TIGIT: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Capitalising short description "protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens" per WP:SDFORMAT (via Bandersnatch)
m v2.05b - Bot T20 CW#61 - Fix errors for CW project (Reference before punctuation)
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Short description|Protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens}}
{{cs1 config|name-list-style=vanc}}
{{#invoke:Infobox_gene|getTemplateData|QID=Q18053232}}
'''TIGIT''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|t|ɪ|dʒ|ɪ|t}} {{Respell|TIJ|it}};<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgicCH6JGVk&t=811s|title=Lung Cancer and Immunotherapy with Dr. Patrick Forde and Oswald Peterson|work=YouTube|date=October 22, 2021|accessdate=5 July 2022}}</ref> also called '''T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains''') is an [[immune receptor]] present on some [[T cells]] and [[natural killer cell]]s (NK).<ref name="surface protein">{{cite journal | title=The surface protein TIGIT suppresses T cell activation by promoting the generation of mature immunoregulatory dendritic cells |vauthors=Yu X, Harden K, Gonzalez LC, Francesco M, Chiang E, Irving B, Tom I, Ivelja S, Refino CJ, Clark H, Eaton D, Grogan JL | journal=Nat Immunol |date=Jan 2009 | volume=10 | issue=1 | pages=48–57 | doi=10.1038/ni.1674 | pmid=19011627|s2cid=205361984 }}</ref> It is also identified as WUCAM<ref>{{cite journal | title=A novel molecular interaction for the adhesion of follicular CD4 T cells to follicular DC |vauthors=Boles KS, Vermi W, Facchetti F, Fuchs A, Wilson TJ, Diacovo TG, Cella M, Colonna M | journal=European Journal of Immunology |date=Mar 2009 | volume=39 | issue=3 | pages=695–703 | doi=10.1002/eji.200839116 | pmid=19197944 | pmc=3544471}}</ref> and Vstm3.<ref name="pmid21416464">{{cite journal | vauthors = Levin SD, Taft DW, Brandt CS, Bucher C, Howard ED, Chadwick EM, Johnston J, Hammond A, Bontadelli K, Ardourel D, Hebb L, Wolf A, Bukowski TR, Rixon MW, Kuijper JL, Ostrander CD, West JW, Bilsborough J, Fox B, Gao Z, Xu W, Ramsdell F, Blazar BR, Lewis KE|display-authors = 6 | title = Vstm3 is a member of the CD28 family and an important modulator of T-cell function | journal = European Journal of Immunology | volume = 41 | issue = 4 | pages = 902–15 | date = April 2011 | pmid = 21416464 | pmc = 3733993 | doi = 10.1002/eji.201041136 }}</ref> TIGIT could bind to [[CD155]] (PVR) on [[dendritic cells]] (DCs), [[macrophages]], etc. with high affinity, and also to [[CD112]] (PVRL2) with lower affinity.<ref name="surface protein"/>
 
Numerous clinical trials on TIGIT-blockade in cancer have recently been initiated, predominantly combination treatments. The first interim results show promise for combined TIGIT and [[PD-L1]] co-blockade in solid cancer patients.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Ge Z, Peppelenbosch MP, Sprengers D, Kwekkeboom J | title = TIGIT, the Next Step Towards Successful Combination Immune Checkpoint Therapy in Cancer. | journal = Frontiers in Immunology | volume = 12 | pages = 699895 | date = 2021-07-22 | pmid = 34367161 | pmc = 8339559 | doi = 10.3389/fimmu.2021.699895 | doi-access = free }}</ref> MechanistallyMechanistically, research has shown that TIGIT-Fc fusion protein could interact with PVR on dendritic cells and increase its [[Interleukin 10|IL-10]] secretion level/decrease its [[Interleukin 12|IL-12]] secretion level under [[Lipopolysaccharide|LPS]] stimulation, and also inhibit T cell activation [[in vivo]].<ref name="surface protein"/>
TIGIT's inhibition of NK cytotoxicity can be blocked by antibodies against its interaction with PVR and the activity is directed through its [[Immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif|ITIM domain]].<ref>{{cite journal | title=The interaction of TIGIT with PVR and PVRL2 inhibits human NK cell cytotoxicity |vauthors=Stanietsky N, Simic H, Arapovic J, Toporik A, Levy O, Novik A, Levine Z, Beiman M, Dassa L, Achdout H, Stern-Ginossar N, Tsukerman P, Jonjic S, Mandelboim O | journal=Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A |date=Oct 2009 | volume=106 | issue=42 | pages=17858–63 | doi=10.1073/pnas.0903474106 | pmid=19815499 | pmc=2764881|bibcode=2009PNAS..10617858S |doi-access=free }}</ref>
 
