Seasoning (slavery): Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

25 September 2024

10 September 2024

8 July 2024

21 April 2024

20 January 2024

  • curprev 13:4513:45, 20 January 2024 Maxim Masiutin talk contribs 15,750 bytes +4 Altered pages. Add: authors 1-1. Removed parameters. Formatted dashes. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. Added the cs1 style template to denote Vancouver ("vanc") citation style, because references contain "vauthors" attribute to specify the list of authors. undo

8 October 2023

25 September 2023

1 May 2023

23 April 2023

12 April 2023

29 March 2023

27 February 2023

18 January 2023

22 October 2022

19 July 2022

9 July 2022

22 June 2022

19 April 2022

3 April 2022

13 February 2022

31 January 2022

27 January 2022

18 January 2022

13 October 2021

10 October 2021

14 September 2021

28 August 2021

1 June 2021

22 April 2021

30 March 2021

15 March 2021

24 February 2021

6 January 2021

21 November 2020

12 November 2020

7 November 2020

29 October 2020

  • curprev 18:4418:44, 29 October 2020 Emtryan talk contribs 14,815 bytes +64 Really the point is that seasoning as a process in the colonial period referred to enslaved Africans. As the literature makes abundantly clear (yes, even Mann's beloved book), this usage for Europeans was far from common or widely accepted unlike its use for enslaved people was in the next century of slavery. Anyways, clarifying revisions. (Also worth noting that Wikipedia style doesn't require mid-sentence citations but to each their own). undo
  • curprev 18:0218:02, 29 October 2020 Elmidae talk contribs 14,751 bytes −155 oh duh, the previous Mann ref was actually to "1493"; reinstated. Anyway, please read the chapter before assuming what it "likely" refers to. Pages 114-117 explicitly deal with Europeans, before turning to Africans undo
  • curprev 17:5217:52, 29 October 2020 Elmidae talk contribs 14,906 bytes +171 two things - a) I mixed up the titles; it's "1493" not "1491" that deals with seasoning. Yes, explicitly for Europeans. Corrected; chapter specified. b) "accepted dictates of style" on Wikipedia require the reference behind the individual statement it pertains to, if it does not apply to the whole sentence. Moved European-specific refs back to previous position. undo
  • curprev 14:0614:06, 29 October 2020 Emtryan talk contribs m 14,735 bytes +3 missing word undo

28 October 2020

  • curprev 20:2020:20, 28 October 2020 Emtryan talk contribs 14,732 bytes +1,139 Actually, that Mann citation likely refers to enslaved people as well. In that section of the book he's discussing Europeans "importing" people so I'm not confident in that reference as evidence for Europeans undergoing "seasoning." I also can't identify any real evidence in either of those articles that the word seasoning was used during the colonial period for Europeans. Moved notes to the end of the sentence in adherence to widely-accepted dictates of style. undo

24 October 2020

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)