen Don't Have a Coronavirus Cure |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-02-25/salvini-and-le-pen-don-t-have-a-european-coronavirus-cure |work=Bloomberg |date=25 February 2020 |archive-date=27 February 2020 |access-date=22 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200227122244/https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-02-25/salvini-and-le-pen-don-t-have-a-european-coronavirus-cure |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Coronavirus: Europe's open borders threatened by spread of disease |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/coronavirus-europe-open-borders-eu-italy-france-britain-germany-spain-a9362536.html |work=The Independent |date=28 February 2020 |archive-date=17 March 2020 |access-date=22 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200317173409/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/coronavirus-europe-open-borders-eu-italy-france-britain-germany-spain-a9362536.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Europe keeps Schengen zone open despite coronavirus |url=https://www.ft.com/content/967789a2-56f6-11ea-a528-dd0f971febbc |work=Financial Times |date=24 February 2020 |archive-date=2 April 2020 |access-date=22 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200402134856/https://www.ft.com/content/967789a2-56f6-11ea-a528-dd0f971febbc |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=EU Says No to Border Closure – Allocates €232 Million to Fight Coronavirus |url=https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/news/eu-says-no-to-border-closure-allocates-e232-million-to-fight-coronavirus/ |work=SchengenVisaInfo.com |date=25 February 2020 |archive-date=25 April 2020 |access-date=22 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200425023232/https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/news/eu-says-no-to-border-closure-allocates-e232-million-to-fight-coronavirus/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Op-Ed: Coronavirus could be a bigger test for the EU than the refugee crisis |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/28/coronavirus-could-be-a-bigger-test-for-the-eu-than-the-refugee-crisis.html |work=CNBC |date=29 February 2020 |archive-date=19 April 2020 |access-date=22 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200419094443/https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/28/coronavirus-could-be-a-bigger-test-for-the-eu-than-the-refugee-crisis.html |url-status=live }}</ref> The deputy leader of the Swiss [[Ticino League]], Lorenzo Quadri, criticised the decision: "It is alarming that the dogma of wide-open borders is considered a priority."<ref>{{cite news |title=Coronavirus Nightmare Could Be the End for Europe's Borderless Dream |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/26/world/europe/coronavirus-european-union.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200226190006/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/26/world/europe/coronavirus-european-union.html |archive-date=
Czech Prime Minister [[Andrej Babiš]] stated in early March that "European countries cannot ban the entry of Italian citizens within the Schengen Area. The only possible way is to have the Italian prime minister call on his fellow citizens to refrain from travelling to other countries of the European Union."<ref>{{cite news |title=Czech PM: Italians Should Be Banned From Travelling Due to Coronavirus |url=https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/news/czech-pm-italians-should-be-banned-from-travelling-due-to-coronavirus/ |work=SchengenVisaInfo.com |date=9 March 2020 |archive-date=23 March 2020 |access-date=22 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200323171345/https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/news/czech-pm-italians-should-be-banned-from-travelling-due-to-coronavirus/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
After Slovakia, Denmark, the [[COVID-19 pandemic in the Czech Republic#Policies to fight the contagion|Czech Republic]] and Poland in mid-March announced complete closure of their national borders, [[European Commission]] President [[Ursula von der Leyen]] said that "Certain controls may be justified, but general travel bans are not seen as being the most effective by the World Health Organization. Moreover, they have a strong social and economic impact, they disrupt people's lives and business across the borders."<ref>{{cite news |title=Denmark, Poland and Czechs seal borders over coronavirus |url=https://www.ft.com/content/4e89ec5c-6565-11ea-b3f3-fe4680ea68b5 |work=Financial Times |date=12 March 2020 |archive-date=14 March 2020 |access-date=22 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200314202823/https://www.ft.com/content/4e89ec5c-6565-11ea-b3f3-fe4680ea68b5 |url-status=live }}</ref> Von der Leyen also apologised to Italy, amidst widespread discontent among Italians for the lack of solidarity shown by Europe.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2020-04-02/eu-commission-apologises-to-italy-over-coronavirus-response|title=EU Commission Apologises to Italy Over Coronavirus Response, Deaths Push Higher|agency=Reuters}}</ref> By the end of March 2020, almost all internal Schengen borders had been closed to non-essential travel. By July 2020, most borders that were closed due to the coronavirus had been reopened.
==Regulation of external borders==
[[File:Rajavartijoita passintarkastuksessa.jpg|thumb|Passport control at an external Schengen border in Finland]]
[[File:Warsaw_Spire,_Poland_23_June_2016.jpg|thumb|The [[Warsaw Spire]], housing [[Frontex]]'s headquarters]]
Participating countries are required to apply strict checks on travellers entering and exiting the Schengen Area. These checks are co-ordinated by the European Union's [[Frontex]] agency, and subject to common rules. The details of border controls, surveillance and the conditions under which permission to enter into the Schengen Area may be granted are exhaustively detailed in the Schengen Borders Code.<ref name="schengen borders code">Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R0562:EN:NOT OJ L 105, 13 April 2006, p. 1] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131114121129/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R0562:EN:NOT |date=14 November 2013 }}).</ref><ref name="Reg2016/399"/>
===Temporary restriction on the entry of persons without the right of free movement for non-essential travel===
In view of the [[COVID-19 pandemic]], on 16 March 2020 the [[European Commission]] issued a recommendation to all EU and Schengen member states to introduce a temporary restriction on the entry of third-country nationals (i.e. travellers who are not EEA/Swiss citizens and family members with the [[Directive 2004/38/EC on the right to move and reside freely|right of free movement]]) to the Schengen Area for non-essential travel for an initial period of 30 days (with the possible prolongation of this period to be assessed based on further developments). However, third-country nationals who are holders of long-term visas or residence permits or are family members of EEA/Swiss citizens are exempt from this restriction. Further, third-country nationals 'with an essential function or need' (such as healthcare workers, transport personnel, aid workers, military personnel, seasonal agricultural workers), passengers in transit, those travelling 'for imperative family reasons' and those 'in need of international protection or for other humanitarian reasons' are exempt from this restriction. Nevertheless, the European Commission re-iterated that 'coordinated and reinforced health checks' should be carried out on all travellers who are permitted to enter the EU and Schengen Area.<ref>COVID-19: Temporary Restriction on Non-Essential Travel to the EU ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0115 COM (2020) 115, 16 March 2020] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200404032520/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0115 |date=4 April 2020 }})</ref>
