Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
| (39 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) | |||
Line 6:
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" |
|rowspan="2" |
Line 56:
Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.
----
<small>You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated [[meta:Research:Wikipedia Dispute Resolution|research page]]. <
|}
Line 66:
== M Roach [[WP:BLP]] ==
* Hi - [[Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Michael_Roach]] - there is a report about some disputed content - please join in the discussion there and seek [[WP:Consensus]] for the desired addition - thanks - [[User:Youreallycan|<
== Roach edit warring warning ==
do not edit war disputed content such as this when it is under discussion at the BLP noticeboard - please take this as a warning - if you continue I will report you and request your editing privileges are removed - [[User:Youreallycan|<
:I simply replaced the info, removed the source you found weak, and added the sources you requested. But seeing your page, and that you were once off2riorob, well...[[User:Tao2911|Tao2911]] ([[User talk:Tao2911#top|talk]]) 22:25, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
::I suggest you go to the BLP noticeboard report and present your case - if your correct within policy I will also support your addition - [[User:Youreallycan|<
== Michael Roach COI ==
Hi - Are you are real life opponent of Michael Roach? You clearly have a [[WP:COI]] - can you make my WP life a bit easier and just accept you are conflicted and state that you will stop editing the biography - [[WP:BLP]] - [[User:Youreallycan|<
:My god, you are such a dick, Rob. Always and in every context. Points for consistency, though.[[User:Tao2911|Tao2911]] ([[User talk:Tao2911#top|talk]]) 13:52, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Line 108:
== own roach ==
Hi - I removed your addition - [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Roach&diff=prev&oldid=498086374 diff] - for reason/s that there is no independent reporting of the issue - please don't replace without consensus support through talkpage discussion - thanks - [[User:Youreallycan|<
HI - this is not a [[WP:RS]] - [http://www.elephantjournal.com/2012/05/tragedy-at-diamond-mountain-an-update/#idc-cover http://www.elephantjournal.com/2012/05/tragedy-at-diamond-mountain-an-update/#idc-cover] - that would assert any notability - please remove the disputed content from the biography of a living person and move to discussion - thanks - [[User:Youreallycan|<
:this source's reliability is already established by having been used by other tertiary sources, plural, used in article, including the New York times than not only quotes it, but links to it. Also, Elephant Journal is bona fide. It's a pay journal, online AND print, with staff, writers, etc.[[User:Tao2911|Tao2911]] ([[User talk:Tao2911#top|talk]]) 23:14, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Line 118:
== June 2012 ==
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-tdel2 --> [[User:Youreallycan|<
:you clearly demonstrate a pattern of siding with this biased editor intent on whitewashing, or in this case, out of frustration simply discrediting the page. Why not wade in and show where there is bias, and anything out of line with sources?[[User:Tao2911|Tao2911]] ([[User talk:Tao2911#top|talk]]) 16:06, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
::Here is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tao2911#Michael_Roach.E2.80.8E_COI the bias], you just won't see/admit/accept it. - [[User:Youreallycan|<
:::what, that I don't like you? I don't see what else you are talking about, since I don't have any opinion about this guy whatsoever, only that 10 news stories should be accurately represented.[[User:Tao2911|Tao2911]] ([[User talk:Tao2911#top|talk]]) 16:10, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
::::You said the other day that the subject of the article was distorting the golden teachings or something along those lines, didn't you? - [[User:Youreallycan|<span style="color:purple;">You</span>]]<span style="color:orange;">really</span>[[User talk:Youreallycan|<span style="color:red;">can</span>]] 16:14, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
::No, I didn't! And this is exactly the kind of nonsense that I find so frustrating. I put in quotes, and said it was a quote, that a critic of Roach said that IN A SOURCE. Abhayakara misread it, said it was me - and a whole thread was derailed from his illiteracy (and this is one of a half dozen similar gaffs on his part.) Now you just repeat it, and take it as an excuse to get me blocked, while lying about the edit history to boot (the POV tag wasn't yours, and I did not revert three times). Nice work.[[User:Tao2911|Tao2911]] ([[User talk:Tao2911#top|talk]]) 18:02, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
== Your edits at [[Michael Roach]] ==
The report at [[WP:AN3#User:Tao2911 reported by Nomoskedasticity (talk) (Result: )]] asserts that you've broken the 3RR rule at [[Michael Roach]] and that you've engaged in a pattern of removal of the POV tag. If you make no effort to respond at the noticeboard, it is likely that you will be sanctioned. Some editors have stated that a short block will be insufficient. Thank you, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 16:34, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
