User talk:Eingangskontrolle
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:11, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
TUSC token 68823afd79bd9aed214b920141b40537
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Deprecated License
[edit]
It has been found that Image:Brugnera-Stemma.png has a deprecated license tag. Please choose a new free license tag which describes the rights of the image correctly otherwise it will be deleted!Thanks for your consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Nikbot (talk) 12:02, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 12:06, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
File deletion warning | File:Brugnera-Stemma.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--User:G.dallorto (talk) 18:44, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Gideon_Gono10.jpg
[edit]{{Autotranslate|1=File:Gideon_Gono10.jpg|base=Image source}}Martin H. (talk) 22:58, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Habe den Originaluploader in diesem Zusammenhang bereits gefragt, w:en:User talk:Macvivo, das "no source" war nicht für den Commons upload sonder den original upload gedacht. --Martin H. (talk) 11:14, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Bildermeutereien
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:46, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Dún Aonghusa 19 Aibreán 2009.JPG is uncategorized since 15 June 2009.
- Image:Meilgaard-boplads.jpg was uncategorized on 14 August 2009.
- Image:Wegener02.jpeg was uncategorized on 21 August 2009.
- Image:Wegener03.jpg was uncategorized on 21 August 2009.
- Image:Bush House (BBC).jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:StMartin Tannheim Deckenfresko.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Chemical Laboratory, Academy of Science Munich (1893) .JPG was uncategorized on 19 February 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Search-300x277.gif was uncategorized on 15 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:42, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Isaac Haleva.jpg was uncategorized on 3 May 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Motorboat Coco (1917).jpg was uncategorized on 12 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:CharlesGuillaumeBrunRagGather.jpg was uncategorized on 14 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:CharlesGuillaumeBrunLaMendiante.jpg was uncategorized on 14 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Летчик-космонавт СССР.jpg was uncategorized on 25 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 26 June 2011 (UTC) Stupid bot...
Rubbish: Category:Dún Aengus was included from the beginning... --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 21:17, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- Du hast das {{subst:uncat}} vom Commonshelper mit kopiert sowie eine Kategorie angegeben. Der Bot informiert scheinbar wenn das Bild als unkategorisiert markiert ist, überprüft aber scheinbar nicht ob eine Kategorie vorhanden ist. --Martin H. (talk) 21:45, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Hammo1.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Hammo1.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Hammo1.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Martin H. (talk) 21:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Geschändetehostie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Saint-Louis (talk) 23:21, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:37, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Ihr dämlichen Bots könnt mir ganz gehörig an die Füße fassen - es steht alles im Text. --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 16:57, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:56, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Da sind und waren gültige Lizenzen drin und der Urheber ist eben nicht mehr feststellbar. --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 05:55, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:AvenueD.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Emdee (talk) 17:45, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:54, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Leider Nein. Siehe Commons:Stamps#United_States, U.S. Briefmarken nach 1977 sind nicht gemeinfrei. --Martin H. (talk) 22:50, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Kelly_Ayotte.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hekerui (talk) 18:52, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:P&H_Mining_Henry_Harnischfeger.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:22, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Juaquin Guzman-Loera2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:03, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Uli Pingel.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Uli Pingel.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Uli Pingel.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
shizhao (talk) 08:47, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
The file was uploaded by another user. I just restored the older version. --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 08:49, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
my POTY2011 vote
[edit]Could you please tell me why you have failed my vote here [1]? I have an eligible account here pl:User:Mik which is cross linked with my commons account. Mik (talk) 22:13, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Please remain calm and collegial
[edit]
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6e/Dialog-warning.svg/28px-Dialog-warning.svg.png)
[2]. --Túrelio (talk) 18:14, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Ich bin ganz ruhig, aber Mitarbeiter der Foundation sollten sich eigentlich garnicht zu solchen Themen die ihren Arbeitgeber betreffen äussern, egal mit welchem account. --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 19:03, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
User:Jorm (WMF)
[edit]Willkommen auf Commons, Eingangskontrolle!
