East Papuan languages: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
m Add: hdl. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here.| Activated by User:Nemo bis | via #UCB_webform
rv: post it somewhere appropriate, like wikt
 
(28 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{More citations needed|date=December 2023}}
{{cleanup lang|date=July 2021}}
{{Infobox language family
|name = East Papuan
Line 16 ⟶ 18:
|child11 = {{nowrap|× [[Reefs – Santa Cruz languages|Reefs – Santa Cruz]]}}<br/>(now Austronesian)
|child12 = × [[Kazukuru language]] <br/>(now Austronesian)
|child13 = × [[Yele language|Yele]] <br/>(now Austronesian)
|glotto = none
}}
Line 25 ⟶ 27:
 
==History of the proposal==
 
The East Papuan languages were proposed as a family by linguist [[Stephen Wurm]] (1975) and others. However, their work was preliminary, and there is little evidence that the East Papuan languages actually have a [[Genetic relationship (linguistics)|genetic relationship]]. For example, none of these fifteen languages marked with asterisks below share more than 2–3% of their basic vocabulary with any of the others. Dunn and colleagues (2005) tested the reliability of the proposed 2–3% [[cognate]]s by randomizing the vocabulary lists and comparing them again. The nonsense comparisons produced the same 2–3% of "shared" vocabulary, demonstrating that the proposed cognates of the East Papuan languages, and even of proposed families within the East Papuan languages, are as likely to be due to chance as to any genealogical relationship. Thus in a conservative classification, many of the East Papuan languages would be considered [[language isolate]]s.
 
Since the islands in question have been settled for at least 35&nbsp;,000 years, their considerable linguistic diversity is unsurprising. However, [[Malcolm Ross (linguist)|Malcolm Ross]] (2001; 2005) has presented evidence from comparing [[pronoun]]s from nineteen of these languages that several of the lower-level branches of East Papuan may indeed be valid families. This is the classification adopted here. For Wurm's more inclusive classification, see the [[EthnologueGlottolog]] entrypage [httphttps://wwwglottolog.ethnologue.comorg/show_family.asp?subid=91729resource/reference/id/135107 here].
 
==Classification (Ross 2005)==
Line 49 ⟶ 50:
}}
 
*'''[[BainingEast New Britain languages|Baining (East New Britain)]]''' family
{{clade
|1={{clade
|1=[[Baining languages|Baining]]: [[Mali language|Mali]]*, [[Qaqet language|Qaqet]], [[Kairak language|Kairak]], [[Simbali language|Simbali]], [[Taulil language|Taulil]]**, [[Butam language|Butam]] (extinct)**, [[Ura language (Papua New Guinea)|Ura]], [[Makolkol language|Makolkol]]
|2=[[Taulil–Butam languages|Taulil–Butam]]: [[Taulil language|Taulil]]**, [[Butam language|Butam]] (extinct)**
}}
}}
 
Line 91 ⟶ 95:
 
===True language isolates===
These three languages are not thought to be demonstrably related to each other or to any language in the world. If the Yele – West New Britain family is not confirmed, the region may contain six isolates rather than three.
 
*'''[[Sulka language|Sulka]]''' isolate* – New Britain (poor data quality; the possibility remains that Sulka will be shown to be related to Kol or Baining)
Line 110 ⟶ 114:
 
==References==
{{Reflist}}
{{Refbegin}}
* {{cite journal | last = Dunn | first = Michael |author2=Ger Reesink |author3=Angela Terrill |date=June 2002 | title = The East Papuan languages: a preliminary typological appraisal | journal = Oceanic Linguistics | volume = 41 | issue = 1 | pages = 28–62 | doi = 10.1353/ol.2002.0019 | oclc = 89720097 | hdl = 11858/00-001M-0000-0013-1ADC-1 | s2cid = 143012930 | hdl-access = free }}
* {{cite journal | last = Dunn | first = Michael |author2= Angela Terrill |author3=Ger Reesink | author4-link = Robert Foley (academic) |author4=Robert A. Foley | author5-link = Stephen C. Levinson |author5=Stephen C. Levinson | date = 2005-09-23 | title = Structural Phylogenetics and the Reconstruction of Ancient Language History | journal = [[Science (journal)|Science]] | volume = 309 | issue = 5743 | pages = 2072–75 | doi = 10.1126/science.1114615 | pmid = 16179483 | bibcode = 2005Sci...309.2072D | oclc = 111923848 | hdl = 11858/00-001M-0000-0013-1B84-E | s2cid = 2963726 | hdl-access = free }}
* {{cite journal | last = Dunn | first = Michael |author2=Malcolm Ross | year = 2007 | title = Is Kazukuru really non-Austronesian? | journal = Oceanic Linguistics | volume = 46 | pages = 210–231 | doi = 10.1353/ol.2007.0018| url = https://pure.mpg.de/pubman/item/item_60507_1/component/file_60508/dunn_2007_is%20kazukuru.pdf | hdl = 11858/00-001M-0000-0013-1EBB-9 | s2cid = 146355432 | hdl-access = free }}
* {{cite book | last = Ross | first = Malcolm | authorlinkauthor-link = Malcolm Ross (linguist) | year = 2001 | chapter = Is there an East Papuan phylum? Evidence from pronouns | editor = [[Andrew Pawley]] | editor-link = Andrew Pawley |editor2=[[Malcolm Ross |editor2-link=Malcolm Ross (linguist) |Malcolmeditor3=Darrell Ross]]Tryon |editor3-link=[[Darrell Tryon]] | title = The boy from Bundaberg: Studies in Melanesian linguistics in honour of Tom Dutton | location = Canberra | publisher = Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University | pages = 301–322 | isbn = 978-0-85883-445-3 | oclc = 48651069 }}
* {{Malcolm Ross Pronouns}}
* {{cite book | last = Wurm | first = Stephen A. | authorlinkauthor-link = Stephen Wurm | year = 1975 | chapter = The East Papuan phylum in general | editor = [[Stephen A. Wurm |Stephen A.editor-link = Stephen Wurm]] | title = Papuan languages and the New Guinea linguistic scene: New Guinea area languages and language study 1 | location = Canberra | publisher = Dept. of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University | pages = 783–804 | isbn = | oclc = 37096514 }}
{{Refend}}
 
{{Papuan languages}}
 
[[Category:East Papuan languages| ]]
[[Category:Languages of Papua New Guinea]]