• Kashima H, Oyama S, Arai H and Mori J. (2024). Trustworthy human computation: a survey. Artificial Intelligence Review. 10.1007/s10462-024-10974-1. 57:12.

    https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10462-024-10974-1

  • Thorne S, Mentzer N, Bartholomew S and Strimel G. (2024). A systematic literature review of student evaluation of peer exemplars and implications for design, Technology, and Engineering Learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 10.1007/s10798-023-09874-2. 34:4. (1441-1462). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024.

    https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10798-023-09874-2

  • Jiang L and Bosch N. Short answer scoring with GPT-4. Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale. (438-442).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3657604.3664685

  • Duncan A, Tang T, Huang Y, Luu J, Thakkar N and Joyner D. Forums, Feedback, and Two Kinds of AI: A Selective History of Learning @ Scale. Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale. (376-382).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3657604.3664667

  • Weegar R and Idestam-Almquist P. (2023). Reducing Workload in Short Answer Grading Using Machine Learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 10.1007/s40593-022-00322-1. 34:2. (247-273). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024.

    https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40593-022-00322-1

  • Alipour S, Elahimanesh S, Jahanzad S, Mohammadi I, Morassafar P, Neshaei S and Tefagh M. (2024). Improving Grading Fairness and Transparency with Decentralized Collaborative Peer Assessment. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 8:CSCW1. (1-24). Online publication date: 17-Apr-2024.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3637350

  • Zhang L, Chen T, Zong Y and Gao X. A Peer Grading Approach for Open-ended Programming Projects Based on Binary System and Swiss System. Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1. (1484-1490).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3626252.3630767

  • Zhang L, Zong Y, Chen T, Ma Y, An S and Zhang L. (2023). A Peer Review Approach to Grading Projects in Computer Courses 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). 10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343176. 979-8-3503-3642-9. (1-7).

    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10343176/

  • Liu J and de Kok E. (2023). CrowdLearn: Open Sourcing Learner Feedback to Enable Open-Ended Assessments in MOOCs 2023 IEEE Learning with MOOCS (LWMOOCS). 10.1109/LWMOOCS58322.2023.10306150. 979-8-3503-1559-2. (1-7).

    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10306150/

  • Poonpon K, Manorom P and Chansanam W. Exploring effective methods for automated essay scoring of non-native speakers. Contemporary Educational Technology. 10.30935/cedtech/13740. 15:4. (ep475).

    https://www.cedtech.net/article/exploring-effective-methods-for-automated-essay-scoring-of-non-native-speakers-13740

  • Han Y, Wu W, Liang Y and Zhang L. Peer Grading Eliciting Truthfulness Based on Autograder. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. 10.1109/TLT.2022.3216946. 16:3. (353-363).

    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9928373/

  • Zhu H, Li N, Rai N and Carroll J. (2022). SmartGroup: A Tool for Small-Group Learning Activities. Future Internet. 10.3390/fi15010007. 15:1. (7).

    https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/15/1/7

  • Ramnarain-Seetohul V, Bassoo V and Rosunally Y. (2022). Similarity measures in automated essay scoring systems: A ten-year review. Education and Information Technologies. 10.1007/s10639-021-10838-z. 27:4. (5573-5604). Online publication date: 1-May-2022.

    https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10639-021-10838-z

  • Luckner N and Purgathofer P. Insights from Peer Reviewing in Large University Courses. Proceedings of the 10th Computer Science Education Research Conference. (86-93).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3507923.3507955

  • Gamage D, Staubitz T and Whiting M. (2021). Peer assessment in MOOCs: Systematic literature review. Distance Education. 10.1080/01587919.2021.1911626. 42:2. (268-289). Online publication date: 3-Apr-2021.

    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01587919.2021.1911626

  • Badea G, Popescu E, Sterbini A and Temperini M. (2020). Exploring the Peer Assessment Process Supported by the Enhanced Moodle Workshop in a Computer Programming Course. Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 9th International Conference, Workshops. 10.1007/978-3-030-23884-1_16. (124-131).

    http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-23884-1_16

  • Dougherty J. (2020). Learning from peers. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges. 35:3. (185-193). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2019.

