Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
Featured picture candidates
File:Tree in Gravatá - Brazil.jpg, not featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2024 at 05:11:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Others
- Info created by BernaBotto – uploaded by BernaBotto – nominated by BernaBotto -- BernaBotto (talk) 05:11, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- BernaBotto (talk) 05:11, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The tree is interesting, but the quality is too low, sorry. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:34, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry. I think this is a cool subject but if you want to succeed at FP it may be worth submitting your images to QIC first and also browsing the other images in the category. This one has a low level of detail at full size. Cmao20 (talk) 13:15, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Harlock81 and Cmao20: QIC opened. BernaBotto (talk) 15:33, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose --Low res and ambiguous subject. Nice tree but my attention don't know where to go in the pic. MorMor 100Polar (Mensajes aquí) 21:13, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad quality, sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 06:25, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Harlock81. --Peulle (talk) 08:13, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2024 at 03:24:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Others
- Info created by Janeklass – uploaded by Janeklass – nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 03:24, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Janeklass (talk) 03:24, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Such side-view photos of hydracarina are very rare. Not many of them exist. Janeklass (talk) 03:27, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:18, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:37, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is really great and not too dark either. Well done! -- Radomianin (talk) 10:01, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think it is still too dark, but FP Cmao20 (talk) 13:13, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:03, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 19:15, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Awesome MorMor 100Polar (Mensajes aquí) 21:14, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fine details. Wolverine X-eye 23:06, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:26, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:36, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 16:47, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Difficult shot. --Peulle (talk) 08:13, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:28, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:02, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 00:08, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2024 at 21:21:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Cheloniidae (Sea Turtles)
- Info An endangered species. The first six images in the gallery are the same species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:21, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:21, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:58, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:12, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:18, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:36, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:10, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:48, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:31, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:04, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:14, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support-- MorMor 100Polar (Mensajes aquí) 21:15, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Way too good. And I actually mean that. Wolverine X-eye 23:07, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice light and colors, high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:47, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 06:52, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:25, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:35, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support----Famberhorst (talk) 16:41, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 16:48, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Janeklass (talk) 4:09, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 06:36, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 08:14, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 00:09, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2024 at 20:30:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements
- Info created by Деан Лазаревски – uploaded by Kiril Simeonovski – nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:30, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:30, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Paracel63 (talk) 05:50, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support-- IrksomeBuccaneer2635 (talk) 12:24, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very clear and instructive view of a nice village in beautiful surroundings. I also like the mix of old and new buildings which shows the development of residential buildings. Some tiny CAs, but not irritating. – Aristeas (talk) 19:13, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:25, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:34, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:23, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas --Terragio67 (talk) 16:49, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support - But I think the photo needs a vertical correction.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:57, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, the minaret seems to be tilted a bit: @Kiril Simeonovski: could you fix it? — Draceane talkcontrib. 10:04, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Perspective corrected.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:43, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, the minaret seems to be tilted a bit: @Kiril Simeonovski: could you fix it? — Draceane talkcontrib. 10:04, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Dank u --Famberhorst (talk) 18:45, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:08, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 06:36, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:11, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2024 at 15:05:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Carcharhinidae (Requiem Sharks)
- Info One FP of this species in an aquarium and one FP of an underwater reflection. One of the photos in the latest adult and children's editions of A Sharp Eye on wildlife photography. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:05, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:05, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent candidate Cmao20 (talk) 15:32, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good quality for an underwater picture. The angle of view is also excellent. The reflection on the surface adds dynamism. But I wouldn't feel very comfortable in the photographer's shoes :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Obviously, that's why I was in bare feet. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:28, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- This way your swimfins didn't get eaten, right? -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:49, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- For this shot I was standing on the sand with mask and snorkel. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:09, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Janeklass (talk) 3:14, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. —Bruce1eetalk 07:37, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:35, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:08, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:32, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:04, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great photo with excellent quality and high documentary value, and the beautiful reflection even adds some artistic value to it. – Aristeas (talk) 19:09, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 06:55, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:25, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:23, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Do we have any category for this type of (under)water reflections? — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:29, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment total internal reflection? Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:00, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:49, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Love the inverted reflection. --Peulle (talk) 08:15, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:39, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Anémona perla de cristal (Heteractis aurora), islas Ad Dimaniyat, Omán, 2024-08-14, DD 10.jpg, featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2024 at 10:19:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class : Anthozoa
- Info created & uploaded by Poco a poco – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:19, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:19, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for the nom Tomer, I also enjoy anemones very much, astonishing creatures. Btw, I made some improvements. Poco a poco (talk) 10:45, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, cool to get a shot from directly above so we can see all these details Cmao20 (talk) 12:55, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:34, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:30, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 19:07, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:42, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful colors and nice composition. The depth of field is quite narrow, but the main part is in focus, and the high resolution of the picture (5,136 × 5,136 pixels) is generous to offer an excellent quality at lower resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:54, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 06:57, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:25, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:20, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support----Famberhorst (talk) 16:44, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 06:36, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Poanes melane-4.jpg, not featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2024 at 06:25:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
