God in Hinduism: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Provided Romanization to Sanskrit terms.
m Rollback edit(s) by ThomasPhams (talk): Addition of unnecessary/inappropriate external links (RW 16.1)
(14 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 12:
[[Hindus]] following [[Advaita Vedanta|Advaita Vedānta]] consider ''[[Ātman (Hinduism)|ātman]]'', the individual soul within every living being, to be the same as Vishnu, Shiva, or Devi,<ref>Mariasusai Dhavamony (1999), Hindu Spirituality, GB Press, {{ISBN|978-8876528187}}, page 129</ref>{{sfn|Olivelle|1992|pp=80-81, 210 with footnotes}}<ref>Ganesh Tagare (2002), The Pratyabhijñā Philosophy, Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|978-8120818927}}, pages 16–19</ref> or, alternatively, identical to the eternal and formless [[Absolute (philosophy)|metaphysical Absolute]] called ''[[Brahman]]''.{{refn|<ref name="Leeming 2014">{{cite encyclopedia |last=Leeming |first=David A. |author-link=David Adams Leeming |year=2014 |title=Brahman |editor-last=Leeming |editor-first=David A. |editor-link=David Adams Leeming |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion |page=197 |edition=2nd |publisher=[[Springer Verlag]] |location=[[Boston]] |doi=10.1007/978-1-4614-6086-2_9052 |isbn=978-1-4614-6087-9 |quote=For [[Hindus]], especially those in the [[Advaita Vedanta]] tradition, [[Brahman]] is the undifferentiated reality underlying all existence. Brahman is the eternal first cause present everywhere and nowhere, beyond time and space, the indefinable [[Absolute (philosophy)|Absolute]]. The gods are incarnations of Brahman. It can be said that everything that is Brahman. And it can be argued that Brahman is a [[Monotheism|monotheistic concept]] or at least a [[Monism|monistic]] one, since all gods – presumably of any tradition – are manifestations of Brahman, real only because Brahman exists.}}</ref><ref name="Halligan 2014">{{cite encyclopedia |last=Halligan |first=Fredrica R. |year=2014 |title=Atman |editor-last=Leeming |editor-first=David A. |editor-link=David Adams Leeming |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion |pages=134–135 |edition=2nd |publisher=[[Springer Verlag]] |location=[[Boston]] |doi=10.1007/978-1-4614-6086-2_54 |isbn=978-1-4614-6087-9}}</ref><ref name="BEH2">{{cite encyclopedia |author-last=Ram-Prasad |author-first=Chakravarthi |author-link=Chakravarthi Ram-Prasad |year=2018 |origyear=2010 |title=Brahman |editor1-last=Basu |editor1-first=Helene |editor2-last=Jacobsen |editor2-first=Knut A. |editor2-link=Knut A. Jacobsen |editor3-last=Malinar |editor3-first=Angelika |editor4-last=Narayanan |editor4-first=Vasudha |editor4-link=Vasudha Narayanan |encyclopedia=Brill's Encyclopedia of Hinduism |location=[[Leiden]] |publisher=[[Brill Publishers]] |volume=2 |doi=10.1163/2212-5019_BEH_COM_2050070 |isbn=978-90-04-17893-9 |issn=2212-5019}}</ref><ref>William Wainwright (2012), [http://stanford.library.usyd.edu.au/entries/concepts-god/ Concepts of God] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150323084508/http://stanford.library.usyd.edu.au/entries/concepts-god/ |date=23 March 2015 }}, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University</ref><ref>U Murthy (1979), Samskara, Oxford University Press, {{ISBN|978-0195610796}}, page 150</ref><ref name="Dissanayake 1993">{{cite book |author-last=Dissanayake |author-first=Wimal |year=1993 |chapter=The Body in Indian Theory and Practice |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lBYz5jgA4-8C&pg=PA39 |editor1-last=Kasulis |editor1-first=Thomas P. |editor2-last=Ames |editor2-first=Roger T. |editor3-last=Dissanayake |editor3-first=Wimal |title=Self as Body in Asian Theory and Practice |location=[[Albany, New York]] |publisher=[[SUNY Press]] |series=SUNY Series: The Body in Culture, History, and Religion |page=39 |isbn=0-7914-1079-X |oclc=24174772 |quote=The [[Upanishads]] form the foundations of [[Hindu philosophy|Hindu philosophical thought]], and the central theme of the Upanishads is the identity of [[Ātman (Hinduism)|Atman]] and [[Brahman]], or the inner self and the cosmic self. [...] If we adhere to the thought that the Brahman is the cosmic principle governing the universe and Atman as its physical correlate, the essence of Upanishadic thought can be succinctly stated in the formula Brahman = Atman.}}</ref>}} Such a [[Advaita Vedanta|philosophical system of ''Advaita'' or non-dualism]] as it developed in the [[Vedanta|Vedānta]] school of [[Hindu philosophy]], especially as set out in the [[Upanishads]], was popularized by the Indian philosopher, Vedic scholar, teacher, and mystic [[Adi Shankara|Ādi Śaṅkara]] in the 8th century CE, and has been vastly influential on Hinduism.{{sfn|Indich|2000|page=vii}}{{sfn|Fowler|2002|pp=240-243}}{{sfn|Brannigan|2009|page=19, Quote: "''Advaita Vedanta'' is the most influential philosophical system in Hindu thought."}} Therefore, Advaitins believe that ''[[Brahman]]'' is the sole [[Para Brahman|Supreme Being]] (''Para Brahman'') and [[Monism|Ultimate Reality]] that exists beyond the (mis)perceived reality of a world of multiple objects and transitory persons.{{refn|<ref name="Leeming 2014"/><ref name="Halligan 2014"/><ref name="BEH2"/><ref name="Dissanayake 1993"/>}}
 