:well I was away from computer and wasn't able to respond. Just like to say that editor youreallycan has showed bias against me personally before. He lied at the board saying I reverted HIS POV tag, when I reverted twice, explained why and asked that an independent editor replace if deemed necessary (with explaination); and '''it wasn't his tag''', it was Abhyakara's, who has been repeatedly warned for POV issues, edit warring, and whitewashing the page. I made dozens of highly constructive edits to that page, incorporating and addressing nearly all of Abhayakara's concerns, solely excepting his repeated desire to simply remove all info he deems "negative" about his admitted guru. So, clearly I disagree with the decision, but whatever. I will happily return to life. Just keep an eye on that page, kids. Abhayakara is sure to be at it with a vengeance, and other editors there have been less than thorough (leaving huge gaps, and making the page have less than real sense).[[User:Tao2911|Tao2911]] ([[User talk:Tao2911#top|talk]]) 17:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
== Blocked ==
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''forty-eight hours''' for edit-warring at [[Michael Roach]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. </div><!-- Template:uw-block -->
Note that I don't consider your promise in your latest edit summary that you wouldn't revert again to hold any weight. You were informed that your 3RR violation was reported to [[WP:AN3]] and you still continued to edit war. More earnest than promising not to revert again is to not revert at all (or self-revert). And you didn't do that. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<span style="color:black;">tariq</span><span style="color:gray;">abjotu</span>]]''' 18:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
== Third opinion requested ==
Hi Tao2911. Could you give your opinion at [[Talk:Sherry Chayat#Hear-say emails]]? Greetings, [[User:Joshua Jonathan|Joshua Jonathan]] ([[User talk:Joshua Jonathan|talk]]) 20:34, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
== Requesting third opinion on Spirituality ==
Hi Tao2911. Could you give a third opinion on [[Spirituality]]? See [[Talk:Spirituality#Lead]], [[Talk:Spirituality#Conceptual background]], [[Talk:Spirituality#Recent edits]] and [[Talk:Spirituality#Requesting third opinions on lead and definition]]. I'm asking you because of your independent and critical style of editing. [[User:Joshua Jonathan|<span style="font-size:small;"><span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">Joshua Jonathan</span></span>]] -[[User talk:Joshua Jonathan|<span style="font-size:medium;"><span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color:black">Let's talk!</span></span>]] 04:47, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
:I appreciate the appreciation, but after a cursory glance I can't quite find my way into the issues on that page. If I have more time I might try later. Looks like you have an obstreperous editor with serious POV problems - I suggest you get some admin supervision and see if that clears the way for a saner climate to make changes. Good luck![[User:Tao2911|Tao2911]] ([[User talk:Tao2911#top|talk]]) 19:17, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
::Well, if you had any integrity, you wouldn't nominate someone for blocking without 'knowing what is going on here'. Also, if you really are a college professor you would not defer to someone in your own field if that person had no professional qualifications in the subject. This is standard etiquette in academic culture. Mr Jonathan has no professional education in the field (even at the undergraduate level), has no experience of publishing and is not a native speaker of English. His many errors of grammar and syntax demonstrate this admirably. These are not ''ad hominem'' attacks but statements of fact. As an academic your profession obliges you to defer to someone who is internationally recognised in the field over someone who has no formal education in the field whatsoever. As a result of your haste you have not only caused another editor to report me for blocking but you are causing many months of hard work by a community of committed editors to be undone by someone who has very little knowledge of the subject. [[Special:Contributions/81.106.127.14|81.106.127.14]] ([[User talk:81.106.127.14|talk]]) 20:05, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
:::you clearly have issues, and here's hoping for an IP block ASAP. The only point I will address since you keep making it: you say "As an academic your profession obliges you to defer to someone who is internationally recognised (sic) in the field over someone who has no formal education in the field whatsoever". This is not how wikipedia works. you are not a "certified expert" here. There is no tenure. You are just another monkey with a keyboard like the rest of us. So, in a word, please shove your expertise somewhere more useful.[[User:Tao2911|Tao2911]] ([[User talk:Tao2911#top|talk]]) 21:59, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
==Talkback==
{{talkback|Lova Falk|User 81.106.127.14|ts=08:05, 6 February 2013 (UTC)}}
[[User:Lova_Falk|<span style="font-size:small;"><span style="font-family:Segoe Print;color:#e75e03">'''Lova Falk'''</span></span>]] [[User talk:Lova Falk|<span style="font-size:small;"><span style="font-family:Segoe Print;color:#336699">talk</span></span>]] 08:05, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
== Dae Gak ==
Hi Tao2911. Could you have a look at [[Dae Gak]]? You've been involved before; I'm just reading the Talk Page now, so you're probbaly a better judge. Greetings, [[User:Joshua Jonathan|<span style="font-size:small;"><span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">Joshua Jonathan</span></span>]] -[[User talk:Joshua Jonathan|<span style="font-size:medium;"><span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color:black">Let's talk!</span></span>]] 03:30, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
== Christmas tree ==
It's just a christmas tree, all those titles and bling-bling for DM... [[User:Joshua Jonathan|<span style="font-size:small;"><span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">Joshua Jonathan</span></span>]] -[[User talk:Joshua Jonathan|<span style="font-size:medium;"><span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color:black">Let's talk!</span></span>]] 05:32, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
