Content deleted Content added
Anachronist (talk | contribs) |
Randy Kryn (talk | contribs) →Presidential term limits 1789–1952: direct link |
||
(48 intermediate revisions by 35 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|
{{Politics of the United States}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=May 2024}}
In the United States, [[term limits]]
Term limits are also referred to as '''rotation in office'''.
== Historical background ==
=== Constitution ===
Term limits date back to the [[
The ancient [[Roman Republic]] featured a system of elected [[Magistrate|magistrates]] — [[Tribune|tribunes]] of the [[plebs]], [[aediles]], [[quaestors]], [[praetors]], and [[consuls]] — who served a single term of one year, with re-election to the same [[magistracy]] forbidden for ten years ''(see [[cursus honorum]])''. According to [[historian]] [[Garrett G. Fagan|Garrett Fagan]], office holding in the Roman Republic was based on "limited tenure of office" which ensured that "authority circulated frequently", helping to prevent [[political corruption|corruption]]. An additional benefit of the
Prior to [[independence]], several colonies had already experimented with term limits. The [[Fundamental Orders of Connecticut]] of 1639, for example, prohibited the colonial governor from serving consecutive terms by setting terms at one year's length, and holding "that no person be chosen Governor above once in two years."<ref>{{cite web|title=Fundamental Orders of Connecticut|url=http://avalon.law.yale.edu/17th_century/order.asp|website=avalon.law.yale.edu |publisher=Yale Law School Lillian Goldman Law Library|access-date=
The [[Articles of Confederation]], adopted in 1781, established term limits for the delegates of the [[Continental Congress]], mandating in Article V that "no person shall be capable of being a delegate for more than three years in any term of six years."<ref>{{cite web|title=Articles of Confederation: March 1, 1781 |url=http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/artconf.asp |website=The Avalon Project |publisher=Yale Law School Lillian Goldman Law Library |access-date=
On October 2, 1789, the Continental Congress appointed a committee of thirteen to examine forms of government for the impending union of the states. Among the proposals was that from the
=== Term limits in the Constitution ===
In contrast to the Articles of Confederation, the [[Philadelphia Convention|federal constitution convention]] at [[Philadelphia]] omitted mandatory term limits from the [[U.S. Constitution]] of 1789. At the convention, some delegates spoke passionately against term limits such as [[Rufus King]], who said "that he who has proved himself to be most fit for an Office, ought not to be excluded by the constitution from holding it."<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PJtRgu3wWWkC&pg=PA62 |title=The Politics and Law of Term Limits |editor-first1=Edward H. |editor-last1=Crane |editor-first2=Roger |editor-last2=Pilon |location=Washington, DC |publisher=Cato Institute |year=1994 |page=62|isbn=9781882577132
When the states ratified the Constitution (1787–1788), several leading statesmen regarded the lack of mandatory limits to tenure as a dangerous defect, especially, they thought, as regards the presidency and the Senate. [[Richard Henry Lee]] viewed the absence of legal limits to tenure, together with certain other features of the Constitution, as "most highly and dangerously [[Oligarchy|oligarchic]]."<ref>{{harvtxt|Ballagh |1911 |loc=Letter to Edmund Randolph dated
=== Presidential term limits
{{harvtxt|Korzi|2013}} says [[George Washington]] did not set the informal precedent for a two-term limit for the Presidency. He only meant he was too worn out to personally continue in office.{{sfn|Korzi|2013|pages=43–44}} It was Thomas Jefferson who made it a principle in 1808. He made many statements calling for term limits in one form or another.{{efn|text=See [https://famguardian.org/Subjects/Politics/ThomasJefferson/jeff1230.htm ''Family Guardian'', "Thomas Jefferson on Politics & Government."]}}
The two-term limit tradition was maintained unofficially for 132 years. It was unsuccessfully challenged by [[Ulysses S. Grant|Ulysses Grant]] in 1880,{{sfn|Stein |1943 |pp=71-116}} [[Theodore Roosevelt]] in 1912,{{sfn|Stein |1943 |pp=
The fact that "perpetuity in office" was not approached until the 20th century is due in part to the influence of rotation in office as a popular 19th-century concept. "Ideas are, in truth, forces," and rotation in office enjoyed such normative support, especially at the local level, that it altered political reality.<ref>{{harv|Struble|1979–1980|loc=p.650, footnote 6}}. The quotation is from Henry James, the biographer.</ref>{{efn|text=For a detailed study of the 19th-century concepts of rotation, consult {{harvtxt|Struble|1979–1980|p=650}}. See also {{harvtxt|Struble|2010}}; {{harvtxt|Young|1966}}.}}
