Content deleted Content added
right place now
m Reverted edits by 196.191.61.173 (talk) to last revision by Animalparty
Tag: Rollback
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 28:
:::::::::::::{{ping|Zhuyifei1999}} Okay, that makes me wonder where the lag comes from - fetching and comparing the hashes should be near-instantaneous. How many Flickr uploads are we trying to process per second? [[User:Samsara|Samsara]] ([[User talk:Samsara#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 10:02, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
::::::::::::::I may have read that too quickly: So we're still downloading images from Flickr all over again and computing our own hashes? That's what I wasn't sure about after your "I just looked at the code again" post. Thanks. [[User:Samsara|Samsara]] ([[User talk:Samsara#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 10:05, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::No, but to get the hashes for old files are not supported by mwclient last time I checked (perhaps I'm wrong). I might have to get some custom code hacked into it. As for Flickr, perhaps a cache might do. --[[User:Zhuyifei1999|Zhuyifei1999]] ([[User talk:Zhuyifei1999|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 10:41, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
::::::::::::::::{{ping|Zhuyifei1999}} The reason for asking the questions the way I did was that if we're just comparing pre-computed hashes, there's no reason this should take more than a few seconds. I recall that there was a time that bots like SignBot and Anomiebot would respond to edits on en-wp near-instantaneously, so I know it can be done. Making review of licenses by bot ''fast enough'' is one way to make this problem go away for the time being. Then one wouldn't need to check old versions or anything like that. [[User:Samsara|Samsara]] ([[User talk:Samsara#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 11:01, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
{{outdent|::::::::::::::::}} Sure, I'll just set the schedule to restart the bot every minute, eh? --[[User:Zhuyifei1999|Zhuyifei1999]] ([[User talk:Zhuyifei1999|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 11:24, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
::I guess that would cut the expected waiting time to 30s, which is almost what I suggested we should aim for. Test it and see? Thanks. [[User:Samsara|Samsara]] ([[User talk:Samsara#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 11:30, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
:::Should be working similar to this now --[[User:Zhuyifei1999|Zhuyifei1999]] ([[User talk:Zhuyifei1999|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 11:50, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
----
:{{ping|Magnus Manske}} Any opinion on whether code could be added to Flickr2Commons to check licence compliance on the server side? Thank you. [[User:Samsara|Samsara]] ([[User talk:Samsara#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 19:24, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
::This is already done by the flinfo tool, which I use to generate the {{tl|Information}} template. --[[User:Magnus Manske|Magnus Manske]] ([[User talk:Magnus Manske|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 14:54, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Line 33 ⟶ 39:
::::To the best of my knowledge, licenses are already checked. I do not know of anything another bot check would improve. If the review bot does some more special magic, it should be incorporated into the flinfo tool. --[[User:Magnus Manske|Magnus Manske]] ([[User talk:Magnus Manske|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 20:26, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
:::::Thank you. Zhuyifei1999 (not pinging this time so your ears don't fall off) can you confirm if what Magnus asked about ("special magic") is the case, and can we perhaps get Flickr2Commons uploads the needed accreditation as a result? [[User:Samsara|Samsara]] ([[User talk:Samsara#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 20:38, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
:::::{{ping|Zhuyifei1999}} Sorry, I guess I had to ping you after all in relation to the above. ^^ [[User:Samsara|Samsara]] ([[User talk:Samsara#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 10:10, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
::::::Yeah I sometime miss things in my watchlist. I'm not entirely sure what {{ping|Magnus Manske}} is talking about, but I would like to point out that [https://bitbucket.org/magnusmanske/magnustools/src/f722fb7b57ba6c9566b3c51fd33d8dc1f684eaee/public_html/resources/js/common.js?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default#common.js-1 list] & [https://bitbucket.org/magnusmanske/flickr2commons/src/1c205e2f2890e7a27584add1bb2178d9dd805133/public_html/main.js?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default#main.js-183 check] are still done on client side of Flickr2Commons.
::::::If Flickr2Commons were to make the check done on server side, please secure the license part of the file description from any possible client side alteration. --[[User:Zhuyifei1999|Zhuyifei1999]] ([[User talk:Zhuyifei1999|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 10:41, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
:::::::{{ping|Magnus Manske}} Sorry to bother you again, but did you see Zhuyifei's ping above? Thanks. [[User:Samsara|Samsara]] ([[User talk:Samsara#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 04:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
----
:[[User:Samsara|Samsara]], another option for you is to apply for a license reviewer right. I think it is fine as you're an experience admin in EN and working on media too. A license reviewer can [[Commons:Upload Wizard/Flickr|upload directly from the URL]] and I think it doesn't require a review. I may wrong as I don't remember it correctly. [[User:Jkadavoor|<span style="color:red;">J</span>]][[User talk:Jkadavoor|e]][[:Category:User:Jkadavoor|<span style="color:red;">e</span>]] 17:13, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Line 38 ⟶ 48:
:::I know that it not that I'm talking about. [[Commons:Upload Wizard/Flickr|upload directly from the URL]] is a special feature only available to admins and license reviewers. So they don't need to depend Flick2Commons for their uploads. [[User:Jkadavoor|<span style="color:red;">J</span>]][[User talk:Jkadavoor|e]][[:Category:User:Jkadavoor|<span style="color:red;">e</span>]] 02:28, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
::::Thanks for clarifying. I added a request. We'll see what happens. Best regards, [[User:Samsara|Samsara]] ([[User talk:Samsara#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 10:01, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
:
 