- Info created by User:EugeneZelenko – uploaded by User:EugeneZelenko – nominated by EponineBunnyKickQueen -- EponineBunnyKickQueen (talk) 06:25, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- EponineBunnyKickQueen (talk) 06:25, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Although soft, I think the shot may have been in focus, but the camera/lens and settings F16 and 1/60 sec have not delivered sharpness. For me, crop is too tight. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:14, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Really sorry but per Charles. I think this is QI but not FP for me. I think the crop is tight, particularly at the bottom. The sharpness is not great (I too suspect diffraction softness is part of it, because the focus is fine) but I'd forgive that if the resolution were higher or the composition were better. This is not a bad photo by any means, but I don't think it's at the level of the best on Commons Cmao20 (talk) 12:54, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the thoughtful reasoning. I'm not a photographer, and this is the first time I've nominated a photo, so I appreciate it. Regardless, I'm grateful to the photographer for providing us with a quality image of this species. :) EponineBunnyKickQueen (talk) 19:56, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Charlesjsharp and Cmao20 -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:08, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
File:FDR 1944 Color Portrait (cropped)(b).jpg, not featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2024 at 22:41:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1940-1949
- Info created by Leon Perskie – uploaded by Emiya1980 – nominated by Wcamp9
- Support -- Wcamp9 (talk) 22:41, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
SupportCmao20 (talk) 23:24, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but on reflection I agree with Charles's point. I'd support the uncropped version. Cmao20 (talk) 12:51, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment We should not nominate cropped images of other people's work. Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:35, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Indeed, the taller aspect ratio and extra headroom of the original uncropped version make for a better portrait. -Julesvernex2 (talk) 10:08, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
* Comment Wcamp9, redirecting the file link to the uncropped version seems to have broken the nomination. I believe the right way to do this is to offer the uncropped version as an Alternative. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 18:37, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Link is restored. The uncropped version can still be added to this nomination as an Alternative. I've taken the liberty to do so since Wcamp9 is new to FPC and doesn't know how the nom system works (you can't go about changing the code in the nom, unless you know exactly what you're doing). Please revert if you don't like it. --Cart (talk) 19:32, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
- Original uncropped version. This version has been nominated before, and as usual this should be declared on new noms. --Cart (talk) 19:32, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Noting the original nomination, I see that I voted and realised that there are compression artefacts. I didn't notice these at first this time, and ought to have looked more closely. They continue to bother me. Cmao20 (talk) 00:52, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:52, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Southern side of Woljeonggyo Bridge illuminated at sunset in Gyeongju South Korea.jpg, featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2024 at 21:56:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#South Korea
- Info created – uploaded – nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 21:56, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 21:56, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:48, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful Cmao20 (talk) 23:01, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Beautiful photo. MorMor 100Polar (Mensajes aquí) 23:02, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 23:39, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 03:22, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Janeklass (talk) 5:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:04, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:08, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful! --Fernando (talk) 13:15, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:09, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:33, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:27, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great light and atmosphere, excellent quality. – Aristeas (talk) 19:07, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 02:40, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Here we are close to perfection. --Terragio67 (talk) 16:54, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 06:36, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:11, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Clara Bow, grayscale.jpg, featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2024 at 18:15:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1930-1939
- Info created by Harold Dean Carsey, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 18:15, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Iconic photo of a famous and important person Cmao20 (talk) 23:02, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 23:46, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Janeklass (talk) 5:18, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:38, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:08, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Paracel63 (talk) 05:16, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 07:11, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:33, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 16:56, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Lone Mountain Sunset (32727260230).jpg, not featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2024 at 15:06:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#Montana
- Info created by Eric Moreno – uploaded by Orizan – nominated by Wcamp9
- Support -- Wcamp9 (talk) 15:06, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This photo is very beautiful but the colours seem oversaturated to me and the white balance looks a little warm. Particularly the fact that the snow appears orange. Cmao20 (talk) 15:47, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- As someone who has been to Big Sky Resort before, the snow practically reflects lights of all colors and very rarely orange Wcamp9 (talk) 16:13, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- MorMor 100Polar (Mensajes aquí) 20:32, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:40, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:56, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:03, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- chromatic aberration particularly visible in the trees at the right -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:35, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2024 at 14:24:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#United Kingdom
- Info I love the composition and light in this photo. created by Keith Lawson 11 – uploaded by Keith Lawson 11 – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:24, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:24, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose There is a problem in the tree. Green flare (note added). And the picture seems over-processed. Foreground is out of focus. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:54, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- + Question to the native English speakers: what does "Alternate route up Pen y Fan What 3 words failed.driveway.informed" mean, in the description? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:09, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The green flair looks like sunlight from the right to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:21, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- A green flare with this definition (#5) in my view. A section with green branches instead of gray all around -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:53, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I agree with Basile that the lens flare is a technical fault. Personally it doesn't bother me too much so I will leave this nomination open until further votes/opinions. However, I am from the UK so perhaps I am a bit biased/overly sensitive to the mood in this photo. Cmao20 (talk) 12:52, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- The composition is excellent. Just the technical flaws bother me (green spot, narrow depth of field with blurred foreground, and lack of sharpness at the left). Maybe also too much clarity -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:32, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I agree with Basile that the lens flare is a technical fault. Personally it doesn't bother me too much so I will leave this nomination open until further votes/opinions. However, I am from the UK so perhaps I am a bit biased/overly sensitive to the mood in this photo. Cmao20 (talk) 12:52, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- A green flare with this definition (#5) in my view. A section with green branches instead of gray all around -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:53, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- To answer the What3words question: It's a type of geolocation, see failed.driveway.informed. — Julian H.✈ 11:15, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, ok, then it makes sense, some way. Thanks! -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:37, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- I turned it into normal coordinates since that seems more useful. — Julian H.✈ 16:19, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, ok, then it makes sense, some way. Thanks! -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:37, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The green flair looks like sunlight from the right to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:21, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Tomer T (talk) 10:21, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:06, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Weak supportFor me, the wonderful mood of the picture outweighs the technical error, so I am personally willing to tolerate it. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:07, 15 December 2024 (UTC)- Weak support moody scene! The green spot is a bummer, though. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:14, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Paracel63 (talk) 05:40, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