During the [[American Civil War|
=== Era of incumbency ===
Line 37 ⟶ 40:
=== Term limits movement ===
A movement in favor of term limits took hold in the early 1990s, and reached its apex in 1992
Many of the laws enacted limited terms for both the state legislature and in the state's delegation to Congress. As they pertain to Congress, these laws were struck down as unconstitutional by U.S. Supreme Court in ''[[U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton]]'' (1995), in which the court ruled, on a 5–4 vote, that state governments cannot limit the terms of members of the national government.<ref name=Carey/><ref>''[[U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton]]'', 514 U.S. 779 (1995).</ref>
Line 46 ⟶ 49:
{| class="wikitable"
|+ Term limits by federal office
|-
!scope="col"| Office
!scope="col"| Restrictions
|-
!scope="row"| [[President of the United States|President]]
| Limited to being elected to a total of two four-year terms. If a vice president becomes president by succession and completes more than two years of said former president's unfinished term, they may be elected in their own right only once. A vice president who becomes president by succession and serves fewer than two years of their predecessor's term may be elected to two more four-year terms. Becoming the president by succession may happen to someone an unlimited number of times, for example, if they are vice president and the president dies, resigns or is removed from office via impeachment conviction.<ref>{{cite news |title=Why the Constitution permits a Gore-Clinton ticket |first=Michael C. |last=Dorf |publisher=[[CNN]] Interactive |url=http://archives.cnn.com/2000/LAW/08/columns/fl.dorf.goreclinton.08.01/ |date=
|-
!scope="row"| [[Vice President of the United States|Vice president]]
| Unlimited four-year terms
|-
!scope="row"| [[United States House of Representatives|House of Representatives]]
| Unlimited two-year terms
|-
!scope="row"| [[United States Senate|Senate]]
| Unlimited six-year terms
|-
!scope="row"| [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] and lower courts
| No term limits, appointed to serve "during good Behaviour"<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html |title=Transcript of the Constitution of the United States – Official Text |publisher=Archives.gov |access-date=
|}
Term limits at the federal level are restricted to the executive branch and some agencies. Judicial appointments at the federal level are made for life
=== President ===
{{Redirect|Four more years|the documentary|Four More Years{{!}}''Four More Years''}}{{Tone|date=November 2020}}
[[George Washington]]'s decision in 1796 not to run for a third term has often been given credit as the start of a tradition that no president should ever run for a third term.<ref>{{cite book|first=Susan|last=Dunn|title=1940: FDR, Willkie, Lindbergh, Hitler-the Election amid the Storm |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9ZUniR1uQcUC&pg=PA129|year=2013|publisher=Yale UP|page=129|isbn=978-0300195132
In the 1780s, about half the states provided term limits for governors.{{sfn|Korzi|2009|p=365}} The [[Constitutional Convention of 1787]] discussed the issue and decided not to institute presidential term limits.
[[File:Theodore Roosevelt's third term political cartoon.jpg|thumb|A political cartoon showing Washington rejecting Theodore Roosevelt's highly controversial run for a third term in 1912]]
In 1861, the [[Confederate States of America]] adopted a six-year term for their president and vice president and barred the president from seeking re-election. That innovation was endorsed by many American politicians after the Civil War, most notably by [[Rutherford B. Hayes]] in his inaugural address. [[Ulysses S. Grant|Ulysses Grant]] was urged to run for a third term in 1876, but he refused. He did try to win the 1880 nomination
[[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] (president, 1933–1945) was the only president to be elected more than twice, having won a third term in 1940 and a fourth term in 1944 (though he died in office three months into his fourth term). This gave rise to a successful move to formalize the traditional two-term limit by amending the [[U.S. Constitution]]. As ratified in 1951, the [[Twenty-Second Amendment to the United States Constitution|Twenty-Second Amendment]] provides that "no person shall be elected to the office of President more than twice."
