The empirical investigation of perspective-based readingDecember 1995
Abstract
No abstract available.
Cited By
Yamamoto S Requirements Review Education Curriculum for Embedded Software Practitioners Proceedings of the 2023 5th World Symposium on Software Engineering, (184-187)- Spadini D, Palomba F, Baum T, Hanenberg S, Bruntink M and Bacchelli A Test-driven code review Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering, (1061-1072)
- (2019). Software inspections, International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 59:4, (296-317), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019.
- Shah U and Jinwala D (2015). Resolving Ambiguities in Natural Language Software Requirements, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 40:5, (1-7), Online publication date: 14-Sep-2015.
- Rong G, Zhang H and Shao D Investigating code reading techniques for novice inspectors Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, (1-10)
- Sulaman S, Wnuk K and Höst M Perspective based risk analysis - a controlled experiment Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, (1-10)
- Scanniello G, Staron M, Burden H and Heldal R On the effect of using SysML requirement diagrams to comprehend requirements Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, (1-10)
- Robbins B and Carver J Cognitive factors in perspective-based reading (PBR) Proceedings of the 2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, (145-155)
- Petersen K, Rönkkö K and Wohlin C The impact of time controlled reading on software inspection effectiveness and efficiency Proceedings of the Second ACM-IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering and measurement, (139-148)
- Wagner S Using Economics as Basis for Modelling and Evaluating Software Quality Proceedings of the First International Workshop on The Economics of Software and Computation
- Lange C and Chaudron M Effects of defects in UML models Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering, (401-411)
- Münch J, Pfahl D and Rus I (2018). Virtual Software Engineering Laboratories in Support of Trade-off Analyses, Software Quality Journal, 13:4, (407-428), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2005.
- Otero M and Dolado J (2005). An empirical comparison of the dynamic modeling in OML and UML, Journal of Systems and Software, 77:2, (91-102), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2005.
- Shull F, Mendoncça M, Basili V, Carver J, Maldonado J, Fabbri S, Travassos G and Ferreira M (2019). Knowledge-Sharing Issues in Experimental Software Engineering, Empirical Software Engineering, 9:1-2, (111-137), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2004.
- Ragg T, Padberg F and Schoknecht R Applying Machine Learning to Solve an Estimation Problem in Software Inspections Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, (516-521)
- Padberg F Empirical interval estimates for the defect content after an inspection Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering, (58-68)
- McDowell C, Werner L, Bullock H and Fernald J (2002). The effects of pair-programming on performance in an introductory programming course, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34:1, (38-42), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2002.
- Otero M and Dolado J (2019). An Initial Experimental Assessment of the Dynamic Modelling in UML, Empirical Software Engineering, 7:1, (27-47), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2002.
- McDowell C, Werner L, Bullock H and Fernald J The effects of pair-programming on performance in an introductory programming course Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, (38-42)
- Siy H and Votta L Does The Modern Code Inspection Have Value? Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM'01)
- Zendler A (2019). A Preliminary Software Engineering Theory as Investigated by Published Experiments, Empirical Software Engineering, 6:2, (161-180), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2001.
Index Terms
- The empirical investigation of perspective-based reading
Recommendations
Perspective-Based Reading: A Replicated Experiment Focused on Individual Reviewer Effectiveness
This paper describes a replication conducted to compare the effectiveness of inspectors using Perspective Based Reading (PBR) to the effectiveness of inspectors using a checklist. The goal of this replication was to better understand the complementary ...
An Experimental Comparison of Checklist-Based Reading and Perspective-Based Reading for UML Design Document Inspection
ISESE '02: Proceedings of the 2002 International Symposium on Empirical Software EngineeringThis paper describes an experimental comparison of two reading techniques, namely Checklist-based reading (CBR) and Perspective-based reading (PBR) for Object-Oriented (OO) design inspection. Software inspection is an effective approach to detect ...
How Perspective-Based Reading Can Improve Requirements Inspections
Because defects constitute an unavoidable aspect of software development, discovering and removing them early is crucial. Over-looked defects (like faults in the software system requirements, design, or code) propagate to subsequent development phases ...