Film distribution: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
m Dating maintenance tags: {{Citation needed}} {{When}}
GreenC bot (talk | contribs)
(26 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{short description|Making a motion picture available to the public}}
'''Film distribution''', (also known ascalled '''Filmfilm exhibition''' or '''Filmfilm distribution and exhibition'''), is the process of making a movie available for viewing byto an audience. This is normally the task of a professional [[film distributor]], who would determine the [[Film promotion|marketing]] and [[film release|release strategy]] for the film, the media by which a film is to be exhibited or made available for viewing and other matters. The film may be exhibited directly to the public either through a [[movie theater]] or [[television]], or [[home video|personal home viewing]] (including physical media, [[Video on demand|video-on-demand]], download, [[Television show|television program]]s through [[broadcast syndication]]). For commercial projects, film distribution is usually accompanied by [[film promotion]].
 
==History==
Initially, all mass-marketed feature films were made to be shown in movie theaters. The identity of the first theater designed specifically for cinema is a matter of debate; candidates include Tally's Electric Theatre, established 1902 in Los Angeles,<ref>{{cite web|title=Tally's Electric Theatre|url=http://cinematreasures.org/theater/8855/|url-status=live|access-date=11 August 2010|website=Cinema Treasures}}</ref> and Pittsburgh's Nickelodeon, established 1905.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.post-gazette.com/ae/movies/2005/06/19/You-saw-it-here-first-Pittsburgh-s-Nickelodeon-introduced-the-moving-picture-theater-to-the-masses-in-1905/stories/200506190169 |title= You saw it here first: Pittsburgh's Nickelodeon introduced the moving picture theater to the masses in 1905|access-date=2007-01-25 |first= Timothy |last= McNulty|date= 2005-06-19|publisher= Pittsburgh Post-Gazette}}</ref> Thousands of such theaters were built or converted from existing facilities within a few years.<ref>{{cite web|title=Pre-Nickelodeon/ Nickelodeon |url=http://www.lib.umd.edu/RARE/Exhibits/Headley/styles1.html |work=A Theater Near You: Washington Theater Memorabilia from the collection of Robert Headley |publisher=University of Maryland Special Collections |access-date=23 August 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120730120150/http://www.lib.umd.edu/RARE/Exhibits/Headley/styles1.html |archive-date=30 July 2012 |url-status=dead }}</ref> In the United States, these theaters came to be known as [[Nickelodeon (movie theater)|nickelodeons]], because admission typically cost a nickel (five cents).
 
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align=center; margin:1em auto 1em auto;"
|+Avg. number of movies watched in cinemas in 2013 per person per year<ref>{{cite web|title=Koreans are No. 1 moviegoers in the world|url=http://www.koreatimesus.com/?p=4311|url-status=live|website=The Korea Times}}</ref>
|-
! Rank !! Country !! Number of movies viewed
Line 18:
| 4 || {{Flagcountry|France}} || align="center" | 3.44
|-
| 5 || {{Flagcountry|India}} || align="center" | 4.14
|}{{clr}}
|-
|}{{clrclear}}
 
Distributors license films to theaters granting the right to show the film for a [[theatrical rental| rental fee]]. The movie theater pays an average of about 50-55% of its ticket sales to the movie studio, as film rental fees.<ref name="PBS">{{cite web|url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/hollywood/business/windows.html|title=PBS Frontline: The Monster that Ate Hollywood: Anatomy of a Monster: Now Playing ... And Playingplaying ... And Playingplaying ...|website=pbs.org|access-date=June 23, 2007}}</ref> The actual percentage starts with a number higher than that, and decreases as the duration of a film's showing continues, as an incentive to theaters to keep movies in the theater longer. However, today's barrage of highly marketed movies ensures that most movies are shown in [[First run (filmmaking)|first-run theaters]] for less than 8 weeks. There are a few movies every year that defy this rule, often [[Limited theatrical release|limited-release]] movies that start in only a few theaters and actually grow their theater count through good word-of-mouth and reviews.{{Citation needed|date=February 2016}} According to a 2000 study by [[ABN AMRO]], about 26% of Hollywood movie studios' worldwide income came from box office ticket sales; 46% came from VHS and DVD sales to consumers; and 28% came from television (broadcast, cable, and pay-per-view).<ref name="PBS"/>
 