Further, on 30 March 2020, the [[European Commission]] published 'Guidance on the implementation of the temporary restriction on non-essential travel to the EU, on the facilitation of transit arrangements for the repatriation of EU citizens, and on the effects on visa policy' in order to provide 'advice and practical instructions'. The Guidance states that member states are permitted to take measures (such as requiring non-nationals to undergo a period of self-isolation if arriving from a territory affected by COVID-19), provided that the same requirements is imposed on its own nationals. The Guidance also clarifies that citizens of the European micro-states (Andorra,
Some EU and Schengen member states have gone further than the European Commission recommendation and have restricted the entry of EEA/Swiss citizens to their respective territories for non-essential travel. For example, on 4 April 2020, [[French Border Police]] refused entry to a group of EU and British citizens who arrived in [[Marseille Provence Airport]] on a [[private jet]] from the UK, with the intention of staying in a holiday villa in [[Cannes]].<ref>{{cite news |last=Willsher |first=Kim |date=10 April 2020 |title=French police turn back private jet of holidaymakers from UK |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/10/french-police-turn-back-private-jet-of-holidaymakers-from-uk |work=[[The Guardian]] |access-date=11 April 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |date=10 April 2020 |title=Partis d'Angleterre en jet privé pour faire la fête à Cannes, ils sont accueillis par les forces de l'ordre |url=https://www.lci.fr/police/covid-19-et-confinement-partis-d-angleterre-en-jet-prive-pour-faire-la-fete-a-cannes-ils-sont-accueillis-par-les-forces-de-l-ordre-2150545.html |work=[[La Chaîne Info]] |language=fr |access-date=11 April 2020 |archive-date=11 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200411000310/https://www.lci.fr/police/covid-19-et-confinement-partis-d-angleterre-en-jet-prive-pour-faire-la-fete-a-cannes-ils-sont-accueillis-par-les-forces-de-l-ordre-2150545.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
On 8 April 2020, the [[European Commission]] invited EU and Schengen member states to extend the restriction on the entry of third-country nationals for non-essential travel for a further period of 30 days until 15 May 2020.<ref>Communication on assessment of state of play of the Communication on non-essential travel ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0148 COM (2020) 148, 8 April 2020] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221226213051/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0148 |date=26 December 2022 }})</ref> On 8 May 2020, the European Commission again invited member states to extend the restriction for another 30 days until 15 June 2020.<ref>Communication on the second assessment of the application of the temporary restriction on non-essential travel to the EU ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0222 COM (2020) 222, 8 May 2020] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221226213053/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0222 |date=26 December 2022 }})</ref> On 11 June 2020, the European Commission recommended member states to prolong the restriction on the entry of third-country nationals for non-essential travel until 30 June 2020.<ref>Communication on the third assessment of the application of the temporary restriction on non-essential travel to the EU ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0399 COM (2020) 399, 11 June 2020])</ref>
===Border checks===
[[File:Nuijamaa Finland Border Crossing Point.jpg|thumb|Border checkpoint for vehicles operated by the [[Finnish Border Guard]] in [[Nuijamaa]] at the [[Finland–Russia border|external border with Russia]]. The lane on the far right is for EEA (including EU) and Swiss citizens only, whereas the other lanes are for all travellers.]]
All persons crossing external borders—inbound or outbound—are subject to a check by a [[border guard]]. The only exception is for regular cross-border commuters (both those with the [[Directive 2004/38/EC on the right to move and reside freely|right of free movement]] and third-country nationals) who are well known to the border guards: once an initial check has shown that there is no alert on record relating to them in the [[Schengen Information System]] or national databases, they can only be subject to occasional 'random' checks, rather than systematic checks every time they cross the border.<ref>Practical Handbook for Border Guards, Part II, Section I, Point 5.8 ([https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/e-library/documents/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/docs/c2019-7131-annex.pdf C (2019) 7131, 8 October 2019, p. 45] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230025715/https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/e-library/documents/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/docs/c2019-7131-annex.pdf |date=30 December 2020 }})</ref><ref>Annex VII of the Schengen Borders Code ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R0562:EN:NOT OJ L 105, 13 April 2006, p. 1] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131114121129/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R0562:EN:NOT |date=14 November 2013 }}).</ref><ref>Annex VII, Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32016R0399 OJ L 77, 23 March 2016, p. 1] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211105080924/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32016R0399 |date=5 November 2021 }})</ref>
Previously, EEA and Swiss citizens, as well as their family members enjoying the right of free movement, were subject only to a 'minimum check' when crossing external borders. This meant that their travel document was subject only to a 'rapid' and 'straightforward' visual inspection and an optional check against databases for lost/stolen travel documents. Consultation of the [[Schengen Information System]] and other national databases to ensure that the traveller did not represent a security, public policy or health threat was only permitted on a strictly 'non-systematic' basis where such a threat was 'genuine', 'present' and 'sufficiently serious'.<ref name="7-2-borders">Article 7(2) of the Schengen Borders Code ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R0562:EN:NOT OJ L 105, 13 April 2006, p. 1] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131114121129/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R0562:EN:NOT |date=14 November 2013 }}).</ref> In contrast, other travellers were subject to a 'thorough check'.<ref name="7-3-borders">Article 7(3) of the Schengen Borders Code ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R0562:EN:NOT OJ L 105, 13 April 2006, p. 1] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131114121129/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R0562:EN:NOT |date=14 November 2013 }}).</ref>
However, after the [[November 2015 Paris attacks|November 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris]], at a meeting of the [[Council of the European Union]] on 20 November 2015, interior ministers from the Member States decided to 'implement immediately the necessary systematic and coordinated checks at external borders, including on individuals enjoying the right of free movement'.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2015/11/20/jha-conclusions-counter-terrorism/|title=Conclusions of the Council of the EU and of the Member States meeting within the Council on Counter-Terrorism|website=www.consilium.europa.eu|access-date=5 January 2023|archive-date=5 January 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230105135247/https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2015/11/20/jha-conclusions-counter-terrorism/|url-status=live}}</ref> Amendments were made to the Schengen Border Code to introduce systematic checks of the travel documents of EEA and Swiss citizens, as well as their family members enjoying the right of free movement, against relevant databases when crossing external borders.<ref name="Reg2017/458">Regulation (EU) 2017/458 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2017 amending Regulation (EU) 2016/399 as regards the reinforcement of checks against relevant databases at external borders ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32017R0458 OJ L 74, 18 March 2017, p.1] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211020075400/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32017R0458 |date=20 October 2021 }})</ref> The new regime came into force on 7 April 2017.