Hindus following [[Dvaita Vedanta|Dvaita Vedānta]] consider that the ''[[Jiva|jīvātman]]'' (individual self) and the eternal and formless [[Absolute (philosophy)|metaphysical Absolute]] called ''[[Brahman]]'' in Hinduism exist as independent realities, and that these are fundamentally distinct.<ref>{{cite book|title=Viṣṇu, the Ever Free: A Study of the Mādhva Concept of God|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hITXAAAAMAAJ|page=227|publisher=Dialogue Series|author=Ignatius Puthiadam|year=1985}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|first=Edwin |last= Bryant| title=Krishna: A Sourcebook (Chapter 15 by Deepak Sarma)| publisher= Oxford University Press| year= 2007| isbn= 978-0195148923| page=358}}</ref> Such a [[Dvaita Vedanta|philosophical system of ''Dvaita'' or dualism]] as it developed in the [[Vedanta|Vedānta]] school of [[Hindu philosophy]], especially as set out in the [[Vedas]], was popularized by the Indian philosopher, Vedic scholar, and theologian [[Madhvacharya|Madhvācārya]] in the 13th century CE, and has been another major influence on Hinduism.<ref>{{cite book|title=Shankara and Indian Philosophy|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hshaWu0m1D4C|author=N. V. Isaeva|publisher=SUNY Press|year=1993|page=253|isbn=978-0791412817}}</ref> In particular, the influence of Madhvācārya's philosophy has been most prominent and pronounced on the [[Chaitanya Mahaprabhu|Chaitanya school]] of [[Bengali Vaishnavism]].<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=U8XVE0_TiLMC&pg=PA22|title=Philosophy of Śrī Madhvācārya|page=22|author=B. N. Krishnamurti Sharma|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass Publications|isbn=9788120800687|year=1986}}</ref>
 
== Henotheism, kathenotheism, and equitheism ==
Line 63:
== Monotheism ==
Monotheism is the belief in a single creator God and the lack of belief in any other Creator.<ref>Bruce Trigger (2003), Understanding Early Civilizations: A Comparative Study, Cambridge University Press, {{ISBN|978-0521822459}}, pages 473-474</ref><ref>Charles Taliaferro and Elsa J. Marty (2010), A Dictionary of Philosophy of Religion, Bloomsbury Academic, {{ISBN|978-1441111975}}, pages 98-99</ref> Hinduism is not a monolithic faith and different sects may or may not posit or require such a belief. Religion is considered a personal belief in Hinduism and followers are free to choose the different interpretations within the framework of ''karma'' and ''samsara''. Many forms of Hinduism believe in a type of monotheistic God, such as [[Krishnaism]] with polymorphic theism, some schools of [[Vedanta]], and [[Arya Samaj]].<ref>{{cite book|author=Eric Ackroyd|title=Divinity in Things: Religion Without Myth|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Bv8o5lGxtgAC&pg=PA78 |year=2009|publisher=Sussex Academic Press|isbn=978-1-84519-333-1 |pages=78 }}, Quote: "The jealous God who says, "Thou shalt have no other gods but me" belongs to the Jewish-Christian-Muslim tradition, but not to the Hindu tradition, which tolerates all gods but is not a monotheism, monism, yes, but not monotheism."</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Frank Whaling|title=Understanding Hinduism|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WudXAAAAYAAJ |year=2010|publisher=Dunedin Academic Press |isbn=978-1-903765-36-4 |pages=19 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Hiroshi Ōbayashi|title=Death and afterlife: perspectives of world religions|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ub8oAAAAYAAJ |year=1992|publisher=Praeger|isbn=978-0-275-94104-8 |pages=145 }}</ref>
 