Typically, one film is the featured presentation (or [[feature film]]). Before the 1970s, there were "[[double feature]] s"; typically, a high-quality "''A'' picture" rented by an independent theater for a lump sum, and a lower-quality [[B movie|"''B'' picture"]] rented for a percentage of the gross receipts. Today, the bulk of the material shown before the feature film consists of previews for upcoming movies (also known as [[trailer (movie)|trailers]]) and paid advertisements.
 
The development of [[television]] has allowed films to be broadcast to larger audiences, usually after the film is no longer being shown in theaters. {{Citation needed|date=January 2012}} In 1971 [[U-Matic]] became the first magnetic format in which movies could be enjoyed in institutions outside the theatre. Later that year, the first [[videocassettes]] of movies became available to consumers to watch in their own homes.<ref>"Timeline/Fun Facts," ''Broadcasting & Cable'', Nov. 21, 2011.</ref> Recording technology has since enabled consumers to rent or buy copies of films on [[home media]] such as [[VHS]] or [[DVD]] (and the older formats ofinclude: [[laserdisc]], [[Video CD|VCD]] and, [[SelectaVision]] – see alsoand [[videodisc]]), and. Internet downloads mayare be available and arealso revenue sources for film production companies.
{{Expand section|optical disc distribution|date=December 2009}}
 
Line 31 ⟶ 33:
Prior to the decline of the [[Motion Picture Patents Company]] (Edison Trust) in 1915, there were two main forms of film distribution: ''states rights'' and ''roadshow''.<ref name="Cobbles">{{cite web|url=http://www.cobbles.com/simpp_archive/statesrights.htm|title=The Early Film Business - Distribution: States Rights or Road Show|author=J.A. Aberdeen|publisher=Cobblestone Entertainment|year=2005|access-date=March 9, 2015}}</ref>
 
Under the states rights system, films were sold on a local, territorial basis. The local salesperson would then play the film as often as they desired in an attempt to make as much profit as possible. Film copyright holders would sell rights of a movie directly to the theater or franchise salesperson,<ref name="Epics">{{cite book |last1=Hall |first1=Sheldon |last2=Neale |first2=Stephen |title=Epics, Spectacles, and Blockbusters: A Hollywood History |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA24 |access-date=March 9, 2015 |year=2010 |publisher=Wayne State University Press |isbn=9780814330081 |page=24}}</ref> typically on a [[Film stock|foot-by-foot]] basis for 10 cents a foot.<ref name="Cobbles"/> Absent major studios or national theater franchises, this system was generally the best way to ensure national release of a film, particularly for shorter films. However, in terms of profitability, the states rights system wasn'twas not the most effective way to screen feature-length films since the film's producers only made money on the initial sale of each film copy.
 
This method also made it possible to screen films of various genre which may be illegal in one state but legal in another.<ref name="Epics"/>
Line 45 ⟶ 47:
 
===Simultaneous release===
A [[simultaneous release]] takes place when a movie is made available on many media (cinema, DVDhome video, VOD) at the same time or with very little difference in timing.
 
Simultaneous releases offer great advantages to both consumers, who can choose the medium that most suits their needs, and production studios that only have to run one marketing campaign for all releases. The flip side, though, is that such distribution efforts are often regarded as experimental and thus do not receive substantial investment or promotion.
 
