User talk:Mylius

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
English: Welcome to the Commons, Doenertier82!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Mylius!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:14, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Frankfurt Am Main-Steinernes Haus-Koeln Untertaschenmacher15 17.gif

Hallo Mylius, was zeigt dieses von Dir stammende Bild denn nun? Das Steinernes Haus in Frankfurt oder doch Haus Saaleck in Köln? Beides gleichzeitig? :-o -- Ies (talk) 17:59, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Huhu Ies, gut aufgepasst! Damals, als ich das Bild für den Steinernen Haus-Artikel eingestellt habe, hatte Haus Saaleck noch keinen eigenen Artikel. Ich vermute mal, dass der Irrtum hier begründet liegt, auch wenn ich das Bild nicht kategorisiert habe. Habe die Beschreibung und Kategorisierung mal überarbeitet, da es zwar mit der Historie des Steinernen Hauses zu tun hat, wie du sicher im Artikel gelesen hast, aber definitiv nur der Kategorie "Haus Saaleck" zuzurechnen ist. Beste Grüße --Mylius (talk) 20:30, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Danke! -- Ies (talk) 14:26, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alsfeld-Neurathhaus-Haustuer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Mbdortmund 12:34, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frankfurt Am Main-Verlauf der Braubach-Ravenstein1862.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:18, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Frankfurt Am Main-St Bartholomaeus-Der Pfarrthurm-Entwurf des Meisters Madern Gertener-um 1415-alternativ.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Frankfurt Am Main-St Bartholomaeus-Der Pfarrthurm-Entwurf des Meisters Madern Gertener-um 1415-alternativ.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

File:Frankfurt Am Main-Virtuelles Altstadtmodell Frankfurt Am Main-Kornmarkt von Hoehe der Kreuzung mit der Weissadler- und Grossen Sandgasse nach Sueden.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:01, 22 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Frankfurt Altstadt-Huehnermarkt-1900.jpg

Hallo Mylius, das Bild wird in dem Ausstellungsheft "Zwischen Dom und Römerberg" des Instituts für Stadtgeschichte von 2006 als ein Bild von Fay aus dem Jahre 1903 ausgewiesen. Nur eine Angabe kann richtig sein, daher solltest du das vielleicht mal prüfen. Liebe Grüße, --David Liuzzo (talk) 17:04, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Du hast völlig Recht, es stammt aus der Serie "Bilder aus dem alten Frankfurt am Main. Nach der Natur." von Fay, der nur für ältere Abbildungen auf Mylius zurückgriff. Das habe ich erst vor kurzem in Erfahrung gebracht. Da ich die Serie komplett im Original erwerben konnte, reiche ich die Original-Lichtdrucke in dieser Kategorie Stück für Stück nach. Die fehlerhafte benannte Autorenschaft habe ich unabhängig davon korrigiert. --Mylius (talk) 20:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frankfurt Am Main-Peter Becker-Frankfurts Vorstadt Sachsenhausen zu Anfang des 17 Jahrhunderts-1889.jpg