Weak support Light and atmosphere are wonderful, and IMHO the flares are not very irritating. (There is also a restrained red flare at the left. However the unequal distribution of sharpness seems a bit astonishing, I can’t explain this at ƒ/7.1 and an 18 mm lens on an APS-C sensor. It’s OK that the foreground is out of focus, but only the cottage and a relatively small part of the wall at the right are really sharp, while the trees at the left and right are already a bit soft … maybe a bad [copy of the] lens?) – Aristeas (talk) 18:39, 16 December 2024 (UTC)Oppose I am very sorry because I 100% agree that this is a very beautiful photo with great composition, light and atmosphere. But now, only at the 3rd glance, I see that there is something like a “cutting line” near the right border (see image note), showing that this photo is a montage – that would be fine, but the line is so coarse that the montage was done inadequately. E.g. it seems that the rightmost sheep was just duplicated (it appears two times there), and the same is true for a fence post, some branches, etc. This spoils the image for me, sorry. – Aristeas (talk) 18:46, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Well noticed. Yes, it's unfortunately a little clumsily done and I think that stops it from being FP. Let's try something else. Cmao20 (talk) 18:59, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2024 at 14:11:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Belgium
- Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:11, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:11, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:02, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support IrksomeBuccaneer2635 (talk) 20:59, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good composition and viewpoint, but a little bit tilted to the left, according to the left part of the tower -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:49, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:50, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 03:22, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:05, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Fernando (talk) 13:27, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:05, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:28, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:45, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:32, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:31, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support - But I think the photo needs a vertical correction.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:56, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Basile and Famberhorst --Terragio67 (talk) 16:58, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:49, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 06:37, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Riyadh Skyline.jpg, featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2024 at 00:47:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
- Info created – uploaded by B.alotaby – nominated by -- Aliphotography (talk) 00:47, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Support-- Aliphotography (talk) 00:47, 14 December 2024 (UTC)- Support IrksomeBuccaneer2635 (talk) 13:43, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:05, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Paracel63 (talk) 05:36, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:14, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:31, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I don't like the bottom crop much, it seems random to me. — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:36, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 06:37, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:55, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I striked the vote by ArionStar's sock. Yann (talk) 19:57, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2024 at 05:28:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Liquid
- Info S-charl, rapids in the mountain stream Clemgia, a tributary of the Inn. A tree carried away by the current finds rest on the higher rock.
All by me -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:28, 14 December 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:28, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support The contrast and clarity are a bit too high for my liking, but that water looks just right, amazing. --Fernando (talk) 08:49, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose To me, it seems like this image was manipulated, hence my oppose. Wolverine X-eye 18:18, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- If you make this accusation, you should also justify it. Ermell (talk) 22:52, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I can’t see any indications of untoward manipulation here. Just a long exposure technique, standard practice. Cmao20 (talk) 23:04, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- The water seems unnatural to me. Wolverine X-eye 18:10, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- This is what water looks like at long exposure. We have several categories with hundreds of similar photos. Example: Category:Long exposures (waterfalls). Some people like this look, other don't and call it "methane falls", but it's still nothing other than long exposure and not manipulated. --Cart (talk) 19:47, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- The water seems unnatural to me. Wolverine X-eye 18:10, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I can’t see any indications of untoward manipulation here. Just a long exposure technique, standard practice. Cmao20 (talk) 23:04, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose That said, I don’t personally find an outstanding composition. Sorry Famberhorst. The picture is very good but it’s not my kind of photo. I don’t really like blurry long exposure water and the composition doesn’t appeal to me. Cmao20 (talk) 23:04, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support and I call bullshit on the manipulation bit, which is a massively unsubstantiated claim anyway. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:10, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support All in all I am rather tired of Long exposures (waterfalls), but IMHO the effect works nicely here. – 20:16, 15 December 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aristeas (talk • contribs) 20:16, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per SHB2000. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:14, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:31, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:44, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:28, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:37, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2024 at 05:11:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Sailboats
- Info created by – uploaded by – nominated by -- Don (talk) 05:11, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Don (talk) 05:11, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Velsheda is the yacht nearest to us. The new boat, Svea, has the red spinaker. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:36, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Diffuse halo around veil, and low level of detail at full resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:30, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry. Good composition, but simply not sharp at full size Cmao20 (talk) 13:23, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Beautifull pic but with a bit of low res and low details when zooming. MorMor 100Polar (Mensajes aquí) 20:33, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --Don (talk) 23:31, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2024 at 04:56:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United States
- Info created – uploaded & nominated by WPPilot -- Don (talk) 04:56, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Don (talk) 04:56, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful colours and light Cmao20 (talk) 13:22, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Once again, not properly categorized. The single and hidden category you use displays in bold "This category page should not hold any files." Please read COM:CAT before nominating here. It is a prerequisite stated on COM:I. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:30, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This image doesn't stand among our finest, in my view. Structure cropped out at the left, harsh light with blown highlights, main facades of the construction in the shadow. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:30, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose (regretfully) – blown highlights alone is enough to ruin this image :(. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:49, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --Don (talk) 23:10, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
File:The Kaaba during Hajj.jpg, featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2024 at 00:43:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Saudi Arabia
- Info
created, uploaded, and nominated byAliphotography (talk) 00:43, 14 December 2024 (UTC) Support -- Aliphotography (talk) 00:43, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Invalid vote by Aliphotography sockpuppet of the blocked user ArionStar.