Line 11 ⟶ 12:
 
===HIV===
During Human Immunodeficiency Virus ([[HIV]]) infection, TIGIT expressing CD8+ T cells hashave been shown to be expanded and associated with clinical markers of HIV disease progression in a diverse group of HIV infected individuals.<ref name="Marks Exhausted">{{cite journal | title=TIGIT Marks Exhausted T Cells, Correlates with Disease Progression, and Serves as a Target for Immune Restoration in HIV and SIV Infection | vauthors=Chew GM, Fujita T, Webb GM, Burwitz BJ, Wu HL, Reed JS, etal | journal=PLOS Pathogens | date=Jan 2016 |doi=10.1371/journal.ppat.1005349 | pmid= 26741490 | volume=12 | issue=1 | pmc=4704737 | pages=e1005349 | doi-access=free }}</ref> Elevated TIGIT levels remained sustained even among those with undetectable viral loads. and aA large fraction of HIV-specific CD8+ T cells simultaneously express both TIGIT and another negative checkpoint receptor, Programmed Death Protein 1 ([[PD-1]]) and retained several features of exhausted T cells.<ref name="Marks Exhausted"/> Blocking these pathways with novel targeted monoclonal antibodies synergistically rejuvenated HIV-specific CD8+ T cell responses.<ref name="Marks Exhausted"/> Further, the TIGIT pathway is active in the rhesus macaque non-human primate model, and mimics expression and function during Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV) infection.<ref name="Marks Exhausted"/> This pathway can potentially be targeted to enhance killing of HIV infected cells during "Shock and Kill" HIV curative approaches.<ref name="shock and kill">{{cite journal | title=HIV: Shock and Kill | author=Steven G. Deeks | journal=Nature |date=July 2012 | volume=487 | issue=1 | pages=439–440 | doi=10.1038/487439a | pmid= 22836995| bibcode=2012Natur.487..439D | s2cid=205073070 }}</ref>
 
