Wikipedia:Requests for comment/YellowMonkey: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Eraserhead1 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(15 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{consensus|On hold until YellowMonkey returns and has a chance to respond to the concerns raised below.}}
{{rfcuarchivetop}}
In order to remain listed at [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct]], at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this sysop and have failed. This must involve the ''same'' dispute, not different disputes. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 00:00, 23 November 2010 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is:
<u>Please note</u>: This template is for listing disputes about actions that are limited to administrators only, specifically these actions:
Line 56:
''{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}''
<!-- Please note: If you did not try and fail to resolve the dispute, but agree with the summary's presentation of events, please sign in the next section. -->
:#[[User:HJ Mitchell|<
:#--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 00:10, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
:#[[User:Seb az86556|Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556]] <sup>[[User_talk:Seb_az86556|> haneʼ]]</sup> 13:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Line 63:
=== Other users who endorse this statement ===
<!-- If you agree with the summary's presentation of events but did not try and fail to resolve the dispute, please sign in this section. -->
:#I'd like to ask in addition that YM adhere to the protection policy too. There have been complaints on RfPP that he's semi-protecting articles for months or indefinitely, including articles he's edited, despite there being almost no vandalism. I raised it with him back in May, but so far as I know he didn't respond. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AYellowMonkey&action=historysubmit&diff=362227912&oldid=362152108] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:YellowMonkey&oldid=361358328#Semi-protection] [[User:SlimVirgin|<
:#I do endorse the issue though note that YellowMonkey hasn't been on-line to respond to these issues. Similar issues have also recently occurred involving a recent unblock [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:YellowMonkey#Hey_now this] thread on YellowMonkey's talk page where he was asked questions about a fairly silent unblock and didn't respond. Block was for stating that "{{diff|User talk:Pal2002|397472197|397449335|I'd knock your teeth out if you in this room right now.}}" and unblock was only documented in any way (that I can find) with the edit summary "useless block". [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit|talk]]) 04:12, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Line 70:
Users who endorse this summary:
# '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<
#Endorsement based in part on participation in the British Empire FAR/C. [[User:Fifelfoo|Fifelfoo]] ([[User talk:Fifelfoo|talk]]) 07:09, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
#-- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 07:28, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Line 86:
# [[User:Lothar von Richthofen|Lothar von Richthofen]] ([[User talk:Lothar von Richthofen|talk]]) 23:20, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
# [[User:Secret|Secret]] <sup>[[User talk:Secret|account]]</sup> 23:43, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
# <
#--''[[User:Brewcrewer|<span style="font family:Arial;color:green">brew</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Brewcrewer|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:#2E82F4">crewer</span>]] [[User talk:Brewcrewer|(yada, yada)]]'' 00:26, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
#--[[User:Shshshsh|<span style="color:blue">'''''Shahid'''''</span>]] • <sup>''[[User talk:Shshshsh|<span style="color:teal">Talk</span><span style="color:black">'''2'''</span><span style="color:teal">me</span>]]''</sup> 12:04, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Line 103:
Users who endorse this summary:
#<span style="font-size:80%;font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold">[[User:The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick|<
#Agree with most, make correction that YM is a ''FAR'' delegate.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:45, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
#I absolutely agree with this assertion, as I myself have noticed this kind of high-handedness on YM's part, and I believe this sort of attitude makes him bypasas other's comments and requests, as, simply put "they are below his ordeal". But he is indeed an excellent contributer to the sports articles. — [[User:Legolas2186|<
===Outside view by RegentsPark===
Line 113:
#--[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] ([[User talk:RegentsPark|talk]]) 01:00, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
#--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:42, 23 November 2010 (UTC) Agree, but I think a sincere apology to YK is in order by now.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:42, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
#-- [[User:Amog|<
#--'''[[User:Jayen466|<
#-- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 06:46, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
#—<span style="font-family:trebuchet ms;font-variant:small-caps;">'''[[User:Ancapp|<
#-- [[User:Mathsci|Mathsci]] ([[User talk:Mathsci|talk]]) 08:02, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
# '''Endorse'''. The point on responsiveness needs to be made, but YM is still far and away a net positive for the project. - [[User talk:2over0|2/0]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/2over0|cont.]])</small> 18:19, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Line 126:
# [[User:Shoy|shoy]] <small>([[User talk:Shoy|reactions]])</small> 16:12, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
# [[User:Lothar von Richthofen|Lothar von Richthofen]] ([[User talk:Lothar von Richthofen|talk]]) 15:40, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
# —[[User:SpacemanSpiff|<
===Outside view by Baseball Bugs===
Line 136:
#←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 01:40, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
#--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:48, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
#Well put. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<
#--[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] ([[User talk:RegentsPark|talk]]) 03:24, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
