Amir al-Mu'minin: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
fixes
Tags: references removed Visual edit: Switched
Reverted 1 edit by DayofGrasp (talk): WP:BLOCKEVADE
 
(28 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 2:
{{Short description|Title designating the supreme leader of an Islamic community}}
{{About|the Islamic title|the leader of the Taliban|Supreme Leader of Afghanistan|the Indonesian footballer named from this title|Amirul Mukminin}}
'''{{Transliteration|ar|Amir al-Mu'minin}}''' ({{lang-ar|أَمِيْر ٱلْمُؤْمِنِيْن|amīr al-muʾminīn}}) is a [[Muslims|Muslim]] title designating the supreme leader of an Islamic community. It is usually translated as "'''Commander of the Faithful'''", though sometimes also as "'''Prince of the Believers'''", a translation deriving from the fact that the word [[emir|{{transl|ar|amir}}]] is used as a princely title in states ruled by the royalty or monarchies. However, according to [[Oriental studies|orientalist]] historian [[H. A. R. Gibb|H.A.R. Gibb]], this translation is "neither philologically nor historically correct".{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}}
 
'''{{translit|ar|ʾAmīr al-Muʾminīn}}''' ({{langx|ar|أَمِيْر ٱلْمُؤْمِنِيْن}}) or '''Commander of the Faithful''' is a [[Muslims|Muslim]] title designating the supreme leader of an [[Ummah|Islamic community]].
==Historical usage==
The title derives from the common Arabic term designating a military commander, {{Transliteration|ar|[[amir|amīr]]}}, and was used for Muslim military commanders already during the lifetime of [[Muhammad]]. In this capacity it was, for example, borne by the Muslim commander at the [[Battle of al-Qadisiyya]].{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}} On his accession in 634, the second caliph [[Umar]] ({{reign|634|644}}) adopted the title. This was likely not for its military connotation, but rather deriving from a [[Quran]]ic injunction to "Obey God and obey the Apostle and those invested with command among you" ([[Sura 4]], verses 58–62).{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}} According to [[Fred M. Donner]], the title's adoption marked a step in the centralization of the nascent Muslim state, as the {{Transliteration|ar|amīr al-muʾminīn}} was acknowledged as the central authority of the [[early Muslim conquests|expanding Muslim empire]], being responsible for appointing and dismissing generals and governors, taking major political decisions, and keeping the {{Transliteration|ar|[[divan|dīwān]]}}, the list of those Believers entitled to a share of the spoils of conquest.{{sfn|Donner|2012|pp=135–136}} From Umar on, the title became a fixed part of caliphal titulature;{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}} Indeed, it appears to have been the chief title of the early caliphs,{{sfn|Donner|2012|pp=98–99}} and the actual title of caliph ({{Transliteration|ar|khalīfa}}, {{lit.|successor}}) does not appear to have been adopted until the reign of the [[Umayyad]] caliph [[Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan]] ({{reign|685|705}}), when he adopted it as a means to strengthen his position, whose legitimacy had been shaky following the [[Second Fitna]].{{sfn|Donner|2012|pp=210–211}}
 
{{anchor|Etymology|Terminology|Translation}}
Among [[Sunnis]], the adoption of the title of {{Transliteration|ar|amīr al-muʾminīn}} became virtually tantamount to claiming the caliphate. As a result, the title was used by the great Islamic dynasties that claimed the universal leadership over the [[Ummah|Muslim community]]: the Umayyads, [[Abbasids]], and [[Fatimids]].{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}} In later centuries, it was also adopted by regional rulers, especially in the western parts of the Muslim world, who used the caliphal rank to emphasize their independent authority and legitimacy, rather than any ecumenical claim.{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}} The [[Caliphate of Cordoba|Umayyads of Cordoba]] adopted it in 928, whence it was also used by several other minor rulers of [[al-Andalus]]. From 1253, the [[Hafsids]] of [[Ifriqiya]] claimed the caliphate, and were followed by the [[Marinids]] of [[Morocco]], following whom all successive [[History of Morocco|Moroccan dynasties]]—the last two of them, the [[Saadi Sultanate|Sa'di dynasty]] and the current [[Alawi dynasty]], also by virtue of their claimed [[sharif|descent from Muhammad]]{{sfn|Pennell|2016|p=6}}—have also claimed it.{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}} The [[Constitution of Morocco]] still uses the term {{Transliteration|ar|amīr al-muʾminīn}} as the principal title of the [[King of Morocco]], as a means to "[legitimise the monarchy's] hegemonic role and its position outside significant constitutional restraint".{{sfn|Pennell|2016|p=7}}
==Name==
Although [[etymology|etymologically]] {{translit|ar|[[emir|ʾamīr]]}} ({{Langx|ar|أَمِيْر}}) is equivalent to English "[[commander]]", the wide variety of its historical and modern use allows for a range of translations. The historian [[H. A. R. Gibb|H.A.R. Gibb]], however, counsels against the translation "Prince of the Believers" as "neither philologically nor historically correct".{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}}
 
