skip to main content
10.1145/2908812.2908867acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Update Strength in EDAs and ACO: How to Avoid Genetic Drift

Published: 20 July 2016 Publication History

Abstract

We provide a rigorous runtime analysis concerning the update strength, a vital parameter in probabilistic model-building GAs such as the step size 1/K in the compact Genetic Algorithm (cGA) and the evaporation factor ρ in ACO. While a large update strength is desirable for exploitation, there is a general trade-off: too strong updates can lead to genetic drift and poor performance. We demonstrate this trade-off for the cGA and a simple MMAS ACO algorithm on the OneMax function. More precisely, we obtain lower bounds on the expected runtime of Ω(K√n + n log n) and Ω(√n/ρ + n log n), respectively, showing that the update strength should be limited to 1/K, ρ = O(1/(√n log n)). In fact, choosing 1/K, ρ sim 1/(√n log n) both algorithms efficiently optimize OneMax in expected time O(n log n). Our analyses provide new insights into the stochastic behavior of probabilistic model-building GAs and propose new guidelines for setting the update strength in global optimization.

References

[1]
T. Chen, P. K. Lehre, K. Tang, and X. Yao. When is an estimation of distribution algorithm better than an evolutionary algorithm? In Proc. of CEC '09, pages 1470--1477. IEEE Press, 2009.
[2]
D. Dang and P. K. Lehre. Simplified runtime analysis of estimation of distribution algorithms. In Proc. of GECCO '15, pages 513--518, 2015.
[3]
B. Doerr, D. Johannsen, and C. Winzen. Drift analysis and linear functions revisited. In Proc. of IEEE CEC '10, pages 1967--1974, 2010.
[4]
C. Doerr and J. Lengler. OneMax in Black-Box Models with Several Restrictions. In Proc. of GECCO '15, pages 1431--1438. ACM Press, 2015.
[5]
S. Droste. A rigorous analysis of the compact genetic algorithm for linear functions. Natural Computing, 5(3):257--283, 2006.
[6]
S. Droste, T. Jansen, and I. Wegener. Upper and lower bounds for randomized search heuristics in black-box optimization. Theory of Computing Systems, 39, 2006.
[7]
T. Friedrich, T. Kötzing, M. S. Krejca, and A. M. Sutton. The benefit of recombination in noisy evolutionary search. In Proc. of ISSAC '15, pages 140--150. Springer, 2015.
[8]
M. Hauschild and M. Pelikan. An introduction and survey of estimation of distribution algorithms. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 1(3):111--128, 2011.
[9]
D. Johannsen. Random Combinatorial Structures and Randomized Search Heuristics. PhD thesis, Universitat des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Germany and the Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik, 2010.
[10]
R. Motwani and P. Raghavan. Randomized Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, 1995.
[11]
F. Neumann, D. Sudholt, and C. Witt. Analysis of different MMAS ACO algorithms on unimodal functions and plateaus. Swarm Intelligence, 3(1):35--68, 2009.
[12]
F. Neumann, D. Sudholt, and C. Witt. A few ants are enough: ACO with iteration-best update. In Proc. of GECCO '10, pages 63--70, 2010.
[13]
P. S. Oliveto and C. Witt. Improved time complexity analysis of the simple genetic algorithm. Theoretical Computer Science, 605:21--41, 2015.
[14]
T. Stützle and H. H. Hoos. MAX-MIN ant system. Journal of Future Generation Computer Systems, 16:889--914, 2000.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
GECCO '16: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2016
July 2016
1196 pages
ISBN:9781450342063
DOI:10.1145/2908812
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 20 July 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. ant colony optimization
  2. estimation-of-distribution algorithms
  3. genetic drift
  4. iteration-best update
  5. runtime analysis
  6. theory

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

GECCO '16
Sponsor:
GECCO '16: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
July 20 - 24, 2016
Colorado, Denver, USA

Acceptance Rates

GECCO '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 137 of 381 submissions, 36%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,669 of 4,410 submissions, 38%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 09 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media