File:Spacecraft thrusters (54224777758).jpg: Difference between revisions
Uploaded a work by Steve Jurvetson from https://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson/54224777758/ with UploadWizard Tag: Flickr |
Changed label, description and/or aliases in en, and other parts |
||||||||||||||
mediainfo | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
caption / en | caption / en | ||||||||||||||
Something old and something new in electric propulsion | |||||||||||||||
Property / depicts | |||||||||||||||
Property / depicts: thruster / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
Property / inception | |||||||||||||||
19 December 2024
| |||||||||||||||
Property / inception: 19 December 2024 / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 04:44, 25 December 2024
Captions
Summary
DescriptionSpacecraft thrusters (54224777758).jpg |
English: The lower box is one the earliest spacecraft ion thrusters (from EOS circa 1962), and on top is a new arrival, a modern marvel from the SpaceX Starlink satellites used for on orbit maneuvering. SpaceX has mastered Argon Hall Effect thrusters, something no one else has been able to do. This affords a higher power density (4.2kW in 2.1kg) and much lower cost gas (about $10 per satellite) than prior designs using Krypton or Xenon. This is one of the early 2023 flight units for Starlink V2 Mini, and the only one outside the company.
These thrusters are for in-space use only, and while they have relatively low thrust, they can run continuously for long periods with a very high ISP, and they are compact and reliable. They are commonly used for satellite station keeping and interplanetary missions, where this Argon thruster could reduce a 5-year transit time to months. The backside of the SpaceX thruster shows how simple it is, with gas lines and wires for the cathode and electrode, insulated with Boron Nitride on the other side and permanent magnets for lensing of the streams. Elon commented on X: "The Starlink ion thruster is a marvel of engineering." Ben Longmier, lead designer of the SpaceX thruster, helped identify the old one I had in my collection. It appears to be “a development unit or early flight unit for a Cesium thruster from EOS (Electro-Optical Systems). The black component underneath the thruster looks to be the propellant tank and you can see several heaters wrapped around and brazed in place. A porous plug would have been used as a ‘valve,’ which takes advantage of a metal wetting and vapor pressure trick to throttle the propellant flow vs. temperature of the porous sintered metal plug.” The final EOS thruster design is in the Smithsonian. It was successfully tested twice in space on flights of Air Force Blue Scout missiles in 1964. Back in 1912, Goddard postulated that high-velocity streams of electrons and positive ions could be “energized” by solar-electric power supplies to provide thrust for an interplanetary spacecraft. He went further to suggest that the source of the ions could come from exposing alkaline atoms, such as mercury or cesium, to hot tungsten surfaces. He was spot on! And more history from Ben: “One of the original Peenemunde rocket scientists on Von Braun’s team was Ernst Stuhlinger, who moved his family to what would become Marshall Spaceflight Center in Alabama. Ernst was close to Von Braun and worked on a lot of the early projects. In the later years of the US space program, both Ernst and Von Braun had dreams of expanding beyond the moon and sending craft deeper into the solar system, specifically Mars. One of Ernst’s concepts involved solar powered craft that would use Cesium ion thrusters to achieve a very high payload fraction delivered from Earth C3 to Mars injection orbit. This was an early solar electric propulsion concept that would ultimately never fly due to the wind down of budgets.” And now, with the modern revival of a Mars program, the SpaceX Marslink satellites take us from dream to dream. I borrow this phrase form the closing of Andrew Chaiken’s A Man on the Moon: “Historians of the far future may look back on Apollo and the missions that are yet to come as one great Age of Space Exploration. But in my mind’s eye it is a slow dissolve, from memory to anticipation, from what has been to what will be, from dream to dream.” |
Date | |
Source | https://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson/54224777758/ |
Author | Steve Jurvetson |
Licensing
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
flickr/\{\{[Ff]lickr[Rr]?eview.*?\}\}/{{Flickrreview|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:#time: Y-m-d }}}}{{Flickrreview|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:#time: Y-m-d }}|%LICENSE%}}> Launch EasyReview+ Passx Remove template- Fail
This image, originally posted to Flickr, has not yet been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer to confirm that the stated license is valid. See Category:Flickr review needed for further instructions. |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 04:44, 25 December 2024 | 2,925 × 4,212 (1.32 MB) | Sv1xv (talk | contribs) | Uploaded a work by Steve Jurvetson from https://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson/54224777758/ with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | Canon |
---|---|
Camera model | Canon EOS-1D X Mark III |
Exposure time | 1/80 sec (0.0125) |
F-number | f/4 |
ISO speed rating | 800 |
Date and time of data generation | 17:23, 19 December 2024 |
Lens focal length | 22 mm |
Credit/Provider | Apple Photos Clean Up |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 72 dpi |
File change date and time | 17:23, 19 December 2024 |
Y and C positioning | Centered |
Exposure Program | Aperture priority |
Exif version | 2.31 |
Date and time of digitizing | 17:23, 19 December 2024 |
Meaning of each component |
|
APEX shutter speed | 6.375 |
APEX aperture | 4 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 4 APEX (f/4) |
Metering mode | Spot |
Flash | Flash did not fire |
DateTime subseconds | 19 |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 19 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 19 |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
Focal plane X resolution | 3,872.6114649682 |
Focal plane Y resolution | 3,872.6114649682 |
Focal plane resolution unit | inches |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Scene capture type | Standard |
Lens used | Canon EF11-24mm f/4L USM |
Rating (out of 5) | 0 |
IIM version | 2 |