Moin, hier ist der Horst ;) Ich habe das von dir digitalisierte Aquarell der Alten Brücke von Frankfurt nochmalig als FP nominiert. Ob es diesmal wohl angenommen wird? Ich drücke die Daumen. Die wohl schönste Altstadtbrücke die meine Augen je erblicken durften, pittoresker selbst als die Prager Karlsbrücke. Wäre das nicht ein klasse Rekonstruktionsprojekt für die Zukunft? Sobald die Häuser auf dem geschundenen TR-Areal wieder stehen, darf es kein Halten mehr geben! ;) Frostige Grüße aus MeckPomm, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 12:33, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo nochmal! Bislang läuft die Nominierung sehr gut, scheint durchzugehen. Auf der Nominierungsseite kam allerdings eine Rückfrage bzgl. der Qualität auf: "Very nice, except for peculiarly looking horizontal and vertical defect lines (see annotations). Could this be retouched, please. If so, I am ready to support. I noticed a significant CCW tilt of the tower to the left. This may be there in the orginal as well. Is it possible to verify that? Just looks peculiar because other man made structures seem to have almost perfect vertical lines. --Slaunger (Diskussion) 18:24, 31 January 2010 (UTC)".
Kannst du dazu eine Aussage treffen? Besten Gruß, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 13:36, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Guck dir mal die Historie von diesem Slaunger an. Rosinenpicker wäre noch ein Euphemismus. Ich sehe gar nicht ein, auf so einen Blödsinn erst einzugehen. Natürlich sind die genannten vermeintlichen Makel schon im Nachdruck vorhanden (sonst hätte ich sie bei meinen Qualitätsansprüchen wohl auch kaum drin gelassen). Ansonsten Dank für die Nominierung & Gruß --Mylius (talk) 18:21, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Scheint in der Tat sehr pingelig zu sein der Mann. Im Übrigen top die Qualität mit der du hier historisches Material hochlädst. So umfangreich und qualitätvoll wie jenes von Frankfurt bekommt man hier wohl von keiner anderen Stadt, oder? Danke dafür. Mein Interesse für die Frankfurter Altstadt steigert sich u.a. dadurch zunehmend. Zwei Abhandlungen zum Thema sind bereits bestellt. Gruß aus dem ewigen meckpommschen Eis, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 12:34, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
So, das Bild ist durchgegangen. :)
Wo bekommt man denn heraus, wann ein Bild "gefeatured" wird? Müsste dann ja bald sein. Beste Grüße aus dem Schwabenland, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 17:04, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Urheberrechtliche Ansprüche dürften aufgrund des Alters erloschen sein"

Hallo!

Um dies ("Urheberrechtliche Ansprüche dürften aufgrund des Alters erloschen sein") zu rechtfertigen solltest du zumindest das Entstehungsdatum dieser Karte bzw. genauere Angaben zum Autor machen. --High Contrast (talk) 17:11, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, wenn du mir jetzt noch sagst, wovon du redest...? Gruß --Mylius (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Blanking

Hi Mylius,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you blanked Johanniterkirche (Frankfurt) on Commons. But blanking the page is not the right way to do this. I'd like to strongly recommend to use {{speedy|reason here}} and add it on top of the page; This way it will be placed on a special list that administrators check regulary for deletion. Thanks again. –Krinkletalk 21:39, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, I wanted to add a category but forgot the cat-prefix. Unfortunately I didn't know how to delete this, therefore the blanking. Thanks for the hint! --Mylius (talk) 21:43, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Frankfurt Am Main-H Worms-Stadtansicht vom Muehlberg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Frankfurt Am Main-H Worms-Stadtansicht vom Muehlberg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 15:00, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"achtzehnten" oder doch "achzehnten"?

Hallo Mylius, entweder gibt es hier auf Commons eine Menge Tippfehler, oder Kollege Aka hat in der de-Wikipedia eine falsche Korrektur vorgenommen. Wie sich der Originaltitel tatsächlich schreibt, konnte ich allein mit Google leider nicht zuverlässsig herausfinden. Zumindest nach der heutigen Rechtschreibung lässt man aber das t in "achtzehn" nicht weg (siehe z. B. Pons-Wörterbuch). Grüße -- Sprachpfleger (talk) 10:57, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Herzlichen Dank für den Hinweis! Leider gibt es tatsächlich eine Menge Tippfehler, ich haben den Titel und sogar den Kategorienamen hier auf Commons schlicht falsch geschrieben. Falls du es nicht übernehmen willst, werde ich mich die nächsten Tage mal um eine Korrektur kümmern. Beste Grüße --16:09, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Ich werde es voraussichtlich nicht tun. Grüße --Sprachpfleger (talk) 14:41, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Frankfurt Am Main-Stadtansicht von der Deutschherrnbruecke zu Beginn der Abenddaemmerung.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Frankfurt Am Main-Stadtansicht von der Deutschherrnbruecke zu Beginn der Abenddaemmerung.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 07:02, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Frankfurt Am Main-Stadtpanorama von der Deutschherrnbruecke am fruehen Abend-20100310.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Frankfurt Am Main-Stadtpanorama von der Deutschherrnbruecke am fruehen Abend-20100310.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 07:03, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Frankfurt Am Main-Panorama des Hoechster Mainufers zwischen Bolongaropalast und Ochsenturm von Sueden-20100524.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Frankfurt Am Main-Panorama des Hoechster Mainufers zwischen Bolongaropalast und Ochsenturm von Sueden-20100524.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 15:02, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Frankfurt Am Main-Stadtpanorama von der Ignatz-Bubis-Bruecke am Mittag-20100424.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Frankfurt Am Main-Stadtpanorama von der Ignatz-Bubis-Bruecke am Mittag-20100424.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 15:01, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frankfurt Am Main-Alte Boerse-Fassadenfiguren-Europa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments technically good, imo terrible sculpture ... --Mbdortmund 02:16, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CN Tower

