-
Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context
Authors:
Gemini Team,
Petko Georgiev,
Ving Ian Lei,
Ryan Burnell,
Libin Bai,
Anmol Gulati,
Garrett Tanzer,
Damien Vincent,
Zhufeng Pan,
Shibo Wang,
Soroosh Mariooryad,
Yifan Ding,
Xinyang Geng,
Fred Alcober,
Roy Frostig,
Mark Omernick,
Lexi Walker,
Cosmin Paduraru,
Christina Sorokin,
Andrea Tacchetti,
Colin Gaffney,
Samira Daruki,
Olcan Sercinoglu,
Zach Gleicher,
Juliette Love
, et al. (1110 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In this report, we introduce the Gemini 1.5 family of models, representing the next generation of highly compute-efficient multimodal models capable of recalling and reasoning over fine-grained information from millions of tokens of context, including multiple long documents and hours of video and audio. The family includes two new models: (1) an updated Gemini 1.5 Pro, which exceeds the February…
▽ More
In this report, we introduce the Gemini 1.5 family of models, representing the next generation of highly compute-efficient multimodal models capable of recalling and reasoning over fine-grained information from millions of tokens of context, including multiple long documents and hours of video and audio. The family includes two new models: (1) an updated Gemini 1.5 Pro, which exceeds the February version on the great majority of capabilities and benchmarks; (2) Gemini 1.5 Flash, a more lightweight variant designed for efficiency with minimal regression in quality. Gemini 1.5 models achieve near-perfect recall on long-context retrieval tasks across modalities, improve the state-of-the-art in long-document QA, long-video QA and long-context ASR, and match or surpass Gemini 1.0 Ultra's state-of-the-art performance across a broad set of benchmarks. Studying the limits of Gemini 1.5's long-context ability, we find continued improvement in next-token prediction and near-perfect retrieval (>99%) up to at least 10M tokens, a generational leap over existing models such as Claude 3.0 (200k) and GPT-4 Turbo (128k). Finally, we highlight real-world use cases, such as Gemini 1.5 collaborating with professionals on completing their tasks achieving 26 to 75% time savings across 10 different job categories, as well as surprising new capabilities of large language models at the frontier; when given a grammar manual for Kalamang, a language with fewer than 200 speakers worldwide, the model learns to translate English to Kalamang at a similar level to a person who learned from the same content.
△ Less
Submitted 8 August, 2024; v1 submitted 8 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
PartIR: Composing SPMD Partitioning Strategies for Machine Learning
Authors:
Sami Alabed,
Daniel Belov,
Bart Chrzaszcz,
Juliana Franco,
Dominik Grewe,
Dougal Maclaurin,
James Molloy,
Tom Natan,
Tamara Norman,
Xiaoyue Pan,
Adam Paszke,
Norman A. Rink,
Michael Schaarschmidt,
Timur Sitdikov,
Agnieszka Swietlik,
Dimitrios Vytiniotis,
Joel Wee
Abstract:
Training of modern large neural networks (NN) requires a combination of parallelization strategies encompassing data, model, or optimizer sharding. When strategies increase in complexity, it becomes necessary for partitioning tools to be 1) expressive, allowing the composition of simpler strategies, and 2) predictable to estimate performance analytically. We present PartIR, our design for a NN par…
▽ More
Training of modern large neural networks (NN) requires a combination of parallelization strategies encompassing data, model, or optimizer sharding. When strategies increase in complexity, it becomes necessary for partitioning tools to be 1) expressive, allowing the composition of simpler strategies, and 2) predictable to estimate performance analytically. We present PartIR, our design for a NN partitioning system. PartIR is focused on an incremental approach to rewriting and is hardware-and-runtime agnostic. We present a simple but powerful API for composing sharding strategies and a simulator to validate them. The process is driven by high-level programmer-issued partitioning tactics, which can be both manual and automatic. Importantly, the tactics are specified separately from the model code, making them easy to change. We evaluate PartIR on several different models to demonstrate its predictability, expressibility, and ability to reach peak performance..
