skip to main content
10.1145/2814895.2814918acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesamConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Haptic and Visual feedback in 3D Audio Mixing Interfaces

Published: 07 October 2015 Publication History

Abstract

This paper describes the implementation and informal evaluation of a user interface that explores haptic feedback for 3D audio mixing. The implementation compares different approaches using either the LEAP Motion for mid-air hand gesture control, or the Novint Falcon for active haptic feedback in order to augment the perception of the 3D space. We compare different interaction paradigms implemented using these interfaces, aiming to increase speed and accuracy and reduce the need for constant visual feedback. While the LEAP Motion relies upon visual perception and proprioception, users can forego visual feedback with interfaces such as the Novint Falcon and rely primarily on haptic cues, allowing more focus on the spatial sound elements. Results of the evaluation support this claim, as users preferred the interaction paradigm using the Falcon with no visual feedback. Furthermore, users disliked active haptic feedback for augmented perception of 3D space or for snapping to objects.

References

[1]
E Berdahl, A Kontogeorgakopoulos, and D Overholt. Hsp v2: Haptic signal processing with extensions for physical modeling. In 5th International Workshop on Haptic and Audio Interaction Design-HAID, Copenhagen, pages 61--62, 2010.
[2]
Edgar Berdahl and Alexandros Kontogeorgakopoulos. The firefader design: Simple, open-source, and reconfigurable haptics for musicians. In Proceedings of the Sound and Music Computing Conference, pages 90--98, 2012.
[3]
Edgar Berdahl, Günter Niemeyer, and Julius O Smith. Using haptics to assist performers in making gestures to a musical instrument. In Proceedings of New Interfaces for Musical Expression, 2009.
[4]
Nicolas d'Alessandro, Joëlle Tilmanne, Ambroise Moreau, and Antonin Puleo. Airpiano: A multi-touch keyboard with hovering control. In Proceedings of New Interfaces for Musical Expression, 2015.
[5]
Steven Gelineck and Dannie Korsgaard. An exploratory evaluation of user interfaces for 3d audio mixing. In Audio Engineering Society Convention 138. Audio Engineering Society, 2015.
[6]
Steven Gelineck, Dan Overholt, Morten Büchert, and Jesper Andersen. Towards an interface for music mixing based on smart tangibles and multitouch. In Proceedings of New Interfaces for Musical Expression, 2013.
[7]
Jürgen Herre, Johannes Hilpert, Achim Kuntz, and Jan Plogsties. Mpeg-h audio---the new standard for universal spatial/3d audio coding. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 62(12):821--830, 2015.
[8]
Michal Lech and Bozena Kostek. Testing a novel gesture-based mixing interface. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 61(5):301--313, 2013.
[9]
Mark T Marshall, Joseph Malloch, and Marcelo M Wanderley. Non-conscious control of sound spatialization. In Proc. of the International Conference on Enactive Interfaces, 2007.
[10]
Justin Mathew, Stéphane Huot, and Alan Blum. A morphological analysis of audio objects and their control methods for 3d audio. In Proceedings of New Interfaces for Musical Expression, 2014.
[11]
Frank Melchior, Chris Pike, Matthew Brooks, and Stuart Grace. On the use of a haptic feedback device for sound source control in spatial audio systems. In Audio Engineering Society Convention 134. Audio Engineering Society, 2013.
[12]
Frank Melchior and Sascha Spors. Spatial audio reproduction: from theory to production. In Audio Engineering Convention 129, 2010.
[13]
William Moss and Bryan Cunitz. Haptic theremin: Developing a haptic musical controller using the sensable phantom omni. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, pages 275--277, 2005.
[14]
Jörg Müller, Matthias Geier, Christina Dicke, and Sascha Spors. The boomroom: mid-air direct interaction with virtual sound sources. In Proc. of the ACM conference on Human factors in Computing Systems, 2014.
[15]
Nils Peters, Georgios Marentakis, and Stephen McAdams. Current technologies and compositional practices for spatialization: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. Computer Music Journal, 35(1):10--27, 2011.
[16]
Jarrod Ratcliffe. Hand motion-controlled audio mixing interface. In Proceedings of New Interfaces for Musical Expression, 2014.
[17]
Stephen Sinclair. Force-feedback hand controllers for musical interaction. PhD thesis, McGill University, 2007.
[18]
Robert Tubb and Simon Dixon. An evaluation of multidimensional controllers for sound design tasks. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 47--56. ACM, 2015.
[19]
Frank Weichert, Daniel Bachmann, Bartholomäus Rudak, and Denis Fisseler. Analysis of the accuracy and robustness of the leap motion controller. Sensors, 13(5):6380--6393, 2013.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
AM '15: Proceedings of the Audio Mostly 2015 on Interaction With Sound
October 2015
250 pages
ISBN:9781450338967
DOI:10.1145/2814895
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 October 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. 3D Audio
  2. Haptic Feedback
  3. Haptic User Interface
  4. Leap Motion
  5. Mid-air gestures
  6. Mixing
  7. Novint Falcon
  8. User Interface
  9. Visualisation

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

AM '15
AM '15: Audio Mostly 2015
October 7 - 9, 2015
Thessaloniki, Greece

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 177 of 275 submissions, 64%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)29
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media