Betreff

Hallo Mylius,

Niabot hat das Original eigentlich sehr gut entstützt aber du kannst es gerne auch probieren. Gruß --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:40, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für Diana !

Thanks for support, kind comments, and improvements of the caption. I'll try to take other pictures in the Louvre, but it is difficult to have good results without flash nor tripod (verboten)! You may find other statues or works from this museum in my galleries, please feel free to add german captions too ! Again, many thanks !--Jebulon (talk) 23:55, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mais, c'est avec plaisir! Thanks for the hint regarding your galleries, I'll try to add more internationalization templates and translations. Keep up the great work! Best regards --Mylius (talk) 21:38, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder in Category:Virtuelles Altstadtmodell Frankfurt am Main

Hallo Mylius,

ich habe ein paar Fragen zu den Bildern in Category:Virtuelles Altstadtmodell Frankfurt am Main. Du hast diese als GNU FDL gekennzeichnet und als Autor Jörg Ott angegeben.

Ich habe als Admin auf Commons ein paar Fragen an Dich:

  • Bist Du Jörg Ott?

Wenn nein:

  • Ist die Software des virtuellen Altstadtmodell unter einer freien Lizenz freigegeben (z.B. GNU)?
  • Oder hast Du eine Freigabe von Jörg Ott um Bilder, die auf dem virtuellen Altstadtmodell basieren, unter einer freien Lizenz veröffentlichen zu können? In diesem Falle wäre eine Freigabe über Commons:OTRS notwendig.
  • Könntest Du, falls Du die erforderlichen Rechte an den Bildern besitzt (s.o.), die Bilder vielleicht noch zusätzlich unter einer anderen Lizenz also GNU FDL veröffentlichen? Z.B. einer freien CC-Lizenz. Dies würde die Verwendung der Bilder vereinfachen, weil somit nicht der komplette Text der GNU FDL mit abgedruckt werden muss.