- And not "created" by Aliphotography. -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support image is fine, but is it a bit off centre? --Fernando (talk) 09:00, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support It is off centre but that doesn't really bother me, also a valuable photo because non-Muslims are not allowed here. Cmao20 (talk) 13:21, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I agree with Cmao20... and ready to support. Please, if you can, you should correct the observations I added in the notes regarding the verticals (mainly visible on the left side) and a strange stitching error on a staircase... Terragio67 (talk) 19:50, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose the fact that this image is off-centre really bothers me. Ping me if this is fixed. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:10, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Off-center does not bother me here, and the photo gives an excellent impression of the mass and diversity of the pilgrims around the Kaaba. Don’t think that there is a stitching error on the stairs, it looks like that but this is a single exposure photo, isn’t it? Correcting the verticals, as suggested by Terragio67, would be nice though. – Aristeas (talk) 18:58, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:45, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
- Centered. Aliphotography (talk) 21:14, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
@Terragio67, SHB2000 2804:1B3:9700:3654:581C:C75E:C6F:7614 13:34, 16 December 2024 (UTC)- Dear IP, please log in or create an account to be allowed to send notifications -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
It's me Aliphotography (talk) 13:10, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Dear IP, please log in or create an account to be allowed to send notifications -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support The alternative is also OK for me. – Aristeas (talk) 19:01, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:45, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Info @Aliphotography: please note that you can vote on your alternative, too -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Invalid vote by Aliphotography sockpuppet of the blocked user ArionStar. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 02:42, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:45, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:28, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:57, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Weak opposeOverlapping error to be corrected on the staircase (to the right of the Al Fath Gate sign), behind the Kaaba. Almost imperceptible and of secondary importance is the lack of verticals on the left side of the colonnade and the Kaaba. Terragio67 (talk) 16:23, 17 December 2024 (UTC)- Weak support Looking better with the Zoom tool, the supposed overlapping error instead turns out to be an exhausted person lying on the ground... I apologize for the visual mismatch... However, my observation regarding the verticals on the left side is negligible but visible to those who are picky about promoting images like this: Interesting and valuable photograph. Terragio67 (talk) 12:35, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 22:10, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive mass of people (Where's Wally? :-)) And striking viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:36, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Per Terragio67. In my opinion the verticals on the left side are leaning to the left. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Famberhorst (talk • contribs) 17:44, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I striked the vote by ArionStar's sock. Yann (talk) 19:55, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2024 at 19:50:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Aurora
- Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:50, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:50, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:21, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Elegant, beautiful and unmanipulated ;) - Radomianin (talk) 21:13, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose reluctantly. IMHO a good attempt but not at the same level as others in the gallery. Also looks a little soft - which could be related to the f/1.4 aperture. --GRDN711 (talk) 21:38, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- The Sony FE 24mm F1.4 GM is a prime lense that is very sharp, even at f/1.4. What happened here is simply that I had used denoising over the image. But since I've uploaded that image I changed my mind and now think night photography shots should not be denoised so I just reuploaded right now a version with no denoise -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:22, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Agree that photos of the night sky should not be denoised. Invariably this will remove stars. Cmao20 (talk) 13:06, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- @GRDN711, what do you think now of the new version of the image ? (press cmd+R on Mac or Ctrl+F5 on Windows with image open to clear cache and see the new version) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:58, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Giles Laurent: You have cleaned up the technical denoising issue and it is now a quality image. I would certainly be happy if it were mine. However, IMHO, it still doesn't have the wow of others in the FP gallery. Now that you are intrigued by the aurora borealis, this might prompt travel back to Iceland's Ring Road, Northern Canada or Norway to look for more. The aurora appears like mysterious magic across the sky. --GRDN711 (talk) 01:38, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Taking a picture of the aurora is not something that you do by simply going to a place and taking a picture. You need the right conditions which you have no power at. The aurora don't happen constantly and you need one to be happening. You also need good weather, which is something extremely rare in Iceland. I spent 2 weeks in the winter period there and there was 100% cloud coverage 98% of the time. And with clouds in front of it, there's nothing to be seen. That night was the only night that I got to see an aurora. I also know a few people that went in search of auroras in other countries like Canada or Norway and that ended up seeing nothing. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:18, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Giles Laurent: You have cleaned up the technical denoising issue and it is now a quality image. I would certainly be happy if it were mine. However, IMHO, it still doesn't have the wow of others in the FP gallery. Now that you are intrigued by the aurora borealis, this might prompt travel back to Iceland's Ring Road, Northern Canada or Norway to look for more. The aurora appears like mysterious magic across the sky. --GRDN711 (talk) 01:38, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Agree that photos of the night sky should not be denoised. Invariably this will remove stars. Cmao20 (talk) 13:06, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support MorMor 100Polar (Mensajes aquí) 21:48, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:44, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:24, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:19, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Janeklass (talk) 5:19, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:27, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:03, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 20:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:30, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:05, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support One of the best images of this kind, in my view. Rather rare phenomenon -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:32, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2024 at 15:49:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Argentina
- A group of tourists trekking by the southern face of the Perito Moreno Glacier, in Argentina. All by -- Fernando (talk) 15:49, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Fernando (talk) 15:49, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really cool. I'd like to see a wider panorama, but this is also good for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 20:07, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support IrksomeBuccaneer2635 (talk) 20:57, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Getting the tones in glacial ice to render well is a challenge and you have done it well here.