==History==
At the same time, the title has retained a connotation of command in the {{Transliteration|ar|[[jihad|jihād]]}} ('holy war'), and has been used thus throughout history, without necessarily implying a claim to the caliphate.{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}}{{sfn|Pennell|2016}} It was used in this sense by the early [[Ottoman sultans]]—who notably rarely used the caliphal title after they took it from the Abbasids in 1517—as well as various [[West Africa]]n Muslim warlords until the modern period.{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}} The title was used by [[Aurangzeb]], the sixth emperor of the [[Mughal Empire]].<ref name="Waseem2003" /> [[Muhammad Umar Khan]] of the [[Khanate of Kokand|Kokand Khanate]] took on the title.<ref name="Sobolev1876" />
The title {{translit|ar|[[emir|ʾamīr]]}} was used for Muslim military commanders during the lifetime of Prophet [[Muhammad]]. It was, for example, borne by the Muslim commander at the [[Battle of al-Qadisiyyah|Battle of al-Qadisiyya]].{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}} On his accession in 634, the second caliph [[Umar]] ({{reign|634|644}}) adopted the title. This was likely not for its military connotation, but rather deriving from a [[Quran]]ic injunction to "Obey God and obey the Apostle and those invested with command among you" ([[An-Nisa|Sura 4]], verses 58–62).{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}}
 
The title derives from the common Arabic term designating a military commander, {{Transliteration|ar|[[amir|amīr]]}}, and was used for Muslim military commanders already during the lifetime of [[Muhammad]]. In this capacity it was, for example, borne by the Muslim commander at the [[Battle of al-Qadisiyya]].{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}} On his accession in 634, the second caliph [[Umar]] ({{reign|634|644}}) adopted the title. This was likely not for its military connotation, but rather deriving from a [[Quran]]ic injunctionAccording to "Obey God and obey the Apostle and those invested with command among you" ([[SuraFred 4]], verses 58–62).{{sfnDonner|Gibb|1960|p=445}} According to [[Fred M. Donner]], the title's adoption marked a step in the centralization of the nascent Muslim state, as the {{Transliterationtranslit|ar|amīrʾAmīr al-muʾminīnMuʾminīn}} was acknowledged as the central authority of the [[early Muslim conquests|expanding Muslim empire]], being responsible for appointing and dismissing generals and governors, taking major political decisions, and keeping the {{Transliteration|ar|[[divan|dīwān]]}} ({{Langx|ar|دیوان}}), the list of those BelieversMuslims entitled to a share of the spoils of conquest.{{sfn|Donner|2012|pp=135–136}} From Umar on, the title became a fixed part of caliphal titulature;.{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}} Indeed, it appears to have been the chief title of the early caliphs,{{sfn|Donner|2012|pp=98–99}} and the actual title of [[Caliphate|caliph]] ({{TransliterationLangx|ar|khalīfa}}, {{خليفة|lit.|=successor|translit=khalifa}}) does not appear to have been adopted until the reign of the [[Umayyad Caliphate|Umayyad]] caliph [[Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan]] ({{reign|685|705}}), when hewho adopted it as a means to strengthen his position, whose legitimacywhich had beenbecome shaky following the [[Second Fitna]].{{sfn|Donner|2012|pp=210–211}}
[[Abdelkader El Djezairi]] assumed the title in 1834.{{Sfn|Esposito|2003|p=1}} The Afghan ruler [[Dost Mohammad Khan]] likewise used it when he proclaimed a {{transl|ar|jihād}} against the [[Sikh Empire|Sikh]] in 1836.{{sfn|Pennell|2016|p=2}}{{sfn|Shahrani|1986|p=35}}<ref name="Shahrani1986" /> According to historian Richard Pennell, this pattern reflects the use of the term {{transl|ar|amīr al-muʾminīn}} for regional rulers with the connotations of wide-ranging and absolute authority over a region, the power to conduct relations with foreign states, the upkeep of the [[Sharia]], and the protection of Muslim territory from non-believers.{{sfn|Pennell|2016|p=16}} [[Timur]] (Tamerlane) also used the title.{{Citation needed|date=September 2021}}
 
Among [[Sunni Islam|Sunnis]], the adoption of the title of {{Transliterationtranslit|ar|amīrʾAmīr al-muʾminīnMuʾminīn}} became virtually tantamount to claiming the caliphate. As a result, the title was used by the great Islamic dynasties that claimed the universal leadership over the [[Ummah|Muslim community]]: the [[Umayyad Caliphate|Umayyads]], [[Abbasid Caliphate|Abbasids]], and [[Fatimid Caliphate|Fatimids]].{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}} In later centuries, it was also adopted by regional rulers, especially in the western parts of the Muslim world, who used the caliphal rank to emphasize their independent authority and legitimacy, rather than any ecumenical claim.{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}} The [[CaliphateUmayyad state of CordobaCórdoba|Umayyads of Cordoba]] adopted it in 928, whence it was also used by several other minor rulers of [[al-Andalus]]. From 1253, the [[Hafsid dynasty|Hafsids]] of [[Ifriqiya]] claimed the caliphate, and were followed by the [[Marinid Sultanate|Marinids]] of [[Morocco]], following whom all successive [[History of Morocco|Moroccan dynasties]]—the last two of them, the [[Saadi Sultanate|Sa'di dynasty]] and the current [[Alawi dynasty]], also by virtue of their claimed [[sharif|descent from Muhammad]]{{sfn|Pennell|2016|p=6}}—have also claimed it.{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}} The [[Constitution of Morocco]] still uses the term {{Transliterationtranslit|ar|amīrʾAmīr al-muʾminīnMuʾminīn}} as the principal title of the [[King of Morocco]], as a means to "[legitimiselegitimize the monarchy's] hegemonic role and its position outside significant constitutional restraint".{{sfn|Pennell|2016|p=7}}
When [[Hussein bin Ali, King of Hejaz|Hussein bin Ali]] was buried in the compound of the [[Al-Aqsa Mosque]] [[Sharifian Caliphate|as a caliph]] in 1931, the following inscription was written on the window above his tomb:{{lang-ar|هَذَا قَبْرُ أَمِيرِ ٱلْمُؤْمِنِينَ ٱلْحُسَيْن بْنُ عَلِي|lit=Haḏa qabru ʾamīri ʾal-mūˈminīna ʾal-Ḥusayn bnu ʿAlī}} which translates to "This is the tomb of the Commander of the Faithful, Hussein bin Ali."<ref>{{cite book |author1=Muhammad Rafi |title=La Mecque au XIVème siècle de l'Hégire / مكة في القرن الرابع عشر الهجري |date=1964 |publisher=/ |location=La Mecque |page=291 |language=ar}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=IslamKotob |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iTBHCwAAQBAJ&pg=PT406 |title=الشريف الحسين الرضي والخلافة لنضال داود المومني |publisher=IslamKotob |language=ar |access-date=2023-12-26 |archive-date=2024-01-02 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240102085623/https://books.google.com/books?id=iTBHCwAAQBAJ&pg=PT406#v=onepage&q&f=false |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
At the same time, the title has retained a connotation of command in the {{Transliteration|ar|[[jihad|jihād]]}} ('{{Langx|ar|جِهَاد}}, "[[Religious war|holy war']]"), and has been used thus throughout history, without necessarily implying a claim to the caliphate.{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}}{{sfn|Pennell|2016}} It was used in this sense by the early [[List of sultans of the Ottoman Empire|Ottoman sultans]]—who notably rarely used the caliphal title after they took it from the Abbasids in 1517—as well as various [[West Africa]]n Muslim warlords until the modern period.{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}} The title was used by [[Aurangzeb]], the sixth emperor of the [[Mughal Empire]].<ref name="Waseem2003" /> [[Muhammad Umar Khan]] of the [[Khanate of Kokand|Kokand Khanate]] took on the title.<ref name="Sobolev1876" />
==Modern usage==
 
In 1996, the title was adopted by the [[Taliban]] leader [[Mullah Omar|Muhammad Umar]].{{sfn|Pennell|2016|p=2}} Mullah Mohammed Omar was conferred the title in April 1996 by a Taliban-convened [[shura]] (assembly) of approximately 1000-1500 Afghan [[ulama]] in [[Kandahar]], when he displayed the [[Shrine of the Cloak|Cloak of the Prophet]] before the crowd. The title granted legitimacy to Omar's leadership of Afghanistan and his declared jihad against the government led by [[Burhanuddin Rabbani]]. Omar was still referred to as Amir al-Mu'minin by his followers and other jihadists, notably al-Qaeda leader [[Ayman az-Zawahiri|Ayman al-Zawahiri]]. [[Akhtar Mohammad Mansoor|Mullah Akhtar Mohammad Mansoor]], the successor of Mullah Omar, was conferred the title in July 2015 upon his appointment as the new leader of the Taliban.<ref name="Joscelyn2015" /> [[Hibatullah Akhundzada]], the third [[List of Taliban leaders|Supreme Leader of the Taliban]], was also conferred the title upon his election in 2016 and became the [[Supreme Leader of Afghanistan|Leader]] of [[Afghanistan]] in 2021.<ref name="Voice" /> In 2005, the [[Islamic State]] leader [[Abu Umar al-Baghdadi]] adopted the title, nine years before the Islamic State proclaimed its caliphate in 2014.{{sfn|Pennell|2016|pp=2–3}} [[Abu Umar al-Baghdadi]] was conferred the title after his appointment in October 2006 by the Mujahideen Shura Council as the first Emir of the newly declared Islamic State of Iraq.<ref name="Kohlmann2006" /><ref name="Bunzel2015" /> As Richard Pennell commented, by claiming the title they positioned themselves as potential "caliphs-in-waiting",{{sfn|Pennell|2016|p=16}} but for the moment, the title was simply the expression of their claim to an overarching "activist authority" over the areas they controlled.{{sfn|Pennell|2016|pp=17–18}}
[[Emir Abdelkader|Abdelkader El Djezairi]] assumed the title in 1834.{{Sfn|Esposito|2003|p=1}} The Afghan ruler [[Dost Mohammad Khan]] likewise used it when he proclaimed a {{transl|ar|jihād}} against the [[Sikh Empire|Sikh]] in 1836.{{sfn|Pennell|2016|p=2}}{{sfn|Shahrani|1986|p=35}}<ref name="Shahrani1986" /> According to historian Richard Pennell, this pattern reflects the use of the term {{transltranslit|ar|amīrʾAmīr al-muʾminīnMuʾminīn}} for regional rulers with the connotations of wide-ranging and absolute authority over a region, the power to conduct relations with foreign states, the upkeep of the [[Sharia]], and the protection of Muslim territory from non-believers.{{sfn|Pennell|2016|p=16}} [[Timur]] (Tamerlane) also used the title.{{Citation needed|date=SeptemberAugust 20212024}}
 
