Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs) m Add: hdl. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here.| Activated by User:Nemo bis | via #UCB_webform |
Kwamikagami (talk | contribs) rv: post it somewhere appropriate, like wikt |
||
(28 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{More citations needed|date=December 2023}}
{{cleanup lang|date=July 2021}}
{{Infobox language family
|name = East Papuan
Line 16 ⟶ 18:
|child11 = {{nowrap|× [[Reefs – Santa Cruz languages|Reefs – Santa Cruz]]}}<br/>(now Austronesian)
|child12 = × [[Kazukuru language]] <br/>(now Austronesian)
|child13 = × [[Yele language|Yele]]
|glotto = none
}}
Line 25 ⟶ 27:
==History of the proposal==
The East Papuan languages were proposed as a family by linguist [[Stephen Wurm]] (1975) and others. However, their work was preliminary, and there is little evidence that the East Papuan languages actually have a [[Genetic relationship (linguistics)|genetic relationship]]. For example, none of these fifteen languages marked with asterisks below share more than 2–3% of their basic vocabulary with any of the others. Dunn and colleagues (2005) tested the reliability of the proposed 2–3% [[cognate]]s by randomizing the vocabulary lists and comparing them again. The nonsense comparisons produced the same 2–3% of "shared" vocabulary, demonstrating that the proposed cognates of the East Papuan languages, and even of proposed families within the East Papuan languages, are as likely to be due to chance as to any genealogical relationship. Thus in a conservative classification, many of the East Papuan languages would be considered [[language isolate]]s.
Since the islands in question have been settled for at least 35
==Classification (Ross 2005)==
Line 49 ⟶ 50:
}}
*'''[[
{{clade
|1={{clade
|1=[[Baining languages|Baining]]: [[Mali language|Mali]]*, [[Qaqet language|Qaqet]], [[Kairak language|Kairak]], [[Simbali language|Simbali]]
|2=[[Taulil–Butam languages|Taulil–Butam]]: [[Taulil language|Taulil]]**, [[Butam language|Butam]] (extinct)**
}}
}}
Line 91 ⟶ 95:
===True language isolates===
These three languages are not thought to be demonstrably related to each other or to any language in the world
*'''[[Sulka language|Sulka]]''' isolate* – New Britain (poor data quality; the possibility remains that Sulka will be shown to be related to Kol or Baining)
Line 110 ⟶ 114:
==References==
{{Reflist}}
{{Refbegin}}
* {{cite journal | last = Dunn | first = Michael |author2=Ger Reesink |author3=Angela Terrill |date=June 2002 | title = The East Papuan languages: a preliminary typological appraisal | journal = Oceanic Linguistics | volume = 41 | issue = 1 | pages = 28–62 | doi = 10.1353/ol.2002.0019 | oclc = 89720097 | hdl = 11858/00-001M-0000-0013-1ADC-1 | s2cid = 143012930 | hdl-access = free }}
* {{cite journal | last = Dunn | first = Michael |author2= Angela Terrill |author3=Ger Reesink | author4-link = Robert Foley (academic) |author4=Robert A. Foley | author5-link = Stephen C. Levinson |author5=Stephen C. Levinson | date = 2005-09-23 | title = Structural Phylogenetics and the Reconstruction of Ancient Language History | journal = [[Science (journal)|Science]] | volume = 309 | issue = 5743 | pages = 2072–75 | doi = 10.1126/science.1114615 | pmid = 16179483 | bibcode = 2005Sci...309.2072D | oclc = 111923848 | hdl = 11858/00-001M-0000-0013-1B84-E | s2cid = 2963726 | hdl-access = free }}
* {{cite journal | last = Dunn | first = Michael |author2=Malcolm Ross | year = 2007 | title = Is Kazukuru really non-Austronesian? | journal = Oceanic Linguistics | volume = 46 | pages = 210–231 | doi = 10.1353/ol.2007.0018| url = https://pure.mpg.de/pubman/item/item_60507_1/component/file_60508/dunn_2007_is%20kazukuru.pdf | hdl = 11858/00-001M-0000-0013-1EBB-9 | s2cid = 146355432 | hdl-access = free }}
* {{cite book | last = Ross | first = Malcolm |
* {{Malcolm Ross Pronouns}}
* {{cite book | last = Wurm | first = Stephen A. |
{{Refend}}
{{Papuan languages}}
[[Category:East Papuan languages| ]]
[[Category:Languages of Papua New Guinea]]
|