- Agree with Cmao20 that a panorama would give a better sense of the size of the Perito Moreno. --GRDN711 (talk) 21:28, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:44, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:24, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:51, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:20, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:34, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 17:27, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely composition and quality. Wolverine X-eye 18:21, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Massive blue structure -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:40, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:57, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Felino Volador (talk) 23:18, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:26, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:17, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support awesome capture :) --SHB2000 (talk) 13:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per GRDN711 and Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 20:10, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:13, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:29, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Kiirunavaara Malmbanan September 2017 01.jpg, not featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2024 at 17:20:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Sweden
- Info Loading of iron ore at Kiruna mine. Situated 200 kilometres north of the Arctic Circle Kiruna mine (and the town of Kiruna) was founded in the 1890s around one of the world's largest deposits of iron ore. Kiruna is connected Iron Ore Line to the to the ice-free port of Narvik (since 1903) and the Swedish port of Luleå (since 1899). The picture is taken from a chartered helicopter, there is no public access or view point. Overview image.
- Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 17:20, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ArildV (talk) 17:20, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I like your photos a lot but I'm not seeing the wow-factor in this one. The image is good quality and entirely competent but it doesn't elicit any real emotion in me. Cmao20 (talk) 12:57, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:32, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2024 at 14:59:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Belgium
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 14:59, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 14:59, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Partial building, cropped statues. Sorry but it's not FP material IMO. --Fernando (talk) 08:57, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Fernando + dust spots next to the left tower. — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:58, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 16:34, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Vesilest (Arrenurus sp.).jpg, featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2024 at 03:15:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Others
- Info created by Janeklass – uploaded by Janeklass – nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 03:15, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Janeklass (talk) 03:15, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- MorMor 100Polar (Mensajes aquí) 12:18, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:44, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:25, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Underexposed in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:33, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:31, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:28, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:06, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I think the brightness should be increased -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:10, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile. — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:41, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I have intentionally used this lighting scheme here (one light source, from one direction). I could also use multiple light sources at once and from multiple directions, but I don't do that because I like this lighting scheme. You can see it in many of my pictures. Not everyone will like it. I like it and that's the most important thing about it. :) janeklass 18:04, 17 December 2024 (UTC
- You may consider it's important for you to enjoy your own pictures (and so much the better!), but it's not important for the collective evaluation. The goal is not to award the FP label to all photographers who like so much their own photos, otherwise we would promote the worst works that have exceptional sentimental value. The goal is to promote the photos that consensually satisfy a majority -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:41, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Understandable - not all photos have to get FP. Honestly, nothing will happen to me in life if the picture doesn't get FP :)
- I've been following this thing here for a while now and sometimes I don't understand what these assessments are based on. Emotion?
- In the case of a microscope photo, I still recommend looking for reference material to understand what level these photos are in the world. It's a very complex genre and some photos that seem bad to the viewer can turn out to be quite good if you compare the tests with similar photos :D Janeklass (talk) 03:22, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Геопарк Мадыген (краски).jpg, featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2024 at 20:18:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kyrgyzstan
- Info created and uploaded by Marat Nadjibaev – nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 20:18, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 20:18, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:21, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely layers. Wolverine X-eye 21:09, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This picture at first glance is excellent, but there are numerous (15) spots in the sky, and this one is slightly noisy. These corrections should be made to make the FP candidacy sustainable. -- Terragio67 (talk) 04:33, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Author tried to fix it — at least dots are gone as far as I see. Красный wanna talk? 05:25, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your prompt response, and, for the quick adjustment made by the author. I appreciated it. Support Terragio67 (talk) 15:46, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Author tried to fix it — at least dots are gone as far as I see. Красный wanna talk? 05:25, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:43, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:08, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:00, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:40, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:05, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Natural art, nicely captured. – Aristeas (talk) 20:27, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:44, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Janeklass (talk) 5:17, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 12:58, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:50, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Rich diversity of colors. Fascinating layers -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:34, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 03:21, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:16, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support great to have another FP from Kyrgyzstan too. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:12, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:27, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:56, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2024 at 19:59:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Russia
- Info Chesme column in the middle of Great Pond, Catherine park, Tsarskoe Selo (now Pushkin town), Saint Petersburg, Russia. UNESCO World Heritage Site. Сreated & uploaded by Игорь Гордеев – nominated by Екатерина Борисова -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 19:59, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 19:59, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:21, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Love the green vegetation and clear water. Wolverine X-eye 21:11, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the collumn and its reflection making the central axis of the photo. Very nice composition. Красный wanna talk? 22:25, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:44, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:08, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:40, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:20, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice combination of centered composition (column) with the variation in the natural surroundings. IMHO a little bit underexposed, but the effect also depends on your screen etc. – Aristeas (talk) 20:25, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:44, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:48, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 07:11, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:26, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:56, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2024 at 19:31:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
- Info created and uploaded by Максат79 – nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 19:31, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 19:31, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:22, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:44, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:08, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:00, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:40, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Terragio67 (talk) 15:58, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — For me a special and atmospheric photo.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:23, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fanastic! --Fernando (talk) 18:48, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — It really looks like Martian landscape. A bit melancholic, but very cool. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 19:46, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Other-worldly. – Aristeas (talk) 20:23, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Екатерина Борисова and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:17, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:43, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Janeklass (talk) 5:19, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:45, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 03:20, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:16, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:12, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:26, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Castle of Najac 20.jpg, featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2024 at 17:48:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#France