△ Less
Submitted 3 March, 2024; v1 submitted 20 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models
Authors:
Gemini Team,
Rohan Anil,
Sebastian Borgeaud,
Jean-Baptiste Alayrac,
Jiahui Yu,
Radu Soricut,
Johan Schalkwyk,
Andrew M. Dai,
Anja Hauth,
Katie Millican,
David Silver,
Melvin Johnson,
Ioannis Antonoglou,
Julian Schrittwieser,
Amelia Glaese,
Jilin Chen,
Emily Pitler,
Timothy Lillicrap,
Angeliki Lazaridou,
Orhan Firat,
James Molloy,
Michael Isard,
Paul R. Barham,
Tom Hennigan,
Benjamin Lee
, et al. (1325 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This report introduces a new family of multimodal models, Gemini, that exhibit remarkable capabilities across image, audio, video, and text understanding. The Gemini family consists of Ultra, Pro, and Nano sizes, suitable for applications ranging from complex reasoning tasks to on-device memory-constrained use-cases. Evaluation on a broad range of benchmarks shows that our most-capable Gemini Ultr…
▽ More
This report introduces a new family of multimodal models, Gemini, that exhibit remarkable capabilities across image, audio, video, and text understanding. The Gemini family consists of Ultra, Pro, and Nano sizes, suitable for applications ranging from complex reasoning tasks to on-device memory-constrained use-cases. Evaluation on a broad range of benchmarks shows that our most-capable Gemini Ultra model advances the state of the art in 30 of 32 of these benchmarks - notably being the first model to achieve human-expert performance on the well-studied exam benchmark MMLU, and improving the state of the art in every one of the 20 multimodal benchmarks we examined. We believe that the new capabilities of the Gemini family in cross-modal reasoning and language understanding will enable a wide variety of use cases. We discuss our approach toward post-training and deploying Gemini models responsibly to users through services including Gemini, Gemini Advanced, Google AI Studio, and Cloud Vertex AI.
△ Less
Submitted 17 June, 2024; v1 submitted 18 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Operationalizing Assurance Cases for Data Scientists: A Showcase of Concepts and Tooling in the Context of Test Data Quality for Machine Learning
Authors:
Lisa Jöckel,
Michael Kläs,
Janek Groß,
Pascal Gerber,
Markus Scholz,
Jonathan Eberle,
Marc Teschner,
Daniel Seifert,
Richard Hawkins,
John Molloy,
Jens Ottnad
Abstract:
Assurance Cases (ACs) are an established approach in safety engineering to argue quality claims in a structured way. In the context of quality assurance for Machine Learning (ML)-based software components, ACs are also being discussed and appear promising. Tools for operationalizing ACs do exist, yet mainly focus on supporting safety engineers on the system level. However, assuring the quality of…
▽ More
Assurance Cases (ACs) are an established approach in safety engineering to argue quality claims in a structured way. In the context of quality assurance for Machine Learning (ML)-based software components, ACs are also being discussed and appear promising. Tools for operationalizing ACs do exist, yet mainly focus on supporting safety engineers on the system level. However, assuring the quality of an ML component within the system is commonly the responsibility of data scientists, who are usually less familiar with these tools. To address this gap, we propose a framework to support the operationalization of ACs for ML components based on technologies that data scientists use on a daily basis: Python and Jupyter Notebook. Our aim is to make the process of creating ML-related evidence in ACs more effective. Results from the application of the framework, documented through notebooks, can be integrated into existing AC tools. We illustrate the application of the framework on an example excerpt concerned with the quality of the test data.
△ Less
Submitted 8 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Safety Assessment for Autonomous Systems' Perception Capabilities
Authors:
John Molloy,
John McDermid
Abstract:
Autonomous Systems (AS) are increasingly proposed, or used, in Safety Critical (SC) applications. Many such systems make use of sophisticated sensor suites and processing to provide scene understanding which informs the AS' decision-making. The sensor processing typically makes use of Machine Learning (ML) and has to work in challenging environments, further the ML-algorithms have known limitation…
▽ More
Autonomous Systems (AS) are increasingly proposed, or used, in Safety Critical (SC) applications. Many such systems make use of sophisticated sensor suites and processing to provide scene understanding which informs the AS' decision-making. The sensor processing typically makes use of Machine Learning (ML) and has to work in challenging environments, further the ML-algorithms have known limitations,e.g., the possibility of false-negatives or false-positives in object classification. The well-established safety-analysis methods developed for conventional SC systems are not well-matched to AS, ML, or the sensing systems used by AS. This paper proposes an adaptation of well-established safety-analysis methods to address the specifics of perception-systems for AS, including addressing environmental effects and the potential failure-modes of ML, and provides a rationale for choosing particular sets of guidewords, or prompts, for safety-analysis. It goes on to show how the results of the analysis can be used to inform the design and verification of the AS and illustrates the new method by presenting a partial analysis of a road vehicle. Illustrations in the paper are primarily based on optical sensing, however the paper discusses the applicability of the method to other sensing modalities and its role in a wider safety process addressing the overall capabilities of AS.