===Cancer===
TIGIT and [[PD-1]] has been shown to be over -expressed on tumor antigen-specific (TA-specific) CD8+ T cells and CD8+ [[tumor infiltrating lymphocyte]]s (TILs) from individuals with melanoma.<ref name="chauvin">{{cite journal | title= TIGIT and PD-1 impair tumor antigen-specific CD8⁺ T cells in melanoma patients |author1=Joe-Marc Chauvin |author2=Ornella Pagliano |author3=Julien Fourcade |author4=Zhaojun Sun |author5=Hong Wang |author6=Cindy Sander |author7=John M. Kirkwood |author8=Tseng-hui Timothy Chen |author9=Mark Maurer |author10=Alan J. Korman |author11=Hassane M. Zarour |name-list-style=amp | journal=J Clin Invest |date=April 2015 | volume=125 | issue = 5 | pages=2046–2058 | doi=10.1172/JCI80445 | pmid= 25866972 | pmc=4463210}}</ref> Blockade of TIGIT and [[PD-1]] led to increased cell proliferation, cytokine production, and degranulation of TA-specific CD8+ T cells and TIL CD8+ T cells.<ref name="chauvin"/> It can be considered an [[immune checkpoint]].<ref name=TIGIT-2017>[http://www.onclive.com/publications/oncology-live/2017/vol-18-no-03/pharmaceutical-leaders-highlight-promise-of-tigit Pharmaceutical Leaders Highlight Promise of TIGIT. Feb 2017]</ref> Co-blockade of TIGIT and [[PD-1]] pathways elicits tumor rejection in preclinical murine models.<ref name="johnston">{{cite journal | title= The Immunoreceptor TIGIT Regulates Antitumor and Antiviral CD8+ T Cell Effector Function |author1=Robert J. Johnston |author2=Laetitia Comps-Agrar |author3=Jason Hackney |author4=Xin Yu |author5=Mahrukh Huseni |author6=Yagai Yang |author7=Summer Park |author8=Vincent Javinal |author9=Henry Chiu |author10=Bryan Irving |author11=Dan L. Eaton |author12=Jane L. Grogan | journal=Cancer Cell |date=December 2014 | volume=26 | issue=6 | pages=923–937 | doi=10.1016/j.ccell.2014.10.018 | pmid= 25465800 |doi-access=free }}</ref> Numerous anti-TIGIT therapies have entered clinical development.
 
* '''Tiragolumab'''
 
Tiragolumab is the furthest progressed anti-TIGIT therapy in development. In [[Non-small-cell lung cancer|non-small cell lung cancer]] (NSCLC) setting, the phase II CITYSCAPE clinical trial ([https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03563716?term=tiragolumab%C2%A8&draw=2&rank=13 NCT03563716]) evaluated the combination of the anti-TIGIT antibody tiragolumab in combination with the anti-[[PD-L1]] antibody [[atezolizumab]] in patients with newly-diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer whose tumors expressed PD-L1. After a median follow-up of 16.3 months, the combination of tiragolumab and atezolizumab reduced the risk of [[Progression-free survival|disease progression or death]] by 38% compared to atezolizumab monotherapy. In a subset of patients with high PD-L1 expression (at least 50% of tumor cells expressing PD-L1), the combination of tiragolumab with atezolizumab further reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 71% compared to atezolizumab monotherapy. Overall, patients who received the combination of atezolizumab and tiragolumab lived a median of 23.2 months, compared to 14.5 months with atezolizumab monotherapy.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Cho |first1=B. C. |last2=Rodriguez-Abreu |first2=D. |last3=Hussein |first3=M. |last4=Cobo |first4=M. |last5=Patel |first5=A. |last6=Secen |first6=N. |last7=Gerstner |first7=G. |last8=Kim |first8=D.-W. |last9=Lee |first9=Y.-G. |last10=Su |first10=W.-C. |last11=Huang |first11=E. |date=2021-12-01 |title=LBA2 Updated analysis and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from CITYSCAPE: A randomised, double-blind, phase II study of the anti-TIGIT antibody tiragolumab + atezolizumab (TA) versus placebo + atezolizumab (PA) as first-line treatment for PD-L1+ NSCLC |url=https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04773-6/abstract |journal=Annals of Oncology |language=English |volume=32 |pages=S1428 |doi=10.1016/j.annonc.2021.10.217 |s2cid=245059452 |issn=0923-7534|doi-access=free }}</ref> Despite this initial success, there was concern that the benefit of PFS in the tiragolumab + atezolizumab arm was driven by the underperformance of atezolizumab in this trial.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Adams |first=Ben |date=2021-11-10 |title=Roche posts 'impressive' TIGIT combo lung cancer data, but trial deaths weigh down shares |work=Fierce Pharma |url=https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/roche-posts-impressive-tigit-combo-lung-cancer-data-as-jefferies-read-blockbuster-sales-tea |access-date=2023-10-13}}</ref> Another concern was that there was no link between TIGIT expression and the efficacy of tiragolumab in the trial.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-05-11 |title=Looking beyond Roche's Tigit bombshell |url=https://www.evaluate.com/vantage/articles/news/trial-results/looking-beyond-roches-tigit-bombshell |access-date=2024-01-20 |website=Evaluate.com |language=en}}</ref>
 