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 17:48, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 17:48, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:29, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow, I find this composition to be really satisfying. Cmao20 (talk) 12:07, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree, I like the composition you performed from this angle. — Terragio67 (talk) 16:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support —--Famberhorst (talk) 16:25, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Fernando (talk) 18:47, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition, colours, clouds. – Aristeas (talk) 20:22, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:43, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree about the composition, very satisfying. BigDom (talk) 12:58, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:43, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:34, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very high resolution, interesting building and nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:27, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 03:20, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:23, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:33, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Celeste box art full.png, featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2024 at 17:24:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Others
- Info created by Maddy Makes Games – uploaded by Czar – nominated by Di -- Di (they-them) (talk) 17:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Di (they-them) (talk) 17:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:32, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain I'll refrain from voting for now until I see other comments. I love to see a material like this available in commons, and it's certainly rare to find and get permission from the copyright's holder. But other than that, is the art of sufficient note and quality to be a FP? --Fernando (talk) 18:46, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:34, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:31, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well-done, professional graphics for a rather appealing, imaginative game. – Aristeas (talk) 19:04, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. Also a famous Game Maker releasing their work in free license -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support A most unusual sight at FPC. I like it. --Peulle (talk) 08:19, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --EUPBR (talk) 09:14, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
File:대릉원 (2).jpg, featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2024 at 12:47:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Cemeteries#South Korea
- Info created by Cultural Heritage Administration - uploaded by Takuyakoz – nominated by Sadopaul -- — Sadopaul 💬 📁 12:47, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- — Sadopaul 💬 📁 12:47, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Korean Bliss ;-) -- -donald- (talk) 13:44, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice composition, but sharpness low and a lot of CAs. --XRay 💬 14:40, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per XRay. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 20:02, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The composition is magical, but per above, the image quality is pretty borderline. Not sure if I can support here. Cmao20 (talk) 12:06, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Difficult decision. Indeed the quality is borderline, yes, but it’s still a pretty usable image and it looks really spectaclar. – Aristeas (talk) 20:21, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Info @Sadopaul: and others: I have “repaired” this nomination because something very unusual has happened here. The nominated picture was File:대릉원.jpg, but there was a big problem with that file: its “File history” showed that it contained two different images – a photo uploaded by User:손묵광 in 2016 and a completely independent photo uploaded in 2022 by User:Takuyakoz over the other image. Probably this was just an accident. Now the two images have been disentangled again by the helpful admin User:Sreejithk2000 – thank you very much, Sreejithk2000! The file File:대릉원.jpg does now show again the original 2016 upload by User:손묵광, the 2022 upload by User:Takuyakoz is now available as a separete file, File:대릉원 (2).jpg. This is how it should be. But this nomination was about the 2022 upload by User:Takuyakoz, so I have updated and renamed this nomination in order to show that image. I hope now everything is correct. Thank you all, – Aristeas (talk) 10:04, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the consideration and administration! — Sadopaul 💬 📁 11:19, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:13, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:30, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:31, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others + distortion. Motif isn't most wowing. --Milseburg (talk) 18:01, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Aristeas. It’s borderline but I think wow overrides quality here. Cmao20 (talk) 01:11, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support If so. --Mile (talk) 11:57, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2024 at 12:09:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Doors
- Info created by Cultural Heritage Administration – uploaded by Sadopaul – nominated by Sadopaul -- — Sadopaul 💬 📁 12:09, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- — Sadopaul 💬 📁 12:09, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No WOW factor for me. It's a rather simple depiction of an old door. --Gnosis (talk) 16:59, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but agree with Gnosis. There is nothing wrong with the image quality but I don't think the motif is outstanding enough for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 12:05, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 08.jpg, not featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2024 at 05:56:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons_(Graubünden)
- Info Tree stump next to path along the mountain stream Brancla. Beautifully shaped dead tree stump surrounded by soft autumn colours invites you to sit on it for a while.
All by me -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:56, 12 December 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:56, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's a decent photo, but the lighting is flat(ish), lacks the wow factor. Especially compared to your many FP which are stunning. I believe the full crop of the photo is better.--Tupungato (talk) 11:01, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I agree with Tupungato. The full view is very much better than the trail, but also there the crop is too tight, since the tops of the trees are cut, and the border of the photograph is too close to the summit of the mountain. Very nice colors. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:41, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Tupungato: and @Harlock81: Thanks for your comments. I re-edited the photo, maybe this is a better representation.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:05, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Better, indeed. Let me think about it. Thanks. --Harlock81 (talk) 22:14, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like this. I didn't think I would at thumbnail size, but at full size and after looking at it for a while, I think this is a beautiful composition and conveys a lovely autumn mood. Cmao20 (talk) 12:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 20:15, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:33, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I fail to see something extraordinary here Poco a poco (talk) 08:29, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not a spectacular subject nor a fantastic scenery, in my view. Midday light is also quite average, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:12, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:30, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:21, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2024 at 21:32:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture
- Info View of the fields from Julio Andrade, Carchi Province, Ecuador. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:32, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:32, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 21:39, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Massive resolution, spectacular landscape, intersting sky.--Tupungato (talk) 11:02, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
OpposeThere is a white line horizontally across the entire panorama (see annotation) --Llez (talk) 15:18, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- No problem, I can fix that, although it's not an edit issue, but a power line Poco a poco (talk) 22:40, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support because I'm sure you will fix the problem Llez notes Cmao20 (talk) 18:00, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I think this would benefit from a bottom crop: bare soil is not very interesting to look at. Also, it should be recategorized to /Agriculture; this is definitely not a natural landscape. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:17, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Recat done. Regarding the crop I will look for a solution tomorrow Poco a poco (talk) 22:40, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- The Cosmonaut: Done (this time the crop) Poco a poco (talk) 19:35, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Lvova, Tupungato, Llez, and Cmao20: IMHO it would be nice to ping the previous voters because this is a considerable change in the composition. No offence, just wanting to help, – Aristeas (talk) 20:12, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It's still good. Tupungato (talk) 20:38, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Honestly I much preferred the composition before :( Cmao20 (talk) 00:59, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It's still good. Tupungato (talk) 20:38, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Lvova, Tupungato, Llez, and Cmao20: IMHO it would be nice to ping the previous voters because this is a considerable change in the composition. No offence, just wanting to help, – Aristeas (talk) 20:12, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support: much better foreground now --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:49, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:33, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:29, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2024 at 21:32:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#France