#[[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit|talk]]) 04:14, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
#--[[User:Jayron32|<
# support the general gist (excluding the Ganga/Ganges issue, of course). --'''[[User:Jayen466|<
#Per Jayen. [[User:SlimVirgin|<
#-- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 06:46, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
#—<span style="font-family:trebuchet ms;font-variant:small-caps;">'''[[User:Ancapp|<
#Endorse, excluding the comments about the content issue. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] <sup>[[user talk:rd232|talk]]</sup> 08:46, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
# [[User:Kanatonian|Kanatonian]] ([[User talk:Kanatonian|talk]]) 18:08, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Line 159:
# -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] <[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]> 22:39, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
# [[User:Cube lurker|Cube lurker]] ([[User talk:Cube lurker|talk]]) 15:12, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
# —[[User:SpacemanSpiff|<
# I believe that there are significant problems with several articles relating to India. [[Hogenakkal Falls]], and its historically lame edit war (in which I was involved, to my shame), is one example of such. YM has dealt with these articles more than most of us. His administrative work, in general, have been an example which places most of us other admins to shame. In this case, he may have gone a bit beyond what is necessary, and may have been a bit less communicative than we might like, and for that some criticism is probably due, if only to reduce the possibility of the individual's actions being possibly made the subject of suspicion. Having said all that, we all make mistakes. If this is the only one YM has made of this degree, that makes me feel even smaller than I otherwise do, particulrly considering the lameness of some of the justly earned criticism I have received. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 19:09, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
#--[[User:Shshshsh|<span style="color:blue">'''''Shahid'''''</span>]] • <sup>''[[User talk:Shshshsh|<span style="color:teal">Talk</span><span style="color:black">'''2'''</span><span style="color:teal">me</span>]]''</sup> 12:06, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Line 169:
# [[User:Lambanog|Lambanog]] ([[User talk:Lambanog|talk]]) 03:51, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
# [[User:Physchim62|Physchim62]] [[User talk:Physchim62|(talk)]] 03:57, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
# Endorse in part. I believe the issue started with his denial to respond to querries by YK. However, simply reverting his wrong blockages is not going to do him good, since he chooses to ignore others mostly. — [[User:Legolas2186|<
# Endorse the junior admin part. YellowMonkey's content contributions are not at issue; misuse of administrator privileges are. [[User:Quigley|Quigley]] ([[User talk:Quigley|talk]]) 20:24, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Line 189:
Users who endorse this summary:
# --'''[[User:Jayen466|<
# I did not take a look at the British Empire nomination before reading through Jayen's asserions. After reading both accused party comments, I am absolutely disgusted with YM's attitude and behaviour towards the Indian editors. And that's coming from an editor, who have time-to-time edited the Indian articles, although lingers on the music articles. I myself faced a little bit of behaviour and shade-throwing from him before, but shrugged it off. Seeing that this is a recurrent issue with YM's editing, I see a complete abuse of editing and administrative tools are going on. I feel the administrative tools in his hand is futile and should be taken down. Regretfully, — [[User:Legolas2186|<
# I felt the RFCU was slightly premature, since YM was not fully active on WP during the ANI discussion. But [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:YellowMonkey&action=historysubmit&diff=398396056&oldid=398359972 these] comments suggest waiting wouldn't have helped, and this summary is a good one. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] <sup>[[user talk:rd232|talk]]</sup> 08:43, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
# Fair enough, and he should probably pass India-related FARs to his fellow delegate. A FAR delegate should not be acting in matters where impartiality can be reasonably questioned.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 14:25, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
# [[User:Zuggernaut|Zuggernaut]] ([[User talk:Zuggernaut|talk]]) 17:17, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
# [[User:Kanatonian|Kanatonian]] ([[User talk:Kanatonian|talk]]) 18:07, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
# [[User:SlimVirgin|<
# [[User:Quigley|Quigley]] ([[User talk:Quigley|talk]]) 20:24, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
# -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] <[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]> 22:39, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
Line 205:
# [[User:Zuggernaut|Zuggernaut]] ([[User talk:Zuggernaut|talk]]) 17:17, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
# YK was being borderline disruptive and I thought it might reach the point of being blocked, but was quite surprised to see a 2 week block, and done with no warning or even announcement that it was done. I discovered the block by accident--it was not obvious he had been blocked. Was also surprised to see his attempts to discuss it over the next few weeks being met with near total silence from YM. I'm less sure about the "British nationalist editors" glorifying the British Empire. But the whole thing was painful to see. I've seen several promising editors driven away from Wikipedia by things like this. Glad to see YK did not give up, and does seem to be working to be less disruptive. [[User:Pfly|Pfly]] ([[User talk:Pfly|talk]]) 18:33, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
# --'''[[User:Jayen466|<
# Endorse the notion that editors (of all nationalities) with underrepresented views should be brought into the fold and not insulted or marginalized. [[User:Quigley|Quigley]] ([[User talk:Quigley|talk]]) 20:24, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
===Outside view by Physchim62===
[[File:
I’ve had several “interactions” with {{admin|YellowMonkey}} over the years, and I must say that I’m not in the least surprised by his attitude over this dispute. The combination of an ''[[ex cathedra]]'' pronouncement followed by a simple refusal to discuss his actions is, for me, one of his hallmarks.