Where carrying out systematic checks against databases would have a disproportionate impact on the flow of traffic at an external border, such checks may be relaxed if, on the basis of a risk assessment, it is determined that it would not lead to a security risk.<ref name="Reg2017/458"/><ref name="Reg2016/399"/> {{how|date=September 2019}} <!-- add procedure here -->
In 'exceptional' and 'unforeseen' circumstances where waiting times become excessive, external border checks can be relaxed on a temporary basis.<ref>Article 9, Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32016R0399 OJ L 77, 23 March 2016, p. 1] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211105080924/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32016R0399 |date=5 November 2021 }})</ref><ref>Article 8 of the Schengen Borders Code ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R0562:EN:NOT OJ L 105, 13 April 2006, p. 1] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131114121129/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R0562:EN:NOT |date=14 November 2013 }}).</ref> {{example needed|date=September 2019}}
Border guards carry out the following procedures when checking travellers who cross external borders:<ref name="Reg2017/458"/><ref name="Reg2016/399">Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32016R0399 OJ L 77, 23 March 2016, p. 1] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211105080924/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32016R0399 |date=5 November 2021 }})</ref>
{|class="wikitable" style="font-size:95%"
Line 698 ⟶ 689:
|{{Yes}}
|-
|colspan="2" |Recording the traveller's entry/exit in a database<br />As of April 2016, only 10 Schengen Member States—Estonia, Finland, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia and Spain—record third-country nationals' entries and exits in their national databases, but data is not exchanged between the national databases of these countries, nor is there a Schengen-wide centralised database tracking entries and exits in all 27 Schengen Member States.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52016SC0115 |title=Commission Staff Working Document: Impact Assessment Report on the establishment of an EU Entry Exit System, pg. 11 |date=6 April 2016
|{{partial|Optional}}
|{{partial|Optional}}
Line 713 ⟶ 704:
|{{partial|Optional}}
|-
|colspan="2" |Checking the authenticity of the short-stay visa (if required) and the identity of its holder by consulting the [[Visa Information System]]<ref>This obligation does '''not''' apply to long-stay visas and residence permits, both of which are expressly outside the scope of [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32008R0767 Regulation (EC) No 767/2008 concerning the Visa Information System] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210304083956/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex:32008R0767 |date=4 March 2021 }} (cf Article 4(1)).</ref>
|{{No}}
|{{Yes}}
Line 720 ⟶ 711:
|colspan="2" |Examining entry and exit stamps in the travel document to ensure that the traveller has not exceeded the maximum duration of authorised stay
|{{No}}
|{{Yes|Yes (with some exceptions)}}<ref>In relation to third country nationals who are not subject to the obligation to have their travel documents stamped (e.g. third country nationals holding residence permits issued by a Schengen member state), it can logically be concluded that border guards at external border crossing points do not need to examine entry and exit stamps in their travel documents to ensure that they have not exceeded the maximum duration of authorised stay. Instead, the border guard should check the validity of the residence permit. (See Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the operation of the provisions on stamping of the travel documents of third-country nationals in accordance with Articles 10 and 11 of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52009DC0489 COM (2009) 489, p. 7] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220619221516/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52009DC0489 |date=19 June 2022 }}), "The Commission is of the opinion that travel documents of third-country nationals who are in possession of a valid residence permit issued by a Schengen Member State should not be stamped. The purpose of stamping a passport serves to establish whether a third country national respected the authorised length of a short stay within the Schengen area. This logic cannot be applied to third country nationals holding a valid residence permit, as the allowed period of stay in the Schengen Member State which issued the permit is determined by the validity of the residence permit.")</ref>
|{{partial|Optional}}
|-
Line 730 ⟶ 721:
|colspan="2" |Verifying the traveller's purpose of stay
|{{No}}
|{{Yes|Yes (with some exceptions)}}<ref name="Exempt TCNs">Some Schengen member states have exempted certain categories of travellers who are subject to a thorough check from the requirement to demonstrate sufficient funds for their stay, proof of onward/return journey and explaining their purpose of stay to the border guard at external border crossing points. For example, France exempts Andorran and Monégasque nationals, holders of residence permits and family reunification visas, diplomats, flight crew etc. from this requirement (see [http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/fr/venir-en-france-22365/formalites-d-entree-en-france/article/controle-a-l-arrivee-en-france diplomatie.gouv.fr] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130827092050/http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/fr/venir-en-france-22365/formalites-d-entree-en-france/article/controle-a-l-arrivee-en-france |date=27 August 2013 }}).</ref>
|{{No}}
|-
Line 751 ⟶ 742:
As shown by the table above, because many procedures are optional, border guards have discretion in deciding how rigorously they check travellers at external border crossing points. As a result, the length of time taken to perform checks differs between Schengen countries. Under the previous regime (whereby those with the right to freedom of movement were subject only to a 'minimum check'), an entry check for an EEA or Swiss citizen took around five seconds on average in Italy, whilst in Norway, on average it took around 1 minute.<ref name="Entryexit2"/> The disparities in checks on third-country nationals (who are subject to a more thorough check) are even greater. For example, an entry check for an [[Visa policy of the European Union#Visa requirements for the Schengen Area, Bulgaria, Cyprus and Romania|Annex II]] national takes around 15 seconds on average in Greece, whilst it takes three to five minutes on average in Slovakia.<ref name="Entryexit1"/><ref name="Entryexit3"/> Similarly, an entry check for an [[Visa policy of the European Union#Visa requirements for the Schengen Area, Bulgaria, Cyprus and Romania|Annex I]] national on average lasts around 30–60 seconds in the Netherlands, whilst in Latvia, it lasts around two to five minutes on average.<ref name="Entryexit1"/>
After the new regime came into force on 7 April 2017, significantly longer waiting times were reported at numerous external border crossing points, especially as it was just before the [[Easter]] holiday. Travellers entering [[Slovenia]] from [[Croatia]] (which was not yet part of the Schengen Area) had to wait several hours as Slovenian [[border guard]]s systematically checked the travel documents of all travellers (including those with the right of free movement) against relevant databases.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.apnews.com/c2dd5f19864e483080e44ec0a5c36af1 |title=New EU Border Controls Create Traffic Nightmare |work=[[Associated Press]] |date=
When carrying out checks at external borders, border guards are, by law, required to respect the dignity of travellers (particularly in cases involving vulnerable persons)<ref>Regulation (EU) No 610/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code), the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement, Council Regulations (EC) No 1683/95 and (EC) No 539/2001 and Regulations (EC) No 767/2008 and (EC) No 810/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32013R0610 OJ L 182, 29 June 2013, p. 5] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211020075944/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32013R0610 |date=20 October 2021 }})</ref> and are forbidden from discriminating against persons based on their sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation.<ref>Article 7, Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32016R0399 OJ L 77, 23 March 2016, p. 1] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211105080924/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32016R0399 |date=5 November 2021 }})</ref>
External border controls are located at roads crossing a border, at airports, at seaports and on board trains.<ref>Details are set out in Annex VI of the Schengen Borders Code ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R0562:EN:NOT OJ L 105, 13 April 2006, p. 1] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131114121129/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R0562:EN:NOT |date=14 November 2013 }}).</ref> Usually, there is no fence along the land border, but there are exceptions like the [[Ceuta border fence]], and some places at the eastern border.<ref>For example, this place at the Lithuania-Belarus border: {{coord|54.275048|25.562439|display=inline}}, visible in Google Streetview.</ref> However, surveillance camera systems, some equipped with infrared technology, are located at some more critical spots, for example at the border between Slovakia and Ukraine, where at some points there is a camera every {{convert|186|m|yd|abbr=off}}.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cafebabel.co.uk/article/23469/smuggling-cigarettes-in-schengen-slovakia.html |title=Smuggling cigarettes in Schengen Slovakia |date=9 January 2008 |access-date=6 September 2011 |archive-date=10 August 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120810161926/http://www.cafebabel.co.uk/article/23469/smuggling-cigarettes-in-schengen-slovakia.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
All travellers entering and leaving the Schengen Area by [[general aviation]] or on a pleasure boat have to make their first point of entry/final point of departure in an airport/[[aerodrome]] or a seaport that is designated as an external border crossing point. By way of derogation, travellers on board a pleasure boat are permitted to make their first port of call at a port that is not designated as an external border crossing point if they notify the port authorities and obtain authorisation from the border guards.<ref>Points 2.