=== Congress ===
[[File:Letter from Senator Hatch regarding Congressional Term Limits.png|thumb|Letter from [[Orrin Hatch|Senator Orrin Hatch]], first elected in 1976, expressing reservations regarding term limits (dated February 10, 2011)]]
[[File:Average Age of Congress.webp|thumb|Average
[[File:Percentage of Congress Over the Age of 70.webp|thumb|Percentage of Congress over the age of 70 through 2022]]
Reformers during the early 1990s used the [[initiative and referendum]] to put congressional term limits on the ballot in 24 states. Voters in eight of these states approved the congressional term limits by an average electoral margin of two to one.<ref>{{cite news |first1=Dana |last1=Priest |first2=William |last2=Claiborne |date=November 9, 1994 |title=Voters in Several States, D.C. Adopt Limits For Legislators |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/termlimits/stories/110994.htm}}</ref> It was an open question whether states had the constitutional authority to enact these limits. In May 1995, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5–4 in ''[[U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton]]'', {{Ussc|514|779|1995}}, that states cannot impose term limits upon their [[federal government of the United States|federal]] [[U.S. House of Representatives|representatives]] or [[United States Senate|senators]].
In the [[1994 U.S. elections]], part of the "[[Contract With America]]" Republican platform included legislation for term limits in Congress. After winning the majority, a Republican congressman brought a constitutional amendment to the House floor that proposed limiting members of the Senate to two six-year terms and members of the House to six two-year terms.<ref>{{USBill|104|HJRES|73}}, 104th Congress</ref> However, this rate of rotation was so slow (the life-tenured Supreme Court averages about 16 years) that the congressional version of term
Defeated in Congress and overridden by the Supreme Court, the federal term limit movement was brought to a halt. The term limits intended simultaneously to reform state legislatures (as distinguished from the federal congressional delegations) remain in force, however, in fifteen states.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://termlimits.org/term-limits/state-term-limits/state-legislative-term-limits/ |title=State Legislative Term Limits |publisher=US Term Limits |access-date=November 21, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |first1=Neil |last1=Pinney |first2=George |last2=Serra |first3=Dalene |last3=Sprick |title=The costs of reform: consequences of limiting legislative terms of service |journal=Party Politics |doi=10.1177/1354068804039121 |volume=10 |issue=1 |pages=69–84 |date=January 2004 |s2cid=145423773 }}</ref>
Line 105 ⟶ 110:
Legal scholars have discussed whether or not to impose term limits on the Supreme Court of the United States. Currently, Supreme Court justices are appointed for life "during good behavior." A sentiment has developed, among certain scholars, that the Supreme Court may not be accountable in a way that is most in line with the spirit of [[checks and balances]].<ref name=Calebresi>{{cite journal |first1=Steven G. |last1=Calebresi |first2=James |last2=Lindgren |title=Term Limits for the Supreme Court: Life Tenure Reconsidered |journal=Harvard Journal of Public Policy |volume=29 |number=3 |year=2006 |url=http://ssrn.com/abstract=701121 |via=Social Science Research Network }}</ref> Equally, scholars have argued that life tenure has taken on a new meaning in a modern context.<ref name="court2.0">{{cite magazine |first1=Richard |last1=Brust |url=http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/supreme_court_20/ |title=Supreme Court 2.0 |magazine=ABA Connection |date=October 1, 2008}}</ref> Changes in medical care have markedly raised life expectancy and therefore have allowed justices to serve for longer than ever before.<ref name="Calebresi" /><ref name=court2.0 /> [[Steven G. Calabresi]] and [[James Lindgren]], professors of law at [[Northwestern University]], argued that because vacancies in the court are occurring with less frequency and justices served on average 26.1 years between 1971 and 2006, the "efficacy of the democratic check that the appointment process provides on the Court's membership" is reduced.<ref name="Calebresi" /> There have been several similar proposals to implement term limits for the nation's highest court, including Professor of Law at [[Duke University]] Paul Carrington's "Supreme Court Renewal Act of 2005."<ref name=Carrington>{{cite web |first1=Paul |last1=Carrington |first2=Roger C. |last2=Cramton |date=January 28, 2005|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050207052334/http://paulcarrington.com/Supreme%20Court%20Renewal%20Act.htm |archive-date=February 7, 2005 |title=Supreme Court Renewal Act: A Return to Basic Principles |website=paulcarrington.com |url=http://paulcarrington.com/Supreme%20Court%20Renewal%20Act.htm }}</ref>