[[Advaita Vedanta]], for instance, espouses [[monism]], and holds ''[[Brahman]]'' to be unchanging and undifferentiated from reality. ''Brahman'' is therefore undifferentiated from the individual self, or ''Atman''.<ref name="Leeming 2014"/><ref name="BEH3">{{cite encyclopedia |author-last=Ram-Prasad |author-first=Chakravarthi |author-link=Chakravarthi Ram-Prasad |year=2018 |origyear=2010 |title=Brahman |editor1-last=Basu |editor1-first=Helene |editor2-last=Jacobsen |editor2-first=Knut A. |editor2-link=Knut A. Jacobsen |editor3-last=Malinar |editor3-first=Angelika |editor4-last=Narayanan |editor4-first=Vasudha |editor4-link=Vasudha Narayanan |encyclopedia=Brill's Encyclopedia of Hinduism |location=[[Leiden]] |publisher=[[Brill Publishers]] |volume=2 |doi=10.1163/2212-5019_BEH_COM_2050070 |isbn=978-90-04-17893-9 |issn=2212-5019}}</ref> The concept is though by some, such as [[David Adams Leeming]] and [[Gavin Flood]], to resemble monotheistic conceptions of god to some degree, since all other since are believed to be manifestations of ''Brahman''.<ref name="Leeming 2014"/><ref name="Flood 2020">{{cite book | last=Flood | first=Gavin Dennis | title=Hindu Monotheism | publisher=Cambridge University Press | date=2020-07-23 | isbn=978-1-108-58428-9 | doi=10.1017/9781108584289}}</ref>
 
Several medieval Muslim scholars, such as [[al-Biruni]] and [[Amir Khusrau]], described Hinduism as fundamentally monotheistic in nature, and attributed polytheistic worship to a lack of education.<ref name="Friedmann, Yohanan 1975">Friedmann, Yohanan. "Medieval Muslim views of Indian religions." Journal of the American Oriental Society (1975): 214-221.</ref>
 
=== Madhvacharya's monotheistic God ===
[[Madhvacharya]] (1238–1317 CE) developed the [[Dvaita]] theology wherein Vishnu was presented as a monotheistic God, similar to major world religions.<ref name="mmyers"/>{{Sfn|Sharma|1962|p=7}} His writings led some, such as [[George Abraham Grierson]], to suggest he was influenced by [[Christianity]].<ref name=skhk177>Sabapathy Kulandran and Hendrik Kraemer (2004), Grace in Christianity and Hinduism, James Clarke, {{ISBN|978-0227172360}}, pages 177-179</ref> However, modern scholarship rules out the influence of Christianity on Madhvacharya,<ref name=skhk177/>{{Sfn|Jones|Ryan|2006|p=266}} as there is no evidence that there ever was a Christian settlement where Madhvacharya grew up and lived, or that there was a sharing or discussion of ideas between someone with knowledge of the Bible and Christian narratives, and him.{{Sfn|Sharma|2000|pp=609-611}} Furthermore, many adherents consider the similarities to be superficial and insubstantial; for example, Madhvacharya postulates three co-eternal fundamental realities, consisting of Supreme Being (Vishnu or paramatman), individual Self ([[jiva|jīvātman]]), and inanimate matter.{{Sfn|Sarma|2000}}
 