At many external border crossing points, there are special lanes for EEA and Swiss citizens (as well as their family members) and other lanes for all travellers regardless of nationality.<ref>Article 9 of the Schengen Borders Code ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32006R0562 OJ L 105, 13 April 2006, p. 8] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210321182103/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32006R0562 |date=21 March 2021 }}).</ref> At some external border crossing points, there is a third type of lane for travellers who are [[Visa policy of the European Union#Schengen Area, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus and Romania|Annex II nationals]] (i.e. non-EEA/Swiss citizens who are exempt from the visa requirement).<ref>Regulation (EU) No 610/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code), the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement, Council Regulations (EC) No 1683/95 and (EC) No 539/2001 and Regulations (EC) No 767/2008 and (EC) No 810/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32013R0610 OJ L 182, 29 June 2013, p. 6] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211020075944/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32013R0610 |date=20 October 2021 }})</ref> Although [[Andorran nationality law|Andorran]] and Sammarinese citizens are not EEA citizens, they are nonetheless able to use the special lanes designated for EEA and Swiss citizens.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.exteriors.ad/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=77&Itemid=39&lang=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130501112729/http://www.exteriors.ad/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=77&Itemid=39&lang=en|url-status=dead|title=Decision on the subject of Andorra and San Marino of the Strategic Committee on Immigration, Frontiers and Asylum (SCIFA) of the EU on 6 October 2004 (13020/1/04/REV1).|archive-date=1 May 2013}}</ref> Since 1 January 2021, British citizens are no longer permitted to use the EEA/Swiss lanes.
Some external border crossing points can only be used by certain travellers. For example, the border checkpoint in [[Veľké Slemence]],
The additional obligations imposed by European law on national border authorities when it comes to processing travellers who are third-country nationals (e.g. the obligation to [[#Passport stamp|stamp their travel documents]]) should not prevent the development of [[automated border control system]]s which are made available to such travellers. As shown by the examples listed above of automated border control systems which have been developed at external border crossing points of the Schengen Area, national border authorities have been able to adapt the design of their automated border control systems to allow third-country nationals to make use of them. One solution is to have a border guard physically positioned next to the automated border gates who can stamp travel documents where required: this approach has been adopted by the [[Finnish Border Guard]] at the automated border gates in [[Helsinki Airport]], where eligible users (who are required to receive a passport stamp) include holders of [[Australian passport|Australian]], [[Canadian passport|Canadian]], [[Japanese passport|Japanese]], [[New Zealand passport|New Zealand]], [[South Korean passport|South Korean]] and [[United States passport|United States]] [[biometric passport]]s,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://cwtjet.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/Automated_Border_Control_Gates.17161248.pdf |title=How To Use The Automated Border Control Gates |work=Finnair Info |access-date=
The Portuguese [[Serviço de Estrangeiros e Fronteiras]] has also adopted the practice of positioning a border guard for stamping next to the automated border gates in [[Lisbon Airport]] where eligible users (who are required to receive a passport stamp) include holders of [[Angolan passport|Angolan]] and [[Brazilian passport|Brazilian]] passports and holders of [[Diplomatic passport|diplomatic/service passports]]. This approach has also been adopted in Italy, where eligible users of [[EGate (Italy)|eGates]] include holders of [[Australian passport|Australian]], [[Canadian passport|Canadian]], [[Israeli passport|Israeli]], [[Japanese passport|Japanese]], [[New Zealand passport|New Zealand]], [[Singaporean passport|Singaporean]], [[South Korean passport|South Korean]], [[United States passport|United States]] and [[Vatican passport|Vatican]] [[biometric passport]]s. A similar but slightly different solution has been adopted by the Dutch [[Royal Marechaussee]] at the Privium [[iris recognition]] automated border gates at [[Amsterdam Airport Schiphol]] (where eligible users include registered EU/EEA/Swiss citizens, US citizens who are [[Global Entry]] members, and all nationals who are holders of [[diplomatic passport]]s), as well as by the [[Federal Police (Germany)|German Federal Police]] at the ABG Plus [[iris recognition]] automated border gates at [[Frankfurt Airport]] (where eligible users include registered EU/EEA/Swiss citizens and US citizens who are [[Global Entry]] members: when eligible third-country nationals use Privium/ABG Plus, after their iris is scanned and verified, a different gate/door/turnstile opens to that for EU/EEA/Swiss citizens and the third-country national user is directed to a lane which leads them to the front of the queue for manual passport checks at immigration desks, where the border guard stamps the user's passport. Another possible solution would be to design the automated border gates to print a paper slip with an entry or exit stamp on it, as well as the user's name and travel document number, whenever the user is a traveller who is subject to the requirement to have their travel document stamped.<ref>Art 11(3) of the Schengen Borders Code (Regulation (EU) 2016/399) recognises that an entry or exit stamp may be recorded on a sheet of paper indicating the traveller's name and travel document number (rather than inside the traveller's travel document) where stamping the travel document would cause 'serious difficulties' for the traveller. It could be argued that at a particular border crossing point the state of facilities are such that to deny travellers subject to the stamping obligation access to automated border gates and to require them to be processed manually by border guards would constitute 'serious difficulties' for such persons.</ref>
Sometimes, external border controls are located on non-Schengen territory. For example, the [[French Border Police]] operates border checks at [[juxtaposed controls]] on travellers departing the United Kingdom for the Schengen Area before they board their train or ferry at [[St Pancras railway station|St Pancras International]], [[Ebbsfleet International railway station|Ebbsfleet International]] and [[Ashford International railway station|Ashford International]] railway stations, as well as at the [[Port of Dover]] and the [[Eurotunnel Folkestone Terminal]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1993/1813/contents/made |title=Channel Tunnel (International Arrangements) Order 1993 |publisher=Legislation.gov.uk |date=
====ETIAS====
{{main|European Travel Information and Authorisation System}}
In November 2016 the European Commission proposed a system for an electronic authorisation of visa-exempt third country nationals called ETIAS (European Travel Information and Authorisation System).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52016PC0731|title=EUR-Lex
ETIAS requirements will, in general, apply to those third country nationals who are not required to have a visa and have no residence permit or similar.
====Carrier's responsibility====
Schengen rules require that all carriers conveying passengers across the Schengen external border must check, before boarding, that passengers have the correct travel documents and visas required for entry.<ref>Article 26(1)(b) of the Schengen Convention.</ref> Carriers that transport third-country nationals without the correct travel documents are imposed with financial penalties and are required to transport those refused entry back to the point of departure.<ref>Council Directive 2001/51/EC of 28 June 2001 supplementing the provisions of Article 26 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 (Carriers Liability Directive) ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32001L0051 OJ L 187, 10 July 2001, p. 45] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210225063353/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32001L0051 |date=25 February 2021 }})</ref> The aim of this measure is to prevent illegal immigration. Further, since immigrants have the [[Right of asylum|right to apply for asylum]] at border control at ports of entry in the EU, though such applications must be made in person in the country where asylum status is sought, this measure has the effect of preventing prospective asylum seekers from boarding public transportation to the Schengen Area (unless they have already obtained a Schengen visa or are visa-exempt).
