A Stakeholder Visualization Tool Study
Abstract
Professional codes of ethics and conduct provide a convenient pedagogy for teaching students to consider social, ethical, and professional issues related to computing. Case studies offer a means for using these codes to analyze such issues, which include the importance of identifying all stakeholders impacted by a computing decision. The research in this article suggests that the introduction of a stakeholder visualization tool into a professional code's text-based case study can positively affect the number of stakeholders considered by students.
References
[1]
ABET. Criteria for accrediting computing programs. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-computing-programs-2021-2022/.
[2]
ACM. Acm code of professional conduct (1972), 1972. https://ethics.acm.org/code-of-ethics/previous-versions/1972-acm-code/.
[3]
Sharon Ainsworth. Deft: A conceptual framework for learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16:183--198, 2006.
[4]
Hanna M. Altorf. Dialogue and discussion: Reflections on a socratic method. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 18(1):60--75, 2019.
[5]
Ronald E. Anderson, Deborah G. Johnson, Donald Gotterbarn, and Judith Parrolle. Using the new acm code of ethics in decision making. Communications of the ACM, 36(2):98--106, 1993.
[6]
Richard Blumenthal and Johanna Blumenthal. Consider visualizing society within the acm code of ethics [poster]. In Proceedings of 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, page 1292, 2020.
[7]
Charles H. Brase and Corrinne P. Brase. Understandable Statistics: Concepts and Methods. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA, USA, 2003.
[8]
Diana L. Burley and Matt Bishop. Cybersecurity curricula 2017, 2017. https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/education/curricula-recommendations/csec2017.pdf.
[9]
James H. Cross, Gerald Engel, Eric Roberts, and Russell Shackelford. Computing curricula 2001 computer science, 2001. https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/education/curricula-recommendations/cc2001.pdf.
[10]
Andrea Danyluk and Paul Leidig. Computing competencies for undergraduate data science curricula, 2021. https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/education/curricula-recommendations/dstf_ccdsc2021.pdf.
[11]
P Fraisse. Motor and verbal reaction times to words and drawings. Psychonomic Science, 12:235--236, 1968.
[12]
Damian Gordon, Michael Collins, and Dympna O'Sullivan. The development of teaching case studies to explore ethical issues associated with computer programming. In UKICER, pages 1--9, 2021.
[13]
Don Gotterbarn and Marty J. Wolf. The code: The acm code of ethics and professional conduct, 2018. https://www.acm.org/code-of-ethics.
[14]
Chuck Huff and C. Diane Martin. Computing consequences: A framework for teaching ethical computing. CACM, 38(12):75--84, 1995.
[15]
ImpactCS. Impactcs (impact computer science), 1995. http://computingcases.org/general_tools/curriculum/impactcs.html.
[16]
Amruth N. Kumar and Rajendra K. Raj. Cs202x acm/ieee-cs/aaai comuter science curricula, 2023. https://csed.hosting.acm.org/.
[17]
Rich LeBlanc and Ann Sobel. Software engineering 2014: Curriculum guidelines for undergraduate degree programs in software engineering, 2014. https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/education/curricula-recommendations/is2020.pdf.
[18]
Paul Leidig and Hannu Salmela. Is202: A competency model for undergraduate programs in information systems, 2014. https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/education/se2014.pdf.
[19]
C. Diane Martin, Chuck Huff, Don Gotterbarn, and Keith Miller. Implementinag a tenth strand in the cs curriculum. CACM, 39(12):75--84, 1996.
[20]
C. Diane Martin and Elaine Y. Weltz. From awareness to action: Integrating ethics and social responsibility into the computer science curriculum. ACM Computers and Society, 29(2):6--14, 1999.
[21]
Richard E. Mayer, Kathryn Steinhoff, Gregory Bower, and Rebecca Mars. A genertative theory of textbook design: Using annotated illustrations to foster meaningful learning of science text. Educationa Technology Research and Development, 43:31--41, 1995.
[22]
Allan Paivio. Images in Mind: The Evolution of a Theory. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Birmingham, United Kingdom, 1991.
[23]
Donn B. Parker. Rules of ethics in information processing. CACM, 11(3):198--201, 1968. https://ethics.acm.org/code-of-ethics/previous-versions/1966-acm-code/.
[24]
Angelo J. Pintoi and Howard J. Zeitz. Concept mapping: A strategy for promoting meaningful learning in medical education. Medical Teacher, 19(2):114--121, 1997.
[25]
Frank Romanelli, Eleanora Bird, and Melody Ryan. Learning styles: A review of theory, application, and best practices. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 73(1), 2009. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2690881/.
[26]
Mehran Sahami and Steve Roach. Computer science curricular 2013. https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/education/cs2013_web_final.pdf.
[27]
Seoul Accord. The seoul accord. http://www.seoulaccord.org/.
[28]
Alan B. Tucker and Bruce H. Barnes. Computing curricula 1991: Report of the acm/ieee-cs joint curriculum task force. CACM, 34(6):68--84, 1991.
[29]
Evan Weingarten, Qijia Chen, Maxeall McAdams, Jessica Yi, Justin Hepler, and Dolores Albarracin. From primed concepts to action: A meta-analysis of the behavior effects of incidentally-presented words. Psychological Bulletin, 142(5):472--497, 2015.
[30]
Jiajie Zhang and Donald A. Norman. Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18:87--122, 1994.
Index Terms
- A Stakeholder Visualization Tool Study
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
The IT professional as stakeholder
SIGMIS-CPR '11: Proceedings of the 49th SIGMIS annual conference on Computer personnel researchThe concept of stakeholder is well established in the field of IS, yet the IT person's role as a stakeholder is often ignored because stakeholders on the customer side are, appropriately, regarded as more important than stakeholders on the supplier ...
Determining Stakeholder Needs in the Workplace: How Mobile Technologies Can Help
Recent advances in mobile computing technologies mean that mobile tools have the potential to determine stakeholder needs in the workplace, with possible benefits to requirements processes. However, mobile requirements engineering tools are a new idea, ...
Stakeholder Challenges in Information Systems Project Offshoring: Client and Vendor Perspectives
This study of international information systems IS offshoring highlights the idea that project success or failure is often in the eye of the beholder and that proper attention needs to be provided to both client and vendor perspectives. This research ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2023
112 pages
Publisher
Consortium for Computing Sciences in Colleges
Evansville, IN, United States
Publication History
Published: 01 October 2023
Published in JCSC Volume 39, Issue 2
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 9Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)5
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 01 Feb 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in