- Info Exterior of the Saint Cecil Cathedral (Cathédrale Sainte-Cécile) in Albi, France. The grim exterior of this resembles a fortress, but the interior is lavishly decorated with art and sculpture as you can appreciate in the choir. The UNESCO World Heritage Site was built between 1282 and 1480 in Southern French Gothic style. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:32, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:32, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Amazing place and good composition but you were pretty unlucky with the light Cmao20 (talk) 17:59, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support: per above. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:18, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:22, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support —By others.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:28, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Cmao20. Still one of the best photos I have seen of that church, of course. – Aristeas (talk) 20:03, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:33, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:37, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:34, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive to me. Radomianin (talk) 18:48, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I like the light and angle of view, but the bottom of the church is a little close to the edge of the frame. BigDom (talk) 02:50, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2024 at 21:11:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#2000-2009
- Info created by Carol M. Highsmith, restored by YitzhakNat and Bammesk, uploaded by Crisco 1492, nominated by Yann
- Info World Trade Center towers, New York, 2 months before the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
- Support -- Yann (talk) 21:11, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:25, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It has terrible blue tint, and the restoration made it even worse. Here is my quick correction to show more or less what the colors should be (it's not good, but it's the right direction).--Tupungato (talk) 11:23, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- @YitzhakNat, Bammesk, and Crisco 1492: Please comment. Yann (talk) 17:02, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- The original also has vignetting. I embedded an RGB profile in the existing restoration, which resulted in the thumbnail and full size corresponding; I cannot speak to the source of the blue tint. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:10, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- This was restored by 2 editors, and 2 years apart. I don't think I will put more time to improve this image. I don't disagree with the comments above and below. I have uploaded a copy of the restored image in PNG format at This link. Please feel free to improve it as you see fit, and please upload your edited versions as a separate file, thanks. Bammesk (talk) 01:28, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Looks also like vignetting --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:34, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
- Support I think that Tupungato has a point, so I made a new version, correcting the blue tint. I also think that Adobe color profile is not the best for the web. Yann (talk) 17:48, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492, Tupungato, and PantheraLeo1359531: FYI. Yann (talk) 17:48, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: looking at the sad state of the original, I appreciate all the effort that went into its restoration. But I don't think it should be promoted until the sky is fixed: it's full of weird and rather disturbing artefacts. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:22, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:33, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:37, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Simply not a good photo. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:09, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I don't think this is going to pass. Thanks for the comments. Yann (talk) 11:35, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Allegory of the Four Seasons, featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2024 at 15:57:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Spring
-
Summer
-
Autumn
-
Winter
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
- Info Allegory of the four seasons in the form of putti, castle park Quedlinburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany; created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 15:57, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 15:57, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great set! --Yann (talk) 16:57, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:26, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Colours, light, angles, subject, all great. Excellent set. Cmao20 (talk) 17:44, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Rolf Kranz (talk) 21:05, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:07, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:21, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose A valid set on FPC, almost a reason to support :) On the other side I don't see what is extraordinary here and the detail is not the best. Do these statues have any historic value? I don't find the statues specially pretty or rich, either. Poco a poco (talk) 14:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:52, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support ----Famberhorst (talk) 16:31, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose As per Poco a Poco, quality pictures but subjects are a bit on the plain side with no wow factor.--Fernando (talk) 18:42, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:03, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:33, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose "Autumn" is not an FP in my view. Harsh light and strong shadow. Also per Poco -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:09, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2024 at 15:21:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Valais
- Info Yes I know that the plants in the foreground are out of focus but I don't think it spoils the totality of the composition. A fresh take on the Matterhorn from an angle I hadn't seen before. Good quality and very high resolution. created by Roy Egloff – uploaded by Roy Egloff – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:21, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:21, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Fernando (talk) 15:58, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:58, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:32, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:27, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Huge resolution and the mountain is conveniently positioned in a gap between two trees -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:04, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:05, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination and Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 09:05, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 12:17, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:19, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:15, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 14:42, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support —-Llez (talk) 16:21, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:52, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:22, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile Terragio67 (talk) 04:42, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:45, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- SupportErmell (talk) 11:40, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Years ago I was at this place. A nice reunion with the Matterhorn.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:45, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:02, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- MorMor 100Polar (Mensajes aquí) 21:52, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:33, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Janeklass (talk) 5:21, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:12, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Gnosis (talk) 05:04, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Paracel63 (talk) 05:25, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Flow of time.jpg, featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2024 at 21:03:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Telescopes / Telescope RC600 of the Caucasian mountain observatory SAI Moscow State University