===Short-stay and transit visas===
Line 787 ⟶ 778:
{{Main|Visa policy of the Schengen Area}}
The rules applicable to short-term entry visas into the Schengen Area are set out in EU regulations which contain two lists: a list of the nationalities (or classes of [[travel document]] holder) which require a visa for a short-term stay (the ''Annex I list'') and a list which do not (the ''Annex II list'').<ref name="visa regulations">Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 of 15 March 2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32001R0539:EN:NOT OJ L 81, 21 March 2001, p. 1] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131208233640/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32001R0539:EN:NOT |date=8 December 2013 }}).</ref>
Being listed in the visa-free list will sometimes but not always exempt the listed nationality or class from the requirement to obtain a work permit if they wish to take up employment or self-employed activity during their stay; business trips are not normally considered employment in this sense.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://bundesrecht.juris.de/aufenthv/__17.html |title=Section 17 of the German Aufenthaltsverordnung |language=de |date=25 November 2004 |access-date=28 November 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071222171653/http://bundesrecht.juris.de/aufenthv/__17.html |archive-date=22 December 2007}}</ref>
An application for a Schengen visa should be submitted to the embassy or consulate of the country which the traveller intends to visit. If a traveller plans to visit multiple countries in the Schengen Area, the application should be submitted to the embassy or consulate of the main destination. If the main destination cannot be determined, the traveller should apply for the visa at the embassy or consulate of the Schengen member state of first entry.<ref>Article 5 of the Visa Code (Regulation (EC) No 810/2009) ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32009R0810 OJ L 243, 15 September 2009, p. 1–58] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210227164027/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32009R0810 |date=27 February 2021 }})</ref> Often, external service providers are contracted by certain diplomatic missions to process, collect and return visa applications.<ref>Article 43 of the Visa Code (Regulation (EC) No 810/2009) ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32009R0810 OJ L 243, 15 September 2009, p. 1–58] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210227164027/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32009R0810 |date=27 February 2021 }})</ref>
The standard application fee for a Schengen visa is EUR 80. There is a reduced visa application fee of EUR 40 for children aged 6 to 12. The visa application fee is waived for children under the age of 6. Where an application is submitted to an external service provider, an additional service fee may have to be paid. The visa application fee (and the additional service fee, if applicable) are not refundable regardless of the outcome of the application.<ref>Article 16 of the Visa Code (Regulation (EC) No 810/2009), as amended by Regulation (EU) 2019/1155 ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32019R1155 OJ L 188, 12 July 2019, p. 25–54] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211020083118/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32019R1155 |date=20 October 2021 }})</ref>
===Entry conditions for third-country nationals===
A Schengen visa or a visa exemption does not entitle the traveller to enter the Schengen Area, but rather allows the traveller to seek entry at the border crossing point. The Schengen Borders Code lists requirements which third-country nationals must meet to be allowed into the Schengen Area. For this purpose, a third-country national is a person who does ''not'' enjoy the [[Directive 2004/38/EC on the right to move and reside freely|right of free movement]] (i.e. a person who is not an EEA citizen or Swiss, nor a family member of such a person).
The entry requirements for third country nationals who intend to stay in the Schengen Area for not more than 90 days in any 180-day period are as follows:<ref>Article 5 of the Schengen Borders Code ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R0562:EN:NOT OJ L 105, 13 April 2006, p. 1] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131114121129/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R0562:EN:NOT |date=14 November 2013 }}).</ref>
* The traveller is in possession of a valid [[travel document]] or documents authorising them to cross the border (a visa is not considered a travel document in this sense); the acceptance of travel documents for this purpose remains within the domain of the member states;<ref>See Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 of 15 March 2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32001R0539:EN:NOT OJ L 81, 21 March 2001, p. 1] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131208233640/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32001R0539:EN:NOT |date=8 December 2013 }}).</ref>
* The travel document must be valid for at least three months after the intended date of departure from the Schengen Area (although in a justified case of emergency, this obligation may be waived) and must have been issued within the previous 10 years;<ref>Regulation (EU) No 610/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code), the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement, Council Regulations (EC)
No 1683/95 and (EC) No 539/2001 and Regulations (EC) No 767/2008 and (EC) No 810/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32013R0610 OJ L 182, 29 June 2013, p. 1] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211020075944/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32013R0610 |date=20 October 2021 }})</ref>
* The traveller either possesses a valid visa (if required) or a valid residence permit;
* The traveller can justify the purpose and conditions of the intended stay and has sufficient means of subsistence, both for the duration of the intended stay and for the return to his or her country of origin or transit to a third country into which the traveller is certain to be admitted, or is in a position to acquire such means lawfully;
Line 807 ⟶ 798:
* The traveller is not considered to be a threat to public policy, internal security, public health or the international relations of any of the Schengen states.
However, even if the third-country national does not fulfil the criteria for entry, admission may still be granted:<ref>Articles 3 and 5 of the Schengen Borders Code ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R0562:EN:NOT OJ L 105, 13 April 2006, p. 1] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131114121129/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R0562:EN:NOT |date=14 November 2013 }}).</ref>
* On humanitarian grounds
* On grounds of national interests
Line 816 ⟶ 807:
====Passport stamp====
Certain travellers receive a [[passport stamp]] when entering and exiting the Schengen Area.
All
Regulation (EU) 2017/2226 envisages the establishment of an [[Entry-Exit-System|Entry-Exit System]] (EES) which will record third-country nationals' entries and exits when they cross the [[#Regulation of external borders|external borders]] of the Schengen Area in a central database, replacing passport stamps.<ref>Regulation (EU) 2017/2226 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2017 establishing an Entry/Exit System (EES) to register entry and exit data and refusal of entry data of third-country nationals crossing the external borders of the Member States and determining the conditions for access to the EES for law enforcement purposes, and amending the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement and Regulations (EC) No 767/2008 and (EU) No 1077/2011 ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32017R2226 OJ L 327, 9 December 2017, p. 20] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240223053359/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32017R2226 |date=23 February 2024 }})</ref> EES had been expected to enter into operation at the end of May 2023,<ref name="EUSmartBorders">{{cite web |url=https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/policies/schengen-borders-and-visa/smart-borders/entry-exit-system_en |title=Smart Borders |publisher=[[European Commission]] |access-date=21 April 2022 |archive-date=21 April 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220421055848/https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/policies/schengen-borders-and-visa/smart-borders/entry-exit-system_en |url-status=live }}</ref> but was delayed until 2025.
