skip to main content
10.1145/3055601.3055608acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring Compliance: Observations from a Large Scale Fitbit Study

Published: 18 April 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Universities often draw from their student body when conducting human subject studies. Unfortunately, as with any longitudinal human studies project, data quality problems arise from student's waning compliance to the study. While incentive mechanisms may be employed to boost student compliance, such systems may not encourage all participants in the same manner. This paper coupled student's compliance rates with other personal data collected via Fitbits, smartphones, and surveys. Machine learning algorithms were then employed to explore factors that influence compliance. With such insight, universities may target groups in their studies who are more likely to become non-compliant and implement preventative strategies such as tailoring their incentive mechanisms to accommodate a diverse population. In doing so, data quality problems stemming from failing compliance can be minimized.

References

[1]
Leo Breiman. 2001. Random Forests. Machine Learning 45, 1 (2001), 5--32.
[2]
FitBit. 2016. What are active minutes? (2016). https://help.fitbit.com/articles/en_US/Help_article/1379
[3]
FitBit. 2016. What should I know about my heart rate data? (2016). https://help.fitbit.com/articles/en_US/Help_article/1565#zones
[4]
Isabelle Guyon, Jason Weston, Stephen Barnhill, and Vladimir Vapnik. 2002. Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Machine learning 46, 1-3 (2002), 389--422.
[5]
Daniel Harrison, Paul Marshall, Nadia Berthouze, and Jon Bird. 2014. Tracking physical activity: problems related to running longitudinal studies with commercial devices. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication. ACM, 699--702.
[6]
Luis G. Jaimes, Idalides J. Vergara-Laurens, and Andrew Raij. 2015. A Survey of Incentive Techniques for Mobile Crowd Sensing. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 2, 5 (Oct 2015), 370--380.
[7]
Rachael Purta, Stephen Mattingly, Lixing Song, Omar Lizardo, David Hachen, Christian Poellabauer, and Aaron Striegel. 2016. Experiences Measuring Sleep and Physical Activity Patterns Across a Large College Cohort with Fitbits. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 28--35.
[8]
J.Ross Quinlan. 1993. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA.
[9]
Aaron Striegel, Shu Liu, Lei Meng, Christian Poellabauer, David Hachen, and Omar Lizardo. 2013. Lessons Learned from the Netsense Smartphone Study. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 43, 4 (Aug. 2013), 51--56.
[10]
Rui Wang, Fanglin Chen, Zhenyu Chen, Tianxing Li, Gabriella Harari, Stefanie Tignor, Xia Zhou, Dror Ben-Zeev, and Andrew T. Campbell. 2014. StudentLife: Assessing Mental Health, Academic Performance and Behavioral Trends of College Students Using Smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3--14.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Data Preprocessing Techniques for AI and Machine Learning Readiness: Scoping Review of Wearable Sensor Data in Cancer CareJMIR mHealth and uHealth10.2196/5958712(e59587)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Feasibility of snapshot testing using wearable sensors to detect cardiorespiratory illness (COVID infection in India)npj Digital Medicine10.1038/s41746-024-01287-27:1Online publication date: 19-Oct-2024
  • (2023)Using Wear Time for the Analysis of Consumer-Grade Wearables’ Data: A Case Study Using Fitbit Data (Preprint)JMIR mHealth and uHealth10.2196/46149Online publication date: 31-Jan-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SocialSens'17: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Social Sensing
April 2017
97 pages
ISBN:9781450349772
DOI:10.1145/3055601
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 April 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. machine learning
  2. mobile sensing
  3. social aspects
  4. user studies

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

CPS Week '17
Sponsor:
CPS Week '17: Cyber Physical Systems Week 2017
April 18 - 21, 2017
PA, Pittsburgh, USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)34
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Data Preprocessing Techniques for AI and Machine Learning Readiness: Scoping Review of Wearable Sensor Data in Cancer CareJMIR mHealth and uHealth10.2196/5958712(e59587)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Feasibility of snapshot testing using wearable sensors to detect cardiorespiratory illness (COVID infection in India)npj Digital Medicine10.1038/s41746-024-01287-27:1Online publication date: 19-Oct-2024
  • (2023)Using Wear Time for the Analysis of Consumer-Grade Wearables’ Data: A Case Study Using Fitbit Data (Preprint)JMIR mHealth and uHealth10.2196/46149Online publication date: 31-Jan-2023
  • (2023)The Importance of Data Quality Control in Using Fitbit Device Data From the Research ProgramJMIR mHealth and uHealth10.2196/4510311(e45103-e45103)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2023
  • (2021)Lifestyle Modification Using a Wearable Biometric Ring and Guided Feedback Improve Sleep and Exercise Behaviors: A 12-Month Randomized, Placebo-Controlled StudyFrontiers in Physiology10.3389/fphys.2021.77787412Online publication date: 25-Nov-2021
  • (2021)Risk Factors for COVID-19 in College Students Identified by Physical, Mental, and Social Health Reported During the Fall 2020 Semester: An Observational Study Using the Roadmap app and Fitbit Wearable Sensors (Preprint)JMIR Mental Health10.2196/34645Online publication date: 3-Nov-2021
  • (2021)Measuring Daily Compliance With Physical Activity Tracking in Ambulatory Surgery Patients: Comparative Analysis of Five Compliance CriteriaJMIR mHealth and uHealth10.2196/228469:1(e22846)Online publication date: 26-Jan-2021
  • (2021)Smoking prevalence, core/periphery network positions, and peer influence: Findings from five datasets on US adolescents and young adultsPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.024899016:3(e0248990)Online publication date: 24-Mar-2021
  • (2021)Using Fitbit data to examine factors that affect daily activity levels of college studentsPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.024474716:1(e0244747)Online publication date: 6-Jan-2021
  • (2021)Designing an Interactive Visualization System for Monitoring Participant Compliance in a Large-Scale, Longitudinal StudyExtended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411763.3443436(1-8)Online publication date: 8-May-2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media