Simultaneous release approaches have gained both praise, with investor [[Mark Cuban]] claiming movies should simultaneously be made available on all media allowing viewers to choose whether to see it at home or at the theater,<ref name="slate2">{{cite web|url=http://www.slate.com/id/2128631|title=Mark Cuban's distribution revolution.|work=Slate Magazine|date=24 October 2005}}</ref> and disapproval, with director [[M. Night Shyamalan]] claiming it could potentially destroy the "magic" of moviegoing.<ref name="latimes">{{cite web|title=Director Warns of Big Screens' Extinction|url=https://articleswww.latimes.com/2005archives/la-xpm-2005-oct/-28/business/-fi-night28-story.html|url-status=deadlive|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130127141546/http://articles.latimes.com/2005/oct/28/business/fi-night28|archive-date=January 27, 2013|work=Los Angeles Times|access-date=April 20, 2020}}</ref>
 
Cinema owners can be affected if they have to share their opportunity window, especially at the beginning of the movie lifecycle, since, according to Disney, about 95% of all box office tickets for a film are sold within the first six weeks after initial distribution.<ref name="Daily Telegraph">{{Cite web|title=DVDS of films to be sold 3 months after cinema release|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/film-news/7271846/DVDs-of-films-to-be-sold-3-months-after-cinema-release.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/film-news/7271846/DVDs-of-films-to-be-sold-3-months-after-cinema-release.html |archive-date=2022-01-11 |url-access=subscription|url-status=live|website=The Telegraph|date=19 February 2010 }}{{cbignore}}</ref>
 
Among relevant simultaneous release attempts are ''[[Bubble (2005 film)|Bubble]]'' (2006) by Academy Award-winning director [[Steven Soderbergh]], ''EMR'' (2005) by James Erskine & Danny McCullough, and ''[[The Road to Guantanamo]]'' (2006).
 
===Shrinking of the theatrical window===
Between 1967 and 1974, the average theatrical window in the United States between a film's theatrical release and its showing on TV was just over 5five years.<ref>{{cite magazine|magazine=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]|date=October 9, 1974|title=Ask FCC To Ban Theatre Pix On TV Til Cable Gets 1st Crack|page=57}}</ref> By 1979, with the advertadvent of pay television, films were normally made available to pay television in the United States one or two years after theatrical release.<ref name=worry/> With the advent of home video, the [[National Association of Theatre Owners]] in the United States passed a resolution in 1980 objecting to the proposed release of video cassettes at the same time as a film was released in theaters on the basis that their release would negatively impact theatrical revenues.<ref>{{cite magazine|magazine=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]|date=October 8, 1980|title=Hirschfield: Stake In New Media Crucial|page=5|last=Gelman|first=Morrie}}</ref> The window between theatrical release and free-to-air television in the United States at the time was normally three years.<ref>{{cite magazine|magazine=[[Daily Variety]]|date=April 16, 1980|title=NBC Pays $5 Mil For Fox' 'Breaking Away' In Hopes Of Bolstering Its Ratings|page=1|last=Fabrikant|first=Geri}}</ref> By 1983 in the United States, the theatrical window before a film would be made available to other media, (at the time, firstly cable or pay TV) was around a year.<ref name=DV83>{{cite magazine|magazine=[[Daily Variety]]|date=October 25, 1983|title=Exhibs Eyeing Future|page=182|last=Greenberg|first=James}}</ref> In France, with the rise of home video, a law was created to give a theatrical window of one year before a film was made available to home video with it then being available to pay television then free-to-air television two or three years later.<ref name=france>{{cite magazine|magazine=[[Daily Variety]]|date=May 1, 1985|title=French Exhibs Spur Seizures Of HV Titles As Vid Battle Continues|page=8|last=Monet|first=Jack}}</ref> By 1985 in the United States, the theatrical window before a film was released on home video was normally four to six months, depending on the performance of the film at the box office.<ref>{{cite magazine|magazine=[[Daily Variety]]|date=July 16, 1985|title=U.S. Suppliers Irked By Ruling On HV Window|page=1}}</ref> Films in the US were then available for pay-per-view four months later<ref name="slate"/> and, approximately two years after its theatrical release date, available for free-to-air television. The reduction in the theatrical window impacted subrun theaters that showed films after they had been screened by first-run theaters.<ref name=DV83/> By 2019, the theatrical window had been reduced to an average of three months in the United States.<ref name="Theatrical Release Window">{{Cite web|url=https://www.natoonline.org/data/windows/|title=Theatrical Release Window|date=2013-07-20|website=NATO|language=en-US|access-date=2019-09-15}}</ref> [[Major film studio#Today's Big Six|Major movie studios]] reportedly pushed to shrink the theatrical window in an attempt to make up for the substantial losses in the [[DVD-Video|DVD]] market suffered since the 2004 sales peak. These attempts have encountered the firm opposition of [[movie theater|theater]] owners, whose profits depend solely upon attendance and therefore benefit from keeping a movie available on their screens.<ref name="wsj" /><ref name="wsj2">{{cite web|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704167704575258761968531140 |title=Hollywood Eyes Shortcut to TV|author1=Lauren A.E. Schuker |author2=Ethan Smith|date=22 May 2010|work=Wall Street Journal}}</ref>
 
In early 2010, [[Disney]] announced it would be putting out the DVD and Blu-ray versions of [[Tim Burton]]'s ''[[Alice in Wonderland (2010 film)|Alice in Wonderland]]'' 14 weeks after the movie's release date (instead of the then usual 17) in order to avoid competition from the [[2010 World Cup]].<ref name="wsj" /> In response to such statements, theater owners made threats not to show the movie on their screens,<ref>{{cite web|author=Pamela McClintock|title='Alice' stirs more exhib ire|url=https://www.variety.com/article/VR1118015335.html|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130205143106/http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118015335/|archive-date=February 5, 2013|work=Variety|access-date=April 20, 2020}}</ref> but later reconsidered their position before the movie was released.<ref name="reuters">{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1810056120100219|title=Disney and UK theater chain reach deal on 'Alice'|author=Reuters Editorial|date=19 February 2010|work=Reuters}}</ref> As of 2019, most major theater chains mandated an exclusivity window of 90 days before release on physical home video and rental availability, and 74–76 days before [[Electronic sell-through|digital sell-through]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/netflix-forgoes-wide-release-martin-scorseses-irishman-1234382|title=Netflix Forgoes Wide Release for Martin Scorsese's 'The Irishman'|website=The Hollywood Reporter|date=27 August 2019|language=en|access-date=2019-10-05}}</ref>
Line 64 ⟶ 66:
Producers of relatively [[Low-budget film|smaller-budget]] movies are also utilizing new release strategies. In 2009, the movie ''[[The House of the Devil]]'' premiered on VOD systems on October 1, and received a [[limited release|limited theatrical release]] one month later. In August 2010, it was announced that the movie ''[[Freakonomics#Film adaptation|Freakonomics]]'' would be released on video on demand on September 3, one month before its theatrical release. The British [[sci-fi]] movie ''[[Monsters (2010 film)|Monsters]]'' has also undergone the same release timetable.{{Citation needed|date=February 2016}} After [[Netflix]] bought the worldwide distribution rights to ''[[Beasts of No Nation (film)|Beasts of No Nation]]'', the film was simultaneously released theatrically and online through its subscription video-on-demand (SVOD) service on October 16, 2015.<ref>{{cite news|title=Netflix to stream 'Beasts of No Nation'|author=Hurwitz|work= USA TODAY|date= March 3, 2015}}</ref>
 
In late 2018, five of the major Hollywood studios, including [[Universal Pictures|Universal]] and [[Warner Bros.]], identified that they were working on an agreement that would see certain movies receive a premium video-on-demand release within weeks of their theatrical premieres.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://variety.com/2017/film/news/vod-early-home-rentals-studios-theaters-1201994060/|title=Studios Push for $50 Early Home Movie Rentals, but Negotiations Are Complex (EXCLUSIVE)|last=Lang|first=Brent|date=2017-02-23|work=Variety|access-date=2018-11-07|language=en-US}}</ref> Nothing came out of these discussions, and after the [[Acquisition of 21st Century Fox by Disney|Disney bought 21st Century Fox]], then Disney [[CEO]] [[Bob Iger]] stated that the theatrical window is working for the company and they had no plans to adjust it.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.indiewire.com/2020/02/disney-plus-theatrical-box-office-1202208720/|title=Disney Soothes Exhibitors, Says It Loves Theaters Just As Much As Disney+|last=Lindahl|first=Chris|date=2020-02-04|website=IndieWire|language=en|access-date=2020-04-02}}</ref>
 
==== COVID-19 pandemic influence====
During the [[COVID-19 pandemic in the United States|COVID-19 pandemic]], all the [[Major film studio|major studios]] broke the theatrical window due to widespread theatre closings and made several films available on home media shortly after their theatrical debuts, such as Universal releasing ''[[The Invisible Man (2020 film)|The Invisible Man]]'' for rental 21 days after theatrical release, [[Sony Pictures Entertainment Motion Picture Group|Sony]] and Columbia Pictures releasing ''[[Bloodshot (film)|Bloodshot]]'' for purchase 12 days after theatrical release,<ref name="streaming early"/> Warner Bros. releasing ''[[The Way Back (2020 film)|The Way Back]]'' 18 days after theatrical release,<ref name="streaming early">{{Cite web|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/movies/2020/03/19/coronavirus-closures-every-new-movie-fast-tracked-streaming/2872961001/|title=All the movies streaming early amid coronavirus theater closures: 'Onward,' 'Sonic the Hedgehog,' 'I Still Believe'|website=USA Today|language=en-US|access-date=2020-03-19}}</ref> and [[Disney]] releasing ''[[Onward (film)|Onward]]'' for purchase 15 days after theatrical release and streaming on [[Disney+]] 29 days after theatrical release.<ref name="break window">{{Cite web|url=httphttps://social.techcrunch.com/2020/03/16/nbcuniversal-breaks-theatrical-window/|title=NBCUniversal will break the theatrical window to release 'The Invisible Man' and other movies on-demand|website=TechCrunch|date=16 March 2020 |language=en-US|access-date=2020-03-17}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/20/21188037/disney-onward-digital-platforms-plus-date-early-release-coronavirus|title=Disney releases Onward for digital purchase two weeks after its theatrical premiere|last=Gartenberg|first=Chaim|date=2020-03-20|website=The Verge|language=en|access-date=2020-03-20}}</ref> ''Sonic the Hedgehog'', ''I Still Believe'', and ''The Invisible Man'' also became available for in-home on-demand viewing after a theatrical run shorter than usual in the wake of widespread theatre closures.<ref name="break window" /><ref name="streaming early" /> As a result of the controversy surrounding the shrinking and even elimination of the theatrical window, in April 2020 [[AMC Theatres]] stated it would no longer screen films made by [[Universal Pictures]] after ''[[Trolls World Tour]]'' was made available for [[video on demand]] purchases simultaneous to its theatrical release.<ref>[https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/04/28/media/trolls-world-tour-universal-amc/index.html AMC bans Universal films from its theaters over ''Trolls World Tour''] CNN, April 29, 2020</ref><ref>[https://amp.theguardian.com/film/2020/apr/29/amc-us-cinema-chain-boycott-universal-studios-home-streaming AMC, largest cinema chain in US, announces boycott of Universal] theguardian.com April 29, 2020</ref><ref>[https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2020/04/30/universal-and-amc-are-quarreling-what-it-says-about-hollywood.html Universal and AMC are quarreling: What it says about Hollywood] cnbc.com April 30, 2020</ref>
 
In November 2020, [[Warner Bros.]] announced it would release ''[[Wonder Woman 1984]]'' simultaneously in theaters and on [[HBO Max]], with theaters granted a higher 60% take of box office sales.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Rubin|first=Rebecca|date=2020-11-18|title='Wonder Woman 1984' to Debut Both on HBO Max and in Theaters|url=https://variety.com/2020/film/news/wonder-woman-1984-hbo-max-release-1234804411/|access-date=2020-12-05|website=Variety|language=en-US}}</ref> In December 2020, Warner Bros. announced it would release its entire 2021 theatrical slate simultaneously in theaters and on HBO Max for 30 days.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Swisher|first=Kara|date=2020-12-04|title=Opinion {{!}} The Window on New Movie Releases Finally Shatters|language=en-US|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/04/opinion/warner-hbo-movies-theaters.html|access-date=2020-12-05|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> [[AMC Theatres]] CEO [[Adam Aron]] criticized the plan.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Keane|first=Sean|title=AMC Theatres boss criticizes Warner Bros. for HBO Max 2021 release plans|url=https://www.cnet.com/news/amc-theatres-boss-criticizes-warner-bros-for-hbo-max-2021-release-plans/|access-date=2020-12-05|website=CNET|language=en}}</ref>
 