Madhvacharya was misperceived and misrepresented by both Christian missionaries and Hindu writers during the colonial era scholarship.{{Sfn|Sarma|2000|pp=19-25}}{{Sfn|Sharma|2000|pp=609-611}} The similarities in the primacy of one God, dualism and distinction between man and God, devotion to God, the son of God as the intermediary, predestination, the role of grace in salvation, as well as the similarities in the legends of miracles in Christianity and Madhvacharya's Dvaita tradition fed these stories.{{Sfn|Sarma|2000|pp=19-25}}{{Sfn|Sharma|2000|pp=609-611}} Among Christian writers, G. A. Grierson creatively asserted that Madhva's ideas evidently were "borrowed from Christianity, quite possibly promulgated as a rival to the central doctrine of that faith".{{Sfn|Sarma|2000|p=20}} Among Hindu writers, according to Sarma, S. C. Vasu creatively translated Madhvacharya's works to identify Madhvacharya with Christ, rather than compare their ideas.{{Sfn|Sarma|2000|pp=22-24}}
 
Modern scholarship rules out the influence of Christianity on Madhvacharya,<ref name=skhk177/>{{Sfn|Jones|Ryan|2006|p=266}} as there is no evidence that there ever was a Christian settlement where Madhvacharya grew up and lived, or that there was a sharing or discussion of ideas between someone with knowledge of the Bible and Christian narratives, and him.{{Sfn|Sharma|2000|pp=609-611}} Furthermore, many adherents consider the similarities to be superficial and insubstantial; for example, Madhvacharya postulates three co-eternal fundamental realities, consisting of Supreme Being (Vishnu or paramatman), individual Self ([[jiva|jīvātman]]), and inanimate matter.{{Sfn|Sarma|2000}}
 
== Brahman==
{{Main|Brahman|Para Brahman}}
Many traditions within Hinduism share the Vedic idea of a metaphysical ultimate reality and truth called ''Brahman''. According to [[Jan Gonda]], ''Brahman'' denoted the "power immanent in the sound, words, verses and formulas of Vedas" in the earliest Vedic texts. The early Vedic religious understanding of Brahman underwent a series of abstractions in the Hindu scriptures that followed the Vedic scriptures. These scriptures would reveal a vast body of insights into the nature of Brahman as originally revealed in the Vedas. These Hindu traditions that emerged from or identified with the Vedic scriptures and that maintained the notion of a metaphysical ultimate reality would identify that ultimate reality as Brahman. Hindu adherents to these traditions within Hinduism revere Hindu deities and, indeed, all of existence, as aspects of the Brahman.<ref>James Lochtefeld, ''Brahman'', The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Vol. 1: A–M, Rosen Publishing. {{ISBN|978-0823931798}}, page 122</ref><ref>Gavin Flood (1996), An Introduction to Hinduism, Cambridge University Press, {{ISBN|978-0521438780}}, pages 84-85</ref> The deities in Hinduism are not considered to be almighty, omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent, and spirituality is considered to be seeking the ultimate truth that is possible by a number of paths.<ref name=johnmurdoch141>;<br>{{cite book|author=Harvey P. Alper|title=Understanding Mantras|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=V8Upy4ApG_oC |year=1991|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass |isbn=978-81-208-0746-4|pages=210–211}}</ref><ref>Guy Beck (2005), Alternative Krishnas: Regional and Vernacular Variations on a Hindu Deity, State University of New York Press, {{ISBN|978-0791464151}}, page 169 note 11</ref><ref>Bruce Trigger (2003), Understanding Early Civilizations: A Comparative Study, Cambridge University Press, {{ISBN|978-0521822459}}, pages 441-442, '''Quote:''' [Historically...] people perceived far fewer differences between themselves and the gods than the adherents of modern monotheistic religions. Deities were not thought to be omniscient or omnipotent and were rarely believed to be changeless or eternal."</ref> Like other Indian religions, in Hinduism, deities are born, they live and they die in every [[kalpa (aeon)|kalpa]] (eon, cycle of existence).<ref>{{cite book|author=W. J. Wilkins |title=Hindu Gods and Goddesses |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=I67W9aqtfOwC&pg=PA354|year=2003|publisher=Courier |isbn=978-0-486-43156-7|pages=354 }}</ref>
 