There are no systematic immigration checks when travelling between Schengen countries (i.e. crossing the [[#Regulation of internal borders|internal borders]] of the Schengen Area). Passport stamps are never issued when travelling between Schengen countries, even when immigration checks between Schengen countries are temporarily re-introduced.<ref name="Regulation 2006, p. 8">Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the operation of the provisions on stamping of the travel documents of third-country nationals in accordance with Articles 10 and 11 of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 ([http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0489:FIN:EN:PDF COM (2009) 489, p. 8] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130309133622/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0489:FIN:EN:PDF |date=9 March 2013 }})</ref>
When travelling to/from a non-Schengen country (i.e. crossing the [[#Regulation of external borders|external borders]] of the Schengen Area), the rules on stamping travel documents are as follows:<ref name="SBC Article 11">Article 11 of the Schengen Borders Code (Regulation (EU) 2016/399) ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32016R0399 OJ L 77, 23 March 2016, pp. 1–52] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200516040303/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A42000A0922%2802%29 |date=16 May 2020 }})</ref>
{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%;"
Line 835 ⟶ 826:
|
*Citizens of [[EU]] and [[EFTA]] member states exercising the right of [[Directive 2004/38/EC on the right to move and reside freely|freedom of movement]]
*Third-country nationals holding a [[residence card of a family member of a Union citizen|residence card issued under Article 10 of Directive 2004/38/EC]], but only if they are accompanying or joining a family member who is a citizen of an EU or EFTA state exercising their right of freedom of movement '''and''' presenting the residence card<ref>Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the operation of the provisions on stamping of the travel documents of third-country nationals in accordance with Articles 10 and 11 of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 ([http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0489:FIN:EN:PDF COM (2009) 489, p. 7] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130309133622/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0489:FIN:EN:PDF |date=9 March 2013 }})</ref>
*Third-country nationals holding residence permits issued by a Schengen member state<ref name="EUReport pp.6+9">Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the operation of the provisions on stamping of the travel documents of third-country nationals in accordance with Articles 10 and 11 of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 ([http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0489:FIN:EN:PDF COM (2009) 489, pp. 6 and 9] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130309133622/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0489:FIN:EN:PDF |date=9 March 2013 }}) "The Commission is of the opinion that travel documents of third-country nationals who are in possession of a valid residence permit issued by a Schengen Member State should not be stamped." "The Commission underlines that travel documents of third-country nationals who are in possession of a valid residence permit of a Schengen Member State are exempted from the stamping obligation on entry and exit."</ref> (including [[British nationality law|British]] citizens who hold residence status under Article 18 of the [[Brexit withdrawal agreement]])<ref>{{cite web |url=https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/brexit_files/info_site/borders_seminar_ppp_final_public.pdf |title=Brexit Readiness: treating UK nationals at the external Schengen borders and related issues |date=
*[[Andorran nationality law|Andorran]], [[Nationality law of Monaco|Monégasque]] and [[San Marino|San Marinese]] citizens
*Holders of [[#Local border traffic at external borders|local border traffic permits]]
Line 847 ⟶ 838:
[[File:Schengen Spain Stamp log.png|250px|thumb|right|Logbook recording which border guards are assigned passport stamps at the [[#Regulation of external borders|external border crossing point]] at the [[Port of Algeciras]] in Spain]]
Border officials are required, by law, to stamp the travel documents of third country nationals who do not qualify for one of the exemptions listed in the right hand column when they cross external borders,<ref>Council Regulation (EC) No 2133/2004 of 13 December 2004 on the requirement for the competent authorities of the Member States to stamp systematically the travel documents of third country nationals when they cross the external borders of the Member States and amending the provisions of the Convention implementing the Schengen agreement and the common manual to this end ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32004R2133 OJ L 369, 16 December 2004, p. 5–10] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221226213055/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32004R2133 |date=26 December 2022 }})</ref> even when border controls have been relaxed. However, nationals of [[Andorran nationality law|Andorra]], [[Nationality law of Monaco|Monaco]], [[San Marino passport|San Marino]] and Vatican City are exempt from this requirement, as are heads of state, whose visits were announced through diplomatic channels, and holders of local border traffic permits and residence permits issued by a Schengen member state.<ref>Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the operation of the provisions on stamping of the travel documents of third-country nationals in accordance with Articles 10 and 11 of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52009DC0489 COM (2009) 489, p. 7]</ref><ref>Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the operation of the provisions on stamping of the travel documents of third-country nationals in accordance with Articles 10 and 11 of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52009DC0489 COM (2009) 489, pp. 6 and 9] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220619221516/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52009DC0489 |date=19 June 2022 }}) "The Commission is of the opinion that travel documents of third-country nationals who are in possession of a valid residence permit issued by a Schengen Member State should not be stamped." "The Commission underlines that travel documents of third-country nationals who are in possession of a valid residence permit of a Schengen Member State are exempted from the stamping obligation on entry and exit."</ref> Certain exemptions also apply to the crews of ships and aircraft.<ref>Practical Handbook for Border Guards, Part II, Section I, Point 6.2 ([https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/e-library/documents/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/docs/c2019-7131-annex.pdf C (2019) 7131, 8 October 2019, p. 56] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230025715/https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/e-library/documents/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/docs/c2019-7131-annex.pdf |date=30 December 2020 }})</ref>
Exceptionally, if stamping a person's travel document would cause serious difficulties (such as political persecution), border officials can instead issue a sheet of paper detailing the person's name, travel document number and entry date and location.<ref name="SBC Article 11"/> However, in practice, border officials do not always stamp the travel documents of travellers as legally required.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_4361.html|title=Schengen Fact Sheet|date=4 October 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081004163015/http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_4361.html |archive-date=4 October 2008 }}</ref><ref name="Regulation 2006, p. 4">Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the operation of the provisions on stamping of the travel documents of third-country nationals in accordance with Articles 10 and 11 of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 ([http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0489:FIN:EN:PDF COM (2009) 489, p. 4] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130309133622/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0489:FIN:EN:PDF |date=9 March 2013 }})</ref> If a person who should have received an entry stamp cannot show one either upon request by a law enforcement officer or upon leaving the Schengen Area to a border official, the officer can presume that the person has been staying illegally in the Schengen Area and can expel them, unless the person can demonstrate using credible evidence (such as transport tickets and accommodation receipts) that they have not exceeded their permitted length of stay in the Schengen Area.<ref>Article 12 of the Schengen Borders Code (Regulation (EU) 2016/399) ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32016R0399 OJ L 77, 23 March 2016, pp. 1–52] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200516040303/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A42000A0922%2802%29 |date=16 May 2020 }})</ref>
Although, according to EU rules, third country nationals who hold residence permits should not have their travel documents stamped, [[France]] nevertheless requires third country nationals holding a ''visa de long séjour valant titre de séjour'' (a long-stay visa serving additionally as a residence permit for up to one year) to receive a passport stamp upon their first entry to the Schengen Area as a part of the process to validate the visa as a residence permit; without an entry stamp, the process cannot be completed.<ref>{{Cite web | url=http://vosdroits.service-public.fr/particuliers/F39.xhtml | title=Quel titre de séjour faut-il avoir pour rester en France plus de 3 mois ? | service-public.fr | access-date=1 January 2024 | archive-date=19 September 2015 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150919071039/http://vosdroits.service-public.fr/particuliers/F39.xhtml | url-status=live }}</ref>
Third-country nationals who otherwise fulfil all the criteria for admission into the Schengen area must not be denied entry for the sole reason that there is no remaining empty space in their travel document to affix a stamp; instead, the stamp should be affixed on a separate sheet of paper.<ref>Practical Handbook for Border Guards, Part II, Section I, Point 6.1 ([https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/e-library/documents/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/docs/c2019-7131-annex.pdf C (2019) 7131, 8 October 2019, p. 56] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230025715/https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/e-library/documents/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/docs/c2019-7131-annex.pdf |date=30 December 2020 }})</ref><ref>Practical Handbook for Border Guards, Part II, Section I, Point 6.4 ([https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/e-library/documents/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/docs/c2019-7131-annex.pdf C (2019) 7131, 8 October 2019, p. 57] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230025715/https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/e-library/documents/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/docs/c2019-7131-annex.pdf |date=30 December 2020 }})</ref>
Entry and exit stamps are applied in black ink, except for the red date stamp and a two-digit security code in the middle. The two-digit security code must be changed at least once a month,<ref>Annex IV of the Schengen Borders Code (Regulation (EU) 2016/399) ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32016R0399 OJ L 77, 23 March 2016, pp. 1–52] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200516040303/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A42000A0922%2802%29 |date=16 May 2020 }})</ref> although some Schengen countries (such as [[Greece]]) change security codes every day.<ref name="Regulation 2006, p. 8"/> The stamps bear the country abbreviation within a circle of stars in the top left hand corner, the name of the entry/exit border crossing point in [[Latin alphabet]] at the bottom, and an icon in the top right hand corner to denote the mode of entry/exit. Below the name of the border crossing point is an identifying number – a record is kept of the identity of the border officer to whom a given stamp is assigned at any given time.<ref>Annex II of the Schengen Borders Code (Regulation (EU) 2016/399) ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32016R0399 OJ L 77, 23 March 2016, pp. 1–52] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200516040303/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A42000A0922%2802%29 |date=16 May 2020 }})</ref> Entry stamps are rectangular and have an arrow into a square, while exit stamps are rectangular with rounded corners and have an arrow out of a square. The stamps do not indicate any maximum permitted duration of stay.
