Content deleted Content added
Diffusing Fooian-century BAR civil servants |
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Added magazine. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:21st-century American women lawyers | #UCB_Category 913/922 |
||
Line 93:
In this [[op-ed]], Slaughter states her support for the [[NATO]] use of force in Libya, describing a lack of NATO as an invitation for other regional regimes to increase their repression to remain in power. She frames the conflict as between value-based and interest-based arguments on intervention, stating that they cannot be distinguished from each other, and states her support for the role of President [[Barack Obama]] in helping to form an international coalition to oppose [[Muammar Gadhafi]]. Slaughter states that she supports the Libyan [[Transitional National Council]] draft constitutional charter and states that she supports comparisons to Iraq, arguing they might prevent similar mistakes in Libya.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://pomed.org/uncategorized/libya-op-eds-bar-too-high-and-challenging-skeptics/|title=Libya Op-Eds: "Bar Too High?" and Challenging Skeptics - Project on Middle East Democracy (POMED)|website=pomed.org|access-date=August 28, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160307073500/http://pomed.org/uncategorized/libya-op-eds-bar-too-high-and-challenging-skeptics/|archive-date=March 7, 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref>
On 25 August 2011, she was roundly criticized by [[Matt Welch]], who sorted through many of Slaughter's prior op-eds and concluded that she was a "situational constitutionalist".<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Welch |first=Matt |url=http://reason.com/blog/2011/08/25/anne-marie-slaughters-end-zone |
[[Clifford May]] on 15 October 2014 wrote a piece in which he drew a straight line between Annan and Slaughter's R2P "norm", and the failure in Libya. May noted that President Obama had cited the R2P norm as his primary justification for using military force with Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi, who had threatened to attack the opposition stronghold of [[Benghazi]].<ref>[http://townhall.com/columnists/cliffmay/2014/10/15/draft-n1905592/page/full townhall.com: "The Demise of 'Responsibility to Protect' at The U.N."], 15 October 2014</ref>
| |||