When [[Hussein bin Ali, King of Hejaz|Hussein bin Ali]] was buried in the compound of the [[Al-Aqsa Mosque]] [[Sharifian Caliphate|as a caliph]] in 1931, the following inscription was written on the window above his tomb: {{lang-langx|ar|هَذَا قَبْرُ أَمِيرِ ٱلْمُؤْمِنِينَ ٱلْحُسَيْن بْنُ عَلِي|littranslit=Haḏa qabru ʾamīri ʾal-mūˈminīna ʾal-Ḥusayn bnu ʿAlī}}, which translates to "This is the tomb of the Commander of the Faithful, Hussein bin Ali."<ref>{{cite book |author1=Muhammad Rafi |title=La Mecque au XIVème siècle de l'Hégire / مكة في القرن الرابع عشر الهجري |date=1964 |publisher=/ |location=La Mecque |page=291 |language=ar}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=IslamKotob |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iTBHCwAAQBAJ&pg=PT406 |title=الشريف الحسين الرضي والخلافة لنضال داود المومني |publisher=IslamKotob |language=ar |access-date=2023-12-26 |archive-date=2024-01-02 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240102085623/https://books.google.com/books?id=iTBHCwAAQBAJ&pg=PT406#v=onepage&q&f=false |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
In 1996, the title was adopted by the [[Taliban]] leader [[Mullah Omar|Muhammad Umar]].{{sfn|Pennell|2016|p=2}} Mullah Mohammed Omar was conferred the title in April 1996 by a Taliban-convened [[shura]] ({{Langx|ar|شُورَىٰ|lit=assembly}}) of approximately 1000-1500 Afghan [[ulama]] in [[Kandahar]], when he displayed the [[Shrine of the Cloak|Cloak of the ProphetMuhammad]] before the crowd. The title granted legitimacy to Omar's leadership of Afghanistan and his declared jihad against the government led by [[Burhanuddin Rabbani]]. Omar was still referred to as Amir{{translit|ar|ʾAmīr al-Mu'mininMuʾminīn}} by his followers and other jihadists, notably al-Qaeda leader [[Ayman az-Zawahiri|Ayman al-Zawahiri]]. [[Akhtar Mohammad MansoorMansour|Mullah Akhtar Mohammad Mansoor]], the successor of Mullah Omar, was conferred the title in July 2015 upon his appointment as the new leader of the Taliban.<ref name="Joscelyn2015" /> [[Hibatullah Akhundzada]], the third [[List of Taliban insurgency leaders|Supreme Leader of the Taliban]], was also conferred the title upon his election in 2016 and became the [[Supreme Leader of Afghanistan|Leader]] of [[Afghanistan]] in 2021.<ref name="Voice" /> In 2005, the [[Islamic State]] leader [[Abu Umar al-Baghdadi]] adopted the title, nine years before the Islamic State proclaimed its caliphate in 2014.{{sfn|Pennell|2016|pp=2–3}} [[Abu Umar al-Baghdadi]] was conferred the title after his appointment in October 2006 by the Mujahideen Shura Council as the first Emir of the newly declared Islamic State of Iraq.<ref name="Kohlmann2006" /><ref name="Bunzel2015" /> As Richard Pennell commented, by claiming the title they positioned themselves as potential "caliphs-in-waiting",{{sfn|Pennell|2016|p=16}} but for the moment, the title was simply the expression of their claim to an overarching "activist authority" over the areas they controlled.{{sfn|Pennell|2016|pp=17–18}}
 
In 2005, the [[Islamic State]] leader [[Abu Omar al-Baghdadi|Abu Umar al-Baghdadi]] adopted the title, nine years before the Islamic State proclaimed its caliphate in 2014.{{sfn|Pennell|2016|pp=2–3}} [[Abu Omar al-Baghdadi|Abu Umar al-Baghdadi]] was conferred the title after his appointment in October 2006 by the Mujahideen Shura Council as the first Emir of the newly declared [[Islamic State of Iraq]].<ref name="Kohlmann2006" /><ref name="Bunzel2015" /> As Richard Pennell commented, by claiming the title they positioned themselves as potential "caliphs-in-waiting",{{sfn|Pennell|2016|p=16}} but for the moment, the title was simply the expression of their claim to an overarching "activist authority" over the areas they controlled.{{sfn|Pennell|2016|pp=17–18}}
 
==Shi'a views==
Line 22 ⟶ 30:
 
===Twelver===
[[Twelver Shi'ism|Twelver Shi'iteShias]] Muslims apply the title exclusively to Imam [[Ali]] [[Patronymic#Arabic|ibn]] [[Abu Talib ibn Abd al-Muttalib|Abu Talib]],{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}} the cousin and son-in-law of Muhammad, regarded as the first [[Imamate in Shia doctrine|Imamimam]] by the Shi'aShia and the officially designated successor to Muhammad. The Shi'a hold that he was the only one given the title during Muhammad's lifetime.<ref name="Majlesi"/>
 