I am referring to this edit. User:Jorm (WMF): "I am employed by the Wikimedia Foundation as a designer." I think he neither is a "Schreibtischtäter" nor involved in the filter-development/decision process. -- RE rillke questions? 18:36, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
I could name a lot of people, who just did their job. Or they were just drafted. And somebody who is employed by the object beeing critized, should never vote in such a poll in the first place. --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 19:00, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- Luckily it is not a voting or poll. Not the majority will decide how the request is closed. You have to convince the closing admin or user by good arguments. -- RE rillke questions? 20:44, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Deletion Request of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anahit History of Prostitution.jpg
[edit]You put a {{Delete}} tag on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anahit History of Prostitution.jpg. That is an inappropriate use of the tag and a waste of Admin time and energy. If we allowed it, it would mean that DR discussions could be spread over two (or possibly more) different DRs at the various levels, rather than kept all in one place.
It is clear that you disagreed with the DR, but, as it turned out, the image was a copyright violation so it could have been deleted on sight. If you disagree with a DR, your proper course of action is to use {{Vk}} = " Keep" (which you did not do) and discuss your reasons, not to propose deleting the DR. Please do not do it again. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:35, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Deprecated License
[edit]
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Dhaka Medical College and Hospital.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 19:38, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:LaurenKate.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 10:57, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:OR President Tom Chamberlain.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Avron (talk) 20:11, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Branodonum-by-Nigel-Stickells.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-mattbuck (Talk) 21:11, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Its all rubbish here in commons - I copied the full information of the original file and the software is not able to render that correctly. It does not even show the bigger image with all his collegues. I will upload images like this in de only. --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 08:56, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Ash_beds_from_eruption_at_Long_Valley_caldera.gif
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Ash_beds_from_eruption_at_Long_Valley_caldera.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ash_beds_from_eruption_at_Long_Valley_caldera.gif]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
— hike395 (talk) 07:01, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Sonst hast du keine Probleme? PD-USGov-USGS ist eindeutig. --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 10:26, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ja, es ist eine gültige Lizenz, aber das Material von der USGS nicht gekommen, aber kam von "Volcano World" von Nodak.edu. Siehe das Link (jetzt Archivierte): http://web.archive.org/web/20080114043639/http://volcano.und.nodak.edu/vwdocs/volc_images/north_america/california/long_valley.html... Ich sehe nicht, dass keine Beweise, die Karte von der USGS ist. Können Sie einige Beweise liefern? — hike395 (talk) 12:58, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
- "Volcano World" wurde die "North Dakota and Oregon Space Grant Consortia administered by the Department of Geosciences at Oregon State University". Siehe http://web.archive.org/web/20080130124854/http://volcano.und.edu/. Diese sind nicht Teil der US-Regierung, aber sind die staatlichen Universitäten. Materialien produziert von staatlichen Universitäten sind nicht in der Public Domain. Ich denke, die Karte muss gelöscht werden. Wir können zu Commons AfD, dauern Wenn Sie es wünschen. — hike395 (talk) 13:15, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ash beds from eruption at Long Valley caldera.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— hike395 (talk) 14:49, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Avalon fullmap.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
AFBorchert (talk) 11:22, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Robert Livingston.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 10:05, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:AR Crittenden Robert.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:AR Crittenden Robert.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
— billinghurst sDrewth 04:08, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Rubbish - Robert Crittenden died 1834. So this information may be interesting, but it is not importent in view of copyright. --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 06:58, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:FALABA 414(TNMTc-JJ7oK-k2GwE)-.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:FALABA 414(TNMTc-JJ7oK-k2GwE)-.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 12:03, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:FALABA 414.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Didym (talk) 01:26, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:FALABA 414(TNMTc-JJ7oK-k2GwE)-.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Didym (talk) 01:27, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content.
We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules. In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files. Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions. Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.
|
2003:4D:2C4E:5CA9:1CF6:DB6B:E917:29A5 18:55, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Dariusz Stola.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Dariusz Stola.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:20, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello!
Thank you for uploading File:FishLake.JPG to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:01, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Ach was, genau dieses Tool benutze ich eigentlich immer. --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 20:00, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:RLMetcalfe.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:RLMetcalfe.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Jcb (talk) 19:59, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Secretary duncan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 23:32, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Image without license
[edit]
This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 14:03, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Michigan Lt. Governor Garlin Gilchrist, official portrait.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:34, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Bimbo Bread truck.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 07:28, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Katie Hill, official portrait, 116th Congress.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Katie Hill, official portrait, 116th Congress.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
JuTa 06:18, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Tammy-episode-picture-still.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |