A Pilot Study of Requirement Prioritization Techniques in Agile Software Development.
Pages 146 - 151
Abstract
Requirement prioritization (RP) is a method for identifying the most critical requirements that should be immediately addressed. The results show how much all parties truly understand the requirements of the project. A trustworthy requirements prioritization process can ensure that the most important requirements are in line with business needs and should be developed first. The process results in the prioritized list of requirements that support decision making in release planning and subsequent activities to maximize software quality and customer satisfaction. This paper identified strengths and weaknesses of existing RP techniques. That leads to identification of factors in selecting the appropriate RP techniques for software projects. The recommendation can lead to improvement of the existing RP techniques. In addition, this paper presents the survey results of RP techniques used in participating software companies which developed software in Agile Software Development (ASD) context. The results reveal the challenges faced in their RP processes.
Supplementary Material
Presentation slides (p146-kuengjai-supplement.pptx)
- Download
- 552.55 KB
References
[1]
Rami Hasan AL-Ta’ani and Rozilawati Razali. 2013. Prioritizing Requirement in Agile Development: A Conceptual Framework. In Procedia Technolory11. 733–739. https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2007.63
[2]
Mais Haj Qasem Amjad Hudaib, Raja Masadehand Abdullah Alzaqebah. 2008. Requirements Prioritization Techniques Comparison. Retrieved April 16, 2020 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322487895
[3]
Masud Z. Easmin R. Asif, S.A. and A.U. Gias. 2017. SAFFRON: A Semi-Automated Framework for Software Requirements Prioritization. Iternational Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Application 8, 12(2017), 1–21.
[4]
Masadeh R. Hudaib, A. and A.L. Alzaqebah. 2008. WGW: A Hybrid Approach Based on Whale and Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithms for Requirements Prioritization. Retrieved December 16, 2020 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327280953WGW_A_Hybrid_Approach_Based_on_Whale_and_Grey_Wolf_Optimization_Algorithms_for_Requirements_Prioritization
[5]
Javed Ali Khan and Izaz Ur Rehman. 2015. Comparison of Requirement Prioritization Techniques to Find Best Prioritization Technique. Retrieved December 16, 2020 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288683724
[6]
Sravika Kothawar and Rakesh Guptha Vajrapu. 2018. Software Requirements Prioritization Practices in Software Start-ups. Retrieved December 16, 2020 from https://www.semanticscholar.org
[7]
Paual Clements Len Bass and Rick Kazman. 2003. Software Architecture in Practice(2nd ed.). Addison Wesley.
[8]
Daniil Murin. 2021. Benefits of requirements prioritization. Retrieved July 19, 2021 from https://www.bonial.com/tech-blog/benefits-of-requirements-prioritization
[9]
Jane Cleland-Huang Paula Laurent and Chuan Duan. 2017. Towards Automated Requirements Triage. http://www.sciencedirect.com
[10]
Kai Petersen and Claes Wohlin. 2009. A comparison of issues and advantages in agile and incremental development between state of the art and an industrial case. Journal of Systems and Software 82, 9 (2009), 1479–1490. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0164121209000855
[11]
Baharom F. Saher, N. and R Romli. 2018. A Review of Requirement Prioritization Techniques in Agile Software Development. In Knowledge Management International Conference (KMICe)2018. School of Computing, College of Arts and Sciences, Miri Sarawak, Malaysia, 242–247.
Recommendations
Stakeholder Involvement in Agile Software Development
NordiCHI '16: Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer InteractionAgile software development processes (Agile), such as Scrum, DSDM, XP and Kanban, have become de facto standards for software development practice. Scrum, the most commonly used process, focuses on delivering functioning software early and continuously, ...
The Combination of Agile and Lean in Software Development: An Experience Report Analysis
AGILE '11: Proceedings of the 2011 Agile ConferenceThere has been a noticeable focus shift from agile methods such as extreme Programming (XP) and Scrum to lean software development in the last several years, which is indicated as â from agile to leanâ . However, the reality may not be as simple or ...
Non-functional Requirement Patterns for Agile Software Development
ICSEB '19: Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Software and e-BusinessFollowing the agile principles, agile software development is popular among software developing organizations. The attractive characteristics of agile development are that it embraces frequent changes and that it gives high priority to users. Due to ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2021
366 pages
ISBN:9781450390675
DOI:10.1145/3494885
Copyright © 2021 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 20 December 2021
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
CSSE 2021
CSSE 2021: 2021 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering
October 22 - 24, 2021
Singapore, Singapore
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 33 of 74 submissions, 45%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 176Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)57
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 20 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View allView Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format