Border guards are required to ensure the secure storage of passport stamps in locked safes between shifts. Border posts are advised to set out clear responsibilities and instructions for the distribution and use of passport stamps.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.schengen.mira.gov.ro/English/Documente/utile/catutil/Updated%20EU%20Schengen%20Catalogue.pdf |title=Schengen Catalogue: External borders control recommendations and best practices |access-date=
According to [[European Commission]] recommendations and guidelines, stamps should be affixed in travel documents by border officials in the following manner:<ref name="Regulation 2006, p. 4"/><ref>Practical Handbook for Border Guards, Part II, Section I, Point 6.5 ([https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/e-library/documents/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/docs/c2019-7131-annex.pdf C (2019) 7131, 8 October 2019, p. 58] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230025715/https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/e-library/documents/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/docs/c2019-7131-annex.pdf |date=30 December 2020 }})</ref>
* in chronological order
* in a horizontal position
Line 868 ⟶ 859:
* if the travel document contains a multiple-entry Schengen visa, the stamp should be affixed on the page facing the one on which the visa is affixed
If a third-country national is refused entry to the Schengen Area, the border official is required to affix an entry stamp in the travel document, cancel the stamp by an indelible cross in blank ink and write the letter corresponding to the reason for the refusal of entry to the right-hand side of the cancelled stamp.<ref>Annex V of the Schengen Borders Code (Regulation (EU) 2016/399) ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32016R0399 OJ L 77, 23 March 2016, pp. 1–52] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200516040303/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A42000A0922%2802%29 |date=16 May 2020 }})</ref><ref>Practical Handbook for Border Guards, Part II, Section I, Point 8.4 ([https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/e-library/documents/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/docs/c2019-7131-annex.pdf C (2019) 7131, 8 October 2019, p. 68] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230025715/https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/e-library/documents/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/docs/c2019-7131-annex.pdf |date=30 December 2020 }})</ref>
By contrast, if a border official has affixed a stamp in a travel document by mistake (as opposed to a refusal of entry), the stamp can be annulled by drawing two parallel lines through the top left-hand corner.<ref>Practical Handbook for Border Guards, Part II, Section I, Point 8.6 ([https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/e-library/documents/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/docs/c2019-7131-annex.pdf C (2019) 7131, 8 October 2019, pp.
<gallery widths="150px" heights="120px" perrow="4" caption="Uniform design of Schengen member states' passport stamps">
Line 886 ⟶ 877:
For stays in the Schengen Area as a whole which exceed 90 days, a third-country national will need to hold either a long-stay visa for a period no longer than a year, or a residence permit for longer periods. A long-stay visa is a national visa but is issued in accordance with a uniform format. It entitles the holder to enter the Schengen Area and remain in the issuing state for a period longer than 90 days but no more than one year. If a Schengen state wishes to allow the holder of a long-stay visa to remain there for longer than a year, the state must issue him or her with a residence permit.
The holder of a long-stay visa or a residence permit is entitled to move freely within other states which compose the Schengen Area for a period of up to three months in any half-year.<ref>Regulation (EU) No 265/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 March 2010 amending the Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement and Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 as regards movement of persons with a long-stay visa ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32010R0265:EN:NOT OJ L 85, 31 March 2010, p. 1] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131014123658/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32010R0265:EN:NOT |date=14 October 2013 }})</ref> Third-country nationals who are [[Long-term resident (European Union)|long-term residents in a Schengen state]] may also acquire the right to move to and settle in another Schengen state without losing their legal status and social benefits.<ref>Council Directive 2003/109/EC concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32003L0109:EN:NOT OJ L 16, 23 January 2004, p.44] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140106152829/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32003L0109:EN:NOT |date=6 January 2014 }}).</ref>
[[Asylum seeker]]s who request international protection under the [[Geneva Convention]] from a Schengen member state are not issued a residence permit, but are instead issued, within three days of the application being lodged, an authorisation to remain on the territory of the member state while the application is pending or being examined. This means that, whilst their application for refugee status is being processed, asylum seekers are only permitted to remain in the Schengen member state where they have claimed asylum and are not entitled to move freely within other states which compose the Schengen Area.<ref>Article 6 of the Council Directive 2003/9/EC laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32003L0009 OJ L 31, 27 January 2003, p. 20] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210515191844/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32003L0009 |date=15 May 2021 }})</ref> Successful applicants who have been granted international protection by a Schengen member state are issued residence permits which are valid for at least three years and renewable, whilst applicants granted subsidiary protection by a Schengen member state are issued residence permits valid for at least 1-year and renewable, unless there are compelling reasons relating to national security or public order. Family members of beneficiaries of international or subsidiary protection from a Schengen member state are issued residence permits as well, but their validity can be shorter.<ref>Article 24 of the Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32004L0083:EN:NOT OJ L 304, 29 April 2004, p. 12])</ref> Applicants who have been granted temporary protection by a Schengen member state (as well as their reunited family members) are issued residence permits valid for the entire period of temporary protection.<ref>Articles 8 and 15 of the Council [[Directive 2001/55/EC]] of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and on measures promoting a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bearing the consequences thereof ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32001L0055 OJ L 212, 20 July 2001, p. 12])</ref>
However, some third-country nationals are permitted to stay in the Schengen Area for more than 90 days without the need to apply for a long-stay visa. For example, France does not require citizens of Andorra, Monaco, San Marino and the Vatican City to apply for a long-stay visa.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://vosdroits.service-public.fr/F16162.xhtml |title=Visas de long séjour pour la France |publisher=Vosdroits.Service-public.fr |date=8 April 2011 |access-date=12 March 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130126151919/http://vosdroits.service-public.fr/F16162.xhtml |archive-date=26 January 2013}}</ref> In addition, Article 20(2) of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement allows for this 'in exceptional circumstances' and for bilateral agreements concluded by individual signatory states with other countries before the Convention entered into force to remain applicable. As a result, for example, [[New Zealand nationality law|New Zealand citizens]] are permitted to stay for up to 90 days in ''each'' of the Schengen countries (Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland) which had already concluded bilateral visa exemption agreements with the [[New Zealand Government]] prior to the Convention entering into force without the need to apply for long-stay visas, but if travelling to other Schengen countries the 90 days in a 180-day period time limit applies.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/new_zealand/eu_travel/visa/index_en.htm |title=Delegation of the European Union to New Zealand: Frequently Asked Questions |publisher=Eeas.europa.eu |date=
===Entry conditions for family members of EEA and Swiss citizens===
Line 908 ⟶ 899:
Permits are issued with a validity period of between one and five years and allow for a stay in the border area of up to three months. Permits may only be issued to lawful residents of the border area who have been resident in the border area for a minimum of one year (or longer if specified by the bilateral agreement). Applicants for a permit have to show that they have legitimate reasons to cross frequently an external land border under the local border traffic regime. Schengen states must keep a central register of the permits issued and have to provide immediate access to the relevant data to other Schengen states.
