Commons:Deletion requests/File:Turkey-GLGBT-flag.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This is a fictional flag and I think that makes it out of scope. Rapsar (talk) 21:38, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- It's not fictional, it's an LGBT pride flag, that's very different.
Keep Fry1989 eh? 17:47, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
- It is fictional, because the uploader is the creator of this flag. It has not been used in anywhere before, in real life I mean.--Rapsar (talk) 17:51, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
- It's not fictional, it's an LGBT pride flag!. Lubunya (talk) 17:20, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Created by your imagination. That makes it unreal, out of scope.--Rapsar (talk) 18:03, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Wrong, there's plenty of LGBT flag maps, they're all valid. Fry1989 eh? 18:16, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- I don't get it. This flag is not been used in "real life" -as long as I know. Something like original research.--Rapsar (talk) 22:18, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- "Original research" means nothing on Commons, that's a Wikipedia term. It's common at different pride parades around the world to see augmented national flags with the rainbow stripes, this easily could have been spotted in Ankara or Instabul, and even if it hasn't, that doesn't mean it has no scope and should just be deleted. Fry1989 eh? 23:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't use it as a Wikipedia term. I was trying to say that this flag is completley "fictional" (again, I didn't see it in real life, anywhere before) and thus, this image is a personal image. As long as it is not being used, it should be deleted per Commons:Project scope.--Rapsar (talk) 21:03, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
- You are using a term which applies to Wikipedia. Fictionality on it's own is not a reason for something to be deleted here. Also, the fact you haven't seen it in real life, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It's completely plausible. Fry1989 eh? 21:12, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
- I can't prove something that does not exist. Can you prove that this flag(s) used in anywhere in real life? There will be no reason to delete this file if you or someone prove that.--Rapsar (talk) 22:36, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
- You are using a term which applies to Wikipedia. Fictionality on it's own is not a reason for something to be deleted here. Also, the fact you haven't seen it in real life, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It's completely plausible. Fry1989 eh? 21:12, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't use it as a Wikipedia term. I was trying to say that this flag is completley "fictional" (again, I didn't see it in real life, anywhere before) and thus, this image is a personal image. As long as it is not being used, it should be deleted per Commons:Project scope.--Rapsar (talk) 21:03, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
- "Original research" means nothing on Commons, that's a Wikipedia term. It's common at different pride parades around the world to see augmented national flags with the rainbow stripes, this easily could have been spotted in Ankara or Instabul, and even if it hasn't, that doesn't mean it has no scope and should just be deleted. Fry1989 eh? 23:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- I don't get it. This flag is not been used in "real life" -as long as I know. Something like original research.--Rapsar (talk) 22:18, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Wrong, there's plenty of LGBT flag maps, they're all valid. Fry1989 eh? 18:16, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Created by your imagination. That makes it unreal, out of scope.--Rapsar (talk) 18:03, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: per Fry1989. INeverCry 19:32, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