- Info created by Nerenisa – uploaded by Nerenisa – nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:03, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:03, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and interesting Cmao20 (talk) 15:25, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Fernando (talk) 15:58, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 16:51, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:59, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:26, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing. Wolverine X-eye 17:42, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:29, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tupungato (talk) 11:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:18, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Tilted/Lacks perspective correction aber otherwise great Poco a poco (talk) 14:16, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 14:43, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support —-Llez (talk) 16:20, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:52, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:46, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support ~Moheen (keep talking) 09:29, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:36, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:02, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 21:52, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- MorMor 100Polar (Mensajes aquí) 21:55, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:16, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Berlin-Kreuzberg, de torens van de Oberbaumbrücke Dm09095168 IMG 5495 2024-09-05 18.10.jpg, not featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2024 at 10:41:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany
- Info created & uploaded by Michielverbeek – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:41, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:41, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's a nice photo, but I'm missing the "wow factor", some additional uniqueness. -- Tupungato (talk) 11:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support for me the wow is in the composition with the cyclists providing a sense of dynamism, the nice light, and the interesting architecture. Cmao20 (talk) 15:30, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:50, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Per Cmao20. Maybe a little more air above would have been better.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:43, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Cmao20, the cyclists provide enough wow factor for Vulcan to support. –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:14, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The left part is unsatisfying, in my view (blurry content, cropped out person, uninteresting dominant lamppost). I don't like the shadows at the right (maybe a tree? and a road sign). Also the building in the background spoils the composition. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:03, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I concur with Basile Poco a poco (talk) 08:36, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2024 at 06:28:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#South Korea
- Info created – uploaded – nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral, but leaning Weak support – I don't love how my eyes are drawn to the background, which isn't the main subject (the grey heron) and feels rather unsharp, but the foreground is fairly good. That said I'm not sure what can be done about this. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:48, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, SHB2000, for your feedback. The background is not spectacular but I find the contrast between natural environment and skyscrapers uncommon compared to what we usually see here. The fact that the park is populated by large birds in total freedom is a local specificity that I find astonishing. As for sharpness, I did my best to optimize it according to the scene including a living being, but perhaps F/13 instead of F/11 would have increased the depth of field. The weather was beautiful that day, and it's a photo I like because it combines two contradictory ideas: nature and urbanization. Like a balance between the two. Landscape connected to megacity, or urbanization with a breath of fresh air in its heart -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nominator, I find the contrast between nature and urban to be compelling and sensitive. Cmao20 (talk) 15:29, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per others. IMHO especially the reflection is advantageous: it brings the background “into” the foreground and connects the buildings with the heron. – Aristeas (talk) 11:36, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Normally one expects another background --Llez (talk) 12:22, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:15, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:55, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:01, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
File:46-203-0009 Pidhirtsi Castle RB 24.jpg, not featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2024 at 17:42:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 17:42, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 17:42, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A tad oversaturated? The sky looks a bit fake -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Info This photo have been taken after sunset when the sky had enough light and clouds had specific colors after sunset, but the groud was too dark to take one shot and avoid gaps in shadows and highlights. So I had to use HDR to receive balance in light between the sky and the ground. Maybe this can explain your thoughts about fake sky. --Rbrechko (talk) 13:54, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- The problem with drone pictures taken in low light is that they are not stabilized like a tripod. It's possible that this lack of quality impacted the result when enhancing the colors afterwards in post-treatment -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:45, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support It does look a bit too saturated but then again I think autumn trees can look like this at sunset Cmao20 (talk) 19:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose too oversaturated. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 15:04, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support: great composition, and the sky looks natural to me, very similar to what I see in Canada in autumn. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The tree on the left spoils the compo IMHO, and yes it looks a bit oversaturated and the WB a bit purpelish Poco a poco (talk) 20:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per SHB2000. --Fernando (talk) 16:02, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:39, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Interesting moment, but left part of the building is hidden, and the colors appear slightly oversaturated. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:45, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:10, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Camo20. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:42, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Aztec Sandstone - Valley of Fire.jpg, not featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2024 at 05:47:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#Nevada
- Info: Aztec Sandstone outcropping in the Valley of Fire. Second nomination - redeveloped to improve fidelity; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:54, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:38, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Low wow factor, in my view. Rocks in midday light with ordinary sky. Perhaps bottom crop too tight. Also Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aztec Sandstone - Valley of Fire1.jpg, already promoted, is very similar, apparently taken the same day (according to the metadata exif "Date and time of data generation"), and slightly better as part of the composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- In what way are they very similar? Different outcrop, the locations are a few km apart, which is evident from the geotags. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:25, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Info There might be a mistake in the date, supposed to be the same as in the metadata exif ("1 March 2012" vs "20 February 2012"). Note that Sahara desert also looks similar on long distances. Those two picture of rocks look pretty identical on several aspects: subject, sky, light. But the other one is better. The patterns are not spectacular here, in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Date corrected, was a mistake indeed. Regarding the rock appearance, one could also say that all the paddies look similar 🤷♂️ --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:17, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- We could. You can. The important thing is to create diverse images, sometimes even with the same subjects. Thanks for the correction -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:10, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Date corrected, was a mistake indeed. Regarding the rock appearance, one could also say that all the paddies look similar 🤷♂️ --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:17, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Info There might be a mistake in the date, supposed to be the same as in the metadata exif ("1 March 2012" vs "20 February 2012"). Note that Sahara desert also looks similar on long distances. Those two picture of rocks look pretty identical on several aspects: subject, sky, light. But the other one is better. The patterns are not spectacular here, in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- In what way are they very similar? Different outcrop, the locations are a few km apart, which is evident from the geotags. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:25, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Calico Hills - panorama.jpg, featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2024 at 05:47:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#Nevada
- Info: Calico Hills panorama. Photo from 2009, so sharpness is admittedly borderline by modern standards. But I feel it still deserves a star based on light and colours. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It's quite good, but the different color of the sky (see note) is distracting for me. Is it a stitching error? — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:38, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Done: fixed; it was some sort of artefact indeed, thanks for the note! --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with nomination. Quality is okay but composition + light is really good, happy to see this get the star Cmao20 (talk) 19:54, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:09, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:38, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:16, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The clouds were white at the beginning but now they are blue -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:06, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:34, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per above -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:22, 17 December 2024 (UTC)