Many of the proposals center around a term limit for justices that would be 10,<ref>{{Cite web |last=diadmin |date=March 5, 2024 |title=Setting Term Limits for the US Government |url=https://www.differentpolicy.org/policies/setting-term-limits-for-the-us-government/ |access-date=April 25, 2024 |website=The Institute for Different Policy |language=en-US}}</ref> 18 years to 25 years in length. (Larry Sabato, Professor of Political Science at the University of Virginia, suggested between 15 and 18 years.)<ref name="Calebresi" /><ref name=court2.0 /><ref name="Carrington" /><ref name= Sabato>{{cite news |first=Larry J. |last=Sabato |url=http://crystalball.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/ljs2010041503/ |title=Reforming the Least Democratic Branch |date=April 15, 1010 |newspaper=Sabato's Crystal Ball: University of Virginia Center for Politics}}</ref> The staggered term limits of 18 years proposed by {{harvtxt|Calebresi|Lindgren|2006}} and {{harvtxt|Carrington|Cramton|2005}} would allow for a new appointment to the Court every two years, which in effect would allow every president at least two appointments.<ref name=court2.0 /> Carrington has argued that such a measure would not require a constitutional amendment as the "Constitution
[[Fairleigh Dickinson University]]'s PublicMind Poll measured American
Some state lawmakers have officially expressed to Congress a desire for a federal constitutional amendment to limit terms of Supreme Court justices as well as of judges of federal courts below the Supreme Court level. While there might be others, below are three known examples:
Line 119 ⟶ 124:
=== Gubernatorial term limits ===
[[File:United States gubernatorial term limits.svg|right|400px|thumb|U.S. gubernatorial term limits as of
{{Col-begin}}
{{Col-2}}
Line 133 ⟶ 138:
]]
Governors of thirty-
Uniquely, [[Virginia]] prohibits its [[Governor of Virginia|governors]] from serving consecutive terms, although former governors are eligible to serve again as governor after a specified period (currently, four years) out of office. Several other states formerly had this "no succession" rule (which was part of Virginia's original constitution in 1776), but all have eliminated the prohibition except Virginia by 2000 (including [[Mississippi]], which repealed it in 1986, and [[Kentucky]], which repealed it in 1992).<ref>Phillip O'Neill, "Virginia's 'No Succession" Rule: Democratic Pillar or Constitutional Relic?, 23 ''Richmond Public Interest Law Review'' 1 (April 2020).</ref>
The governors of the following states and territories are limited to two consecutive terms, but are eligible to run again after four years out of office: [[Governor of Alabama|Alabama]],<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.legislature.state.al.us/Codeofalabama/constitution/1901/CA-246125.htm |title=AMENDMENT 282 RATIFIED |website=Alabama Constitution |pages=Amendment 282 |access-date=
Equivalently, the governors of [[Governor of Indiana|Indiana]]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.in.gov/legislative/ic/code/const/art5.html |title=ARTICLE 5 |website=Indiana Constitution |pages=Article V, § 1 |access-date=
Finally, the governors of the following states and territory are limited to two terms
The governors of [[Governor of New Hampshire|New Hampshire]] and [[Governor of Vermont|Vermont]] may serve unlimited two-year terms. The governors (or equivalent) in the following states, district, and territory may serve unlimited four-year terms: [[Governor of Connecticut|Connecticut]], [[Governor of Idaho|Idaho]], [[Governor of Illinois|Illinois]], [[Governor of Iowa|Iowa]], [[Massachusetts]], [[Governor of Minnesota|Minnesota]], [[Governor of New York|New York]], [[Governor of Texas|Texas]], [[Governor of Utah|Utah]], [[Governor of Washington|Washington]], [[Governor of Wisconsin|Wisconsin]], [[Mayor of Washington, D.C.|District of Columbia]], and [[Governor of Puerto Rico|Puerto Rico]]. The governor of Utah was previously limited to serving three terms, but all term limit laws have since been repealed by the legislature.