Line 226:
#[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 18:38, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
#[[User:Tomayres|Tomayres]] ([[User talk:Tomayres|talk]]) 19:46, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
#[[User:HJ Mitchell|<
#[[User:SarekOfVulcan|SarekOfVulcan]] ([[User talk:SarekOfVulcan|talk]]) 20:14, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
#[[User talk:East of Borschov|East of Borschov]] 22:35, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
#--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] ([[User talk:Crossmr|talk]]) 23:42, 23 November 2010 (UTC) Wow. That's kind of disgusting.
# Only the last paragraph. [[User:Shoy|shoy]] <small>([[User talk:Shoy|reactions]])</small> 16:12, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
# [[User:DC|<
# [[User:Quigley|Quigley]] ([[User talk:Quigley|talk]]) 20:24, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
# The total failure to address the OTD concerns properly when raised on his talk page strikes me as particularly egregious.--[[User:Korruski|<strong><
# Non-responsiveness is a huge problem for an admin, and this does increasingly look like a pattern. Having been well aware of this issue at arbcom, it's even harder to excuse. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] <sup>[[user talk:rd232|talk]]</sup> 11:46, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
#[[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 08:01, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
# [[User:Hillcountries|Hillcountries]] ([[User talk:Hillcountries|talk]]) 10:08, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
# -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] <[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]> 21:34, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
# --'''[[User:Jayen466|<
# [[User:Cube lurker|Cube lurker]] ([[User talk:Cube lurker|talk]]) 15:14, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
# Agree. He's authoritarian and blocks people in disputes that he doesn't understand. [[User:Ninguém|Ninguém]] ([[User talk:Ninguém|talk]]) 20:53, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Line 244:
#Specifically discussion of admin actions. If YM is unwilling to do that, he shouldn't be using the tools. --[[User:Kbdank71|Kbdank71]] 16:02, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
# [[User:Outback the koala|Outback the koala]] ([[User talk:Outback the koala|talk]]) 08:36, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
# Absolutely '''spot on''' - I believe the term "practice what you preach" applies here. Imho, looking at the discussion and the clear lack of judgement in application of the block, I agree with other signers and the poster of this view, this admin should not be in possession of the tools if they are unwilling to deal with issues arising from their use in a sensible and civil manner. I therefore in addition to this comment, call for '''Desysop''' and '''Recall''' of this administrator. '''[[User:BarkingFish|<
===Outside view by Kanatonian===
Line 360:
#[[User:Serpent's Choice|Serpent's Choice]] ([[User talk:Serpent's Choice|talk]]) 20:26, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
#Believe this should be followed up by uninvolved admin to view deletions and revisions. This may be a serial pattern here. Given YM's ... unyielding response, this could happen again, and very likely will.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 20:36, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
#Just a question. The summary says YM has not protected pages since June 1, 2010, but he has, and in several cases I've looked at, in violation of policy (semi-protecting articles he has edited recently and/or semi-protecting them for months, a year, or indefinitely after almost no vandalism). See the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=protect&user=YellowMonkey&page=&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_patrol_log=1&hide_review_log=1 protection log here]. [[User:SlimVirgin|<
#Endorse the analysis of blocking actions <s>but, per SlimVirgin, question the analysis of protection actions</s>. The six-month semi-protection of [[Nguyễn Văn Thiệu]] seems very questionable given the low level of vandalism, and YM's obvious involvement in the editing, both evidenced in the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nguy%E1%BB%85n_V%C4%83n_Thi%E1%BB%87u&limit=250&action=history article history]. [[User:Physchim62|Physchim62]] [[User talk:Physchim62|(talk)]] 20:51, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
#[[User talk:East of Borschov|East of Borschov]] 22:36, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Line 366:
#[[User:Kanatonian|Kanatonian]] ([[User talk:Kanatonian|talk]]) 23:55, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
#[[User:Tomayres|Tomayres]] ([[User talk:Tomayres|talk]]) 01:54, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