=={{Autotranslate|base=Autopatrolgiven/heading}}==
Line 58 ⟶ 67:
:::::I just noticed your comment in your edit summary. Yes, the transfer of copyvios has been a problem on Commons, mainly from non-English wikis (arwiki in particular) that are not at all careful about copyright. Another repeated problem has been when people upload images to enwiki as 'fair use', and then someone else (who does not understand copyright) changes the license and marks them for transfer. Then some third person transfers them, and they are deleted. Then the ''original'' uploader comes here and yells at us about their file being deleted, when all 'we' did was delete an upload that was not in accordance with our policies. The only step at which we, on Commons, can stop that process is with the person who uploads the file here... people who upload works that they did not create are responsible for checking their copyright status before they do so. [[User:Revent|<span style="color:#151B54;font-family:Garamond ">Revent</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Revent|<b style="font-family:Garamond ;color:#006400">talk</b>]]</sup> 13:52, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
:{{tps}} I tried to improve the wordings [[Commons:Moving files to Commons|here]]. [[User:Jkadavoor|<span style="color:red;">J</span>]][[User talk:Jkadavoor|e]][[:Category:User:Jkadavoor|<span style="color:red;">e</span>]] 14:10, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
 
== Removing magenta from photo ==
 
Dear Samsara,
I've been meaning to thank you for removing the magenta from Joe Rosenthal's photo that I shot in 1990. It looks better than it was because of your skill. Joe's photo is being used a lot lately (the US Marines are spearheading a petition to name a Navy warship after Joe --USSJoe).
Do you think you can remove the magenta in Reverend Jim Jones' photo that I took in 1977? Thank you in advance.
--Nancy Wong
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CommissionerJimJones.JPG
 
http://usmclife.com/2017/03/marine-vets-urge-lawmakers-name-warship-famous-iwo-jima-photographer/ {{unsignedIP2|21:58, 30 March 2017|204.102.74.26}}
 
== [[:File:Edward Weston and Marguerite Mather.jpeg]] ==
{{Autotranslate|1=File:Edward Weston and Marguerite Mather.jpeg|2=|3=|base=Idw}} [[User:Animalparty|--Animalparty]] ([[User talk:Animalparty|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 09:28, 11 January 2019 (UTC)