In Hinduism, Brahman connotes the highest Universal Principle, the [[Absolute (philosophy)|Ultimate Reality]] in the [[universe]].<ref name="james122">{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5kl0DYIjUPgC|title=The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism|last=Lochtefeld|first=James G.|publisher=[[The Rosen Publishing Group]]|year=2002|isbn=978-0823931798|volume=1|pages=122}}</ref><ref name=ptraju>P. T. Raju (2006), ''Idealistic Thought of India'', Routledge, {{ISBN|978-1406732627}}, page 426 and Conclusion chapter part XII</ref>{{Sfn|Fowler|2002|pp=49–55 (in Upanishads), 318–319 (in Vishistadvaita), 246–248 and 252–255 (in Advaita), 342–343 (in Dvaita), 175–176 (in Samkhya-Yoga)}} In major schools of [[Hindu philosophy]], it is the material, efficient, formal and final [[Four causes|cause]] of all that exists.<ref name=ptraju/><ref>Mariasusai Dhavamony (2002), Hindu-Christian Dialogue: Theological Soundings and Perspectives, Rodopi Press, {{ISBN|978-9042015104}}, pages 43–44</ref><ref name=fxclooney>For dualism school of Hinduism, see: Francis X. Clooney (2010), ''Hindu God, Christian God: How Reason Helps Break Down the Boundaries between Religions'', Oxford University Press, {{ISBN|978-0199738724}}, pages 51–58, 111–115;<br />For monist school of Hinduism, see: B. Martinez-Bedard (2006), ''Types of Causes in Aristotle and Sankara'', Thesis – Department of Religious Studies (Advisors: Kathryn McClymond and Sandra Dwyer), Georgia State University, pages 18–35</ref> It is the pervasive, genderless, infinite, eternal truth and bliss which does not change, yet is the cause of all changes.<ref name=james122/>{{Sfn|Fowler|2002|pp=53–55}}<ref name="jeffreybrodd">{{Cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/worldreligions2000jeff|url-access=registration|title=World Religions: A Voyage of Discovery|last=Brodd|first=Jeffrey|publisher=Saint Mary's Press|year=2009|isbn=978-0884899976|edition=3rd|pages=[https://archive.org/details/worldreligions2000jeff/page/43 43]–47}}</ref> Brahman as a metaphysical concept is the single binding unity behind the diversity in all that exists in the universe.<ref name=james122/>{{Sfn|Fowler|2002|pp=50–53}}
Line 83 ⟶ 85:
Brahman is discussed in Hindu texts with the concept of [[Ātman (Hinduism)|Atman]] (Self),<ref name=sphilips/>{{Sfn|Fowler|2002|pp=49–53}} [[Personal god|personal]],{{refn|group=note|[[Saguna Brahman]], with qualities}} [[Absolute (philosophy)|impersonal]]{{refn|group=note|[[Nirguna Brahman]], without qualities}} or [[Para Brahman]],{{refn|group=note|Supreme}} or in various combinations of these qualities depending on the philosophical school.<ref>Klaus K. Klostermaier (2007), ''A Survey of Hinduism'', Third Edition, State University of New York Press, {{ISBN|978-0791470824}}, Chapter 12: Atman and Brahman – Self and All</ref> In [[Dualistic cosmology|dualistic]] schools of Hinduism such as the theistic [[Dvaita Vedanta]], Brahman is different from Atman (Self) in each being, and therein it shares conceptual framework of [[God]] in major world religions.<ref name=fxclooney/><ref name=mmyers>Michael Myers (2000), Brahman: A Comparative Theology, Routledge, {{ISBN|978-0700712571}}, pages 124–127</ref><ref>Thomas Padiyath (2014), ''The Metaphysics of Becoming'', De Gruyter, {{ISBN|978-3110342550}}, pages 155–157</ref> In [[Nonduality (spirituality)|non-dual]] schools of Hinduism such as the [[monism|monist]] [[Advaita Vedanta]], Brahman is identical to the Atman, Brahman is everywhere and inside each living being, and there is connected spiritual oneness in all existence.<ref name=jeffreybrodd/><ref name="Arvind Sharma 2007 pages 19-40">Arvind Sharma (2007), ''Advaita Vedānta: An Introduction'', Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|978-8120820272}}, pages 19–40, 53–58, 79–86</ref><ref>John E. Welshons (2009), ''One Soul, One Love, One Heart'', New World Library, {{ISBN|978-1577315889}}, pages 17–18</ref>
 
The Upanishads contain several ''mahā-vākyas'' or "Great Sayings" on the concept of Brahman:<ref name="EoH 270">{{cite book|last=Jones|first=Constance|title=Encyclopedia of Hinduism|year=2007|publisher=Infobase Publishing|location=New York|isbn=978-0816073368|pages=270}}</ref>
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-