===Ismailism===
The [[Isma'ilism|Isma'ili]] Fatimid caliphs used the title as part of their titulature,{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}} and in the [[Nizari Isma'ilism|Nizari]] branch of Isma'ilism, the {{Transliterationtranslit|ar|amīrʾAmīr al-muʾminīnMuʾminīn}} is always the current [[Imamate in Nizari doctrine|Imam of the Time]]. In [[Nasir al-Din al-Tusi]]'s ''The Voyage'' (''Sayr wa-Suluk''), he explains that the hearts of the believers are attached to the Commander of the Believers, not just the [[Quran|Command]] (written word) itself. There is always a present living imam in the world, and following him, a believer could never go astray.<ref>{{Citation|last=Virani|first=Shafique N.|title=Salvation and Imamate|date=2007-04-01|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311730.003.0009|work=The Ismailis in the Middle Ages|pages=165–182|publisher=Oxford University Press|doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311730.003.0009|isbn=978-0-19-531173-0|access-date=2020-11-17|archive-date=2024-01-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240102085648/https://academic.oup.com/book/1488/chapter-abstract/140901675?redirectedFrom=fulltext|url-status=live}}</ref>
 
===Zaydism===
Among the [[Zaydism|Zaydis]], the title retained strong connotations with the leadership of the {{transl|ar|jihād}}, and was thus the right of any rightful Imam who stepped forth to claim his right by force of arms.{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}} The title was thus part of the titulature of the Zaydi [[Imams of Yemen]] until the end of the Yemeni monarchy.{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}}

The [[Kharijites]] did not use the term, except for the [[Rustamid dynasty]].{{sfn|Gibb|1960|p=445}}
 
==Non-Muslim usage==
The ''[[Kitáb-i-Íqán]]'', the primary theological work of the [[Baháʼí Faith]], applies the title Commander of the Faithful to [[Ali]], the son-in-law of the Islamic prophet Muhammad.<ref name="Bahai"/>
 
A similar (but not the same) title{{clarify|date=FebruaryAugust 20202024}} was afforded to the [[Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth]]'s monarch as the Grand Duke of Lithuania by the [[Lipka Tatars]], who used to speak a [[Turkic languages|Turkic]] language. The title of sire was used "Vatad", as in "homeland" ("Vatan"), which meant "defender of the rights of Muslims in non-Islamic countries." The Grand Duchy was viewed as a new [[homeland]]. Vatad was viewed as a variation on the name [[Vytautas]] in Lithuanian or Władysław in Polish, which was known in the diplomatic notes between the [[Golden Horde]] and the countries of Poland (Lechistan) and Lithuania (Lipka) as "Dawood". One can claim that, since [[Casimir III the Great|Casimir the Great]], the Polish-Lithuanian monarch as the King of Poland was tasked with the protection of the rights of the Jews and other non-Christians.
 
==In fiction==
In [[James Joyce]]'s 1939 novel ''[[Finnegans Wake]]'' (page 34.6), an informer who is spreading nasty rumoursrumors about the main character is described as "Ibid, commender of the frightful".
 
In the [[French language|French]] comic series ''[[Iznogoud]]'', Caliph [[Haroun El Poussah]], one of the protagonists of the series, is frequently addressed by inferiors as commander of the faithful (''{{lang|fr|commandeur des croyants'' in the original French}}).
 
In [[Margaret Atwood]]'s 1985 dystopian novel ''[[The Handmaid's Tale]]'' leaders of the fictional [[The Handmaid's Tale|Republic of Gilead]], a militaristic [[theonomy]], are referred to as "Commanders of the Faithful."
 
{{Portal|Islam
}}
==See also==
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}
*[[Dua]]
*[[Sabr (Islamic term)]]
*[[Tasbih]]
*[[Salawat al-Sha'baniyya]]
{{Div col end}}
 