# As I said in one of my summaries, the administrative tools in the hand of a corrupt editor is devastating. YM shines a worthy example of that. I don't give a damn about how many Fas he has. — [[User:Legolas2186|<
# This is what it's about. Nothing else. [[User:Seb az86556|Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556]] <sup>[[User_talk:Seb_az86556|> haneʼ]]</sup> 13:45, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
# [[User:Shoy|shoy]] <small>([[User talk:Shoy|reactions]])</small> 16:12, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
# [[User:Quigley|Quigley]] ([[User talk:Quigley|talk]]) 20:24, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
# Endorse. Note: Mnlira013 has no deleted contributions. The user's additions in 2010 were merely adding [[History.com]] links to some External links. The sole talk page interaction was a note from someone else describing this as "Nonconstructive editing." (in the edit summary - [[WP:Twinkle|Twinkle]]'s Vandalism Warning Level 1, I think), which wasn't exactly helpful, and suggests YM didn't even look at the user talk page, because seeing that should have prompted some notification about spam (since he saw it that way), most obviously by choosing an appropriate block message. Except of course it wasn't spam, even if the links shouldn't be added. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] <sup>[[user talk:rd232|talk]]</sup> 11:14, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
# --'''[[User:Jayen466|<
# [[User:Jafeluv|Jafeluv]] ([[User talk:Jafeluv|talk]]) 22:59, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
# [[User:Hillcountries|Hillcountries]] ([[User talk:Hillcountries|talk]]) 09:59, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Line 384:
Users who endorse this summary:
# --[[Special:Contributions/150.101.127.159|150.101.127.159]] ([[User talk:150.101.127.159|talk]]) 09:01, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
#That was an intemperate comment, and it was followed by a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Redthoreau&action=historysubmit&diff=394722433&oldid=394722168 rebuke] from [[User:DGG|DGG]]. --'''[[User:Jayen466|<
#I remembered that, but wasn't quite sure whether to bring it up. But since you did... Yes, not good to make such statements at RFA, without any evidence (handwaving to the effect that "anyone can see from his edits in that topic area" is not evidence), and then not respond to DGG's rebuke. In view of the latter aspects, seems a relevant part of the behaviour pattern being discussed. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] <sup>[[user talk:rd232|talk]]</sup> 16:14, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
# [[User:Kanatonian|Kanatonian]] ([[User talk:Kanatonian|talk]]) 16:39, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
# [[User:Quigley|Quigley]] ([[User talk:Quigley|talk]]) 20:24, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
# [[User:Hillcountries|Hillcountries]] ([[User talk:Hillcountries|talk]]) 09:59, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
# His rude behavior is unbecoming of an admin in my opinion, and he seems to hold grudges based on what he deems to be an editor's ideological point of view. [[User:Redthoreau| <
===Outside view by Nick-D===
Line 399:
#--[[User:CarTick|CarTick]] ([[User talk:CarTick|talk]]) 11:47, 24 November 2010 (UTC) well said. very similar to what i [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=398057531 said] at ANI. It is no surprise his no-nonsense approach is not popular with more than a few. --[[User:CarTick|CarTick]] ([[User talk:CarTick|talk]]) 11:47, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
#--[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] ([[User talk:RegentsPark|talk]]) 12:45, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
#-- [[User:Amog|<
#--[[User:Mkativerata|Mkativerata]] ([[User talk:Mkativerata|talk]]) 18:44, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
# Has the balls to admit to being wrong and apologise; rare quality in an admin. Is prepared to jump in and deal with a problem; rare quality in an admin. Well said. Seems like a lot of people are indulging in chips on shoulders rather than contributing to an RFC. ''[[User:Justin_A_Kuntz|Justin]]'' <small>''[[User Talk:Justin_A_Kuntz|talk]]''</small> 22:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Line 412:
# [[User:Bilby|Bilby]] ([[User talk:Bilby|talk]]) 14:16, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
# [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 23:54, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
# —[[User:SpacemanSpiff|<
# [[User:Secret|Secret]] <sup>[[User talk:Secret|account]]</sup> 00:21, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
# –[[User talk:Moondyne|Moondyne]] 14:01, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Line 435:
Users who endorse this summary:
# [[User:Quigley|Quigley]] ([[User talk:Quigley|talk]]) 19:54, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
# Agree wholeheartedly with the last portion of your statement, this is something that needs to head to arbcom. [[User:DC|<
#Absolutely. If YellowMonkey won't do the decent thing and simply resign his tools, they should be removed from him. [[User:Physchim62|Physchim62]] [[User talk:Physchim62|(talk)]] 20:17, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