:I wouldn't say so exactly. It's more the issue of him muddying the waters, mixing his business/self-help/pop psychology with his authentic Zen bona fides. He is a Soto priest; being a priest does not make you "enlightened". In fact, as his generation especially demonstrates, it can lead to a lot of inflation and confusion. He said he was going to "turn in his robes", ie stop being a priest. I wish he would've followed through - but no, he was "begged" (he claims) not to do so (by one guy - failing to give any heed to the three dozen that asked him to follow through). What would Zen do without him? (More quickly recover and flourish, I'd say.)[[User:Tao2911|Tao2911]] ([[User talk:Tao2911#top|talk]]) 20:26, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
::I've checked (again) all of his titles; it's actually just the normal Zen-curriculum. But it is presented as "big stuff", like "look what I've accomplished!" That's what irritates me; it's a sales-talk. guess you're right about "muddying the waters" etc. Best regards, [[User:Joshua Jonathan|<span style="font-size:small;"><span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">Joshua Jonathan</span></span>]] -[[User talk:Joshua Jonathan|<span style="font-size:medium;"><span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color:black">Let's talk!</span></span>]] 04:09, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
== June 2014 ==
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]]. I have automatically detected that <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=612675816 your edit] to [[Dennis Merzel]] may have broken the [[syntax]] by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:Dennis Merzel|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20{{subst</noinclude>:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new my operator's talk page].</span>
:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
*<nowiki>zuise]] in Japan (ceremonial "abbot-for-one-night" rituals at the head temples of the Soto school)</nowiki>{{red|''')'''}}<nowiki>,{{sfn|Ford|2006|p=166}} and in 1988 he was officially installed as abbot of Hosshinji Zen temple</nowiki>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow [[User:BracketBot#Opting out|these opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, <!-- (-1, 0, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->[[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]] ([[User talk:BracketBot|talk]]) 20:04, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
== [[Big Mind Process]] ==
I read the research-paper; very insightful... [[User:Joshua Jonathan|<span style="font-size:small;"><span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">Joshua Jonathan</span></span>]] -[[User talk:Joshua Jonathan|<span style="font-size:medium;"><span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color:black">Let's talk!</span></span>]] 20:46, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
== [[Good work on Adi Da]] ==
You have made the article historically accurate. Thanks! [[User:Dseer|Dseer]] ([[User talk:Dseer|talk]]) 20:07, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
*thanks! I worked hard on that durn page! So happy all the fights ended and it stabilized now for years, pretty much.[[User:Tao2911|Tao2911]] ([[User talk:Tao2911#top|talk]]) 17:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] ==
Hi,<br>
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current [[WP:ACE2015|Arbitration Committee election]]. The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia [[WP:RFAR|arbitration process]]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[WP:ARBPOL|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to [[WP:ACE2015/C|review the candidates' statements]] and submit your choices on [[Special:SecurePoll/vote/398|the voting page]]. For the Election committee, [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692210171 -->
== [[WP:ACE2016|ArbCom Elections 2016]]: Voting now open! ==
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Tao2911. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2016|2016 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2016/Candidates|the candidates' statements]] and submit your choices on '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/399|the voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/31&oldid=750614956 -->
== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Tao2911. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2017|2017 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2017/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/400|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/10&oldid=813413927 -->
== Proud Boys ==
I'm assuming you know about [[WP:3RR]]. If not, now you do. The burden is on you to get consensus for controversial changes. [[User:Grayfell|Grayfell]] ([[User talk:Grayfell|talk]]) 21:16, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
== January 2018 ==
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Proud Boys]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Grayfell|Grayfell]] ([[User talk:Grayfell|talk]]) 21:18, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
:total douchebaggery.[[User:Tao2911|Tao2911]] ([[User talk:Tao2911#top|talk]]) 21:27, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''
'''Please carefully read this information:'''
The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2|here]].
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> --[[User:DrFleischman|Dr. Fleischman]] ([[User talk:DrFleischman|talk]]) 21:29, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Tao2911. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2018|2018 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2018/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/710|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/11&oldid=866998401 -->
| |||