In 2022, voters in
=== State legislatures with term limits ===
* [[Arizona State Legislature]]: four consecutive two-year terms for both houses (eight years). No limit on total number of terms.
Line 157 ⟶ 162:
* [[Colorado General Assembly]]: four consecutive two-year terms in the [[Colorado House of Representatives|House]] (eight years) and two consecutive four-year terms in the [[Colorado Senate|Senate]] (eight years). Former members can run again after a four year break.
* [[Florida Legislature]]: may serve no more than eight consecutive years in either house. No limit on total number of terms.
*[[Illinois Senate]]: Senate presidents and minority leaders may not serve for more than 10 years.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocNum=3&GAID=14&DocTypeID=SR&LegId=99248&SessionID=91&GA=100|title=Illinois General Assembly - Bill Status for SR0003|website=www.ilga.gov|access-date=
* [[Louisiana State Legislature]]: three consecutive four-year terms for both houses (twelve years). Members may run for the opposite body without having to sit out an election.
* [[Maine Legislature]]: four two-year terms for both houses (eight years). No limit on total number of terms.
* [[Michigan Legislature]]: twelve years combined in either chamber of the legislature.<ref>{{Cite web |last=DesOrmeau |first=Taylor |date=November 9, 2022
** Prior to the 2022 election, the limits were three two-year terms for [[Michigan House of Representatives|House]] members (six years) and two four-year terms for [[Michigan Senate|Senate]] members (eight years).
* [[Missouri General Assembly]]: four two-year terms for [[Missouri House of Representatives|House]] members (eight years) and two four-year terms for [[Missouri Senate|Senate]] members (eight years). Members may be elected again to the other house, but not serve more than 16 years.
* [[Montana Legislature|Montana State Legislature]]: four two-year terms for [[Montana House of Representatives|House]] members (eight years) in any sixteen-year period and two four-year terms for [[Montana Senate|Senate]] members (eight years) in any sixteen-year period.
* [[Nebraska Legislature]]: [[Unicameralism|unicameral]] legislature; members limited to two consecutive four-year terms (eight years), after which they must wait four years before running again.<ref>[http://nebraskalegislature.gov/faq/faq_senators.php "Frequently Asked Questions About Senators".] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140701192926/http://nebraskalegislature.gov/faq/faq_senators.php |date=July 1, 2014
* [[Nevada Legislature]]: six two-year terms for [[Nevada Assembly|Assembly]] members (twelve years) and three four-year terms for [[Nevada Senate|Senate]] members (twelve years).
* [[North Dakota Legislative Assembly|North Dakota Legislature]]: two cumulative four-year terms for both houses (eight years). Term limits only apply to individuals elected after the approval of the amendment in 2022.<ref name=":11" />
Line 177 ⟶ 182:
Some localities impose term limits for local office. Among the 20 most populous U.S. cities:
* There are no term limits in [[Baltimore, Maryland]]; [[Charlotte, North Carolina]]; [[Chicago, Illinois]]; [[Columbus, Ohio]]; [[Detroit, Michigan]]
* Term limits of equal length are applied to both mayors and city council members in [[Austin, Texas|Austin]], [[Dallas, Texas|Dallas]], [[Houston]], and [[San Antonio]] in Texas; [[Jacksonville, Florida]]; [[Memphis, Tennessee]]; [[New York City]]; and [[San Diego]], [[San Francisco]], and [[San Jose, California|San Jose]] in California.<ref name=2010NYC/>
* [[Philadelphia, Pennsylvania]], has term limits for the mayor, but not the city council.<ref name=2010NYC/> The mayor may serve two consecutive terms but there is no limit on the total number of terms.