#[[User:Kanatonian|Kanatonian]] ([[User talk:Kanatonian|talk]]) 21:18, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
#This is highly problematic. I recall a similar case from 2008 (see [[Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics/Archive_39#Section_break_2]]), in which YM blocked one of his/her opponents (Googlean) with the motivation that Googlean had violated a 'consensus' (a consensus proclaimed by YM him/herself and not endorsed by any other editor prior to the block was issued). --[[User:Soman|Soman]] ([[User talk:Soman|talk]]) 22:51, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
#[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] ([[User talk:Crossmr|talk]]) 23:10, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
#Disquieting. --'''[[User:Jayen466|<
#There's a pattern here.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 02:54, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
# <small>(Lo and behold, I'm endorsing Quigley.)</small> [[User:Seb az86556|Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556]] <sup>[[User_talk:Seb_az86556|> haneʼ]]</sup> 03:04, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
#As has been stated, repeated pattern of poor administration. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 08:25, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
#Endorsing; I'm open to the possibility of YM explaining his side of this (as I requested) sufficiently well that I'd strike my endorse, but I'm not holding my breath. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] <sup>[[user talk:rd232|talk]]</sup> 10:55, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
#Some kind of explanation is needed. But part of the problem is that explanations seem rarely to be forthcoming.--[[User:Korruski|<strong><
# [[User:Jafeluv|Jafeluv]] ([[User talk:Jafeluv|talk]]) 23:17, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
# I still can't believe the corruptness that this user has been going on with. I always thought that he was quite high-almighty type of editor, fantastic FA developer, however, these behaviours and actions are certainly not acceptable in Wikipedia. There will be no explanation from his side I guess, because the facts show that this is indeed an on-going matter. What happened to Quigley, certainly happened to many. Its time to give up on this user. Either remove his administrative tools or maybe a block is eminent. — [[User:Legolas2186|<
# [[User:Hillcountries|Hillcountries]] ([[User talk:Hillcountries|talk]]) 09:59, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
# -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] <[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]> 21:47, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Line 461:
Users who endorse this summary:
# [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] <sup>[[user talk:rd232|talk]]</sup> 12:00, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
# --'''[[User:Jayen466|<
#--[[User:Korruski|<strong><
# [[User:Quigley|Quigley]] ([[User talk:Quigley|talk]]) 14:40, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
# [[User:Kanatonian|Kanatonian]] ([[User talk:Kanatonian|talk]]) 17:45, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
# [[User:DC|<
# Seems more bizarre than WikiCriminal to me. Note however that YM has used his alternate account to try to ''deflect'' criticisms of his lack of admin accountability, by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/YellowMonkey&diff=prev&oldid=398546684 pointing out] that {{user|YellowAssessmentMonkey}} has plenty of talk page contributions while {{admin|YellowMonkey}} has remarkably few: the problem remains that the talk page contributions on YAM are not the ones that are expected of YM as an admin. [[User:Physchim62|Physchim62]] [[User talk:Physchim62|(talk)]] 19:10, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
# [[User:Hillcountries|Hillcountries]] ([[User talk:Hillcountries|talk]]) 09:59, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Line 477:
===Outside view by Access Denied===
Desysop him NOW. He has a habit of randomly accusing editors. At Redthoreau's RFA he called Redthoreau a communist pov pusher. And there was the retarded nationalist incident. And this terrible block. And he misuses his user talk page. He has such a long header that the talk page took over 8 minutes to load for me. Then the pageload hung and I had o load it all over again. I think heshould be desyssoped; he has clearly misused the tools. <small class="ad-sig" style="background:#800;border:1px solid black;color:white;">'''[[User:Access Denied|<
;Editors who endorse this summary
#<small class="ad-sig" style="background:#800;border:1px solid black;color:white;">'''[[User:Access Denied|<
#[[User:TheTimesAreAChanging|TheTimesAreAChanging]] ([[User talk:TheTimesAreAChanging|talk]]) 05:08, 2 December 2010 (UTC)He does indeed have a terrible habit of personal vendettas.
Line 502:
-->
{{rfcuarchivebottom}}
|