skip to main content
research-article

The CENDARI Infrastructure

Published: 12 April 2018 Publication History

Abstract

The CENDARI infrastructure is a research-supporting platform designed to provide tools for transnational historical research, focusing on two topics: medieval culture and World War I. It exposes to the end users modern Web-based tools relying on a sophisticated infrastructure to collect, enrich, annotate, and search through large document corpora. Supporting researchers in their daily work is a novel concern for infrastructures. We describe how we gathered requirements through multiple methods to understand historians’ needs and derive an abstract workflow to support them. We then outline the tools that we have built, tying their technical descriptions to the user requirements. The main tools are the note-taking environment and its faceted search capabilities; the data integration platform including the Data API, supporting semantic enrichment through entity recognition; and the environment supporting the software development processes throughout the project to keep both technical partners and researchers in the loop. The outcomes are technical together with new resources developed and gathered, and the research workflow that has been described and documented.

References

[1]
Michel Beaudouin-Lafon and Wendy Mackay. 2002. Prototyping development and tools. In Human Computer Interaction Handbook, J. A. Jacko and A. Sears (Eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1006--1031. http://www.isrc.umbc.edu/HCIHandbook/.
[2]
Richard A. Becker and William S. Cleveland. 1987. Brushing scatterplots. Technometrics 29, 2, 127--142.
[3]
Tobias Blanke and Conny Kristel. 2013. Integrating holocaust research. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 7, 1--2, 41--57.
[4]
Nadia Boukhelifa, Emmanouil Giannisakis, Evanthia Dimara, Wesley Willett, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2015. Supporting historical research through user-centered visual analytics. In Proceedings of the EuroVis Workshop on Visual Analytics (EuroVA’15).
[5]
CENArch. 2015. CENDARI Archival Directory. Retrieved March 7, 2018, from https://archives.cendari.dariah.eu/.
[6]
CENDARI. 2015. Collaborative European Digital Archive Infrastructure. Retrieved March 7, 2018, from http://www.cendari.eu.
[7]
CENGitHub. 2016. Cendari Development Repository on GitHub. Retrieved March 7, 2018, from https://github.com/cendari/.
[8]
CENOnt. 2014. Deliverable 6.3: Guidelines for Ontology Building. Retrieved March 7, 2018, from http://www.cendari.eu/sites/default/files/CENDARI%20_D6.3%20Guidelines%20for%20Ontology%20Building.pdf.
[9]
CENTools. 2016. Deliverable D7.4: Final releases of toolkits. Retrieved March 7, 2018, from http://www.cendari.eu/sites/default/files/CENDARI_D7.4%20-%20Final%20releases%20of%20toolkits.pdf.
[10]
Genevieve Clavel-Merrin. 2004. MACS (multilingual access to subjects): A virtual authority file across languages. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 39, 1--2, 323--330.
[11]
Jennifer Edmond, Jakub Beneš, Nataša Bulatović, Milica Knežević, Jörg Lehmann, Francesca Morselli, and Andrei Zamoiski. 2015a. The CENDARI White Book of Archives. Technical Report. CENDARI. http://hdl.handle.net/2262/75683
[12]
Jennifer Edmond, Natasa Bulatovic, and Alexander O’Connor. 2015b. The taste of “data soup” and the creation of a pipeline for transnational historical research. Journal of the Japanese Association for Digital Humanities 1, 1, 107--122.
[13]
Michael Franklin, Alon Halevy, and David Maier. 2005. From databases to dataspaces: A new abstraction for information management. ACM SIGMOD Record 34, 4, 27--33.
[14]
Thomas R. Gruber. 1993. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5, 2, 199--220.
[15]
Barbara Hayes-Roth. 1985. A blackboard architecture for control. Artificial Intelligence 26, 3, 251--321.
[16]
Cornelia Hedeler, Alvaro A. A. Fernandes, Khalid Belhajjame, Lu Mao, Chenjuan Guo, Norman W. Paton, and Suzanne M. Embury. 2013. A functional model for dataspace management systems. In Advanced Query Processing: Volume 1: Issues and Trends. Springer, Berlin, Germany, 305--341.
[17]
Georg G. Iggers. 2005. Historiography in the Twentieth Century: From Scientific Objectivity to the PostModern Challenge. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, CT.
[18]
Gene Kim, Patrick Debois, John Willis, and Jez Humble. 2016. The DevOps Handbook: How to Create World-Class Agility, Reliability, and Security in Technology Organizations. IT Revolution Press.
[19]
Patrice Lopez. 2009. GROBID: Combining automatic bibliographic data recognition and term extraction for scholarship publications. In Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. Springer, Berlin, Germany, 473--474.
[20]
Eleanor Mattern, Wei Jeng, Daqing He, Liz Lyon, and Aaron Brenner. 2015. Using participatory design and visual narrative inquiry to investigate researchers? Data challenges and recommendations for library research data services. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 49, 4, 408--423.
[21]
Alexander Meyer. 2016. mner—Multilingual Named Entity Recognition and Resolution. Retrieved March 7, 2018, from http://136.243.145.239/nerd/.
[22]
Michael J. Muller. 2003. Participatory design: The third space in HCI. In The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, J. A. Jacko and A. Sears (Eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1051--1068. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=772072.772138
[23]
P. Shvaiko and J. Euzenat. 2013. Ontology matching: State of the art and future challenges. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 25, 1, 158--176.
[24]
G. Stoilos, G. Stamou, and S. Kollias. 2005. A string metric for ontology alignment. In Semantic Web—ISWC 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3729. Springer, 624--637.
[25]
Trame. 2016. Home Page. Retrieved March 7, 2018, from http://trame.fefonlus.it/.
[26]
Amanda Visconti. 2016. Home Page. Retrieved March 7, 2018, from http://www.infiniteulysses.com/.
[27]
Claire Warwick. 2012. Studying users in digital humanities. In Digital Humanities in Practice, C. Warwick, M. M. Terras, and J. Nyhan (Eds.). Facet Publishing in association with UCL Centre for Digital Humanities, London, 1--22.
[28]
Bridgette Wessels, Keira Borrill, Louise Sorensen, Jamie McLaughlin, and Michael Pidd. 2015. Understanding Design for the Digital Humanities. Studies in the Digital Humanities. Sheffield: HRI Online Publications. http://www.hrionline.ac.uk/openbook/chapter/understanding-design-for-the-digital-humanities.
[29]
Mark D. Wilkinson, Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Gabrielle Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, Niklas Blomberg, et al. 2016. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data 3, 160018.
[30]
Suzanne Yoakum-Stover. 2010. Keynote Address “Data and Dirt.” Available at http://www.information-management.com/resource-center/?id=10019338

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. The CENDARI Infrastructure

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
    Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage   Volume 11, Issue 2
    June 2018
    124 pages
    ISSN:1556-4673
    EISSN:1556-4711
    DOI:10.1145/3199679
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 12 April 2018
    Accepted: 01 May 2017
    Revised: 01 May 2017
    Received: 01 April 2016
    Published in JOCCH Volume 11, Issue 2

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. History
    2. research

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Funding Sources

    • European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013/FP72007-2011)

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media