However, this would be short-lived, because in March 2021, it was announced that Warner Bros. would discontinue same-day releases in 2022, as part of an agreement the studio reached with [[Cineworld]] (who operates [[Regal Cinemas]]) and will instead use a 45-day exclusive release window for theaters.<ref>{{cite web |last1=D'Alessandro |first1=Anthony |last2=Tartaglione |first2=Nancy |title=Regal Cinemas To Reopen In April; Parent Cineworld & Warner Bros Reach Multi-Year Deal To Show WB Films In U.S. & UK |url=https://deadline.com/2021/03/cineworld-regal-warner-bros-deal-theatrical-windows-us-cinemas-reopening-1234719255/ |website=Deadline |access-date=March 24, 2021 |date=March 23, 2021 |quote=Cineworld and Warner Bros have also hatched a multi-year agreement that will see the No. 2 global exhibitor show the studio's 2021 theatrical and HBO Max day-and-date titles in the U.S. as of their theatrical release. Then, beginning in 2022, Warner Bros theatrical films will have a 45-day window of theatrical exclusivity at Cineworld's Regal chain.}}</ref> Most recently,{{when|date=January 2023}} the parent company has reached an agreement for a 17-day and a 31-day theatrical window with Universal Pictures and has agreed on a deal with Walt Disney Pictures to show its movies in U.S. and U.K. theaters.{{citation needed|date=January 2023}}
 
==Other distribution methods==
Some films may be made specifically for non-theatrical formats, being released as a "[[Television film|television movie]]" or "[[direct-to-video]]" movie. The production values on these films are often considered to be of inferior quality compared to theatrical releases in similar genres; some films that are rejected by their own [[movie studio]]s upon completion may be distributed through these markets.{{Citation needed|date=February 2016}}
 
===Straight-to-video release===
{{further|Direct-to-video}}
A straight direct-to -video release (oralso called "''straight-to-[[DVD]]''" or "''straight-to-[[Blu-ray]]''", depending on the media uponused whichfor thefilm movie is made availabledistribution) release occurs when a movie is released on [[home video]] formats (such as VHS, DVD, etc.) without being released in theaters first, thereby not taking into consideration the "theatrical window".
 
As a result of strong DVD sales, Directstraight-to-video releases achieved higher success and were noted in 2005 to have become a profitable market lately,<ref>{{cite web|author=Scott Hettrick|title=Spending on DVDs up 10%|url=https://www.variety.com/article/VR1117935319.html|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130208225556/http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117935319/|archive-date=February 8, 2013|work=Variety|access-date=April 20, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=DVD Exclusive Online|url=http://www.dvdexclusive.com/article.asp?articleID=2259|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060515194442/http://www.dvdexclusive.com/article.asp?articleID=2259|archive-date=15 May 2006}}</ref> especially for [[independent film|independent]] moviemakersfilmmakers and companiesdistributors.<ref>Lerman, Laurence (September 17, 2001). "Independents' 'Bread and Butter'". ''Video Business'' 21 (38): Section: Video Premieres</ref>
 
===Internet release===
Feature films that have been released directly to [[YouTube]] or other [[streaming]] sitesplatforms include : ''[[HomeZeitgeist: (2009The film)|HomeMovie]]'' (20092007), ''[[The Cult of Sincerity]]'' (2008), ''[[Home (2009 film)|Home]]'' (2009), ''[[Life in a Day (2011 film)|Life in a Day]]'' (2011), and ''[[Eyes and Ears of God: Video Surveillance of Sudan]]'' (2012) and ''[[Zeitgeist: The Movie]]'' (2007), ''[[Schwarz Weiss Bunt]]'' (2020).
 
==See also==
Line 101 ⟶ 103:
 
{{Filmmaking}}
{{Authority control}}
 
[[Category:Film distribution| ]]