Holders of local border traffic permits are able to spend up to 3 months ''every time'' they enter the border area of the country which has issued the permit (this time limit is far more generous than the "90 days in a 180-day period" normally granted to third-country nationals visiting the Schengen Area).<ref>{{cite web|title=Judgement of the European Court of Justice of 21 March 2013, Case C‑254/11, Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg Megyei Rendőrkapitányság Záhony Határrendészeti Kirendeltsége v Oskar Shomodi|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62011CJ0254:EN:NOT |publisher=Eur-lex.europa.eu|access-date=
Before the conclusion of an agreement with a neighbouring country, the Schengen state must receive approval from the [[European Commission]], which has to confirm that the draft agreement is in conformity with the Regulation. The agreement may only be concluded if the neighbouring state grants at least reciprocal rights to EEA and Swiss nationals resident on the Schengen side of the border area, and agrees to the repatriation of individuals found to be abusing the border agreement.
Line 917 ⟶ 908:
* Poland–Ukraine in July 2009.<ref name="local traffic 2011">{{cite news|first1=Anne |last1=Eckstein |title=Cross-border travel to become easier in Kaliningrad area |date=29 July 2011 |newspaper=Europolitics |url=http://www.europolitics.info/europolitics/cross-border-travel-to-become-easier-in-kaliningrad-area-art310843-46.html |access-date=27 August 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111002131024/http://www.europolitics.info/europolitics/cross-border-travel-to-become-easier-in-kaliningrad-area-art310843-46.html |archive-date=2 October 2011}}</ref>
* Romania–Moldova from October 2010.<ref name="local traffic 2011"/>
* Latvia–Belarus from February 2012.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://naviny.by/rubrics/english/2012/02/02/ic_articles_259_176699/ |title=Consulates in Belarus, Latvia begin issuing local border traffic permits |publisher=Naviny.by |date=
* Norway–Russia from May 2012.<ref name="notifications_under_article_19_en"/>
* Poland–Russia (Kaliningrad Area) from July 2012<ref>{{cite web|last=Staalesen |first=Atle |url=http://www.barentsobserver.com/en/borders/more-russians-get-visa-free-travelling-29-06 |title=More Russians get visa-free travelling |publisher=Barentsobserver.com |date=
* Latvia–Russia from June 2013.<ref>[https://www.academia.edu/13700780/Latvian_visa-free_border_zones_with_Russia_and_Belarus_what_are_they_and_why Latvian visa-free border zones with Russia and Belarus: what are they and why] academia.edu</ref>
* Romania–Ukraine from May 2015.<ref name="notifications_under_article_19_en">{{Cite web|url=https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/e-library/documents/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/docs/notifications_under_article_19_en.pdf|title=
* An agreement between Croatia–Bosnia and Herzegovina is applied on provisional basis, pending ratification.<ref name="notifications_under_article_19_en"/>
On 28 April 2014, Moldova was classified as an [[Visa policy of the Schengen Area|'Annex II' nationality]]. On 11 June 2017, Ukraine was classified as an 'Annex II' nationality. Therefore, Moldovan and Ukrainian citizens who hold [[biometric passport]]s no longer require a visa to enter the Schengen Area and Romania, thus obviating the need to apply for a local border traffic permit (unless they wish to spend more than 90 days in a 180-day period permitted by the visa exemption, given that local border traffic permit holders are allowed to stay for 3 months in the border area on each entry).
There are or have been plans for Lithuania–Russia, Poland–Belarus, Bulgaria–Serbia and Bulgaria–North Macedonia local border traffic agreements.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/local-border-traffic-at-external-land-borders.html|title=EUR-Lex
The agreement between Poland and Belarus had been due to enter into force by 2012,<ref>Second report on the implementation and functioning of the local border traffic regime set up by Regulation No 1931/2006 ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52011DC0047:EN:NOT COM/2011/0047 final])</ref> but was delayed by Belarus,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://visa-free-europe.eu/2012/05/belarus-plays-the-border-security-card-with-the-eu/ |title=Belarus Plays The Border Security Card with the EU |publisher=Visa-free-europe.eu |access-date=
In late 2009, Norway began issuing one-year multiple-entry visas, without the usual requirement of having family or a business partner in Norway, called Pomor-Visas, to [[Citizenship of Russia|Russians]] from [[Murmansk Oblast]], and later to those from [[Arkhangelsk Oblast]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.sikunews.com/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100928075653/http://www.sikunews.com/News/International/Traffic-flows-from-Murmansk-to-Kirkenes-8033|url-status=dead|title=sikunews.com|archive-date=28 September 2010|website=www.sikunews.com}}</ref> Finland is not planning border permits, but has issued over one million regular visas for Russians in 2011, and many of them multiple-entry visas. The EU was planning to allow up to 5-year validity on multiple-entry visas for Russians.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/06/03/51241897.html |title=5 years in Schengen for Russians |publisher=English.ruvr.ru |date=3 June 2011
There is also a similar system for local border traffic permits between [[Spain]] and [[Morocco]] regarding [[Ceuta]] and [[Melilla]]. This system is older and was included in the 1991 accession treaty of Spain to the Schengen Area.<ref name="AccessionSpain"/> In this case there are identity checks for anyone travelling to other parts of the Schengen Area (possible by boat and air only). Such checks are not the rule for other local border traffic zones.
Line 943 ⟶ 934:
===National security risk===
Hungary allows entry to the Schengen Area for persons from countries such as [[Belarus]] and [[Russia]] with limited security screening, resulting in a [[national security]] risk for the Schengen Area.<ref name="i463">{{cite web | last=Másolva | first=Link | title=Kémbank utáni kiskapu? Családostul, átvilágítás nélkül jöhetnek az orosz és belarusz "vendégmunkások" Magyarországra | website=Forbes.hu | date=25
==Police and judicial co-operation==
Line 951 ⟶ 942:
The vast majority of data entries on the SIS, around 49 million, concern lost or stolen objects. The European Council reports that in 2013 an average of 43 stolen vehicles a day were detected by authorities using the SIS database.<ref name="consilium.europa.eu"/>
A list of EU authorities with access to SIS is published annually in the [[Official Journal of the European Union]]. As at 24 June 2015, 235 authorities can use the SIS database.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52015XC0624(01)|title=List of competent authorities which are authorised to search directly the data contained in the second generation Schengen Information System pursuant to Article 31(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Article 46(8) of Council Decision 2007/533/JHA on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System|date=1 January 2015}}</ref> The SIS database is operationally managed by [[eu-LISA]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.eulisa.europa.eu/AboutUs/WhoWeAre/Pages/default.aspx|title=Pages
The Schengen Agreement also allows police officers from one participating state to follow suspects across borders both in [[hot pursuit]]<ref name="BBC-Schengen">{{cite web|title=Q&A: Schengen Agreement|date=12 March 2012 |publisher=BBC|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13194723 |access-date=9 February 2013}}</ref> and to continue observation operations, and for enhanced mutual assistance in criminal matters.<ref>Title III, Chapter 2 of the Schengen Convention.</ref>
Line 1,010 ⟶ 1,001:
** Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32006R1987 OJ L 381, 28 December 2006, p. 4]).
** Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32008D0615:EN:NOT OJ L 210, 6 August 2008, p. 1]).
** Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32016R0399 EUR-Lex
{{Visa policies in the European Union}}
|