==References==
 
===Citations===
<references>
<ref name="Bahai">[http://reference.bahai.org/en/t/b/KI/ki-4.html] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210510211504/https://reference.bahai.org/en/t/b/KI/ki-4.html|date=2021-05-10}} "The Kitáb-i-Íqán PART ONE". BAHA'I REFERENCE LIBRARY. Retrieved 2014-09-11.</ref>
<ref name="Bunzel2015">{{cite journal |author=Cole Bunzel |title=From Paper State to Caliphate: The Ideology of the Islamic State |url=https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/The-ideology-of-the-Islamic-State.pdf |publisher=Center for Middle East Policy, Brookings Institution |location=Washington, D.C. |date=March 2015 |journal=The Brookings Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World |issue=Analysis Paper No. 19 |access-date=2016-09-25 |archive-date=2020-02-22 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200222184044/https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/The-ideology-of-the-Islamic-State.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
<ref name="EIQadir">{{cite encyclopedia |author=John Esposito |author-link=John Esposito |encyclopedia=The Oxford Dictionary of Islam |title=Abd al-Qadir |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6VeCWQfVNjkC&pg=PA1 |year=2003 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |pages=1 |isbn=9780195125597 |access-date=2015-04-25 |archive-date=2024-01-02 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240102085548/https://books.google.com/books?id=6VeCWQfVNjkC&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q&f=false |url-status=live }}</ref>
<ref name="Joscelyn2015">{{cite web |title=The Taliban's new leadership is allied with al Qaeda |author1=Thomas Joscelyn |author2=Bill Roggio |website=FDD's Long War Journal |date=2015-07-31 |url=http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2015/07/the-talibans-new-leadership-is-allied-with-al-qaeda.php |access-date=2015-10-14 |archive-date=2016-06-17 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160617003457/http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2015/07/the-talibans-new-leadership-is-allied-with-al-qaeda.php |url-status=live }}</ref>
<ref name="Kohlmann2006">{{cite web |author=Evan Kohlmann |author-link=Evan Kohlmann |title=Controversy Grows Over Supposed Unity of Iraqi Mujahideen as Al-Qaida Announces Founding of Sunni Islamic State |publisher=Counterterrorism Blog |date=2006-10-15 |url=http://counterterrorismblog.org/2006/10/controversy_grows_over_suppose.php |archive-url=http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20091013133844/http://counterterrorismblog.org/2006/10/controversy_grows_over_suppose.php |url-status=dead |archive-date=2009-10-13}}</ref>
<ref name="Majlesi">Majlesi, Bahar al-Anwar, Vol. 37, P. 339, hadith 81</ref>
<ref name="Sobolev1876">{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ad9EAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA27 |title=Latest History of the Khanates of Bokhara and Kokand |author=Leonid Nikolaevich Sobolev |date=1876 |publisher=Foreign Department Press |access-date=2017-11-15 |archive-date=2024-01-02 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240102085549/https://books.google.com/books?id=Ad9EAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA27#v=onepage&q&f=false |url-status=live }}</ref>
<ref name="Voice">{{Cite web |title=Statement by the Leadership Council of Islamic Emirate regarding the martyrdom of Amir ul Mumineen Mullah Akhtar Muhammad Mansour and the election of the new leader |date=2016-05-25 |website=Voice of Jihad |url=http://shahamat-english.com/2016/06/13/statement-by-the-leadership-council-of-islamic-emirate-regarding-the-martyrdom-of-amir-ul-mumineen-mullah-akhtar-muhammad-mansour-and-the-election-of-the-new-leader/ |access-date=2016-06-14 }}{{Dead link|date=June 2022 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>
Line 57 ⟶ 75:
</references>
 
===Sources===
* {{Cite book|last=Donner|first=Fred M.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qBzRj7OajmEC|title=Muhammad and the Believers: At the Origins of Islam|year=2012|publisher=Harvard University Press|isbn=978-0-674-06414-0}}
* {{EI2|last=Gibb|first=H. A. R.|author-link=H.A.R. Gibb|title=Amīr al-Muʾminīn|volume=1|page=445}}
* {{cite journal |first=Richard |last=Pennell |title=What is the significance of the title 'Amīr al-mu'minīn'? |journal=The Journal of North African Studies | year=2016 |volume=21 |issue=4 |pages=623–644 |doi=10.1080/13629387.2016.1157482|s2cid=148543546 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |year=2003 |title=Abd al-Qadir |encyclopedia=The Oxford Dictionary of Islam |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6VeCWQfVNjkC&pg=PA1 |access-date=2015-04-25 |last=Esposito |first=John |author-link=John Esposito |pages=1 |isbn=9780195125597 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240102085548/https://books.google.com/books?id=6VeCWQfVNjkC&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q&f=false |archive-date=2024-01-02 |author=John Esposito |url-status=live}}
* {{cite book |author=Nazif Shahrani |first=Nazif |author-link=Nazif Shahrani |editor1=Ali Banuazizi |editor2=Myron Weiner |editor2-link=Myron Weiner |title=The State, Religion, and Ethnic Politics: Afghanistan, Iran, and Pakistan |date=1986 |publisher=Syracuse University Press |page=35 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=l6cmuTfzvZEC&pg=PA35 |chapter=State Building and Social Fragmentation in Afghanistan: A Historical Perspective |isbn=9780815624486 }}
 
{{Authority control}}