The phase III, randomized, double-blinded SKYSCRAPER-01 trial, which evaluates the efficacy of the combination of tiragolumab and atezolizumab in NSCLC patients whose tumors have high PD-L1 expression, failed to show a significant PFS improvement in the combination arm compared with placebo + atezolizumab, although it showed "a numerical improvement" in both endpoints of PFS and overall survival (OS).<ref>{{Cite web |title=[Ad hoc announcement pursuant to Art. 53 LR] Roche reports interim results for phase III SKYSCRAPER-01 study in PD-L1-high metastatic non-small cell lung cancer |url=https://www.roche.com/investors/updates/inv-update-2022-05-11 |access-date=2023-10-12 |website=www.roche.com |type=Press release}}</ref> In August 2023, an internal PowerPoint presentation detailing OS data of the second analysis was mistakenly made public on the Internet and showed a numerical improvement in terms of OS [estimated overall survival after a median follow-up of 15,5 months: 22,9 months in tiragolumab + atezolizumab arm versus 16,7 months in placebo + atezolizumab arm, HR: 0,81 (95% CI: 0,63, 1,03)].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Another twist in the TIGIT saga |url=https://www.oncologypipeline.com/apexonco/https%3A%2F%2Frp.liu233w.com%3A443%2Fhttps%2Fwww.oncologypipeline.com%2Fapexonco%2Fanother-twist-tigit-saga |access-date=2023-10-12 |website=ApexOnco |language=en}}</ref> No new safety signals were identified and the trial remains blinded to investigators and patients.<ref>{{Cite web |title=[Ad hoc announcement pursuant to Art. 53 LR] Roche provides update on Phase III Skyscraper-01 study in PD-L1-high metastatic non-small cell lung cancer |url=https://www.roche.com/media/releases/med-cor-2023-08-23 |access-date=2023-10-12 |website=www.roche.com |type=Press release}}</ref>
 
Tiragolumab also shows encouraging efficacy in [[hepatocellular carcinoma]] setting. In the MORPHEUS-liver trial, tiragolumab + atezolizumab + bevacizumab significantly improved response rate and PFS in both patients with positive PD-L1 expression and with negative PD-L1 expression.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Finn |first1=Richard S. |last2=Ryoo |first2=Baek-Yeol |last3=Hsu |first3=Chih-Hung |last4=Li |first4=Daneng |last5=Burgoyne |first5=Adam |last6=Cotter |first6=Christopher |last7=Badhrinarayanan |first7=Shreya |last8=Wang |first8=Yulei |last9=Yin |first9=Anqi |last10=Rao Edubilli |first10=Tirupathi |last11=Gane |first11=Edward |date=2023-06-01 |title=Results from the MORPHEUS-liver study: Phase Ib/II randomized evaluation of tiragolumab (tira) in combination with atezolizumab (atezo) and bevacizumab (bev) in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). |url=https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.4010 |journal=Journal of Clinical Oncology |language=en |volume=41 |issue=16_suppl |pages=4010 |doi=10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.4010 |s2cid=259083998 |issn=0732-183X}}</ref>
 