* [[Los Angeles, California]], and [[Phoenix, Arizona]], have term limits for both the mayor and city council, but the term limits for the mayor are stricter than the term limits for the council.<ref name=2010NYC/>
A two-term limit was imposed on [[New York City Council]] members and citywide elected officials (except for [[district attorney]]s) in [[New York City]] after a 1993 [[referendum]] (see the Charter of the City of New York, § 1138). On November 3, 2008, however, when [[Michael Bloomberg]] was in his second term of [[Mayor of New York City|mayor]], the City Council approved the extension of the two-term limit to a three-term limit; one year later, he was elected to a third term. The two-term limit was reinstated after a referendum in 2010.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/term_limits_will_land_on_city_ballot_678DP9Lc8B4gbfNFbXTKMN | work=New York Post | title=Term limits will land on city ballot in Nov | date=
== Negative impacts ==
Research studies have shown that legislative term limits increase legislative polarization,<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last1=Olson|first1=Michael|last2=Rogowski|first2=Jon C|date=
Term limits have not proven to reduce campaign spending,<ref name=":7">{{Cite journal|last1=Masket|first1=Seth E.|last2=Lewis|first2=Jeffrey B.|date=March 1, 2007
== See also ==
Line 212 ⟶ 217:
*{{cite book |first=David |last=Pietrusza |title=1920: The Year of Six Presidents|location=New York|publisher=Carroll & Graf|year=2007}}
*{{cite book |first=Charles W. |last=Stein |title=The Third-Term Tradition: Its Rise and Collapse in American Politics |year=1943 |location=New York |publisher=Columbia University Press }}
*{{cite journal |first=Robert Jr. |last=Struble |url=http://www.tell-usa.org/totl/13-publications_files/PSQ_House_Turnover_1979.pdf |title=House Turnover and the Principle of Rotation |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101011082927/http://www.tell-usa.org/totl/13-publications_files/PSQ_House_Turnover_1979.pdf |archive-date=
*{{cite book |first=Robert Jr. |last=Struble |title=Treatise on Twelve Lights |date=2010 |chapter=Rotation in Office, and other democratic reforms |chapter-url=http://www.tell-usa.org/totl/06-Rotation%20&%20other%20reforms.htm#Part_2 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160411104723/http://www.tell-usa.org/totl/06-Rotation%20%26%20other%20reforms.htm#Part_2 |archive-date=
*{{cite book |first=James S. |last=Young |title=The Washington Community, 1800–1828 |url=https://archive.org/details/washingtoncommun00youn |url-access=registration |location=New York |publisher=Columbia University Press |year=1966 }}
==Further reading==
* Kousser, T. (2004). [[doi:10.1017/CBO9780511614088|''Term Limits and the Dismantling of State Legislative Professionalism''.]] Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=O'Keefe |first= Eric |title= Term Limits |author-link=Eric O'Keefe (political activist) | editor-first=Ronald |editor-last=Hamowy |editor-link=Ronald Hamowy |encyclopedia=The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=yxNgXs3TkJYC |year=2008 |publisher= [[SAGE Publishing|SAGE]]; [[Cato Institute]] |location= Thousand Oaks, CA |doi=10.4135/9781412965811.n308 |isbn= 978-1-4129-6580-4 |oclc=750831024| lccn = 2008009151 |pages= 504–06
* {{cite journal |last=Peabody |first=Bruce G.|title= George Washington, presidential term limits, and the problem of reluctant political leadership |journal=Presidential Studies Quarterly |volume=31 |issue=3 |date=2001 |pages=439–453 |doi=10.1111/j.0360-4918.2001.00180.x |url=https://www.thefreelibrary.com/George+Washington%2c+Presidential+Term+Limits%2c+and+the+Problem+of...-a078545876 }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Sigel |first1=Roberta S. |author-link1=Roberta Sigel |first2=David J. |last2=Butler|title= The Public and the No Third Term Tradition: Inquiry into Attitudes Toward Power |journal=Midwest Journal of Political Science |volume=8 |issue=1 |date=1964 |pages=39–54 |doi=10.2307/2108652 |jstor=2108652 }}
|