△ Less
Submitted 18 August, 2022; v1 submitted 17 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCode
Authors:
Yujia Li,
David Choi,
Junyoung Chung,
Nate Kushman,
Julian Schrittwieser,
Rémi Leblond,
Tom Eccles,
James Keeling,
Felix Gimeno,
Agustin Dal Lago,
Thomas Hubert,
Peter Choy,
Cyprien de Masson d'Autume,
Igor Babuschkin,
Xinyun Chen,
Po-Sen Huang,
Johannes Welbl,
Sven Gowal,
Alexey Cherepanov,
James Molloy,
Daniel J. Mankowitz,
Esme Sutherland Robson,
Pushmeet Kohli,
Nando de Freitas,
Koray Kavukcuoglu
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Programming is a powerful and ubiquitous problem-solving tool. Developing systems that can assist programmers or even generate programs independently could make programming more productive and accessible, yet so far incorporating innovations in AI has proven challenging. Recent large-scale language models have demonstrated an impressive ability to generate code, and are now able to complete simple…
▽ More
Programming is a powerful and ubiquitous problem-solving tool. Developing systems that can assist programmers or even generate programs independently could make programming more productive and accessible, yet so far incorporating innovations in AI has proven challenging. Recent large-scale language models have demonstrated an impressive ability to generate code, and are now able to complete simple programming tasks. However, these models still perform poorly when evaluated on more complex, unseen problems that require problem-solving skills beyond simply translating instructions into code. For example, competitive programming problems which require an understanding of algorithms and complex natural language remain extremely challenging. To address this gap, we introduce AlphaCode, a system for code generation that can create novel solutions to these problems that require deeper reasoning. In simulated evaluations on recent programming competitions on the Codeforces platform, AlphaCode achieved on average a ranking of top 54.3% in competitions with more than 5,000 participants. We found that three key components were critical to achieve good and reliable performance: (1) an extensive and clean competitive programming dataset for training and evaluation, (2) large and efficient-to-sample transformer-based architectures, and (3) large-scale model sampling to explore the search space, followed by filtering based on program behavior to a small set of submissions.
△ Less
Submitted 8 February, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Automap: Towards Ergonomic Automated Parallelism for ML Models
Authors:
Michael Schaarschmidt,
Dominik Grewe,
Dimitrios Vytiniotis,
Adam Paszke,
Georg Stefan Schmid,
Tamara Norman,
James Molloy,
Jonathan Godwin,
Norman Alexander Rink,
Vinod Nair,
Dan Belov
Abstract:
The rapid rise in demand for training large neural network architectures has brought into focus the need for partitioning strategies, for example by using data, model, or pipeline parallelism. Implementing these methods is increasingly supported through program primitives, but identifying efficient partitioning strategies requires expensive experimentation and expertise. We present the prototype o…
▽ More
The rapid rise in demand for training large neural network architectures has brought into focus the need for partitioning strategies, for example by using data, model, or pipeline parallelism. Implementing these methods is increasingly supported through program primitives, but identifying efficient partitioning strategies requires expensive experimentation and expertise. We present the prototype of an automated partitioner that seamlessly integrates into existing compilers and existing user workflows. Our partitioner enables SPMD-style parallelism that encompasses data parallelism and parameter/activation sharding. Through a combination of inductive tactics and search in a platform-independent partitioning IR, automap can recover expert partitioning strategies such as Megatron sharding for transformer layers.
△ Less
Submitted 6 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Standardisation of practices in Open Source Hardware
Authors:
Jérémy Bonvoisin,
Jenny Molloy,
Martin Haeuer,
Tobias Wenzel
Abstract:
Standardisation is an important component in the maturation of any field of technology. It contributes to the formation of a recognisable identity and enables interactions with a wider community. This article reviews past and current standardisation initiatives in the field of Open Source Hardware (OSH). While early initiatives focused on aspects such as licencing, intellectual property and docume…
▽ More
Standardisation is an important component in the maturation of any field of technology. It contributes to the formation of a recognisable identity and enables interactions with a wider community. This article reviews past and current standardisation initiatives in the field of Open Source Hardware (OSH). While early initiatives focused on aspects such as licencing, intellectual property and documentation formats, recent efforts extend to ways for users to exercise their rights under open licences and to keep OSH projects discoverable and accessible online. We specifically introduce two standards that are currently being released and call for early users and contributors, the DIN SPEC 3105 and the Open Know How Manifest Specification. Finally, we reflect on challenges around standardisation in the community and relevant areas for future development such as an open tool chain, modularity and hardware specific interface standards.
△ Less
Submitted 15 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