In [[Small-cell carcinoma|small-cell lung cancer]], tiragolumab didn't show any OS and PFS benefit in the SKYSCRAPER-02 trial,<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Rudin |first1=Charles M. |last2=Liu |first2=Stephen V. |last3=Lu |first3=Shun |last4=Soo |first4=Ross A. |last5=Hong |first5=Min Hee |last6=Lee |first6=Jong-Seok |last7=Bryl |first7=Maciej |last8=Dumoulin |first8=Daphne W |last9=Rittmeyer |first9=Achim |last10=Chiu |first10=Chao-Hua |last11=Ozyilkan |first11=Ozgur |last12=Navarro |first12=Alejandro |last13=Novello |first13=Silvia |last14=Ozawa |first14=Yuichi |last15=Meng |first15=Raymond |date=2022-06-10 |title=SKYSCRAPER-02: Primary results of a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of atezolizumab (atezo) + carboplatin + etoposide (CE) with or without tiragolumab (tira) in patients (pts) with untreated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). |url=https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2022.40.17_suppl.LBA8507 |journal=Journal of Clinical Oncology |language=en |volume=40 |issue=17_suppl |pages=LBA8507 |doi=10.1200/JCO.2022.40.17_suppl.LBA8507 |issn=0732-183X}}</ref> but its development in SCLC setting is being continued as consolidation therapy for patients with limited-stage SCLC who have not progressed during/after chemotherapy and radiotherapy ([https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04308785 NCT04308785]).
 
In the Skyscraper-04 trial assessing the efficacy and safety of tiragolumab in patients who have recurrent, PD-L1 positive cervical cancer, the combination of tiragolumab and atezolizumab, although improved response rate in both PD-L1 low and PD-L1 high subgroups, only did so marginally and non-significantly.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Salani |first=Ritu |date=2023-11-05 |title=Efficacy and safety results from SKYSCRAPER-04: An open-label randomized phase 2 trial of tiragolumab plus atezolizumab for PD-L1-positive recurrent cervical cancer |url=https://medically.roche.com/global/en/oncology/igcs-2023/medical-material/IGCS-2023-presentation-salani-watch-efficacy-and-safety-results-pdf.html |access-date=2024-01-20 |website=medically.roche.com}}</ref>
 
The combination of tiragolumab, atezolizumab, and platinum-containing chemotherapy improved PFS and OS compared with comparator arms in esophageal cancer patients in the phase II MORPHEUS-EC trial and the phase III SKYSCRAPER-08 trial.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Hsu |first=Chih-Hung |date=2024-01-18 |title=SKYSCRAPER-08: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of first-line tiragolumab + atezolizumab and chemotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma |url=https://medically.roche.com/global/en/oncology/2024-gi-cancers-symposium/medical-material/gi-cancers-symposium-2024-presentation-chih-hung-hsu-SKYSCRAPER-08-pdf.html |access-date=2024-01-20 |website=medically.roche.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Sun |first=Jong-Mu |display-authors= |date=2024-01-18 |title=MORPHEUS-EC: a phase Ib/II open-label, randomized study of tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated locally advanced unresectable or metastatic esophageal cancer |url=https://medically.roche.com/global/en/oncology/2024-gi-cancers-symposium/medical-material/gi-cancers-symposium-2024-poster-jong-mu-sun-MORPHEUS-EC-pdf.html |access-date=2024-01-20 |website=medically.roche.com}}</ref>
 
The Skyscraper-06 trial was ended in July 2024 in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer as tiragolumab plus Tecentriq and chemotherapy did not meet the primary endpoints of progression-free survival (PFS) at primary analysis and overall survival (OS) at the first interim analysis.<ref>{{cite news |title=Roche stops pivotal TIGIT trial after Keytruda lands knockout blow at first attempt |url=https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/roche-stops-pivotal-tigit-trial-after-keytruda-lands-knockout-blow-first-attempt |publisher=Fierce Biotech |date=4 July 2024}}</ref> The OS hazard ratio was 1.33 at the first interim analysis, indicating that patients are living longer on [[Pembrolizumab|Keytruda]] than tiragolumab.<ref>{{cite news |title=[Ad hoc announcement pursuant to Art. 53 LR] Roche provides update on phase II/III SKYSCRAPER-06 study in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer |url=https://www.roche.com/media/releases/med-cor-2024-07-04 |publisher=Roche |date=4 July 2024}}</ref>
 
==See also==