    /doi/10.5555/3381569.3381589

  • Badea G and Popescu E. (2019). Instructor Support Module in a Web-Based Peer Assessment Platform 2019 23rd International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC). 10.1109/ICSTCC.2019.8885687. 978-1-7281-0699-1. (691-696).

    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8885687/

  • Gao X, Wright J and Leyton-Brown K. (2019). Incentivizing Evaluation with Peer Prediction and Limited Access to Ground Truth. Artificial Intelligence. 10.1016/j.artint.2019.03.004. Online publication date: 1-Jul-2019.

    https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0004370219301559

  • Kulkarni C. Design Perspectives of Learning at Scale. Proceedings of the Sixth (2019) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale. (1-11).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3330430.3333620

  • Begel A and Ko A. (2019). Learning Outside the Classroom. The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research. 10.1017/9781108654555.027. (749-772).

    https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781108654555%23CN-bp-26/type/book_part

  • Fincher S and Robins A. (2019). The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research

    https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781108654555/type/book

  • Badea G, Popescu E, Sterbini A and Temperini M. (2019). Integrating Enhanced Peer Assessment Features in Moodle Learning Management System. Foundations and Trends in Smart Learning. 10.1007/978-981-13-6908-7_19. (135-144).

    http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-13-6908-7_19

  • Usher M and Barak M. (2017). Peer assessment in a project-based engineering course: comparing between on-campus and online learning environments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 10.1080/02602938.2017.1405238. 43:5. (745-759). Online publication date: 4-Jul-2018.

    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02602938.2017.1405238

  • Kross S and Guo P. Students, systems, and interactions. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale. (1-10).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3231644.3231662

  • Cambre J, Klemmer S and Kulkarni C. Juxtapeer. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (1-13).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173868

  • Jarrett J, Blake M and Saleh I. Crowdsourcing, Mixed Elastic Systems and Human-Enhanced Computing–A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing. 10.1109/TSC.2017.2674662. 11:1. (202-214).

    http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7864475/

  • Meek S, Blakemore L and Marks L. (2016). Is peer review an appropriate form of assessment in a MOOC? Student participation and performance in formative peer review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 10.1080/02602938.2016.1221052. 42:6. (1000-1013). Online publication date: 18-Aug-2017.

    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02602938.2016.1221052

  • Vaughan J. (2017). Making better use of the crowd. The Journal of Machine Learning Research. 18:1. (7026-7071). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017.

    /doi/10.5555/3122009.3242050

  • Neznanov A and Maksimenkova O. (2016). The PASCA. Procedia Computer Science. 96:C. (826-837). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.08.261

  • Kaufman G, Flanagan M and Punjasthitkul S. Investigating the Impact of 'Emphasis Frames' and Social Loafing on Player Motivation and Performance in a Crowdsourcing Game. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (4122-4128).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858588

  • Alcock S, Dufton J and Durusu-Tanrıöver M. (2015). Archaeology and the MOOC: Massive, open, online, and opportunistic. Journal of Social Archaeology. 10.1177/1469605315609017. 16:1. (3-31). Online publication date: 1-Feb-2016.

    https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1469605315609017

  • Kulkarni C, Kotturi Y, Bernstein M and Klemmer S. (2016). Designing Scalable and Sustainable Peer Interactions Online. Design Thinking Research. 10.1007/978-3-319-40382-3_14. (237-273).

    http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-40382-3_14

  • Shashidhar V, Pandey N and Aggarwal V. Spoken English Grading. Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. (2089-2097).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2783258.2788595

  • Basu S, Wu A, Hou B and DeNero J. Problems Before Solutions. Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale. (205-213).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2724679

  • Kulkarni C, Bernstein M and Klemmer S. PeerStudio. Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale. (75-84).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2724670

  • Wright J, Thornton C and Leyton-Brown K. Mechanical TA. Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. (96-101).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2676723.2677278

  • Kulkarni C. Making distance matter. Adjunct Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. (25-28).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2658779.2661169