Mit den besten Grüßen! --ALE! ¿…? 07:45, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zu deinen Fragen: nein, ich bin nicht Jörg Ott. Das virtuelle Altstadtmodell ist nicht unter einer freien Lizenz freigegeben, es handelt sich um ein urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk. Eine „Software“ als solche existiert nicht, da das Modell im Wesentlichen aus 3D Studio Max-Modulen besteht. Das Einverständnis von Jörg Ott, die Bilder explizit unter der genannten Lizenz zu veröffentlichen, liegt mir schriftlich vor. Eine andere Lizenz ist nicht gewünscht. Genügt es, eine E-Mail von Jörg Ott an das OTRS-System zu schicken? Auch wenn ich nicht verstehe, wo da der Unterschied zur bisherigen Lösung läge. --Mylius (talk) 08:56, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ich denke, dass es genügt die E-Mail von Jörg Ott an OTRS zu schicken. Ideal wäre natürlich, wenn Herr Ott dies selbst macht. Der Vorteil von solchen OTRS-Tickets ist, dass nachgeprüft werden kann, was tatsächlich in dieser Erlaubnis drin steht. Bilder ohne OTRS-Tickets mit Verdacht auf Urheberrechtsverletzung werden oftmals ohne große Nachfrage gelöscht oder sind zumindest Kandidaten für einen Löschantrag. Das kann man mit einem OTRS-Ticket vermeiden. --ALE! ¿…? 14:59, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Frankfurt_Am_Main-Luftbild_Bildstelle_Generalbauinspektion-1942-44-932.660.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Frankfurt_Am_Main-Luftbild_Bildstelle_Generalbauinspektion-1942-44-932.660.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Frankfurt_Am_Main-Luftbild_Bildstelle_Generalbauinspektion-1942-44-932.660.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin H. (talk) 16:14, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Martin H., das wurde für Bilder aus dem selben Bestand schon mal diskutiert, siehe hier und ggf. hier. Aufgrund der automatisierten Fertigung gibt es keinen Urheber. --Mylius (talk) 16:26, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Mylius, da ich Deine Benutzer-Diskussionsseite nicht gelesen hatte, habe ich Commons:Forum#Luftbild_ohne_Sch.C3.B6pfungsh.C3.B6he.3F für ein anderes von Dir hochgeladenes Bild begonnen und möchte Dich darauf hinweisen. Diskussion am Besten dort. Freundliche Grüße, --Emha (talk) 16:44, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michael Herl-20100106.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Michael Herl-20100106.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 12:19, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Habe die Lizenz entsprechend abgeändert. Habe eine E-Mail von Michael Herl, nach der Bernd Kammerer mit der Nutzung des Fotos für die Illustration des Artikel in DE-WP einverstanden ist. Entsprechend habe ich eine Lizenz genommen, die eine kommerzielle Nutzung möglichst ausschließt. Zumindest GFDL 1.2 only ist meines Wissens nicht verboten. --Mylius (talk) 13:42, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dann leite die Freigabe unter GFDL 1.2 bitte an OTRS weiter. Bitte beachte: Kommerzielle Verwendung muss erlaubt sein, überall, nicht nur in Wikipedia. Ein Einverständniss, dass ein Foto in einem Artikel verwendet werden kann ist keine Freigabe unter einer freien Lizenz sondern nicht ausreichend. Siehe Commons:Projektrahmen#Ben.C3.B6tigte_Lizenzbestimmungen bzw. der folgende Abschnitt Nicht erlaubte Lizenzbestimmungen. --Martin H. (talk) 14:11, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Alles klar. Habe die Lizenz auf Cc-by-sa-3.0-de geändert und werde die E-Mail an das OTRS-Team schicken. --Mylius (talk) 14:19, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Michael Herl-20100106.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Michael Herl-20100106.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Michael Herl-20100106.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin H. (talk) 14:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michael Herl-20100106.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 22:03, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank You for the Wikipedia Picture

Hello, My name is Duane Hurst and I recently made a free (non-commercial) English web site to share information with people. I added links to your Wikipedia/Wikimedia freeware picture (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Dresden-Altstadt_von_der_Marienbruecke-II.jpg). I also gave credit to you on my web pages for your work. Thank you for sharing with the public. My website is:

http://www.freeenglishsite.com/

I add pictures such as yours to one of the following major sections of my site: 1. World section - contains information and over 10,000 images of every world country and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/index.htm

2. USA section - contains information and images of every USA state and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/usa/index.htm

3. English section - "Mel and Wes" lessons in conversation format. Stories are located in various USA states and world countries such as China, England, Germany, Japan, Mexico and Thailand. Each lesson has many slang terms and idioms, which I link to my Slang Dictionary. This eventually will have over 5,000 terms. Currently, it has about 3,000 slang and idioms. I regularly add new lessons and slang terms. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/lessons/index.htm Slang Dictionary link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/slang/Eslang_a.htm

Prior to retirement, I taught English at several private and public universities in the United States.

Please share this free site with your friends. I hope all will enjoy the pictures and find the English information useful. Sincerely,  Duane Hurst in Utah, USA

Email address: duanerhurst@freeenglishsite.com --75.162.209.2 00:54, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mylius&oldid=85230388"